Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Zach Paikin

GET UPDATES FROM Zach Paikin
 

Time for More Sober Talk on Israel

Posted: 02/03/2013 8:32 am

If you're in Ontario, it's one Liberal leadership race down and one to go. With the provincial race now behind us, let's take a peek at the federal contest.

A recent interview that federal Liberal leadership candidate Martha Hall Findlay conducted with the National Post caught my eye for its rather striking title. Why the Post chose to make the headline of a "wide-ranging interview" something to do with a minute element of of Canadian non-domestic policy is beyond me.

What is more important, however, is discussing the content of Hall Findlay's comments as they appear excerpted in the interview summary. Reflecting on these comments will provide us, hopefully, with the ability to discuss Levantine politics in a more sober fashion in the future. (Disclosure: I am supporting Marc Garneau in this leadership race. My opinions here and elsewhere are mine and do not necessarily reflect the view of any leadership campaign.)

First off, Stephen Harper does not provide Israel with "absolute, blind, unilateral support [...] at all costs." What Stephen Harper does do is turn what should be a foreign policy issue into a domestic electoral wedge in order to earn the support of Jewish voters through careful and extensive messaging.

Not even two weeks before Hall Findlay's interview with the Post, Harper's foreign minister John Baird was joining the global chorus of criticism of Israel's decision to plan new settlement construction in the wake of the Palestinian Authority's recent United Nations bid to earn recognition of statehood.

The position of the Harper government is that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal. The Obama administration won't go that far -- they'll only call them illegitimate. If we zero in on settlements as Hall Findlay does, then clearly the Obama administration -- reviled in conservative Jewish circles for not being pro-Israel enough -- appears to be more supportive of the Jewish state than Harper. I could go on.

Second, it's time to put an end to the use of the following phrases and terms: "anti-Israel," "pro-Israel," and "to support Israel." Israel is a state. No one ever accuses a head of government of being too "pro-France" or "anti-Spain." Using simplistic adjectives to describe a prime minister isn't conducive to an intelligent conversation about international relations.

So let's go back to basics. The three fundamental tenets of the international relations paradigm known as realism explain quite accurately how the global -- or any regional -- system works.

First, the primary actor in the global system is the state. Second, the primary (and possibly exclusive) function that states perform on the global stage is pursue their interests (raison d'état, as Cardinal Richelieu put it). Finally, international stability is achieved and military conflict is limited when there is a balance of power between states.

In the Levant today, there has been a balance of power between states since 1973. The designation of Israel by the United States under Richard Nixon as the regional hegemon have prevented inter-state war from erupting in the Levant ever since.

Israel's sheer strength made a peace treaty all the more attractive to Egypt, which in turn transformed the slowly-evolving disengagement line between Israel and Syria into the quietest frontier in the region. Without its ally Egypt, tiny Syria wasn't about to start a war with the Jewish state.

So when Western politicians talk about keeping Israel strong and secure, what they're talking about is preventing inter-state war in the Levant (inter-state war being far more destructive than other forms of war) and consequently not allowing another Arab oil embargo with significant global ramifications to take place as it did in 1973. (If you're interested, more on that here.)

That doesn't mean that Ottawa's relationship with Jerusalem isn't and shouldn't be more complex than that. What it does mean is that there's a reason why Israel is a Western ally and that public pronouncements by Western leaders usually reflect that partnership.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- from a Canadian perspective in a multipolar world -- should be treated by politicians and the media according to its stature as a minute element of Canadian foreign policy. When compared with trade policy with Asia, the Americas and Europe or with Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic, it becomes clear that this conflict is not in the top tier of Canadian foreign policy priorities.

What Canada needs from its public policy, economic, political and media elite is an adult conversation about Canada's global outlook from a strategic perspective. A little dose of realism -- both in the paradigmatic and in the psychological sense -- would come in handy.

Loading Slideshow...
  • 2012 -- Barack Obama

    U.S. President Barack Obama waves to supporters following his victory speech on election night in Chicago, Illinois on November 6, 2012. (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

  • 2008 -- Barack Obama

    Nov. 4, 2008: U.S. president-elect Barack Obama waves at his supporters during his election night victory rally at Grant Park in Chicago. (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

  • 2004 -- George W. Bush

    In this Nov. 3, 2004 file photo, President George W. Bush and first lady Laura Bush salute and wave during an election victory rally at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)

  • 2000 -- George W. Bush

    U.S. Republican presidential candidate and Texas Governor George W. Bush casts his vote in Austin, Texas on November 7, 2000. (PAUL RICHARDS/AFP/Getty Images)

  • 1996 -- Bill Clinton

    President Bill Clinton, wife Hillary and daughter Chelsea wave to supporters in front of the Old State House during an election night celebration in Little Rock, Ark. on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 1996. (AP Photo/David Longstreath)

