There are about 20,000 separate groups in the U.S. dedicated to animal causes -- from small Mom and Pop rescue groups devoted to helping, say, a specific breed of dog, to the very largest of organizations, like The Humane Society of the United States, with our agenda of animal protection priorities as extensive as the problems themselves.
In large part, the profusion of these groups is a positive thing -- raising our national level of energy and awareness to combat the challenges of cruelty, whether involving pets, farm animals, wildlife or animals use in research. There are hundreds of millions of animals that need our attention in this busy nation, so 20,000 groups with locked arms is probably just the bare minimum to keep our society moving forward.
But, and of course, there is a "but" to be voiced, a small few who claim to have the interests of animals at heart let their ambitions get the best of them. They end up, perversely, giving comfort to those who have a vested economic interest in the status quo mistreatment of animals, including countless thousands of breeding dogs caged in horrible puppy mills, and the millions of animals cruelly confined in industrial-scale agricultural operations, and so many more.
We have witnessed just such an instance lately on the Huffington Post.
An angry opinion writer has tried to build himself up by tearing down the work of The HSUS. A small thinker who takes on a large organization in the hopes of gaining recognition is a tired old story, and we'll let him find some other group to play that game. But -- yes, another " but" -- it's not a good idea these days to let even absurd accusations go unanswered out of concern that someone may think silence is the same as surrender.
So we'll reply. On our terms.
The red-in-the-face online writer thinks he could do a better job for animals if only he could command an organization as big and proud and as deeply rooted in our culture as the HSUS. Allow us, just once, to borrow from his own inelegant writing: "This is a complete crock."
His ideas are so weak that he has no organization to speak of. Indeed, all he brings to the discussion is a keyboard and the hope that the Internet will grant him his wish of all vain name-callers, a minute in the spotlight and a smattering of praise from those who revel in the incomplete story.
The lesson here is simple: When you hear the honourable name of a long standing charity dragged through the mud, look a little deeper and make up your own mind. Sometimes, a critic is right. Other times, you might find yourself wondering why someone who professes to care for animals spends his time attacking groups that are doing the work of caring for animals.
The HSUS and its affiliates protect dogs, cats, and other animals every day of the year, through education, rescue, veterinary services, support to local shelters; by backing better public policies concerning puppy mills, dogfighting, and animal cruelty; by promoting improved animal care and control throughout the United States and abroad; and by conducting advertising to promote sterilization and adoption that benefits every shelter in the nation, something that simply otherwise could not be done on this scale except by an organization with the reach of HSUS.
The HSUS provided direct care for 76,955 animals in 2011 alone -- through rescue, rehabilitation, veterinary service, and sanctuary. When we add the spay and neuter surgeries undertaken in cooperation with World Spay Day partners, the number of animals involved rises to 125,625.
Our leadership in working to pass Prop B in Missouri, to crack down on puppy mills, has resulted in 800 of these substandard operations shutting down just in the last two years.
Millions -- yes, millions upon millions -- of animals benefit from the work of The HSUS in bringing to an end the severe confinement of farm animals. More than 40 major companies, including restaurants like McDonald's and giant food service providers like Sysco, have announced just this year the phase-out of gestation crates in their pork supply chains. These crates keep breeding pigs all but immobilized for much of their lives.
It's our effectiveness and dogged pursuit of protecting all animals that led one agribusiness industry publication to write: "The progression of this issue also exemplifies how quickly the Humane Society of the United States can affect change...HSUS and its efforts are having an impact."
To accomplish such leaps forward for animals, The HSUS is also committed to working with new allies for the sake of animals. We have collaborated with mega corporations to reduce suffering. We have partnered with hunters in the fight against wildlife abuses, such as canned hunts and poaching. After we led the way in seeing that he was punished, we provided Michael Vick opportunities to speak to at-risk young men and steer them away from the dead-end world of dog fighting.
We joined the United Egg Producers, the largest trade group in the egg industry, to push for national standards to give laying hens more room and better treatment. We pioneered the idea of a "humane economy" -- to harness the creative potential of the free market system to satisfy both human needs and animal protection.
The HSUS is rated a four-star charity (the highest possible) by Charity Navigator, approved by the Better Business Bureau for all 20 standards for charity accountability, voted by Guidestar's Philanthropedia experts as the #1 high-impact animal protection group, and named by Worth Magazine as one of the 10 most fiscally responsible charities. These are the ratings that count in real charity work.
There is room in our vast, energetic movement for disagreement about priorites and about the value of alliances. But there should be zero tolerance for harsh rhetoric that gives comfort to those who would harm animals. That's not what it means when we speak of a more compassionate world.
