Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Yoni Goldstein
 

Extremists Have Hijacked the (Worthy) Muslim Debate

Posted: 09/21/2012 2:11 am

I've wondered often enough what utter hopelessness would feel like. I think I know now, because the raging battle between the demented people hell-bent on depicting the Muslim prophet Muhammad in lurid and, frankly, insulting films and cartoons, and those equally demented people who respond to such presentations with unbridled violence are engulfed in a diabolical circle.

There is no solution to it, as far as I can tell, nor is there any indication either side is even interested in seeking one out. And for the rest of us stuck in the middle -- that is to say, those of us who see in this latest episode a complete lack of common sense on display in both these groups -- there is nothing to do but sit on the sidelines and watch. And hope we manage to avoid getting caught in the middle, which could very easily mean injury, even death, should we happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The wingnuts -- not only the religious, but the militantly secular ones, too -- who continue to produce salacious images of Muhammed have no agenda but to provoke Muslims. Their operation is not about freedom of speech or expression -- and it certainly is not about art (the infantile production and pathetic acting of the Innocence of Muslims "trailer" on YouTube is only one of many tip-offs). It is about garnering a reaction which is a known entity, for if there is one thing non-Muslims can say with certainty about Muslims it is that some of them will respond to any image portrayal of Muhammad with angry mobs and possibly the killing and maiming of demonstrably innocent people. There is, in short, no new point to be made by these cartoons and films, and if there is no point then there is no reason to produce them in the first place.

There is also no reason to react the way Muslims in the Middle East and parts of Europe have over the last two weeks. The level of fury and violence is inexcusable, the backlash as ill-informed and as stupid as the cartoons and the film. I don't ask that Muslims laugh these calumnies off as if they were nothing -- they are most definitely something. But a little perspective is quite obviously necessary, since, in the first case, as nearly everyone but the wingnuts has gone to great lengths to explain over and over again, these are the works of hateful fruitcakes with whom the vast majority of us do not associate (indeed, we detest them, too), and second, we are talking about a few bits of paper coloured in with magic markers and one atrocious 13-minute movie clip. (And it is not as though some Muslims are not guilty of presenting other religions in a, to put it politely, contentious manner, either.)

The berserk cartoonists and filmmakers (and their equally insane publishers and sponsors) cannot be stopped because we cannot legislate away hatred, try as we might. And the protesters and terrorists, simply put, refuse to stop because of a mistaken apprehension that the entire non-Muslim world is against them, with the proof being a handful of tasteless pictures in what is essentially France's version of Mad magazine.

The irony is that, try as they might to display how different they are from one another, it is impossible to distinguish these two groups from one another. They are both caricatures, which is a bad enough insult to heave on living, breathing humans, but, also, they need each other, equally: the not insignificant number of Muslims who believe the West is out to destroy their belief system and way of life require the crass images of Muhammed to legitimize their cause; the purveyors of the images need the Muslim reaction to validate their provocation. Around and around it goes.

It is maddening, absolutely maddening, to witness these two sides going at each other, especially since this is not some silly argument that will cool off with time and the acquisition of some perspective and understanding but the very serious, seminal struggle of our times, and there is no indication we are getting any closer to solving the question of how the Western value system and the Muslim one can coexist.

Of course, they can coexist, and it is the utmost hope of so many of us that some day they will. And this is why it is thoroughly disheartening, and so very disappointing, to see a discussion so worthwhile being hijacked by two groups of lunatics whose only point of agreement, seemingly, is that they must continue to disagree at all costs. And damn the rest of us caught, helplessly, in the middle.

 

Follow Yoni Goldstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/yonigoldstein

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:03 PM on 09/22/2012
what i find is sad in all this debate is the apartheid we hear, 'we the muslims' and you [all those who are not].i am sure there are many muslims who will not even blink concerning the movie or the cartoon because they believe in democracy, opinion and free speech. those that are really bothered are those who want these same liberties for themselves but do not accept it in others.and these which are essential to creating peace are necessary for all.the planet cannot only be a one sided thing. some people are religious and others are not. and it does not mean the religious are right and the others are not, and it does not mean that the religious are nice and others are not and vice versa.but in countries where the separation of state and religion are law , the law of freedom of expression must prevail. in countries where religion is law then the laws of the land have to be respected.but to assume one religion can outlaw another is impossible.but you can be sure that with internet everyone at one point will be insulted by the reality of the others ,just like videos of women portrayed as suckled animals. but a world consensus of what is acceptable and what is not will have to come with time, understanding and tolerance of all people on the planets and not only a one sided thing.
photo
jeremyemilio
My micro-bio is NOT empty
05:32 PM on 09/21/2012
Soooo... you know where you said that people who do things to insult others, and people who riot and kill others when they get insulted are 'EQUALLY' demented?

That's about where you lost me.

In fact, I found it a tad bit insulting... so where, precisely, does that put you on your false equivalency scale of dementia?
12:48 PM on 09/21/2012
It is not the responsibility of a filmmaker to make sure nobody becomes violent as a result. Those protesters have nobody to blame but themselves for behaving so childishly.
12:45 PM on 09/21/2012
These people react with violence explicitly because of what they believe the prophet Moohammed would want them to do and you take the filmmaker to task for being "insulting"?! The problem in this scenario is not the filmmaker but Islam itself.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
emulsifier
I love the whole world, boom-de-ahda, boom-de-ahda
06:32 PM on 09/21/2012
These people don't react violently because they believe thats what the Prophet Muhammad would want them to do. All the verses in the Quran, hadith, and scholars point to be calm.
These people are simply violent because they have pent-up frustrations due to their political situation, and lack of education. The political parties in Pakistan and Egypt are using this film as an anti-american narrative to exploit their own goals. They don't care whether these people destroy their own property, they get votes and win favour with the public.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Nosotti
in the middle so I can go left or right
10:14 PM on 09/23/2012
Exactly. The poor and uneducated are being used to push political agendas. Maybe they're even being paid to be protesters.
12:05 PM on 09/21/2012
I read as far as the correlation you drew between islamic murderers and cartoon creators before realizing your article was offensive to me. Do you want to know what I did? I stopped reading. I looked away. I dismissed the article. You can rest assured that no further action will be taken by me. Certain authors, animators and film makers cannot hope for the same from their antagonists...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
06:37 PM on 09/22/2012
I only wish I could fav this comment ten times.
11:57 AM on 09/21/2012
An interesting piece, but i feel part of the hopelessness revolves around the focus on cherished values of both the East and the West, specifically the sacred and freedom of speech, respectively. Neither side will give each up, nor should they.

