Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tim Hudak

GET UPDATES FROM Tim Hudak
 

Part 2: Give Workers the Chance to Say "No" to Old-Time Union Bosses

Posted: 07/03/2012 8:00 am

Imagine if the Canadian boxers or kayakers competing in the 2012 Olympics had to do it with one arm tied behind their backs. It wouldn't be long before outraged Ontarians demanded a rule change, to put everyone back on a level playing field.

So why should Ontarians have to live -- and work -- with labour laws, regulations and institutions that are decades out of date, limiting competition, workplace flexibility and job creation?

It's time to modernize our labour markets and rules, to give Ontario employees more choice and control over their own workplace needs and freedoms. Taking bold action on this front is all part of getting our economic fundamentals right, by encouraging the kind of flexible workforce Ontario businesses need to be competitive and create good jobs again.

In the Ontario PCs' new "Paths to Prosperity: Labour Flexibility" white paper, we say it's time to rethink the extraordinary powers government grants unions. While unions fight to protect existing jobs, they can't be allowed to prevent new jobs from being created. Ontario needs to focus on expanding its economy and creating jobs, not just on slowing job losses. That's not the road back to prosperity. It's the wrong path.

Over time, unions have contributed to developing Ontario's middle class and to improving safety in the workplace. These were important gains. Unions prospered in a world of large corporations, jobs-for-life and a relatively slow pace of change. But those days are gone. The world has changed. The protectionist instincts that shaped our worldview then have given rise to globalization now.

Today, workers of all ages want and take far more control over their careers, switching employers and even moving to new fields altogether. They need workplaces, pay and benefits that will make it easy for them to branch out and try new approaches and ideas. Old-fashioned workplaces where union contracts narrowly prescribe exactly how a job must be done and who will do it just aren't compatible with the 21st century-style competition we face from abroad. Neither are the grievances that usually meet efforts to adapt to customer or consumer demand, and that often result in operations grinding to a halt, resulting in lost market share.

Unfortunately, the big public sector unions don't seem to have noticed the rapid shift to a 21st century economy, which features more small and medium-sized employers, multiple careers for workers and constantly changing economic demands. They're more at home with workplace laws, rules and government agencies that date back in some cases to the 1940s.

Yet in American states with which Ontario must compete in the 21st century, far different rules apply. So far, 23 of them have adopted laws making closed union shops illegal, and which protect employees from being fired for not paying union dues.

We've studied their approach carefully to sift through for what we can adapt to our own realities. Same with the experience of Europe, Australia and New Zealand, which have all moved ahead on labour market reforms just like these. So while they may be new ideas for Canada, they're standard practices in most of the industrialized world where we do business. And for countries and markets we want to do business with -- by attracting jobs and investment here to Ontario.

The changes in the United States are critically important to our province. Why? Because our neighbour is on the verge of a manufacturing renaissance. The Boston Consulting Group projects that net labour costs for manufacturing in China and the U.S. will converge around 2015. This U.S. manufacturing renaissance is expected to take place primarily in states with voluntary unionism.

Over the last decade, more than five million Americans have moved from states where union financial support is mandatory to states where it is voluntary. Modern labour market rules create opportunity (not to mention fatter paycheques), and workers follow.

Bold changes that make union leaders accountable to their members are pro-market, pro-worker, economic reforms that take issue with the extraordinary ability of unions to levy what amounts to a tax. These changes can take a number of different forms. They can make forced union membership an unfair labour practice for unions and employers. They can also require that union dues be collected by union officials themselves -- not by the employer or the provincial government through automatic payroll deductions -- to drive more accountability.

Reforms can guarantee that all votes by secret ballot can be administered independently, for example by the Ontario Labour Relations Board or Elections Ontario. Not only should every employee have the right to a secret ballot vote to certify or not, but all strike votes and collective agreement ratification votes should be by supervised secret ballot as well.

Sometimes big challenges require big ideas. And big ideas mean big change. Ontario has bounced back before by thinking -- and acting -- with bold strokes. Ontario can again lead Canada in competitiveness and job creation by getting our economic fundamentals right. But a key step will be to open up economic opportunities for individual workers -- not old-time union bosses.

