Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tim Knight

GET UPDATES FROM Tim Knight
 

Part 5: Can the Commonwealth Survive Without the Queen?

Posted: 06/01/2012 5:07 pm

Tim Knight, who started out British and became Canadian, writes the regular HuffPost column Watching the Watchdog. Last Monday he began a six-part series on the Queen of Canada -- whose Diamond Jubilee celebration starts this weekend.

He uses Elizabeth's Canadian titles as a focus for the series:

"Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith."

To try to understand who this Queen of Canada is, what she does and how she does it, Knight wrote a background last Monday. On Tuesday, he started examining her Canadian titles one by one.

Since then he's looked into the next words of the Queen's title. Today he explores the fifth and sixth parts.


... And Her Other Realms and Territories ...

Elizabeth is hereditary Queen of 16 independent, sovereign states known as her realms and territories, nearly all former British colonies.

Members are Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, the Bahamas, Barbados, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Antigua, Belize, Granada, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Papua New Guinea and the United Kingdom.

She's not been particularly successful at keeping these realms and territories together -- inheriting 32, but now reigning over only half that many. Even so, 137-million people live in them

Elizabeth came dangerously close to losing even her British realm when Princess Diana died. For too long she refused to show what the British people considered proper respect and her popularity tanked. One Briton out of every four called for the end to the monarchy.

At the last moment she attended Diana's funeral, bowed her head, and her ratings recovered.

Symbolically, her job in the realms and territories -- whose military fight and sometimes die in her name -- is to guarantee stable governance and be a nonpartisan safeguard against abuse of power.

Her actual job when she visits, however, is to pretty much do what the local prime minister tells her. She reads speeches written by other people, signs documents, cuts ribbons, plants trees and shakes thousands of hands.

The rule is: Don't touch her, but if she puts out a hand, shake it. Gently. And don't speak to her unless she starts the chat.

Rather optimistically, Buckingham Palace claims Elizabeth is "equally at home in all her realms".

However, while she herself may feel at home, most people consider her just a nice old English lady in strange hats who drops by occasionally, reads clichéd speeches in a peculiar, super-upper-class English accent -- rather badly at that -- and probably does no real harm.

Resentment over slavery and the centuries of British colonialism that followed still simmers in many of these nations.

Even so, there are still many subjects in her realms proud of their inherited British history, values and traditions. Two of them, New Zealand and Australia, recently made it clear they want to keep the monarchy, at least for now.

But most realms and territories will likely end their British-based monarchical system when she goes. In fact, a recent online poll in Canada reported two out of three Canadians would prefer a republic after Elizabeth.

Already, Jamaica's prime minister has announced plans to turn the Caribbean island into a republic even before that. She calls Elizabeth "a beautiful lady" but adds in patois: "I think, time come."

... Head of the Commonwealth ...

The 54-member Commonwealth of Nations was born after World War ll out of the ashes of the British Empire -- the greatest colonial power in all of history.

It includes some two billion people, almost a third of the planet's population. Amongst its members are all sixteen of the realms and territories over which Elizabeth is Queen, including founding member Canada. (First Commonwealth Secretary-General, a sort of CEO, was Arnold Smith from Toronto.)

In the remaining forty-eight independent nation-states in the Commonwealth, Elizabeth is simply head, a sort of honourary president-for-life job she inherited from her father, George Vl.

The Commonwealth isn't a political union. Instead, it's a sort of gentlemen's club in which countries of different size, wealth and power -- but shared English language -- get together more or less as equals for mutual support and occasional squabbles.

Where other countries exchange embassies, Commonwealth countries uniquely send high commissioners to each other's capitals.

In her 1957 Christmas broadcast, her first on TV, Elizabeth talked of her dedication to both Great Britain and the Commonwealth:

"I cannot lead you into battle. I do not give you laws or administer justice but I can do something else -- I can give my heart and my devotion to these old islands and to all the peoples of our brotherhood of nations."

Commonwealth nations, like her realms and territories, have generally been both stable and democratic.

That's because the club stipulates that members be functioning democracies:

"... committed to democracy, good governance, human rights, gender equality, and a more equitable sharing of the benefits of globalization."

Not all, in fact, always honour these admirable aims. Zimbabwe, for instance, was kicked out in 2003 because of egregious human rights abuses under President Robert Mugabe.

Most significant legacies from the British Empire to today's Commonwealth are variations of the English language, English common law and Westminster democracy.

Then, of course, there's soccer, the world's most popular sport, and the arcane and very British sports of cricket and rugby. Canada is one of very few Commonwealth countries where these sports are less than national passions.

When in the Commonwealth, (she's made 173 tours) Elizabeth's job is, once again, to make speeches written by other people (in this case, lauding the "Commonwealth Family") and do the realms and territories thing -- sign documents, cut ribbons, plant trees and shake thousands of hands.

As with Her realms and territories, many Commonwealth nations have unhappy memories of slavery and colonialism. Perhaps she had this past in mind when she ascended to the throne in 1952 and declared:

"The Commonwealth bears no resemblance to the empires of the past. It is an entirely new conception built on the highest qualities of the spirit of man: friendship, loyalty, and the desire for freedom and peace."

Unlike the realms and territories, however, Elizabeth's successor will not automatically become head of the Commonwealth. In fact, it's likely that if the position isn't eliminated entirely, some other figurehead will swiftly replace her.

