Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tikva Hecht

GET UPDATES FROM Tikva Hecht
 

The Dark Knight Rises: Safety Not Guaranteed ...

Posted: 07/29/2012 12:00 am

I had planned to write this post after seeing The Dark Knight Rises but I haven't seen it. Not in protest. I've considered going but the thought leaves me... uncomfortable. I don't know if, and to what extent, the movie's to blame for what happened but blame seems too simple anyway. In a recent op-ed Stephen Marche urges his readers to move past blame-wrestling to think about deeper connections between violence and movies (theatrics). I'm not an expert on this topic and wouldn't know where to begin breaking down these connections into sociological or historical claims, but I know I'm struggling with them and from within them.

I know that, as much as I haven't seen Dark Knight out of respect, it's also fear driving me: fear of contextualizing the tragedy and making it more real, but even more so, fear of the movie itself, of its raw darkness brilliant in its ability to present an iconic fantasy in horrifically realistic tones. And that goes beyond violence. The Dark Knight movies offer a perverse kind of escape because we escape into them with all our grittiest baggage (this may be a definition of art). But when it feels like the exchange is going both ways, how do we understand that? Without placing blame, the shooting in Colorado mimics these movies, movies which were already mimicking us as we might be if our superhero games were played out in real life. This collision between the world we escape from and the world we escape into destabilizes both.

Underneath that instability is a further anxiety: on screen at least, this collision can also be thrilling. After all, orchestrating a show of it extremely well is at the heart of The Dark Knight trilogy's success, exactly what we want from it. That, more than anything, is what I didn't want to face this past week.

So I went to see Safety Not Guaranteed instead. An ironic choice. Safety groups the classic time-travel themes -- regret, lost opportunity, fate vs free choice -- around questions of escapism; rather than exploring consequences for the space-time continuum, we're just waiting to find out whether or not the damn machine works. Are the characters running towards or away from their important truths?

Walking into the theater with multiple versions of this question already very much on my mind, it seemed like Safety was taunting me. Which it was, a voice from the just-distance-enough past that it could taunt these things lightly. Beyond taunting, however, Safety does something similar to what I thought I wouldn't be able to stomach in The Dark Knight, except rather than host the all-too-human in a comic book world, Safety reverses the procedure.

It introduces us to Kenneth, a character integrating practices he's picked up from action-figures into an otherwise hapless small town life. Kenneth is rather good at this, so it doesn't come off as completely pathetic. At the same time, it stays continually awkward, uncalled for. If you've seen the movie, think of the break-in scene. The thing is, Kenneth never transcends being-a-nerd-trying-to-be-a-hero. Which makes it so we're not able to tell if he's closer to hero or lunatic. Is he a visionary assessor of reality (the only one who understands how time works) or does he have no grasp on reality at all?

Because Darius, the intern working on Kenneth's story, can't know if trusting him is very right or very wrong, we can't know if we're rooting for the good guys or the bad guys. We don't know who to trust and who to mock, or if the movie is trusting us to play along or mocking us for it. This goes beyond time-travel. Every life choice shown is also shown to be susceptible to accusations of escapism, and defiant against them.

This extends to the audience's choice to watch the movie. Safety's strength is that it's genre-ambiguous until the last will-it-or-won't-it moment. This makes what's at stake (above the fictional outcome) what kind of movie you're even watching, what kind of viewing experience you're having. And continually leaves open the question of which experience do you want. But it's a trick question.

If what you think you want is an indie feel-good, then you're hoping the time machine works at the end. But if the machine works, the main characters are admirable because of their ability to shake off cultural distractions in order to engage with life substantially. The escape is the illusion that we can avoid escapism, or that what looks like escape may not be. If the machine doesn't work, we'll have been watching something harshly realistic. But the unavoidable reality it will have shown us is that we're all escapists and that that's a dangerous thing to be. Either way, each ending contains something of the other.

This puzzle resonated with me. As did Kenneth, his sincerity evoking what is best in dreams and make-believe but his defensiveness and anti-social behavior begging concern. Concern made all the more palpable with James Holmes on the mind. The filmmakers behind Safety obviously didn't intend for this, but it does seem, rather eerily, to speak to those deeper ways in which art and society are interconnected and responding to each other.