The focus should be placed on the real causes of this issue, specifically politics. Who is making these crude videos and cartoons? Folks who want to undermine current governments and create a war between the West and Muslims, those who want laws changed in their countries to undermine the rights of a minority and bar muslims from immigrating to those countries.
Who are the folks causing (the planned) riots in the Middle East? Those who lost the recent elections, those loyal to former dictators and those who belong to violent opposition parties.

These are small but very vocal political groups and unfortunately the media, politicians and the public are falling in to their trap.
10:33 AM on 09/21/2012
You claim that both sides are equally demented and it's impossible to distinguish between the two. I agree that both sides are demented, but not equally. One side is fighting with words and pictures and the other side is fighting with violence. Violence is a much more serious offence. How can you ignore this very important difference?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Ike Awgu
10:26 AM on 09/21/2012
I take serious issue with the notion that depicting Muhammad in a "demented" way is the moral equivalent to responding to such presentations with unbridled violence. I also refuse to surrender the right, to anyone, to ridicule religious figures of any faith. I find it incredible that Yoni labels cartoonists and filmmakers who parody Muhammad as "beserk" and their publishers and sponsors as "insane". No one would label Monty Python's “Life of Brian” or South Park as the work of "insane" publishers and sponsors. I doubt very much that Yoni would write a column labeling the creators of South Park or Monty Python as "beserk" for filming projects that ridiculed Jesus or made fun of Christians, Scientologists or any other faith. The push to make ridicule of Muhammad unacceptable, a character who to billions of people is just some dead guy, is more tasteless and obscene than the people making the charge seek to paint "The Innocence of Muslims".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nancy Lorieau
12:09 PM on 09/21/2012
I would think that "sociopathic" is a good word for you and others who would deliberately provoke the situation by ridiculing the founder of the Islamic faith because, when you do this, you are certain of the reactions your ridicule will provoke and certain that you are putting lives at risk.
photo
jeremyemilio
My micro-bio is NOT empty
05:41 PM on 09/21/2012
It's time for the minority of Muslims who are nutty enough to riot in the streets and even to kill people every time they get wind of an insulting cartoon or YouTube clip to grow up and join the rest of modern civilization.

By tip-toeing around such extremists, all that apologists like you accomplish is to prolong their purgatory in the dark ages.

Are you really suggesting that everyone in the world is fair game, except for Muslims because a few of them act like psychopaths every time someone insults them? If that's your solution, maybe we should all act like psychopaths, and we could all earn immunity from any form of ridicule.

Good call.
06:42 PM on 09/22/2012
I think ridiculing the founder of the islamic faith is essential he did it to him self by calling himself a prophet but yet did not prophisize and by claiming he road a donkey to mecca at night with only himself and the donkey witnessed it.
07:40 PM on 09/21/2012
Well said Ike!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:24 AM on 09/21/2012
You have a refreshing viewpoint. I would add that different viewpoints on emmigration and immigration cause much of the strife as well. The Western world is open to immigration. By that we think we mean you are welcome to join our society if you fit our criteria. I think that within muslim society they see emmigration as colonization. You migrate and expand your society, bringing political and religious leaders along to keep everyone on script. Much like England and France did in Canada and the US 300 years ago.

If you are migrating your society you will come into conflict with those who do not wish to do what you tell them to do. Likewise you will resent groups who emmigrate to your ancestral lands and attempt to convert them. This confuses western society. We have long been taught to be accomodating to immigrants as they learn our ways and blend into our culture, enriching our society. We are frankly stumped at handling a colonization attempt. Likewise to many muslims I imagine our resentment to being told how to behave is confounding.
09:17 AM on 09/21/2012
Thank you for writing this Yoni. Hopelessnes is what I feel as well for this situation. I am not sure how this could get better, or would this get bettter. Maybe it will get even worse than what it is now and then people will realize that all this hatred has to end. It has happened in the past.

These are my sentiments exactly.
08:30 AM on 09/21/2012
So if an amateurish video like "The Innocence of Muslims" is nothing more than "demented provocation", then what would a thoughtful, incisive film that dissected the flaws of Islam look like ?
Films like The Last Temptation of Christ and The Life of Brian, looked both seriously, and mockingly, at the contradictions and foibles of Christ and of Christianity.
Would such contraversial, yet genuine, films be possible about Islam?
09:29 AM on 09/21/2012
Sure, if you a) can find flaws in the Qur'an and b) don't mind crazy people putting fatwas on your head.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr e MaN
Political Atheist
10:53 AM on 09/21/2012
If you can't find flaws in the qua-ran you have not looked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Nosotti
in the middle so I can go left or right
10:34 PM on 09/23/2012
People would put a fatwa on your head if you said you were going to look for flaws in the Qur'an. The people behaving violently are validating the views of the makers of "The Innocence of Muslims". Looking for flaws in the Qur'an, just Google it.