 
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 65
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:02 PM on 07/03/2012
workers should not be coerced into joining unions against their wishes. unions use mob mentality to keep their membership in check. there is no democracy in unions. modern workplaces need to be flexible - that being said with the normalization of unions, laws countering any potenatial abuse of employees by employers would have to be strengthen and made easy to apply otherwise this whole exercise is a waste of time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justcurious1
10:36 PM on 07/03/2012
So these unions you all want to preserve are the same ones who still use Stalin-era vocabulary? The same ones who insist on having 5 workers on a pothole crew when 2 would do? The same union members that told me to stop working so hard when I was a teenager because it would show everyone else up? The same union that punished me for continuing to work hard? The same union that couldn't give a shit about the customer? The same union where if you didn't agree with the prevailing views that you were pilloried and ostracized? The same union that protects the incompetent at all cost? You're writing about this glorious union, right? Just checking.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:35 PM on 07/03/2012
Anyone else notice Huff Post Canada is loaded with blogs and articles by right wing spinsters? It's no wonder 99 percent of the comments are opposed to the article. Here's an idea for the Huff Post Canada; why not have articles and blogs that your readers actually agree with? What kind of a business model is it to fill your site with views opposed by most of your readers?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justcurious1
07:09 AM on 07/04/2012
You're joking, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:15 AM on 07/05/2012
No I am not joking. Just look at this article, read the comments. Am I wrong. Most of the comments are the polar opposite of the article. There are several regular articles and blogs from right wing think tanks on this site, even Conrad Black has an article here regularly. And in all cases the comments are completely contradictory to the article.
Is anything I just stated inaccurate?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcus Davies
I'm still standing
08:08 PM on 07/03/2012
With ideas like these, it looks like the "P" will soon be dropped from the Ontario Conservative Party as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcus Davies
I'm still standing
07:39 PM on 07/03/2012
A more honest opening paragraph would read: "Imagine if the Canadian boxers or kayakers competing in the 2012 Olympics had to do it without health and safety protection, without rules, without referees and without international standards.". THAT metaphor is far more appropriate to describe the direction Mr. Hudak wishes to take labour law.

What is most galling about this metaphor abuse is that the Olympics are about excellence - higher faster further, etc. - yet the race Mr. Hudak wants to win is the one to the bottom. I beg you, Mr. Hudak, when citing the laws in Louisiana and Mississippi as our Nirvana to please present the whole picture, including poverty levels, literacy rates, education levels, and health care coverage, to name a few. If you are promising to lead us somewhere, perhaps you should provide a more complete picture.

I believe you will discover that Canadians have repeatedly rejected that view of our future, and packaging the old up as "new" will not make it more palatable.
07:29 PM on 07/03/2012
The "solutions" pandered by these born-again economic neo-liberal types presumes that we don't have an historical memory or brains.

Either way, it's arrogant and insulting.

If that's the best you can come up with for solutions to our current economic and political power inequalities, you must think the average citizen is a complete idiot.

What else you got, Tim?
06:44 PM on 07/03/2012
As Michel Chartrand put it, in a country run by thieves, the honest person's place is in prison. If the likes of Hudak get their way, that's where the honest people will go.
06:38 PM on 07/03/2012
This makes me want to vomit. What a bunch of regurgitated Republican bunk. Next he's going to be calling the 1% the job creators.Think about it. How many pairs of pants will a billionaire buy? Probably not as many as 10,000 middle class house holds earning $100,000. How many jugs of milk, or shoes or cars? The middle class are the job creators because they create demand. Demand for all kinds of products skyrockets especially as the middle class start families, buy houses, build communities and send their kids to school. Without a strong middle class, which Unions play an important role, you only have to look south of the border to see our future. Increase in poverty, reduced standard of living and the 1% owning the government and the judiciary.
georgee2
My Canada Includes Everyone
04:13 PM on 07/03/2012
Tim your idea is not new. Many centuries ago it had a name. Serfdom
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baizhongtang
Reality has an anti-neoliberal agenda
06:48 PM on 07/03/2012
Are you saying that huge transnational corporate entities that have moved production to locations where humans rights are a simple suggestion would have no qualms about bringing that "modern way to do business" to developed countries? Surely that couldn't happen here, our business people are fair and trustworthy here, right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:02 PM on 07/03/2012
Everything is about competition in the North American mindset, and issue pushed firmly by the tories and reacted to by the democratic socialists.
Why cant the government, private employers, and unions come together to talk and set strategy for 50 years ahead instead of fighting eveyr 4 or 5 years?
Has this adverserial system really helped us?
Life is not like competitive sport, it is NOT boxing.
07:21 PM on 07/03/2012
The Scandinavian countries appear to have done a good job on this subject . I wonder why we can't do it here ? Could it be that business likes the way things are now since they are the ones that control the political agenda ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:11 AM on 07/04/2012
But thats the sad thing, business employers ARE more happy in Scandinavian countries than they are here. People are just short sighted and have trouble seeing what is best for them.
03:49 PM on 07/03/2012
Tim, if you give Ontario another chance to say "No" to your Harris brand of corporate welfare conservatism, we will gladly continue to do so.
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
03:45 PM on 07/03/2012
Tim, Tim, Tim, try to see the world the way it is. A union is workers (you know, the people who actually produce wealth) banding together to improve the lot of these workers. I know that you think that this is a bad thing, but how then can you ignore the fact that a corporation is a "union" of shareholders that acts together to benefit these shareholders?