In Safety, the demarcation between what we should be expected to take seriously and what we should be expected to dismiss as fiction (or craziness -- this word comes up again and again in the movie) falls but doesn't crash, spared the weight of this past week. It is, therefore, easier for the movie to offer its characters a balancing redemption, first, through the trust which becomes so critical and so binding when other foundations become shaky, and, second, through trust specifically in the possibility for imagination to actualize into the extraordinary rather than the horrific.

Giving in fully to this trust, the way Darius can, of course isn't an option outside of the movies. It would be like re-releasing The Dark Knight with the villains edited out and cheering for a shadow-boxing Batman. But the hope is that, with this trust, the hazy space between our escapes and our constraints becomes a little less daunting. Otherwise, the question of healing seems unapproachable.

So I know I will see The Dark Knight Rises, though I know it might still be a little bit longer before I do.

 

Follow Tikva Hecht on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@storymadam

FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:48 AM on 07/31/2012
I was shocked reading many of the comments posted here. The sensitivity that the author of this article expressed is something that is sorely lacking in our society and I think we would greatly benefit if more people possessed it. To me, it makes sense to feel fear ignited by fantasy. As she wrote, "this collision between the world we escape from and the world we escape into destabilizes both." She is taking this reality (and fantasy within this reality) seriously, and we would do well to follow her lead. Also, it is numbing to think that people do not experience some form of secondary trauma when hearing about a threat to another's existence. Reacting to trauma (first or second hand) is healthy since it shows awareness of one's self and one's fragility. The numbness exhibited by so many today is terrifying. I appreciated the perspective presented in this article and look forward to more posts.
07:05 AM on 07/30/2012
Ummm that movie sucked big time. Total franchise killer.Don't see it because its a clunky piece of junk that makes no sense. Its also extremely long.

I'm serious, it really is bad. I was horrified. Worst editing ever in the last hour, and it turns into a total cheese-bath. Gruesomely corny dialogue. The part where the police get trapped for three months in a subway tunnel and then spring up all dry-cleaned with perfect morale to charge the machine guns with tattered american flags everywhere was the cheesiest thing ever put on film. Bane is ridiculous.

Avoid this film until it goes to Netflix. Watching this piece of crap endorses the dumbing down of film.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cael
06:07 PM on 07/29/2012
Well, due to your fear, they one and you let them.
Congrats.

It is absolutely ridiculous to not see the movie due to fear, unbelievably ridiculous.
02:33 PM on 07/29/2012
You know people are too sensitive when they start suffering from PTSD after something terrible happened to someone else.
photo
Marcus047
given up on HP
02:26 PM on 07/29/2012
Do you leave your house at all? After all, there are so many things that happen in the US and on American tv and movies that should keep you from ever leaving your home here in Canada. And maybe we'd all be better for it, if you and all others who fear that what they see on american tv will happen to them, simply stay inside. Just silly, really.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
05:13 AM on 07/29/2012
I think that the media in general, including the internet, is an influence in our lives to be guarded against. You start flipping through movie titles and themes, and you've got war movies, crime movies, high-tension action thrillers, edge-of-your-seat political stuff, and...you wonder if the people that turn this stuff out still remember how to do anything that doesn't involve muzzle flash? Ya gotta wonder. You put a gun on-screen, or a pair o boobies, and you're going to increase ticket sales, because people LIKE sex and violence. Sick fascination? Well, that's entertainment, as they say, people aren't going to flock to the theater to listen to two people probably bored to tears but masking it well reciting lines back and forth to each other over a drawn-out dinner, they can get that action at home or at a restaurant. No, when people plonk down their $12.50, they want some cliffhanger stuff, and at least one death, and the giant kraken, and the hero, and the villains and the cops and the seconds-from-disaster thrill-stuff. And, the damsel in distress, the more distressed, the better. Visceral reactions to depictions of danger and violence and impending peril. Most periolous. But, what happens to YOUR head in the audience, after you get thusly imperiled, time and time and time and time again, and maybe you were kind of weak in the head to begin with a la Holmes?