  • 1992 -- Bill Clinton

    Bill Clinton and Al Gore celebrate in Little Rock, Arkansas after winning in a landslide election on November 3, 1992. (AP Photo)

  • 1988 -- George H. W. Bush

    President-elect George Bush and his family celebrate his victory on November 8,1988 at the Brown Convention Center in Houston. (WALT FRERCK/AFP/Getty Images) <em><strong>CORRECTION:</strong> An earlier version of this slide was titled "George W. Bush." It has been fixed.</em>

  • 1984 -- Ronald Reagan

    President Ronald Reagan gives a thumbs-up to supporters at the Century Plaza Hotel in Los Angeles as he celebrates his re-election, Nov. 6, 1984, with first lady Nancy Reagan at his side. (AP Photo/File)

  • 1980 -- Ronald Reagan

    President-elect Ronald Reagan and wife Nancy wave to well-wishers on Tuesday, Nov. 4, 1980 at Century Plaza Hotel in Los Angeles after his election victory. (AP Photo)

  • 1976 -- Jimmy Carter

    Democratic presidential candidate Jimmy Carter embraces his wife Rosalynn after receiving the final news of his victory in the national general election on November 2, 1976. (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

  • 1972 -- Richard Nixon

    U.S. President Richard M. Nixon meets at Camp David, Maryland, on November 13, 1972 to discuss the Vietnam situation with Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger (L) and Maj. Gen. Alexander M. Haig Jr.(R), Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. (Photo by AFP PHOTO/NATIONAL ARCHIVE/Getty Images)

  • 1968 -- Richard Nixon

    President-elect Richard M. Nixon and his wife, Pat, were a picture of joy at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York, Nov. 6, 1968, as he thanked campaign workers. At left are David Eisenhower, Julie Nixon's fiance, Julie and her sister Tricia at center. (AP Photo)

  • 1964 -- Lyndon Johnson

    President Lyndon Johnson proves he's a pretty good cowhand as he puts his horse, Lady B, through the paces of rounding up a Hereford yearling on his LBJ Ranch near Stonewall, Texas, on November 4, 1964. (AP Photo/Bill Hudson)

  • 1960 -- John F. Kennedy

    Caroline Kennedy peeps over the shoulder of her father, Senator John F. Kennedy, as he gave her a piggy-back ride November 9, 1960 at the Kennedy residence in Hyannis Port, Mass. It was the first chance president-elect Kennedy had to relax with his daughter in weeks. (AP Photo)

  • 1956 -- Dwight D. Eisenhower

    President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Vice President Richard Nixon salute cheering workers and Republicans at GOP election headquarters in Washington, November 7, 1956, after Adlai Stevenson conceded. (AP Photo)

  • 1952 -- Dwight D. Eisenhower

    President-elect Dwight Eisenhower and first lady-elect Mamie Eisenhower wave to the cheering, singing crowd in the Grand Ballroom of the Hotel Commodore in New York City on Nov. 5, 1952 after Gov. Adlai Stevenson conceded defeat. (AP Photo/Matty Zimmerman)

  • 1948 -- Harry S. Truman

    U.S. President Harry S. Truman holds up an Election Day edition of the Chicago Daily Tribune, which, based on early results, mistakenly announced "Dewey Defeats Truman" on November 4, 1948. The president told well-wishers at St. Louis' Union Station, "That is one for the books!" (AP Photo/Byron Rollins)

  • 1944 -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

    President Franklin Roosevelt greets a young admirer as he sits outside his home in Hyde Park, N.Y., on election night, November 7, 1944. Behind him stands his daughter, Mrs. Anna Roosevelt Boettinger and the first lady, Eleanor Roosevelt. (AP Photo)

  • 1940 -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

    American President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882 - 1945) speaking to a crowd of 25,000 at Madison Square Garden in New York on Nov. 8, 1940, before his sweeping re-election for a third term. (Photo by Fox Photos/Getty Images)

  • 1936 -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

    The Republican Governor of Kansas and presidential candidate, Alfred Landon (1887 - 1987) greeting the American President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882 - 1945) (seated) prior to the presidential elections. Future United States President Harry S. Truman can been seen in the background. (Photo by Keystone/Getty Images)

  • 1932 -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

    Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt of New York at his Hyde Park, N.Y. home November 6, 1932, seen at the conclusion of the arduous months of campaigning following his presidential nomination in Chicago. (AP Photo)

  • 1928 -- Herbert Hoover

    President-elect Herbert Hoover is seated at a table with wife, Lou, and joined by other family members on Nov. 9, 1928. Standing from left: Allan Hoover; son; Margaret Hoover, with husband, Herbert Hoover, Jr.,at right. Peggy Ann Hoover, daughter of Herbert Hoover Jr., sits with her grandmother. (AP Photo)

