Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Todd Herron

GET UPDATES FROM Todd Herron
 

It's Only Monday and I've Already Read Romney's Obituary

Posted: 11/05/2012 7:02 am

The New York Times' polling website, FiveThirtyEight.com, is showing the odds of Obama winning the Presidency at 85 per cent. This number has been going up dramatically for the last couple of days as the polling numbers are starting solidify around a must-have Electoral College win for Obama and a nice-to-have win in the popular vote.

This is not lost on conservative bloggers who see the inevitable on Tuesday: an Obama second term. And in the modern world of reporting news before it happens, conservative bloggers are already writing Mitt Romney's political obituary. Erick Erickson, ultra-conservative blogger for redstate.com in a scathing editorial referred to Romney as "unprincipled" and the "silly putty of politicians." He writes:

"I've been reading the 200 pages of single spaced opposition research from the John McCain campaign on Mitt Romney. There is no issue I can find on which Mitt Romney has not taken both sides. He is neither liberal nor conservative. He is simply unprincipled. The man has no core beliefs other than in himself.

Mitt Romney ... is a man devoid of any principles other than getting himself elected. As much as the American public does not like Barack Obama, they loath a man so fueled with ambition that he will say or do anything to get himself elected. Mitt Romney is that man."

BLOG CONTINUES BELOW SLIDESHOW...

Loading Slideshow...
  • Here's a look at the issues he and other Canada-U.S. watchers feel will land on the big desk in the Oval Office in the months and years to come. <strong><em>With files from CBC</em></strong>

  • Energy Policy

    Wilkins puts energy policy at the top of the list of Canadian issues facing the next U.S. president. "It is a huge part of our trade relationship and obviously the controversial issue right now is the approval of the Keystone pipeline," said Wilkins. "I think that has the most immediate and profound impact on the relationship of the two countries. It can mean thousands of jobs in the U.S. It can mean more Canadian energy flowing to the U.S. and would give us a little more energy independence from some of the other countries that we depend on that don't necessarily like us, like Venezuela." Romney has said he will approve Keystone XL, a 1,900-kilometre project that would carry oilsands crude from Alberta to the U.S. Gulf Coast. Obama initially welcomed TransCanada Corp.'s $7.6-billion plan, but put it temporarily on hold late last year, asking the State Department to take another look at a new route that would bypass the environmentally sensitive Sandhills area in Nebraska. Keystone XL has faced significant opposition from environmentalists, who both oppose oilsands development and view the pipeline itself as an ecological disaster waiting to happen. Don Abelson, director of the Canada-U.S. Institute at Western University in London, Ont., says energy policy is a critical cross-border issue that's not going to go away. "Both Obama and Romney are very well aware of what's going on in Western Canada and how the United States could benefit from that, so there's been a lot of discussion about North American energy independence and lessening their dependence on the Middle East."

  • Trade

    In his view, Abelson says "first and foremost" among the Canadian issues facing the next U.S. president is "our concern about trade and the border." "It's always a concern that not only the next president but the next Congress looks favourably upon the importance of the trade relationship between the two countries and that as committed as both countries are to maintaining a secure border, that they don't lose sight of the importance of allowing for the unfettered movement of goods and services." In the past four years, there have been some protectionist tendencies on the U.S. side, including Buy America clauses in bills, one of which, restricting public works projects to U.S.-made steel and manufactured goods, was passed by Congress "I think there was some expectation that when Barack Obama became president in 2008 that he would not be as committed to thickening the border," says Abelson. But "clearly he has been." Wilkins, a Republican, also feels that Buy America clauses are protectionist and not helpful. "I'm hopeful that they won't come up again, but I think if you have an Obama administration the likelihood is higher than if you have a Romney administration."

