Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Syed Hussan

GET UPDATES FROM Syed Hussan
 

The Great Tory Rip-Off of Migrant Workers

Posted: 12/18/2012 7:14 am

Today is the International Migrants Day. On Dec 18, 1990, 22 years ago, the UN passed the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. No migrant-receiving country, including Canada, has ratified this convention.

2012-12-17-HolidayParty12.jpg


Just last week, Federal Human Resources Minister Finley took away special E.I. benefits from migrant workers through a quiet Thursday afternoon regulatory change. She did this assuming that most people wouldn't notice. Just to add insult to injury, she cut these benefits that were won after years of protest by the women's movement, on December 6 -- the National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women.

This isn't just a mean-spirited move, or a lump of coal as a Christmas gift to migrant workers as the Toronto Star notes, it is part of a long-term strategy to take away basic support from all unemployed workers, irrespective of immigration status. Migrant workers, seen as the most vulnerable, are just the test case. If these benefits aren't restored, and E.I. not expanded for migrant workers now, the axe on all E.I. benefits for all workers will fall far more swiftly and painfully then it already has.

Just in 2008, migrant workers and their employers paid an estimated 300-million dollars in to E.I. but were only able to access some paternal, maternal and compassionate benefits. Now even that has been made off-limits. This while, the numbers of temporary workers contributing in to E.I. premiums has gone up by nearly 17 per cent since 2008.

This theft of migrant workers' hard earned money takes place in a year where Canadians laws are already stacked up against them. In Canada, it is legal to pay migrant workers 5-15 per cent below the average -- a total jettisoning of the age old consensus of equal pay for equal work. Recruiters run amok, charging migrant workers thousands of dollars while provincial laws do little to end this exploitation. Migrant workers are often unable to get full social services or access basic health, and safety protections. Those that fall sick or complain face deportations.

In a press release by MWAC member Justicia for Migrant Workers, Junior Sylvester a 12-year veteran of the Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program says

"The elimination of these special benefits violates the nature of the Employment Insurance act that was put into place to protect our families and our children from falling into poverty."

Adriana Paz Ramirez, an organizer for Justicia for Migrant Workers agrees, adding "For over 40 years migrant workers have been subsidizing Canada's E.I. fund yet have been 'ineligible' to receive full benefits, and now they are being completely stripped away from the few special benefits they were able to access. This is completely unjust and outrageous." (See Justicia's call for actions, including a vigil in Toronto today, here).

The United Food and Commercial Workers Union (also a member of MWAC) launched a petition against these cuts, insisting "It is the Great Tory Ripoff of Migrant Workers. It is like being forced to buy mandatory auto insurance but you are excluded from coverage."

The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) has noted how migrant workers were again being treated differently then workers with citizenship. The CLC noted: "The Minister did not mention that Canadians and permanent resident workers who pay into the E.I. system are able to access maternity/paternity benefits when they reside out of the country."

The Canadian parliament isn't exactly the pinnacle of democratic process right now (case in point: the massive budget bill that was pushed through Commons earlier last week despite immense opposition), but it must be noted that the banning of migrant workers from E.I. benefits they paid for happened without being discussed in the Commons.

Much of public policy is being set by press release and through decisions summarily announced on the government's online website. Remember how tens of thousands of refugees had their healthcare cut -- that was a regulatory change. You know how women are forced to stay in marriages for two years to get citizenship -- regulatory change.

Harper's Ministers have been summarily amassing powers for themselves. Jason Kenney, one of the key architects of our current temporary immigration system, has given himself unilateral power to decide which refugees should be indefinitely jailed and which shouldn't. Trying to keep up with him, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development Diane Finley has amassed special powers for herself to define what constitutes "suitable employment" for E.I. claimants, and to define "reasonable and customary efforts" to find work.

Claimants can be cut off benefits if they decline "suitable employment" and do not make "reasonable and customary efforts" to find work. This includes taking jobs at wages 30 per cent below what they were previously earning. The expansion of the temporary foreign workers program, theft of E.I. benefits from migrant workers and Canadian citizens alike, are all part of one "cheap labour" strategy.