It's entirely possible though, that the Commonwealth is no longer particularly relevant to the modern world and will slowly fade away into history.

The next and final installment will examine the last part of Elizabeth's title "... Defender of the Faith" and Knight's summing up: "She's kept the faith in a way her final title, Defender Of The Faith, doubtless never intended". Stay tuned.

 

Follow Tim Knight on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TimKnight6

FOLLOW CANADA
Tim Knight, who started out British and became Canadian, writes the regular HuffPost column Watching the Watchdog. Last Monday he began a six-part series on the Queen of Canada -- whose Diamond...
Tim Knight, who started out British and became Canadian, writes the regular HuffPost column Watching the Watchdog. Last Monday he began a six-part series on the Queen of Canada -- whose Diamond...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
canobserv
09:12 AM on 06/04/2012
I am not a Monarchist......but am I the only one slightly offended by the term "Queenie"? it seems so childish.........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
11:39 AM on 06/03/2012
Not that we're all that connected to other Commonwealth countries except by trade and sports, but it will be like siblings drifting apart and focusing on their own families after the parents pass on.
01:43 AM on 06/02/2012
I hope not, I am ashamed to live in a 'nation' that is considered part of the British commonwealth. Anything we can do to relegate the role of Britain in our current affairs to the history books is definitely a step forward (its inbred, mostly German, heads of state as well). The colonial heritage of this country is a legacy of genocide and foreign occupation that we should if anything be disgusted with.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
10:44 AM on 06/02/2012
About that "mostly German" comment, it's been observed that once William reaches the throne, he will be of first British king since Charles II. His mother's Spencer lineage is a "cadet house" of the Stuarts (meaning offspring of one of a king's concubines....Charles II I think, maybe Charles I I'm not sure).....not that him being a Stuart will redeem the monarchy in Scotland.

Nearly every European royal house is "mostly German" now, whether actual sitting heads of state or heirs pretender. Between the Hohenzollerns producing dozens of princesses in the age when noble weddings were one of the main instruments of diplomacy and Victoria (of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, since renamed "Windsor") herself cranking out the grandchildren everyone from the Borbons to the Romanovs were "German" by the end of the Age of Empire......I think this even included the Yugoslav and Albanian monarchies, definitely the Italian and Greek and Scandinavian ones; one exception would be the Ottomans (if there's even an heir to that line, I don't think so...). Nobility itself was something like a separate ethnicity across the board, as marriage with commoners was rare for centuries.
10:15 PM on 06/01/2012
Sadly, I have to repeat my thoughts from yesterday's column. I don't see much value in the monarchy these days; and the Commonwealth, while a noble concept, is also a construct whose time has run out. Gone are the days with nations needed deified leaders to rule them and provide a reason to live, work and breathe (no matter how benevolent the dictator). Gone are the days of Louis the Sun King. Why keep around an impotent monarchy that is but a shadow of its former power and glory, and which drains the coffers of the people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
10:53 AM on 06/02/2012
LOL they don't drain "the coffers of the people" anything like governments and politicians do......there's also a very strong case to be made, in the case of the UK, to how much their presence and accoutrements contribute to tourism revenues. Not that Buckingham Palace and the Tower and Windsor Castle will disappear off the map and stop drawing tourists....but there's a whole economy built around the House of Windsor, and British tourism just wouldn't be the same without it. Doesn't apply in Canada, nor in other monarchies e.g. Spain or Norway, where there's no similar obsession with the presence of royalty, and it's true places like Neuschwanstein in Bavaria and Schoenbrunn in Vienna remain big tourist draws, and Versailles and the Louvre of course (the Louvre was a royal palace - THE royal palace - before it became a museum). But "draining the coffers of the people", while it DID apply to the Romanovs and the various Russian boyardoms (and the Sun King), has really more been the province of politicians rather than empowered nobles. The Ottomans were known for their largesse and spending programs, in fact......
Hafingnetonne
A few words
09:54 PM on 06/01/2012
Monarchy has a soothing effect of solidity, durability and permanence on any country's psyche. I wish we will keep our monarchy at all cost and all hazzards as this country needs all the cement it can muster to stay united and only a crown can unite us more.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
10:56 AM on 06/02/2012
The Crown is the ONLY thing that drew the British North American colonies and possessions together, in fact. It's the ONLY thing that united us and made us a "country". The Crown is the cement that held the country together, and very specifically the foundation of our legal system and of the political mandate which our politicians have come to disabuse.

The problem isn't Her Majesty. The problem is the Man Who Would Be King.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Skepticat
Supporting skeptical felines everywhere
07:37 PM on 06/01/2012
Although members of the Monarchist league will be furiously writing letters to the contrary - its pretty hard for most Canadians to get worked up over either a foreign monarch living thousands of miles away whether gracious or not - or any pretences of symbolic ties to a long vanished colonial past.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
10:56 AM on 06/02/2012
Well, at least Her Majesty replies to mail about electoral fraud, when not a single government MP will......
07:01 PM on 06/01/2012
Sadly, I have to repeat my thoughts from yesterday's column. I don't see much value in the monarchy these days; and the Commonwealth, while a noble concept, is also a construct whose time has run out. Gone are the days with nations needed deified leaders to rule them and provide a reason to live, work and breathe (no matter how benevolent the dictator). Gone are the days of Louis the Sun King. Why keep around an impotent monarchy that is but a shadow of its former power and glory, and which drains the coffers of the people.