Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Supriya Dwivedi

GET UPDATES FROM Supriya Dwivedi
 

The PQ is Right About One Thing -- Asbestos Needs to Go

Posted: 08/30/2012 8:24 am

I have not exactly kept it a secret that I disagree with many aspects of the Parti Québécois' current platform. However, when it comes to the PQ's policy on asbestos, I couldn't agree more. If elected, the PQ has stated that it would essentially abolish the asbestos industry in Quebec.

All forms of asbestos, including chrysotile asbestos or white asbestos as it is commonly referred to, are proven carcinogens. They cause malignant mesothelioma, lung and laryengeal cancer. This has been known for quite some time; consequently, no other G8 country currently mines and exports this known cancer-causing agent.

The current governments of Canada and Quebec claim to promote the "controlled use approach" to asbestos, and assert that if handled safely there is negligible risk for cancer. This, of course, is nonsensical politician speak. Countless associations, including the Canadian Medical Association, the World Health Organization and the Canadian Cancer Society have repudiated the claim that asbestos may be handled without risk.

Moreover, chrysotile asbestos is primarily exported, with very little of it being used domestically. In the past, countless instances of chrysotile's uncontrolled use have been uncovered in developing countries, with the most note-worthy example stemming from the CBC documentary, Canada's Ugly Secret.

Part of the interest in asbestos lies in its intrinsic properties, as it is an excellent insulator and binder; however, it is also very fibrous in nature. It is this property that makes it so dangerous. Asbestos fibres are so light that they can effortlessly become airborne, which means that it is not only front-line workers who are at risk, but also those who are exposed to the fibres through the air or from contaminated hair and skin.

The PQ would pave the way for an asbestos ban by first cancelling a $58-million loan promised by Jean Charest's Liberals to the failing Jeffrey Mine, in order to re-open it. Now, why would a provincial government crippled with debt be loaning out $58 million for an industry on the verge of collapse? Well, the answer could lie in the fact that it was the international trade and marketing firm, Balcorp, who first expressed interest in re-opening the mine back in 2011.

The plot thickens of course, considering Balcorp is led by Liberal lobbyist and occasional philanthropist, Baljit Chadha, who also happens to be a member of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (Jean Chrétien nominated him in 2003). When Balcorp couldn't cough up the cash, the Quebec Liberals swooped in and decided it would help cause cancer for millions of people in the developing world by lending $58 million to a dying industry (pun semi-intended) that employs few people in Quebec.

The rationale behind keeping the asbestos industry has become increasingly unclear and unfounded. The Canadian asbestos industry has decreased dramatically and there is no shred of evidence to prove that it will recover, as more and more nations are choosing to ban the substance. Thus, any contention by asbestos industry members or politicians that asbestos mining is beneficial to the Canadian economy is mistaken.

Current polls are projecting that the PQ will form the next government, with the Coalition Avenir Québec forming the official opposition, both of whom oppose mining asbestos. While Quebecers may be in for a rough ride on sovereignty, language and identity issues, this is one facet of the next would-be government that should have us all breathing a little easier (pun not necessarily intended but serendipitously welcomed).

 

Follow Supriya Dwivedi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/supriyadwivedi

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
I have not exactly kept it a secret that I disagree with many aspects of the Parti Québécois' current platform. However, when it comes to the PQ's policy on asbestos, I couldn't agree more. If elect...
I have not exactly kept it a secret that I disagree with many aspects of the Parti Québécois' current platform. However, when it comes to the PQ's policy on asbestos, I couldn't agree more. If elect...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:42 PM on 08/30/2012
As someone who lost her father to asbestos, I cannot wait for this corrupt industry to finally die. And so, I cheer on the PQ and CAQ and hope that they will make good on their promises. We welcome all to Sarnia on September 29th to join us for "A Walk to Remember Victims of Asbestos." For more info check out asbestos.cattran.ca.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Supriya Dwivedi
10:31 PM on 09/01/2012
Thanks for the info, and it's been too long that Canada has allowed for this industry to live on
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:20 PM on 08/30/2012
Supriya, I agree 100% on this with you. I am very glad to see you got onboard with the National NDP's position on this.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Supriya Dwivedi
10:27 PM on 09/01/2012
I've been "on board" with this position for the last 7 years, when I first was made aware of the asbestos industry in Quebec. Last year, I wrote a 50 page paper on it for an environmental law seminar I was taking, and could not have been more horrified at what our federal and provincial governments were doing. I don't always agree with the NDP platform, nor do I always agree with the Green/Liberal/Conservative platform. I think it's important to not let your own values be ruled by a political party, for then you simply allow your views to be predetermined by a bunch of party insiders.
02:37 PM on 08/30/2012
Lets just hope that they stick to this plan and don't sweep it under the carpet once the affected parties start to push back. The PQ mentioned that they will consult with the affected workers first etc. and I sincerely hope they don't decide that it is out of their hands and that they back-track when they realize that some people care more about jobs then cancer risks.

I have a little niggling doubt when politicians actually offer to consult the public. It always feels like they are trying to pass the buck and avoid actually taking a stand on an issue. Maybe I'm just too jaded after all I've seen.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Supriya Dwivedi
10:30 PM on 09/01/2012
I share your cynicism!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
01:42 PM on 08/30/2012
Wow... Chrony capitalism at its worst.. And I was rooting for Charest. Now I just don't care.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Supriya Dwivedi
10:28 PM on 09/01/2012
I feel your pain. Although, I cannot help but think that if Charest were any sort of a leader he would have stepped down and allowed someone else to run as the leader of the PLQ.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
11:48 AM on 09/04/2012
Thanks for the reply. - It seems leaders like Charest always require a democratic boot out of office... Unfortunately, because you're right that a different leader likely would have helped the Libs a lot. Yet, the asbestos lobby is really just too powerful for such an antiquated industry.
12:44 PM on 08/30/2012
Thank you, Supriya, for a very well-wrtten piece. As a former safety officer with the federal govt, I can recall receiving training on the safe removal of asbestos by the same government who came out strongly supporting the reopening of the asbestos mine in Quebec. This business of shipping cancer-causing products off our Canadian shores to the disposable people of third world countries is a blight on this country that brings to mind the slave trade of the 18th and 19th centuries. Another way of looking at this - we can see the horrific effects of large corporations that can buy and sell politicians at will in the U.S. - we don't need that style of government here.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Supriya Dwivedi
10:29 PM on 09/01/2012
Agreed!