Refugees who came to Canada over the past 30 years end up paying more income tax in this country than immigrant investors admitted under the now-defunct Immigrant Investor Program, critics say.
Ian Young, a South China Morning Post journalist based in Vancouver, crunched the numbers with data from Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
Only a small proportion of the immigrant investors who’ve come to Canada under the program since 1980 end up staying here, Young said, again relying on numbers from the federal government.
"After five years, only 39 per cent of investor immigrants declared any income. Not only that, those who did, their average incomes were very low,” he said in an interview with CBC’s The Current on Friday.
Not much Canadian income
They may have been millionaires, but they were earning very little money here in Canada. Immigrant investors declared about $18,000 to $25,000 of income annually, he said.
"Why? Either because they were living off existing wealth, or they weren’t declaring their [global] incomes," Young said.
By contrast, refugees to Canada start out earning about $17,500 a year and by the end of their first 10 years, 66 per cent of them are declaring an earned income.
Their annual earnings eventually reach a level closer to economic immigrants to Canada, in the $30,000 range, he said.
Canada’s immigrant investor program operated from 1980 until it was closed by the Harper government last year, bringing more than 180,000 people to Canada. Many in the early years were Hong Kong Chinese, but the more recent immigrants have been mainland Chinese.
There have been solid citizens who came out of the program, but some just return to their home country passport in hand, Young argues.
Young considers the program a failure, not least because there is little evidence of business formation in Canada from the influx of newcomers.
"If an immigrant investor already had a very successful business back in China, why would they shut that down and try to start afresh in Canada," he said.
He argues it amounted to a cash-for-passport program, without benefiting the Canadian economy.
Not much integration
Sharry Aiken, who teaches refugee law at Queen’s University, considers the program a failure for other reasons.
"The program failed in terms of fostering permanent attachment to Canada social cohesion, labour market integration, more broadly," she said.
In addition to the high rates of return migration, those from the investor immigrant program who stayed remain in ethnic enclaves and failed to get language skills, studies show, she said.
"Refugees that are actually employed, their incomes were on a par with economic immigrants, very much contradicting this notion that refugees are coming and acting as a drain for taxpayers and a drain on the Canadian economy," she said.
The new Immigrant Investor Venture Capital Pilot Program beginning this year could suffer from the same failure to integrate participants, she said.
The bar is set higher – immigrant investors must have $10 million net worth and invest at least $2 million in a venture capital fund, with little guarantee of return. That’s discouraged new applicants to the pilot, Young said, though the federal government hasn’t released how many applications it has received.
What happened to all the money?
Chris Ho, an immigration lawyer in Richmond, B.C., is also critical of the immigrant investor program, saying there’s been no public accounting of what happened to the millions those investors brought to Canada.
In the early days, immigrant investors were asked to sink $400,000 into a Canadian venture, but later the figure was raised to $800,000.
Ho said it’s “ridiculous” to say those immigrants are not an asset to Canada because they don’t pay much income tax here.
"Typically they would buy a house. They would spend a lot of money in fixing a house, buying a car, spending a lot of money consuming goods, stuff like that. All kinds of things that help the economy," Ho said.
"Look at the property taxes they pay every year on a house worth $1 million or $2 million."