  • Border Security

    Late last year, Canada and the U.S. signed a new perimeter security and trade agreement that aimed to make everything from travel to cross-border business easier. But the deal came with negotiations to ease American security concerns and means the two countries will share information about who enters and exits the country. Canada will adopt two U.S. screening measures: an electronic travel authorization for visitors who don't need visas to travel to Canada, and a system to deny boarding to inadmissible passengers before they get on the plane. Security at the border is another "huge" Canadian issue for the next U.S. president, but Abelson doesn't think it will necessarily become harder for people crossing from one country to another. "I think we'll continue to see co-operation between both countries in terms of sharing intelligence and information," he says, adding that more is also going to have to be done when it comes to border infrastructure such as bridges and roads.

  • Foreign Policy

    Abelson says Canada should be concerned about the foreign policy direction of the next U.S. administration. "I don't think Canadians have the appetite or the stomach for going back to a time where the United States was putting pressure on us to become involved in military conflicts," he says, adding "the issue that's going to be on the agenda of the next president will be Iran and possibly Syria. "From a Canadian perspective, we want to be very careful that regardless of who's occupying the Oval Office, that we are not under pressure or put under intense pressure to become involved in future military conflicts unless our direct national security interests are at stake." And then there's China. Canada's navy played a key role this summer in the world's largest international naval exercise, which has as a main worry the possibility of a less-than-friendly China. The U.S. was a big player in the exercise, and it came about six months after Obama signalled a foreign policy "pivot," pointing to the Pacific rather than keeping the longstanding focus on the Middle East and Europe. With Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government also signalling great interest in selling resources like oil to China, Canada could find itself in a rather sensitive spot reconciling those sometimes differing perspectives.

  • The Economy

    Gary Doer, Canada's ambassador to the U.S., told reporters earlier this month that one of the most important issues for Canada in the U.S. election will be whether the winner can avoid sending the U.S. economy over the so-called "fiscal cliff." Obama and the Republican-controlled Congress have been deadlocked over the U.S. budget and face a Jan. 1 deadline for a deal. If there isn't one, a series of pre-set spending cuts and tax increases kick in and could have the effect of slowing an already fragile U.S. economic recovery. Doer wouldn't say which candidate or party he feels is best equipped to break the budget impasse in Congress. But no matter who wins an election that in the U.S. has focused primarily on the economy, Abelson sees a huge challenge getting the agreement needed on Capital Hill to sort out the looming budget and debt questions. "I agree with Gary Doer that of course the economy is the most important issue, but as we saw during the discussion over the debt crisis, how bad do things have to become for both sides to work together?" Every country in the world, Canada included, is affected by how the U.S. economy plays out, suggests Abelson. "Our trade relationship, the spillover effect into our own country, of course, that's one of the reasons we need to pay very close attention to what's going on in Washington."

Romney's Etch-a-Sketch campaign strategy very nearly worked. While "liberal" heads exploded its strident inconsistency, what was more shocking was polls showed that, for nearly half of Americans, this was OK!

It is unlikely that this unprincipled strategy will work again. Obama's battle for the White House has been primarily a battle against an ostensibly slow recovery, hampered by a gridlocked congress. In reality, the recovery has been remarkably good considering how deep the hole was. BusinessInsider.com shows the historical fact that economies perform better under the Democrats. By 2016, the economy will be in full steam again and a new Democratic nominee (Hillary Clinton 2.0?) will be crowing about Obama's success and arguing why it should continue.

In the meantime, conservatism in the USA will face an unprecedented crisis. It is no longer a proud animal; it is a fearful one. Unrelenting demographics shifts will continue to make the USA a majority-minority nation -- a nation where there is no majority race. We can expect an inevitable xenophobic backlash from fearful conservatives: calls from the right for more restrictive immigrant policies and talk of making English the national language. (Americans should look north to Canada before going down this rocky road!) They will be shouting at the rain as this backlash will run counter to America's evolving demographics.

