Reaction to Stephen Harper's Davos announcement of coming changes to Old Age Security was predictable. "Poor old people" was the general tenor -- one day they're heading jauntily toward retirement at 65, but now, because of our emotionless jerk of a prime minister, they'll have to work an extra two years.
Well, boo hoo. Am I the only one unmoved by the "Won't someone think about the old people" cries? Because it seems to me that working an extra two years is the least old people and soon-to-be-old baby boomers can do for the rest of us.
Two years really isn't a long time. By the time you get to 65, years must pass by as quickly as days do for the typical 30-year-old. Those extra two years will be over in a jiffy -- old people will hardly notice the extra time at all.
Moreover, oldies have already been working for 40 years; they're used to the routine and it's my understanding that old people love sticking to routines -- that they turn into shriveled head cases when their daily schedules don't follow predictable patterns. So staying at work (combined with regular consumption of prunes) is actually the healthiest option for them.
Another point: People are living a lot longer these days. It's common for Canadians to live well into their 80s and 90s, so old folks'll have lots of time to make up for the hours of bridge, lawn bowling, and daytime TV-watching lost to two extra working years. The Young and the Restless will still be around, don't worry.
You think working till 67 is bad? Well, we're going to be working into our 80s at least, for lower salaries and with much worse health care and fewer government handouts. Every economic indicator says life is going to be a pantload harder for people now entering, or just entered into, the work force (if we can even find jobs in the first place).
All those times you told us about how everything you did -- the back-breaking work, going without fancy clothes and cars, etc. -- was so we could have a better future? Well, turns out the future's going to suck. Thanks for that.
I'd remind old folks that us younger people will be the ones taking care of your drooling shells as you inevitably fall victim to Father Time. Don't piss us off with your complaining, or we might just throw you in one of those nursing homes you made us swear we'd never send you to. Instead of leaving us in even bigger debt so you can have one of those stair-escalator contraptions in your house, why not save up the money with two years of extra work? Money doesn't grow on trees, you know.
You always tried to teach us about the value of work -- that working hard is its own reward, that it would keep us honest and make us better, smarter people. We listened to you, and now we're slaving away, often at jobs we can't stand and with people we loathe. Did you take work calls and answer work emails on the weekends? Didn't think so.
We're going to be corporate slaves for the next 50 years -- the least you can do is stay in your jobs for another 24 months before you start doing nothing for a living.
Your generation was taught to accept conventional wisdom, our generation has been trained to challenge it. We know that 65 is nothing more than an arbitrary number -- that it makes no more logical sense to retire at 65 than at 67, or 75. The world's changed -- nobody's buying your "I'm old and wiser than you" routine.
We know that we know more than you -- we've grown up in a world where all knowledge is available at the click of a mouse. The collective wisdom of the Internet trumps your meandering stories of personal hardships. We're the wise ones, not you.
So, old people, it's time to get up off the couch and make yourselves useful. No more free rides here.
Follow Yoni Goldstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/yonigoldstein
Retire already and let my generation have some of the good jobs.
The Baby Boomers, not really through any fault of their own but merely as a result of their numbers, will continue to drain the economy into old age. The size of their cohort will ensure their needs are met above all others (as they always have been), which means they will get their pensions until the bulk of them have passed on.
The following generations will pay for it through the nose - just as they always have due to the Boomers - although there will be none for them when it is their time to retire. I venture to say that the entire concept of "retirement" will be reshaped and/or eliminated altogether by that time, anyway.
Those who follow the Boomers will truly work up to their last breath, paying for the debts their elders left behind.
What is most aggravating about the whole situation, however, is the steadfast refusal by the older generations to even try to comprehend the very logical fear and anxiety their younger counterparts feel about their own futures.
But more than that, the Baby Boomers are SELFISH: I really see a "you can't take it with you" attitude to new retirees I know, that they will spend all their money on themselves before leaving it to ANYONE. They will golf, and travel, and play sports, and go to restaurants and spas, and spend it all.
I think Gen X will be largely in favour of Euthanasia.
He should have been a bit more outrageous (or perhaps witty) so we know for certain that there is indeed a joke here to be let in on.
In short, an 'axe' won't do. An income adjusted program could get around that problem, but my feeling about the "Harper Government" :: somehow we've lost "Government of Canada" :: is that what hurts the poorest is ideologically ideal.
These “droves of civil servants” who are retiring at 55 are doing so under legally negotiated contracts.
The jobs and careers they are vacating are good paying jobs now left open for the next generation so that they can become tax paying wage earners in our society. These jobs will provide an income so that they may be able to purchase homes and goods and contribute to a sustainable society our Canadian economy.
These retirees after years of faithfully contributing their own monies to their pensions are retiring with the income and benefits that are legally owed to them. With their pensions and benefits they will for years to come pay additional taxes, purchase goods and services in Canada, contribute to a sustainable Canada.
Why is it being inferred they should feel guilty for working and contributing for the last 35 plus years? Why are some so diligently begrudging them of this?