Diane Finley and Kenney think they can get away with this program, simply because no one is paying attention, the question is, are they right? Soon after the E.I. changes were announced, migrant worker organizing escalated. Migrant workers themselves organized an educational seminar for non-migrant workers about the impact of these E.I. cuts in Southern Ontario, while many MWAC members issued statements and organized actions. Migrant workers and their allies are demanding justice, status, dignity and full rights, and we are creating those as a reality in our communities.

As one migrant worker in Leamington said when the E.I. benefits were first announced,

"It doesn't matter our race, our colour, or the country we come from. United we fight for our rights. United we are strong."

ONTARIO MIGRANT WORKERS TAKE A STAND

 

Follow Syed Hussan on Twitter: www.twitter.com/hussansk

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
Today is the International Migrants Day. On Dec 18, 1990, 22 years ago, the UN passed the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families.
Today is the International Migrants Day. On Dec 18, 1990, 22 years ago, the UN passed the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families.
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:33 AM on 12/19/2012
As migrant workers are not Canadian citizens, why are they even paying into a program such as EI. They are only supposed to be here temporarily and therefore, once their work is ended, they should be returning to their home country. It is time for the government to get tough with Canadians who are seeking employment or who are on welfare and able to work, to have them take these jobs that migrants are currently holding. There is something not right with our system when we have thousands of Canadians unemployed and we import people to do our work...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:17 PM on 12/21/2012
How many Canadians do you know that want to pick apples for a dollar a bushel?
photo
bujudunton
Everyone is entitled to my opinion
11:26 AM on 12/18/2012
If a migrant worker isn't working, why are they still in Canada and not their home country. If there isn't any work available they should migrate home until work opens and not collect unemployment.

Just rig the system so Migrant workers no longer contribute to EI and get sent home after their contract is finished.

Problem solved.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Syed Hussan
05:54 PM on 12/18/2012
If migrant workers are excluded today from E.I. special benefits, Canadian citizens will follow tomorrow. Have you seen what has already happened to the state of E.I. - so many people are already excluded. This is a slippery slope and its about where people were born or what colour their passport is - it is about a government agenda to rip money off from migrants and give it to their buddies.
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
10:24 AM on 12/18/2012
The narrative will go as follows
"Did these migrant workers really believe that they were being brought here for their benefit?, it's all really their fault for coming here in the first place."
I heard Jason Kenney blathering on the radio this morning how taxpayers will be saved $20,000,000 by not providing health care to refugees. How much could we save if we had REAL MP pension reform? How much could we make if we nationalized an equal 20% of the resources in Canada that is now owned by foreign governments? It boggles the mind how warped the thinking is.
photo
BentleysPal
We'd be better off if Springers ruled the world
09:24 AM on 12/18/2012
Isn't the term "migrant" self-explanatory? Why on earth should they be entitled to EI benefits?
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
10:49 AM on 12/18/2012
Seeing as we are a nation of 'migrants' you aren't entitled to them either, even though you pay for them, see how this works, how do you like them apples?
11:50 AM on 12/18/2012
The article stated that these migrant workers and their employers paid over $300 million into EI in 2008 alone... does that not make them entitled to their own benefits in which they paid?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
08:55 AM on 12/18/2012
So we should be paying pogey to migrant workers after they've gotten their "stamps"?
The point of these folks being here is to work.
The fact they have to contribute the same payroll deductions as canadians is a refection on the fact that while they are here the do enjoy the same benifits under the law as canadians.
They get hurt, they go to the hospital.
They drive on our roads.
They use our all the same resources as you and I do.
The fact that they have to contribute to ui benifits is a means of covering the administrative costs the government incurs processing all their individual files.
It is a benifit to them and it is a benifit to us.
09:33 AM on 12/18/2012
@Warren - I'm curious, do you write your comments yourself, or are they supplied directly from someone in Harper's government? i hope they're paying you well, selling one's soul should be well compensated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
09:50 PM on 12/18/2012
i just do it for kicks
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
10:50 AM on 12/18/2012
If they pay, they play.