The conservatives will split -- the Fearful Conservatives on one side, the Embracing Conservatives on the other. Embracing Conservatives will embrace the demographic change, distance themselves from religious demagoguery, and return to the conservative credos of individual freedom, self-reliance, and fiscal prudence. If they let the politics of fear take over and the only principle remaining for the conservative movement is power-for-power's-sake, then today it's Romney's political obituary we are writing and tomorrow it will the obituary of the conservative movement itself.

Loading Slideshow...
  • 2012 -- Barack Obama

    U.S. President Barack Obama waves to supporters following his victory speech on election night in Chicago, Illinois on November 6, 2012. (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

  • 2008 -- Barack Obama

    Nov. 4, 2008: U.S. president-elect Barack Obama waves at his supporters during his election night victory rally at Grant Park in Chicago. (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

  • 2004 -- George W. Bush

    In this Nov. 3, 2004 file photo, President George W. Bush and first lady Laura Bush salute and wave during an election victory rally at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)

  • 2000 -- George W. Bush

    U.S. Republican presidential candidate and Texas Governor George W. Bush casts his vote in Austin, Texas on November 7, 2000. (PAUL RICHARDS/AFP/Getty Images)

  • 1996 -- Bill Clinton

    President Bill Clinton, wife Hillary and daughter Chelsea wave to supporters in front of the Old State House during an election night celebration in Little Rock, Ark. on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 1996. (AP Photo/David Longstreath)

  • 1992 -- Bill Clinton

    Bill Clinton and Al Gore celebrate in Little Rock, Arkansas after winning in a landslide election on November 3, 1992. (AP Photo)

  • 1988 -- George H. W. Bush

    President-elect George Bush and his family celebrate his victory on November 8,1988 at the Brown Convention Center in Houston. (WALT FRERCK/AFP/Getty Images) <em><strong>CORRECTION:</strong> An earlier version of this slide was titled "George W. Bush." It has been fixed.</em>

  • 1984 -- Ronald Reagan

    President Ronald Reagan gives a thumbs-up to supporters at the Century Plaza Hotel in Los Angeles as he celebrates his re-election, Nov. 6, 1984, with first lady Nancy Reagan at his side. (AP Photo/File)

  • 1980 -- Ronald Reagan

    President-elect Ronald Reagan and wife Nancy wave to well-wishers on Tuesday, Nov. 4, 1980 at Century Plaza Hotel in Los Angeles after his election victory. (AP Photo)

  • 1976 -- Jimmy Carter

    Democratic presidential candidate Jimmy Carter embraces his wife Rosalynn after receiving the final news of his victory in the national general election on November 2, 1976. (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

  • 1972 -- Richard Nixon

    U.S. President Richard M. Nixon meets at Camp David, Maryland, on November 13, 1972 to discuss the Vietnam situation with Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger (L) and Maj. Gen. Alexander M. Haig Jr.(R), Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. (Photo by AFP PHOTO/NATIONAL ARCHIVE/Getty Images)

  • 1968 -- Richard Nixon

    President-elect Richard M. Nixon and his wife, Pat, were a picture of joy at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York, Nov. 6, 1968, as he thanked campaign workers. At left are David Eisenhower, Julie Nixon's fiance, Julie and her sister Tricia at center. (AP Photo)

  • 1964 -- Lyndon Johnson

    President Lyndon Johnson proves he's a pretty good cowhand as he puts his horse, Lady B, through the paces of rounding up a Hereford yearling on his LBJ Ranch near Stonewall, Texas, on November 4, 1964. (AP Photo/Bill Hudson)

  • 1960 -- John F. Kennedy

    Caroline Kennedy peeps over the shoulder of her father, Senator John F. Kennedy, as he gave her a piggy-back ride November 9, 1960 at the Kennedy residence in Hyannis Port, Mass. It was the first chance president-elect Kennedy had to relax with his daughter in weeks. (AP Photo)

  • 1956 -- Dwight D. Eisenhower

    President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Vice President Richard Nixon salute cheering workers and Republicans at GOP election headquarters in Washington, November 7, 1956, after Adlai Stevenson conceded. (AP Photo)

