Ryan Bird, a spokesman with the Toronto District School Board, said 34,762 elementary school students were absent on the first day of the campaign, which was largely organized through Facebook. That's more than double the 14,191 absences recorded last Monday.
At least one of the city's elementary schools had an absentee rate of more than 90 per cent, Bird said. Thorncliffe Park Public School was reporting that 1,220 of its 1,350 students were not in class, he said, adding that about 100 parents had turned up to stage a protest outside the building.
Thorncliffe Park, which serves students from Grades 1 to 5 in midtown Toronto, is widely recognized as having a large Muslim population.
Many of the objections to the updated curriculum have been mounted on religious grounds. Opponents have argued that the new program, which will teach students about concepts including gender identity, sexual orientation and masturbation, does not align with their values and is not appropriate for school-age children.
Sihu Yahaira, who has withdrawn her three children from school for the week, said gender issues are particularly at odds with her Christian faith.
"God created only two genders, and they want to teach that there's more than two genders. That's wrong," Yahaira said at a protest outside the provincial legislature. "For us, it's against our beliefs."
John Cassels, whose children attend elementary school in Georgina, Ont., feared the new curriculum will have a destructive influence on future generations.
"It will promote early sexualization of children. It will promote attitudes and behaviours that we find unacceptable," Cassels said of the new program. "We live in a democratic society. We just want our voice to be heard."
Curriculum supporters, however, contend the updated guidelines have brought Ontario in line with the rest of the provinces in Canada as well as several jurisdictions in the United States.
Alex McKay, Executive Director of the Sex Information and Education Council of Canada, says the only aspects of the curriculum that are not addressed in other provinces are conversations around consent and the dangers of sharing sexually explicit images electronically.
McKay says the curriculum is entirely age appropriate.
"For sexual health education to be effective, young people need to be armed with this information as they approach ages where a significant proportion of them will begin to become sexually active," McKay said. "Providing basic information...as kids are approaching puberty is developmentally appropriate."
Opposition efforts grew more vocal in recent weeks with the advent of a Facebook group called "Parents & Students on strike: one week no school." The group encouraged parents who oppose the curriculum to keep their kids at home in protest, even offering a letter template to explain their children's absence.
The Toronto District School Board said any absences related to the protest would be treated just like any other and students were responsible for catching up to any missed classwork.
At least one school board was expecting a spike in absences during the early days of the Facebook campaign.
Janet McDougald, chair of the Peel District School Board, said she thinks a "fair number" of parents will pull their kids from school for at least the first day of the week in the culturally diverse region just west of Toronto.
McDougald said opposition to the new curriculum has been largely founded on misinformation.
"There are people, for their own purposes that I can't predict what they are, but they have spread outrageous material in the community," she said. "Totally outrageous material, that in fact we're going to demonstrate how to masturbate, that children are going to have to show their private parts. I mean, that's just ridiculous."
Under the new curriculum, Grade 3 students will learn about same-sex relationships, kids in Grades 4 and up will learn more about the dangers of online bullying, while the perils of sexting will come in Grade 7.
Lessons about puberty will move from Grade 5 to Grade 4, while masturbation and "gender expression" are mentioned in the Grade 6 curriculum. Anal sex is part of the Grade 7 curriculum, in the context of choosing to abstain from or delay certain activities in order to avoid sexually transmitted infections.
Ontario parents also have the right to withdraw their children from aspects of the curriculum that they find objectionable.
Sex education has long been a hot-button issue in the United States, where some conservative jurisdictions have brought in abstinence-only sex-ed instruction, while others have programs similar or even more progressive than Ontario's. And even in the U.K. and countries like progressive Iceland, with curricula similar to Ontario's and other Canadian provinces, there is some opposition to evolving sex-education programs.
That's despite the fact that numerous Canadian and international studies have shown that fulsome sex-education programs have played a part in teens waiting longer to have sex, in increased contraceptive use and in reduced teen pregnancy rates.
A comprehensive 2011 U.S. study by Wellesley College also showed that programs like Ontario's are simply addressing questions that kids are already asking in a digital world where the information is at their fingertips.
_ With files from Allison Jones
Follow @mich_mcq on Twitter
Also on HuffPost