Wages earned by workers at a company are taxed at full statutory rates, but investors enjoy preferential tax treatment in the form of dividend tax credits, and capital gains tax rates when they sell the shares if profits aren't distributed as dividends but increase the value of the shares. Investors in a company do so in the hope of earning profits, but long-term workers at a company have invested their lives and their families welfare in the conpany. Is it the Regressive Preservative position that the rights of money trump the rights and interests of workers?

Curtailing the rights of unions because it has been done in the US is to engage in a race to the bottom, and the only beneficiaries of such a policy are the corporations, the "unions" of shareholders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baizhongtang
Reality has an anti-neoliberal agenda
06:53 PM on 07/03/2012
Great points...unfortunately, few people have such clarity...much easier to blame unions. Or the public service. Or immigrants.

I feel your pain.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:16 PM on 07/03/2012
I love it. LOL
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dredesch
03:33 PM on 07/03/2012
The author starts writing about "employees" when he really means "employers". Employees don't want to be changing jobs and moving constantly from place to place, uprooting their kids and leaving a familiar neighborhood. Employers want that.

Unless they are unattached and have no outside responsibilities, most people like to settle down. Of course, many like to move around and seek new challenges all the time and that's good, but no one can say they are a majority.

Just more neo-con double-speak that tries to convince us that because corporations have been able to force workers elsewhere to accept degraded working conditions (often destroying the unions in the process), we'll have to do the same thing here or else we won't be "competitive".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baizhongtang
Reality has an anti-neoliberal agenda
06:55 PM on 07/03/2012
Let's not forget that in a competition, one person or party wins, and everybody else loses. Great plan for a society/planet.
03:16 PM on 07/03/2012
Actually, Timmy, fair-haired-boy of Ontario's corporate capitalist elite, it's both an old idea and a bad idea. It's just the same kind of union-bashing you and your Neoconservative/Neoliberal ilk have been practicing for decades -- a Three-Dressed-Up-As-A-Nine.
After more than 30 years of right-wing economics -- Reaganomics -- Mulroneynomics -- Harrisnomics -- so-called "supply-side" economics -- so-called "trickle-down economics -- or just plain Voodoo economics, Ontario's working class has become so desperate that many workers would be sorely tempted to quit their unions so they can stop paying union dues. And as their unions collapse, the capitalist corporations regain total freedom to ride roughshod over their workers.
No, Timmy, fair-haired-boy of the corporate capitalist elite, that is not what Ontario or Canada or the U.S. or Europe need.
What Ontario and Canada need is much stronger unions -- and an end to federal and provincial laws that tilt the table very strongly in management's favour --, an end to corporate so-called "free trade", such as NAFTA, and an end to the right wing's determination to eventually reduce taxes to absolutely nothing for corporations and the wealthy.
What we need is to leverage Canada's amazing natural wealth into a value-added economy -- aimed at serving the needs of Canadians, first and foremost, and to enable the Other 99 Percent of Canadians to once again be able to claim their fair share of what our economy produces. www.WRISEUP.COM.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
baizhongtang
Reality has an anti-neoliberal agenda
06:58 PM on 07/03/2012
How about a WORLD union...that would help bring back a balance of power, wouldn't it? No more pitting countries (workers) against each other...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
newshoundmama
My bite's worse than my bark
09:29 PM on 07/03/2012
right-wing economics = just plain evil economics. . .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:56 PM on 07/03/2012
The trick is to make it profitable for all people, doing things in a somewhat different manner that compensates for the current zation. The hard part will be getting the civil back, but it is doable.

Satan wouldnt break the spell. If your wondering how God fights a war its pretty simple. king of kings was top of the list. Theres a vacancy now if anyone else would care to try.

Power is just an illusion, for I am weak and powerless.