  • 1952 -- Dwight D. Eisenhower

    President-elect Dwight Eisenhower and first lady-elect Mamie Eisenhower wave to the cheering, singing crowd in the Grand Ballroom of the Hotel Commodore in New York City on Nov. 5, 1952 after Gov. Adlai Stevenson conceded defeat. (AP Photo/Matty Zimmerman)

  • 1948 -- Harry S. Truman

    U.S. President Harry S. Truman holds up an Election Day edition of the Chicago Daily Tribune, which, based on early results, mistakenly announced "Dewey Defeats Truman" on November 4, 1948. The president told well-wishers at St. Louis' Union Station, "That is one for the books!" (AP Photo/Byron Rollins)

  • 1944 -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

    President Franklin Roosevelt greets a young admirer as he sits outside his home in Hyde Park, N.Y., on election night, November 7, 1944. Behind him stands his daughter, Mrs. Anna Roosevelt Boettinger and the first lady, Eleanor Roosevelt. (AP Photo)

  • 1940 -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

    American President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882 - 1945) speaking to a crowd of 25,000 at Madison Square Garden in New York on Nov. 8, 1940, before his sweeping re-election for a third term. (Photo by Fox Photos/Getty Images)

  • 1936 -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

    The Republican Governor of Kansas and presidential candidate, Alfred Landon (1887 - 1987) greeting the American President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882 - 1945) (seated) prior to the presidential elections. Future United States President Harry S. Truman can been seen in the background. (Photo by Keystone/Getty Images)

  • 1932 -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

    Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt of New York at his Hyde Park, N.Y. home November 6, 1932, seen at the conclusion of the arduous months of campaigning following his presidential nomination in Chicago. (AP Photo)

  • 1928 -- Herbert Hoover

    President-elect Herbert Hoover is seated at a table with wife, Lou, and joined by other family members on Nov. 9, 1928. Standing from left: Allan Hoover; son; Margaret Hoover, with husband, Herbert Hoover, Jr.,at right. Peggy Ann Hoover, daughter of Herbert Hoover Jr., sits with her grandmother. (AP Photo)

  • 1924 -- Calvin Coolidge

    U.S. President Calvin Coolidge and first lady Grace Coolidge are shown with their dog at the White House portico in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 5, 1924. (AP Photo)

  • 1920 -- Warren Harding

    Senator Warren Harding, with wife Florence and his father George, shown on Aug. 27, 1920. (AP Photo)

  • 1916 -- Woodrow Wilson

    Surrounded by crowds, President Woodrow Wilson throws out the first ball at a baseball game in Washington in this 1916 photo. (AP Photo)

  • 1912 -- Woodrow Wilson

    Woodrow Wilson (1856 - 1924), the future American president, casts his vote while Governor of New Jersey, on Nov. 14, 1912. (Photo by Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)

 

Follow Todd Herron on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@ToddHerron