  • 1924 -- Calvin Coolidge

    U.S. President Calvin Coolidge and first lady Grace Coolidge are shown with their dog at the White House portico in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 5, 1924. (AP Photo)

  • 1920 -- Warren Harding

    Senator Warren Harding, with wife Florence and his father George, shown on Aug. 27, 1920. (AP Photo)

  • 1916 -- Woodrow Wilson

    Surrounded by crowds, President Woodrow Wilson throws out the first ball at a baseball game in Washington in this 1916 photo. (AP Photo)

  • 1912 -- Woodrow Wilson

    Woodrow Wilson (1856 - 1924), the future American president, casts his vote while Governor of New Jersey, on Nov. 14, 1912. (Photo by Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)

 

Follow Zach Paikin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@zpaikin

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:32 AM on 02/04/2013
We can all argue almost forever - 'pro this' and 'anti' that. Reality is that Kissinger and others have stated that Israel will cease to exist. We little people cannot fully understand what this means, but history has shown that the big boys get what they want and 'By Deception They Will Do War'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg YanickThompson
09:51 PM on 02/03/2013
ya for sure I could see Canada coming to poor south Africa,s defense when people were giving them a hard time over Apartheid !!! comparing the two makes apartheid look mild ! The action,s upon the civilian population of Palestinian,s is sick,immoral ,illegal and roundly condemned by the rest of the world , but Canada,s PM announces that Canada stands by radical Zionism is over the top and made me totally ashamed of my country,s government ..
02:05 PM on 02/04/2013
You're not paying attention. Israel's preeminent military status in the region has kept the peace for decades, although the current Arab social revolutions are posing a challenge. Keeping Egypt under management is key.

If Israel's hand on Palestinians is so brutal, how do you explain the polls in which only 30 percent of East Jerusalem Arabs would give up Israeli citizenship even if a Palestinian state were to come into being?

The international community may condemn Israel on a diplomatic level, at the UN, because of dependence on Arab oil. At the level of trade and commerce, Israel has very strong international relations and, by the way, there is no adjudication of Israeli illegality whatsoever. UN pronouncements are political not legal. The UN has no authority to adjudicate anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg YanickThompson
10:00 PM on 02/04/2013
dear blue I see your paying attention , its just what are you paying attention to has little relevance to the million or so civilians!!!! forced into the worlds biggest open air prison by a huge US supplied military ...WTF this is not about stupid politics,or your delusional idea that somehow Israel has kept the peace for decades ..just the opposite , like they just bombed Syria like a few days a go , that is an act of war , or you somehow want to believe the idea it was for peace , and for gods sake don't bring up them wanting despretly to stsrt world war 3 with Iran!!!! absolutely nuts (keeping the peace ) , ... And your statement that 30 % of Palestinians who have yet to be booted out of there homeland would not give up there citizenship,,, like freaking duhhh , the fact that its only 30 % says exactly the opposite , why would anybody want to go back to poverty and destitution which has been forced on the Palestinian,s in the first place !!! makes no sense especially with kids .. never mind how many kids have been murdered by the Israeli military enforcing there apartheid action,s .. apartheid was wrong and the whole world knew it , only this is more brutal and sociopathic !! wonder what you would spout if your kids were behind the wire !!! in there own land !!!!
02:26 PM on 03/02/2013
Geo-political interests are not the sole concern of Canadians. Canadians also want our government to stand up for basic human rights be it in Africa or the mid-east or anywhere else.

We are paying attention. It's obvious that Israel is not least bit interested in a two state or a one state solution. Their intent is to keep expanding their territory through settlements creating new "facts on the ground".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles the Great
Canadian/Israeli Goy in Alert,Nunavut
04:52 PM on 02/03/2013
Your right! Most when people say this is usually in far left wing politics who usually just make things as they go along. Also Canada has never been a neutral nation period! Many people are usually in La La Land when they think this.
04:36 PM on 02/03/2013
Keeping Israel militarily strong may have kept the ME stable with the dictators, some of whom were actively supported by the west, who were in power. It appears that the we were totally unprepared for the Arab Spring as we had and still don't have a Plan B to cope with the destabilization it has created. The link to The Sentry article in this post states that Obama was wrong to concentrate on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as the Arab countries biggest concern was Iran. However that was the view of the leaders not most of the people in those countries who are very angry about the Israeli occupation. don't see Iran as much of a threat and are in the midst of turfing their leaders out of power.

