Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Tim Knight

GET UPDATES FROM Tim Knight
 

Watching the Watchdog: Snoozing Through "The National"

Posted: 03/ 7/2012 4:07 pm

Veteran television producer Tim Knight will contribute a regular blog to HuffPost, analysing and rating the top news shows in Canada. Today he analyses last night's CBC News program, "The National." Next he'll look at CTV National News and report back on Thursday.

Episode: The National, CBC News

Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Anchor: Peter Mansbridge.

Lead Story: Too Important to Understand -- Super Tuesday is "the most important day of the race so far for the U.S. Republican presidential nomination." Mansbridge laudably takes time to try to explain in the introduction what it's all about but ends up making the unwieldy process more or less incomprehensible. (I say this sympathetically, having covered two U.S. elections for two American networks myself.)

Paul Hunter does a rather routine job of reading over somewhat random footage and edits about Super Tuesday until, as happens so often with reporters, he's on-camera at the end. That's when he suddenly becomes human, thinking aloud rather than merely reading. And suddenly, for the first time, we viewers take part in the drama of the story with him.

Possible Side Effects -- Kelly Crowe's story about "unprecedented" shortage of drugs in some provinces because of problems at Sandoz, Canada, makes sense until she mentions in passing that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently wrote to Sandoz warning of problems with its "quality control." Oddly, Crowe doesn't try to find out if those problem drugs threaten our health.

Right to Know vs. Bafflegab -- Should political party staffers testify before House committees? Laurie Graham is marvelously tenacious pursuing Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister, Dean del Mastro, into the elevator. She endlessly demands to know "Why would you come here and say Liberals should and Conservative staffers shouldn't (answer questions in the House)." To her credit, Graham just won't take bafflegab for an answer.

Not Yet Ready for Prime Time -- Interesting public service story from Duncan McCue warning Canadian drug dealers against even trying to do business directly with Mexican drug dealers. Two recent Canadians murdered down there indicate to former drug squad Mountie that we're just too naïve for the drug big time.

Unexpected New Role for Bank -- No explanation offered why Royal Bank is offering settlement cash to people defrauded by Montreal crook Earl Jones. Surely the bank can't be just doing the decent thing? Obvious example of just providing facts without bringing understanding.

It's Not Me, It's You -- With a federal budget coming down in just three weeks, Mansbridge asks the Bottom Line panelists "What's so bad about running a deficit?" Nearly 20 minutes later, I still haven't a clue. Words like "structural" and "cyclical" are thrown around a lot. And the difference between "deficit" and "debt" is investigated but never clear. Only bright point is that Mansbridge suddenly becomes a lot more human now he can talk to real people, about things that interest him, rather than just reading the teleprompter at the camera.

The Naked Truth -- Now the best story of the evening: Decidedly voluptuous Jann Arden poses nude for Zoomer magazine. Deana Sumanac reports delightedly and with considerable respect on "a woman on the brink of 50 in all her glory, with no touch-ups." To her credit, weatherwoman Claire Martin calls Arden "a braver woman than I am." And rather seductively admits "underneath these clothes, I'm naked too," before getting on with the weather.

Verdict: All in all, a fairly mediocre news hour. Too many questions left dangling. And should The National really devote 20 minutes to four people's views on something as complex as an upcoming budget (which none of them, of course, have seen) when there are so many other truly important stories to cover?

Wonder if the budget panel could have been turned into a debate, which would at least have forced the members to take sides, and not just sprout random views more or less appropriate to the latest Mansbridge question.

Quick Poll

Do you think Knight's analysis of The National is fair?

VOTE

 
Veteran television producer Tim Knight will contribute a regular blog to HuffPost, analysing and rating the top news shows in Canada. Today he analyses last night's CBC News program, "The National." N...
Veteran television producer Tim Knight will contribute a regular blog to HuffPost, analysing and rating the top news shows in Canada. Today he analyses last night's CBC News program, "The National." N...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
09:30 PM on 03/08/2012
The CBC today preaches submission, not inquiry. And their pundits like Coyne and Hebert lecture us that we don't know what we're talking about etc.....

What really gets me with the CBC is the lack of genuine political diversity in the voices and faces we see. How much of the full-time news channel is business-oriented shows including those covering politics? Eco-documentaries are one thing; panels that actually included all views, and not just those of the business sector, are noticeably absent....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
09:30 PM on 03/08/2012
"Too many questions left dangling. And should The National really devote 20 minutes to four people's views on something as complex as an upcoming budget (which none of them, of course, have seen) when there are so many other truly important stories to cover? "

Not just dangling, but unasked altogether......

Recent "Nationals" seem to be full of all kinds of anything-but-robocalls coverage, but that's par for the course with any national media; defraying and suppressing important issues while making a big deal, and/or boring us to death, with trivialities. Or sexcrime, as Orwell called it, or distant disasters and especially lurid political scandals in the US, investigated in detail there and assiduously reported here BECAUSE it is "big news" down there.

Why is there no further investigative coverage, for example, of the ties between the GOP and its consultants and corporate allies with the Tories? Why should we even be discussing a budget being tabled by a government whose very legitimacy to hold the PCO is under question by the public at large? Why has no reporter staked out the call centre in Thunder Bay to see how many Tories there are working on the files there before Elections Canada can get there? Instead we are fed panel shows telling us we don't care, or that the Tories will win shuffling this aside so we might as well all give up because we won't win anyway.
05:10 PM on 03/08/2012
I watch The National every night, but sometimes I wonder why I bother. I often wind up with more questions unanswered than answered. And there is far too much fluff, e.g. Jann Arden, whom I like but don't really need to see naked. Nor do I appreciate the often-maudlin overcoverage of personal tragedies. What happened to thoughtful reporting and discussion of Canadian events and politics? Except for in-your-face issues like the voting fraud scandal and conservative ministers calling environmentalists radical ecoterrorists and nearly everybody supporters of child pornography, we get very little of what is really going on in Parliament. Sure, it may be boring most of the time, but shouldn't we get some daily summary of what our MPs and senators are up to? Why is there so little coverage of world events and politics, unless they are accompanied by riots or are obvious important issues like the financial crisis? And last, but not least, why is there so much pompous babbling by Rex Murphy?
10:36 AM on 03/08/2012
talking to real people makes mansbridge human -------

that explains the prime minister ---he doesnt-- he isnt
06:23 PM on 03/07/2012
That was rather good. Please continue with the reviews.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:57 PM on 03/07/2012
VERY, very, very, weryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy fare.
puts me to sleep.
10:35 AM on 03/08/2012
were you riding a bus or a cab?