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
The New York Times' polling website, FiveThirtyEight.com, is showing the odds of Obama winning the Presidency at 85 per cent. This number has been going up dramatically for the last couple of days as ...
The New York Times' polling website, FiveThirtyEight.com, is showing the odds of Obama winning the Presidency at 85 per cent. This number has been going up dramatically for the last couple of days as ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:06 PM on 11/05/2012
Hopefully Romney loses, and the lesson is learned that you cannot buy a presidency no matter how many 100s of millions you throw at it, and no matter how many lies you tell. Let's have a new Amendment, outlining sensible campaign funding.
12:24 PM on 11/05/2012
Yes, I am a proud Canadian immersed in the never ending Election saga; however, my fathers’ side is American so I feel entitled to offer my opinion.
Barack Obama has made mistakes, and learned from his mistakes. He learned the hard way that he cannot be the catalyst for change in D.C. without the co-operation of the Republicans. His “Pollyanna” view that the 2 parties could come together to rescue the failing economy must have hit him hard like a striking baseball bat.
It appears Obama has adjusted his thinking and platform and should be commended for learning from the past. What he offers is honesty, something that is foreign to Romney. Romney has not yet learned that his lies come back to haunt him time and time again. His platform changes according to the way the survey winds blow. If Romney wins this election, I will most certainly “SMH”. Have the Americans not learned from stolen 2000 election? I guess not, because Bush was voted in for a second term. They say things happen in three’s, I am shaking my head...
11:53 AM on 11/05/2012
Last night Piers Morgan (or however you spell his name) said that Obama may win just because of being the president during the hurricane Sandy disaster. He really misses a fundamental point, where it is the concept of state aid (more in alignment oddly enough with the Dems than the Republicans who seem to be supposedly Christian- based) that is what is happening with the Sandy effect. People now see that things like this could happen to anyone. Assistance, whether it is for universal healthcare or disaster relief, is a good thing and that will be what helps Obama to win. It's just doing the right thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
huevos07
The Anti-Beck, Conservative Hunter
10:23 AM on 11/05/2012
Whether Fearful or Embracing, all conservatism is based on lies. It's either the lies of religion or the lies of economics, both man-made creations that we can bend and shape at will and are not rooted in anything other than the human imagination. Outside of human beings, neither Gods, nor money exist.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lisaward
07:39 AM on 11/05/2012
Read them and weep - Democracy is not for sale... I dont' care how many billionaires are behind you...It's the "Majority" that will win in the end...

OBAMA/BIDEN 2012
abetterplace
Capitalistic reverand
07:38 AM on 11/05/2012
There is no 'conservative movement' as such in the US. It is still what is left of the principles that built this Country. Today's Republican Party is made up of both the 'old' Republicans and the 'old' Democrats, the 'old' Democrats being those that jumped ship as the liberals and socialist in this Country grabbed the coat tail of the Democratic Party and hung on. Regardless of who wins this election, the US is in for years of turmoil as the conservatives battle it out with the socialist for control of this nation.
11:05 AM on 11/05/2012
It just kills me how the American Right keeps calling Obama and the Democratic Party "Socialists". They have no idea what a Socialist is and Obama is NOT one. Plain and simple. But as is typical in the U.S. ignorance is considered a badge of honor and just saying they are SOCIALISTS plays right into the ignorance of a large percentage of the American populace.