Stephen Harper may have gained political support within Canada by making Israel a wedge issue but it has also done enormous damage to Canada's reputation for being a fair minded nation. The author cites the recent condemnation of additional Israeli settlement building to suggest that Harper isn't a unilateral supporter of Israel. However Israel has continued building settlement homes for the 7 years Harper has been in power. and this is the first time he has condemned this practice and only after every other western nation had done so. As well Lawrence Cannon as Foreign Minister once stated that the settlements were illegal in a HOC committee meeting from which Harper immediately retreated.
07:38 AM on 02/04/2013
Canada is fair minded in supporting Israel. Canadian's support Israel's democracy over the Arab countries theocracies. Equal treatment for all in Israel. Persecution of religious minorities and women in Muslim countries. Human rights for all Israeli citizens. No human rights for anyone in Muslim countries. The Palestinians seek to create a Jew-free Palestinian state. Why would Canada support the creation of another Arab apartheid state in the ME? Twenty-one of these states is not enough for these liberals who support the Palestinians over Israel.
04:20 PM on 02/03/2013
This is the trouble......Every one is talking....no one is listening !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:27 PM on 02/03/2013
"The position of the Harper government is that Israeli settlements in the West Bank are illegal."

What one says and what one does are often two different things when dealing with controversial issues. I believe if Harper and Baird were honest, on this issue, we would not have the ambiguity in public opinion and you would not have raised the point.

"Israel is a state." Legally you are correct. Morally . . . now therein lies the right question of concern.

If you want a sober conversation about Israel, you have to at least pose the right questions.
06:17 AM on 02/04/2013
Israel existed as a country thousands of years before Canada and most other European states. Israel was not created in 1948, it was re-established in 1948 after 2,000 years of foreign occupation. True, It used to be a kingdom and today is a democracy. But so did England. And those "illegal" settlements are built on land which has had Jewish communities and cities for thousands of years. How can a Jewish town re-established on prior Jewish towns be suddenly considered illegal or immoral?
This comment has been removed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:38 AM on 02/04/2013
Reviving an historic story like this makes me respect Buddhism all the more. At least they believe in living your life in the present.

Perhaps we should go back to the Cenozoic Era.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gustav Hotch
Don't worry...be happy !
11:30 AM on 02/03/2013
There must be some reasons why people are using terms like ''anti-zionism'' anti-Israel'' The truth is that no one can trust Israel.Truth is that Israel has an enormous stockpile of nuke weapons ,atomic,WMD's,bio-chemical weapons and is denying Iran 's nuclear energy..Israel has ignored all UN resolutions concerning its WMD's .Things won't change but get worse since the extreme-right Beitenu party has joined the Likhoud.The settlers and ultra -orthodox want all Palestinians out of Israel.
06:19 AM on 02/04/2013
The reason terms like ''anti-zionism'' anti-Israel'' are used are because those who are anti Israel don't care about the fact or what Israel does. They hate Israel, period.
03:38 PM on 02/04/2013
Keep in mind that the world supported Israel in it's early years, before creation of the term Palestinian. "Palestinian" was not even used in UN Sec Council Resn's 242, 1967 or 338, 1973. It was after 1973 that the Arab states realized Israel could not be eliminated through military aggression and chose instead to use a diplomatic tack by creating entitlement for a new "Palestinian People." the West Bank was termed "Occupied Palestinian Territory" for the first time in UN Sec Council Res. 446, 1979, with no legal evidence adduced for Palestinian entitlement.

The "Palestinian" gambit was back up by the OPEC oil embargo of 1973. The west fell into line with this blackmail for the sake of Arab oil. That is when the world became "anti-Israel." It's hypocrisy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gustav Hotch
Don't worry...be happy !
07:14 PM on 02/04/2013
The word '''Palestine ''' is written in the Bible
09:09 AM on 02/03/2013
You either don't read or you don't have a clue of Canadian History in regard to how Israel was regarded as part of foreign policy by Canada before the Liberals began to change that. Yes, the change to this pro-Israeli position started with the Liberals. Canadians overwhelmingly dissaproved of both the Liberal and Conservative pro-Israeli stance change because we want to see our Country as a fair broker internationally. Your suggestion that Harper and his gang aren't over the top when it comes to Israel is plain bizarre given the facts on the table. If Findlay is looking to step back from Israel and be a fair broker interms of Canada's stance that is enough to get my vote for sure.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
06:38 PM on 02/06/2013
Don't pretend to speak for CANADIANS.

The gov't does that, they are elected to do so.

Your post is simply an opinion, and everyone has one.
10:01 PM on 02/06/2013
I don't pretend to speak for Canadians but lets be clear here past studies have shown that a majority of Canadians are oppossed to the stance on Israel taken by both the Liberal and Conservative Governments. The want neutrality and fairness not a pro-Israeli or anyone else stance from the Government and that used to be our position.