Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tim Knight

GET UPDATES FROM Tim Knight
 

Part 6: Queen Elizabeth, Defender of the Faith

Posted: 06/03/2012 10:15 am

Tim Knight, who started out British and became Canadian, writes the regular HuffPost column Watching the Watchdog. Last Monday he began a six-part series on the Queen of Canada -- whose Diamond Jubilee celebration starts this weekend.

He uses the Queen's Canadian titles as a focus for the series:

"Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith."

To try to understand who this Queen of Canada is, what she does and how she does it, Knight's columns have examined her titles, one by one, over the week.

Today he explores the seventh and last part of her title.


... Defender of the Faith.

Elizabeth even has her own church, a sort of reformed Roman Catholicism.

She's Supreme Governor of the Church of England, the breakaway faction founded by one of her predecessors, Henry Vlll, so he could divorce and marry again. Three years later, when his new bride couldn't produce an heir, he had her charged with treason and beheaded.

Despite this profane start, today's Church of England includes some 1.7 million members around the world. Elizabeth appoints its bishops including the spiritual boss, the Archbishop of Canterbury. Unlike the Pope, neither she nor the Archbishop claim infallibility in matters of faith and morals.

In fact, the church and the Queen have become almost invisible. Back when she was crowned, the then Archbishop of Canterbury claimed she was "God-called" to serve her people.

The fictitious Sir Humphrey Appleby (Yes, Prime Minister) once remarked wryly:

"The Queen is inseparable from the Church of England. God is an optional extra."

The Church of England has long been disparaged as less a church than "the Conservative Party at prayer."

Elizabeth herself leaves no doubt about her strong faith:

For me the teachings of Christ and my own personal accountability before God provide a framework in which I try to lead my life. I, like so many of you, have drawn great comfort in difficult times from Christ's words and example.

In Britain, the title means she defends her Church of England. But since none of her 15 other realms has a state religion, it's conveniently interpreted -- by those nations like Canada that still use the title in reference to her -- as meaning she defends freedom of religion and faith in some Supreme Power.

Prince Charles has suggested a compromise. When he's king, he says, he'd like to be known as "defender of faith." Hardly a ringing declaration of undying support for the good old C of E!

Great Britain's coat of arms, not incidentally, includes the rather arrogant motto "Dieu et mon droit" (God and my right).

Here endeth the lesson on the breakdown and explanation of Elizabeth's Canadian titles.

----------------------

I started this series by writing that Elizabeth is, by most accounts, actually two people.

One -- a decent, honourable, dedicated woman close to the end of her life and reign who takes her responsibilities very seriously, works very hard and believes passionately in her God, her job and her duty.

The other -- an imperious, autocratic, cold and isolated Prisoner of the Palace who lives a world away and apart from her Canadian realm, is a relic of Britain's not-always-glorious imperial and colonial past and the ultimate personification of its still crippling class system.

From there, I explored her Canadian titles. What the words mean. How she honours their intent.

Now, splendid titles are traditionally bestowed by royalty on each other and on those they would reward, coerce and recruit.

Taking full advantage of all possible accompanying pomp, ceremony and garish uniforms, their main purpose is to brand, justify and validate the status, power and privilege of the ruling class in the eyes of lesser mortals.

And, of course, they're always written in appropriately purple prose -- particularly if the title is inherited rather than earned.

Still, when it comes to titles, it's obvious that to Elizabeth, titles are a lot more than just empty words.

At an age when anyone less dedicated would have retired to her castles, her corgis, her horses and her grandchildren, one of those grandchildren, Prince William, insists that she still takes the titles' meaning and responsibilities very seriously:

"She'll want to hand over knowing she's done everything she possibly could to help and that she's got no regrets and no unfinished business... and that she's not let anyone down -- she minds an awful lot about that."

William's words echo her own, so very long ago on her 21st birthday:

"I declare before you all that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family to which we all belong."

From within her golden cage of enormous privilege and great wealth, Elizabeth has honoured that vow with considerable dignity. She's kept the faith in a way her final title, Defender Of The Faith, doubtless never intended.

In troubled times -- and there have been many -- she's ably represented and embodied power, tradition, order and stability in her many realms.