Why more serious Americans don't speak out about this is chilling. Maybe they should watch Idiotocracy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy) and see their future unless they wake up and stop being such wimps.
05:25 AM on 11/05/2012
So Todd Heron and other LWN's here....why do you people support illegal immigration and allow this madness to hammer our job markets taking away jobs from Americna citizens in dire need of them? Why do you support illegal imigration when our public school systems are in dire straits due to them...yes a unspoken comment by the left...even though it rings true. Lastly, what exactly do you left wing nuts tell all the legal immigrants who have spent the time and money coming here legally..."schucks you didn't have to do that"...eventually the boo hoo nation will speak up for you (neglecting the fact that it hammers our kids future, our education system, emergency rooms, and jobs...sorely needed now). No tell me....if the people are here due to "no fault of their own", and it certainily is no fault of mine or yours...whose fault is it? Yes our congress....note how I do not fault Obama...he only inherited the mess. Are we going to do anything about it or allow it to get to a point where every decade or so we have this situation. What I mean by do anything about it is secure our borders, fine employers who take advantage of this system and by all mean get a decent workers program here that allow immigrants to be a productive part of our society...but do it the right way.
06:32 PM on 11/05/2012
Try talking your family into crawling on thier hands and knees in the hot sun all day to pick say, Strawberries, to make a living and then you will understand the need for migrant workers. They do the work that Americans think is beneath them and if they were'nt there your food would lay in the fields and rot. These are not jobs that people will do to support their families but imigrants will.
02:36 PM on 11/07/2012
I am all in favor of legal imigrants, migrant workers, working with whom is here now illegally...just not the status quo liberals think is the way it has to be. Every 20 years..."schucks darnit...we have another 25 million illegals here...hmmmmwonder what program tahh Americans in need have that we can pilfer".
05:22 AM on 11/05/2012
Wow! He's right. The GOP went too far right awhile ago...and then went scary, crazy right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awetitu
My Micro-Bio is empty? O noes!
08:43 AM on 11/05/2012
They went so far right even McCarthy's ghost went "Whaaaaaa-?"
05:20 AM on 11/05/2012
The american public doesen't like Barack Obama? Really? What effing planet are you from? The public you're talking about is so irrelevant that its funny. If Barack Obama was so hated by the public, there's no way in hell he could win a second term. This is so much bull!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BritishAmerican
07:48 AM on 11/05/2012
Thanks as I was just going to write the same thing. Barack Obama is much loved by most Americans and the world. Racists don't like him and who cares? They're a nonentity
03:46 AM on 11/05/2012
I certaintly hope that you are right; I can't even begin to think about what willl happen if R&R somehow manage to win this election.
photo
radiojunkie
tune addict
03:43 AM on 11/05/2012
Stark reality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonlike60
opinion will not belie the truth
02:08 AM on 11/05/2012
Well done.
I hope the conservative party reinvents itself into a more inclusive organization. I do not recognize the current party. It seems to be governed by irrational bias.
05:25 AM on 11/05/2012
You think we need to inlude more illegal immigrants or just make English our NON language...?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
09:08 AM on 11/05/2012
Your reply is a perfect example of the irrationality the poster was talking about.
01:44 PM on 11/05/2012
I think you just need to lose your fear of 'the outsiders'.
01:39 AM on 11/05/2012
The republican party signed its own death sentence decades ago, when the decision was made to align the party with religious fundamentalism. This was truly a case of grabbing a tiger by the tail, as I do not believe that traditional fiscal conservatism, which tends towards the libertarian, has much in common with the activist religiosity of the evangelical right. It has now gotten to the point where anyone who fails to toe the socially conservative party line risks excommunication and the traditional rule of never criticizing another republican extends even to those who would minimize or justify rape. Disgusting, and those chickens are now coming home to roost. I don't know if Romney will lose on Tuesday, although I hope that he does. The Republican party certainly deserves it having supported for the office of teh presidency such a cynically self-absorbed, self-promoting, flagrantly dishonest candidate. Since the man has taken a position on at least two sides of just about every issue in this campaign, I can only conclude that he is lying at least half the time. I might worry that he is lying about his convictions, but suspect that other than being convinced he should be president, he has none.
01:24 AM on 11/05/2012
How good your words sound + so profoundly true. I,m not sure about another Clinton for 2016 though. They,ve done good but I want Elizabeth Warren elected for the 2016 Presidency.
09:58 AM on 11/05/2012
Or perhaps Jennifer Granholm (former governor of Michigan)
12:13 AM on 11/05/2012
If modern conservatives truly promoted individual freedom, self-reliance, and fiscal prudence in a measured, clear-headed and responsible way, then you could call me a conservative.

Instead of simply acting as a legitimate (and high necessary) watchdog against the inefficacy of an overexpanded government, to me, modern conservatives seem to be infected by a form a zealotry that allows them to both wildly condemn justifiable government activity while contradictorily demanding bloated military, law-enforcement and "correctional" spending.

I believe that the conservative movement has lost touch with its core values and has allowed itself to be hijacked and manipulated to serve big business's interests. In a very literal sense, it seems to have embraced a level of ignorance of which an increase of demagoguery, religious extremism, xenophobia and disregard for science are a consequence.

Both conservative and liberal forces must balance each other out within a functional democratic government or it will run astray into one form of extremism or another. Americans (and to an increasing degree, my fellow Canadians) need to realize that, at this point in time, the left-wing extreme of a communist takeover is a far-away fantasy, while the right-wing extreme of an authoritarian society in which a rich elite exploit an impoverished underclass is becoming a reality.