01/21/2014 04:08 EST | Updated 03/23/2014 05:59 EDT

Philippe Couillard releases Liberals' secular charter position

After months of delays and flip-flopping, Quebec Liberal Party Leader Philippe Couillard has released his party’s official position on the proposed secular charter.

His latest position is not a complete rejection of the charter which, if passed into law, would ban the wearing of overt religious symbols by public sector employees.

“For us, the religious neutrality of the State does not mean the neutrality of the people,” Couillard stated.

SPECIAL REPORT: CBC Montreal's coverage of the secular charter debate

He said Tuesday that he would support banning the chador, niqab and burqa for women who work in the public sector.

“We consider that the wearing of these three items of clothing by women is the instrumentalization of religion with the end goal of oppression and submission. We are applying this judgment,” Couillard said.

He said he knew that he and the Quebec Liberal Party were cast in a negative light over the past few months because he did not take a firm stand on the Parti Québécois’s secular charter.

"People criticized me for not moving quickly, but I wanted to take my time to study the issues and form my opinion and so I accepted the criticism," Couillard said in French.

“It’s not black and white like the PQ is telling you,” he continued.

He said he was against a ban on turbans, kippas and hijabs for most civil servants.  He said police officers and prison guards should be allowed to wear some religious garments, but it should be left to individual institutions to decide whether that’s appropriate.

“We have to respect the autonomy of organizations,” Couillard said.

He said there wasn’t a single police officer in Quebec who currently wears the turban, calling the discussion a debate on a “hypothetical situation.”

“He can ask to wear the turban. He has to justify why he’s making the request,” Couillard said.

Bernard Drainville, the PQ minister responsible for the secular charter, said the Liberals’ position was unnecessarily convoluted.

“I find that it’s a position that is ambiguous, that is confusing, that is complicated and that is not comprehensive,” Drainville said. “I’m having a lot of trouble following him.”

Drainville said religious neutrality of the State and that of its employees are part and parcel of the same thing.

“For a lot of people the State is the teacher, the policeman, the civil servant, the nurse, the educator. It’s all that,” he said.