You can criticize her personally, say she's a willing Prisoner of the Palace, autocratic, imperious, cold, isolated from other people, quite possibly not the world's greatest mother.

And you can point out that the Canadian monarchy she represents is a most peculiar institution, relying on nothing more meaningful than an accident of birth.

And there's some truth in all these charges.

But you can't deny that, like her long ago predecessor, Elizabeth l, she has "the heart and stomach of a king."

In her way and in her fashion, Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith, has always, always, done her duty.


This series is adapted from Knight's proposal for a multi-part TV series on the Queen now in pre-production, seeking sponsors. It will examine her role in each of the 16 nations over which she reigns.

 

Follow Tim Knight on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TimKnight6

FOLLOW CANADA
Tim Knight, who started out British and became Canadian, writes the regular HuffPost column Watching the Watchdog. Last Monday he began a six-part series on the Queen of Canada -- whose Diamond...
Tim Knight, who started out British and became Canadian, writes the regular HuffPost column Watching the Watchdog. Last Monday he began a six-part series on the Queen of Canada -- whose Diamond...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:22 PM on 06/05/2012
Great article!! Left me questioning the legitimacy of the Monarchy in Canada, particularly in Quebec ... as this article manifests how insignificant, and outdated the system is to modern day Canada.
I am anticipating the day she hands over power, and how that will affect her successor's titles and sphere of influence!! Will we skip Charles or experience a Commonwealth Spring???
The angles used by the author were excellent, and tremendously appreciated as we were exposed to various facets of the Queen's life and history one wouldn't normally ponder.
Kudos to the old lady for a job well done, and really exemplifying how blue blood gets the job done ... If only Lobengula and Shaka had read the same history books that she did, we'd be living in a totally different world.
09:40 PM on 06/04/2012
Maybe your summary post says it best Mr. Knight. In your posting you try to present (as all good writers should) both the good and bad of the Queen's predicament. You have done, admittedly, a top-notch job fact finding for this extensive review of the Jubilee. Outstanding historical review and commentary. I can see both sides without a doubt. Your voice is clear in your writing. You echo or seem to anticipate in your writing comments that you imagine people will make about your thoughts and ideas. These interspliced comments suggest you understand what your viewers will think in reviewing your words. Perhaps the most insightful thing I took from this last review was that you said she was "born" into this situation. There were no choices for her as an individual. In many ways, she is not her own person. She was cast in a role that she was to assume without regret and pass along to those next in line. So, again, please know I will continue to pass by the supermarket magazines that hold covers of royalty but will do so now with much more balanced perspective with ideas not considered before. I won't buy the magazines but I am now better informed. How's that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trashcan Man
Luck does not reduce risk even when it seems to.
08:25 PM on 06/04/2012
I like the Queen. I really want to respect the monarchy and would like to have faith that institution could effectively rule for the benefit of it's subjects. At least be a symbol for people rise higher in art, literature, science and social responsibility. The treatment by the media is infantile, shallow and treating the monarchy as fashion show. Granted knighthoods are awarded based on record sales. The series presented here however is an exception.
The future of the Empire probably isn't a good one as it has been reduced to the common wealth, or the common poverty. Corporate take over and mass privatization of the worlds resources may be more at fault for the decline of the empire resulting in the Monarchy being not as powerful as it could have been. The Monarchy might be wise to encourage it's subjects to take an interest in the humanities and science as opposed to the people's latest religion, money as God. This would make them a better example to it's subjects as opposed to the Saudi Royal Family for example, who despite their untold wealth, have contributed nothing to humanity. At least The British Royals have done away with beheadings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
A radical leftist with a JS Woodsworth avatar.
04:18 PM on 06/04/2012
Here's a twist: When Henry VIII first took the title "Defender of the Faith," the Pope granted it to him to defend Catholicism against Protestants! But before long he was using to defend Anglicanism against Catholics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidwgray08
03:44 PM on 06/04/2012
Great, no more of this nonsense. There is no point trying to pretend the truth about the British monarchy and its history is anything but something to be ashamed of, and an affront to freedom-loving humanity.

Be a serf elsewhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr e MaN
Political Atheist
01:06 PM on 06/03/2012
Yes the family values of Henry the viii. This mode of thinking is for the dust bin of history. She is a nice lady but that is it.