Oct 15, 2013 at 21:49:55
“If the Liberals (and the NDP) has any sense at all, they would form a coalition and end Harper's governance.”
bespoken on Oct 16, 2013 at 01:21:05
“Unfortunately, that's not currently possible. That's what having a majority means. You can't actually be brought down in the House of Commons.
Whitey McWhite on Oct 15, 2013 at 23:26:41
“I don't think it would function how you think it would. Harper has gotten a ton of seats that people once thought he would never get his hands on. Canada would just separate into two sides(or three if you include Quebec) instead of three.”
heterodoxlibertarian on Oct 15, 2013 at 22:06:26
“No because liberalism is neither left nor right and the NDP is most certainly left. From a liberal perspective, a coalition with the NDP makes as much sense as a coalition with the Tories. Both represent fundamentally mistaken philosophies, the NDP on economics, the Tories on opportunity and personal freedom.”
Oct 12, 2013 at 17:47:57
“You don't just "accidentally" come across porn on the Internet; most websites do not have porn ads on them. If the federal government even entertains the notion of getting an anti-porn bill through Parliament, then it will be one more nail to the concept of net neutrality.”
agsterino on Oct 12, 2013 at 20:19:06
“There are many things blocked on the Internet, why shouldn't porn? Unless you do some searching, you cannot watch many things like real life: beheading, deaths, bomb making, sadistic torture, so why real life porn? Magazines cannot have covers showing porn accessible to kids, they are high up and covered.
Look up sexual addiction issues, and children and porn. There is a problem ... A huge one.
Keep porn personal and either pay extra or opt in. Lift a finger to opt in instead of criticizing those same people raising your children.”
“To all the people offended by this, bring it down a notch. All religious symbols are in the realm of public domain, and I'm pretty sure her aim isn't to offend Hindus (and even if it is, it is still within her right to cause offense).”
Highball on Apr 25, 2013 at 22:41:16
“Well, you know what Linus Torvalds said: "I like offending people, because I think people who get offended should be offended."
“Why don't you take your antiquated amendment to the logical extreme and equip every citizen with a nuclear weapon? That will definitely make the US more secure.”
swatcapt on Apr 19, 2013 at 02:18:58
“Um. Maybe because 1) a nuke is not in commons use so it is not protected. 2) some what like the first it is not a small arm which is normally what is that 2am refers to. 3) you can protect you self with a nuke as you would kill your self as well as an attack another everybody else.”
Apr 18, 2013 at 19:11:53
“Hear, hear. Canada can of course continue to have a great relation with the UK, but having some antiquated figurehead who belongs in a museum as Canada's head of state is just wrong and makes a mockery of our sovereignty. Yes, yes, I know that the Queen has (almost) no real power in Canada, but the idea that she supersedes the head of government is ridiculous.”
“While there is nothing wrong with advertising your own personal preferences, there are much better, and subtle ways of getting some nookie over the holidays. According to various articles, he has done a lot of good for his community and has a good heart, so I am sure there would be a lot of suitable girlfriend candidates for him to pick if he just tried to engage with women a bit more.”
Dec 4, 2012 at 20:28:53
“I agree that the Harper administration's stance on Palestine's bid for statehood at the UN General Assembly is deeply shameful and highly embarrassing, but I love Canada, and if you want to protest, and protest against Harper and his neo-con cronies. And if Quebec wants to secede, go ahead, see how well it can manage itself without the rest of the country.”
“If she's willing and he/she is paying, then who cares? But seriously, I think hiring a call-girl would be more fulfilling than this, for these nice ladies just do not live up to the fantasy standard.”