Canada's reputation around the world has been severely tarnished as images of thugs burning cars and looting stores has been splashed across the news screens of every country.
Strikingly similar to the pictures from Toronto's G20 just last year at this time!
Vancouver police were quoted recently that "things had changed" and that there was no possibility of riots after a hockey game. No repeats of 1994! How naïve to think that -- there will always be thugs if the police are not present at big events.
But the real issue is what is becoming of policing in Canada?
Last year officers in Toronto were ordered not to take action as hoodlums burned police cars and looted stores on some of the most prestigious streets in the city.
A day later, instructions were to kettle hundreds of citizens for hours in the rain.
Police brass said that they needed to question every person in order to determine who were the criminals --and yet many persons detained in the rain were not ever approached by the police. A year later, still no accountability, and no answers.
In Vancouver, cars were burning in the streets, stores were looted, and very little, if any, action taken. Today, police are asking the public to send in pictures so they can try to identify the culprits!
Is this what policing in Canada has come to? Let the thugs take over and then ask the public for clues? If the rank-and-file officers in Vancouver are anything like those in Toronto, they are embarrassed by their leadership. We need answers, and accountability.
Stephen LeDrew: You Still Have Some Explainin' to Do, Toronto Police Brass!
BBC News - Vancouver: Riots after Canucks' Stanley Cup defeat
Vancouver riot 'kiss' photograph sparks mystery | World news | The ...
Vancouver Riot PHOTOS: Frustration Over Canucks Loss Spills Into ...
Photos: Riots, fire, destruction after Vancouver's loss | Posted ...
EXCLUSIVE: Vancouver riot's 'kissing couple' tell their story ...
Vancouver Riot | Activists clash with riot police in Vancouver ...
YouTube - Stanley Cup Riot In Vancouver - 1994
2011 Vancouver Stanley Cup riot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Vancouver Riots 2011: Fans Riot as Canucks Lose Stanley Cup ...
Photos of Vancouver rioting - The Globe and Mail
Vancouver Riot Kiss captures this era (PHOTO)?
Vancouver Riots: Couple Kisses During Chaos (PHOTO)
Calgary-bound Olympic hopeful suspended over link to Vancouver riots
The Vancouver Riot: Passion Over Reason
Vancouver riot paints sad picture of our youth
Taiwan's NMA Turns Vancouver Riot Into An Animation
The man who fought Vancouver's mob talks to the Star
Actually there is a lengthy continuum of police and city actions between the two alternatives you suggest. The official discourse indicates that what transpired is NOT preferable and the city and police leadership needs to rethink its naive and self-righteous position that Vancouver is immune to quite predictable mob mentality.
Certainly during the G20 fiasco, the police behaved like a nascent and thuggish force from some budding dictatorship, but the situation in Vancouver surely stemmed at least partly from a desire _not_ to imitate Toronto's example.
It looks, from the footage, as if Vancouver's police force ought to have moved in earlier, but the footage might be misleading: it is disjointed and inconclusive. Vancouver tried to believe that its citizenry was more mature and sensible than it actually was - surely that's the side we would prefer them err on? The alternative would be to assume that every group larger than four people is a potential mob and to remove everyone's civil liberties entirely to avoid a repeat. Somehow, I don't think that's where any of us would want this to go.
And why should we think that because we have a police force, we are somehow uninvolved in the crime-solving process? Do we think because we pay for a police force, our involvement and responsibility is complete? How many times have we railed at situations where no one who witnessed a crime is willing to disclose information to help bring the culprits to justice, because they 'don't want to get involved'?
The two examples are, in fact, quite different: they involve different motivations, different people both as rioters/demonstrators and two different police forces. Comparing them is overly simplistic.