Follow The Humane Society of the United States on Twitter: www.twitter.com/HumaneSociety
-all of this done at taxpayer expense?!?”
http://topcatsroar.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/2887/
September 4, 2012
The Guilford Co pound in NC kills roughly half its dogs and cats – unless the pet happens to look like a Rottweiler, Chow Chow or “Pitbull”. Guilford Co kills 100% of any pets who resemble those types of dogs.
Not surprisingly, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) thinks the pound is swell. And when HSUS recently trucked nearly 200 pets from pounds in Louisiana and Mississippi after Hurricane Isaac, the multi-million dollar organization thought Guilford Co would be a great place to send 17 of them.
I wonder how many of the remaining dogs and cats “rescued” by HSUS will also be sent to places that kill pets. Even if the shelter taking in the animals doesn’t kill these particular individuals, the issue of displacement killing comes into play. Either way, pets are likely to be needlessly killed in the name of “rescue”, courtesy of HSUS, while the organization rakes in more donations to pay salaries and other expenses unrelated to saving shelter animals. Let me know if you see a story about your local pound receiving any of these Hurricane Isaac pets.
The same could be said about this weekend nationally. As HSUS is out there doing the research and updating their Twitter feed (http://twitter.com/HumaneSociety) to direct people to pet friendly shelters, what is No-Kill doing? Promoting a book that merely casts their opinion of what other national organizations are doing wrong. It always comes back to the same answer for me - if No-Kill has to bash other organizations to get attention, then they lack a credible product worth donating to. I wouldn't buy a Jaguar car if their commercials alway said GM does this or that wrong.
With HSUS, you know what your money is being spent on and what they are doing. On the other hand, No-Kill spends their money creating fictional pamphlets that tell myths about No-Kill saving communities money, instead of the truth that it costs communities millions.
http://www.humanesociety.org/about/
Watch out for the flying monkeys, who should be arriving shortly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Mary_(folklore)
It's nice company that you keep, HSUS; Lilly Tangers (Pat Dunaway) and Mike Vick are great examples of your most esteemed followers.
Been doing a bit of book reviewing, have you?
I will grant you one thing, however -- this outright lie is particularly brazen: "His ideas are so weak that he has no organization to speak of. Indeed, all he brings to the discussion is a keyboard and the hope that the Internet will grant him his wish of all vain name-callers, a minute in the spotlight and a smattering of praise from those who revel in the incomplete story."
You know perfectly well that I have an "organization." More than one, in fact. A huge grassroots network of organizations, not as well funded as the HSUS (very few groups are), but growing in a manner that clearly constitutes a threat to bloated, inefficient lobbies like the misnamed Humane Society of the United States.
If people here want a sense of the nonexistent organizations with which I'm affiliated, they can start by Googling the "No Kill Advocacy Center". Then move on to "No Kill Nation". If you need more information, try "No-Kill Communities". And if you're still not satisfied that we exist, I can supply a year's worth of reading.
Why assume that someone who criticizes your tactics is just trying to get attention for himself? In fact, there are a growing number of animal activists who believe your brand of advocacy is doing more harm than good. You’ve become experts at turning high-profile welfare campaigns into "victories” that generate donations for you and mislead people into thinking meaningful progress is being made when it isn't. Your idea of a "humane economy to satisfy both human needs and animal protection,” is a big "crock.” This kind of thinking will ensure the continued exploitation and abuse of animals. People will just feel better about doing it.
Collaboration with the egg industry may help increase profits, but the hens will still live their lives in small wire cages, in semi-darkness. They will never see sunshine or step foot on grass. They will still suffer from the same painful genetic deformities, and they will still have their beaks mutilated to prevent them from pecking other hens out of frustration and boredom. They will not be treated “humanely.” Stop trading away the rights of living beings in order to boost donations and create the fantasy of “just one bad day” for the billions of farmed animals who will, in reality, continue to lead lives of suffering, even those with a few extra inches of space.
It is also important to note that this federal law would mandate cages for laying hens and preempt any state laws offering higher welfare standards for laying hens, including banning cages altogether. For anyone who is interested in learning more about this, please visit: http://www.hfa.org/pr072512.html
As a longtime supporter and volunteer for HSUS, I have seen their dedication, honesty and effectiveness in their animal protection efforts. I work with and support several animal groups and organizations, both local and national and have to say that HSUS is the most impressive. They work on the root causes of animal cruelty in suffering, to reduce the flow of animals in shelters, to prosecute abusers, respond to disasters and help pass animal protection legislation. True animal advocates implicitly understand how important their work is to animal welfare.
It asks Americans to:
"make a special gift to help The Humane Society of the United States care for the dogs seized in the Michael Vick case ... your gift will be put to use right away to care for these dogs."
Two weeks after Google captured this page, HSUS CEO Wayne Pacelle told The New York Times that his organization (1) didn't have custody of Michael Vick's dogs; (2) didn't know anything about the conditions in which they were being kept; and (3) recommended to federal government authorities that all of them should be euthanized".