New Moving Video Proves Why Poverty Is Sexist

130 million girls around the world are currently not enrolled in school.

Poverty affects millions of people around the world — but women and girls are hit the hardest.

A moving new one-minute video by ONE, a campaigning and advocacy organization aiming to end extreme poverty and preventable disease, proves why.

While the topics of gender equality have been a hot topic for a number of years, "there’s nowhere on earth where women have the same opportunities as men," the group says — and it's a huge problem.

"We want this video to be a clear message that issues like child marriage and girls’ access to education MUST be included in the call for gender equality," ONE wrote on their blog.

"In Sub-Saharan Africa, girls without an education are five times more likely to to be married by the time they are 18," they later penned in the entry. "They are 7 per cent less likely to complete secondary education than boys, and are less likely to be given the opportunity to participate in, or contribute to, their countries’ economies."

According to ONE, 130 million girls around the world are currently not enrolled in school.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shared similar views last year when he made a statement saying poverty affects women and girls differently and declared that he will stand as a leader for the cause.

"As a feminist, I know that women must be treated equally everywhere," Trudeau said.

"Canada’s commitment to the Global Fund is the first step on a path toward a new global policy that prioritizes equal treatment of girls and women," he also said in the open letter. "Investing in health will enable girls and women to survive and flourish, including by making key contributions to ending extreme poverty for everyone."

Also on HuffPost

Cameron branded poverty a "moral disgrace"
Back in 2006, David Cameron said he felt poverty was an "economic waste" and a "moral disgrace". So what have the coalition done to stamp it out?
Child poverty will rise by 400,000 by 2020
According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the coalition's reforms will increase absolute poverty by 400,000 in 2020.
Most children in poverty are in working families
Two-thirds (66%) of children growing up in poverty live in a family where at least one member works, according to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) figures.
Child poverty was meant to be under control by 2020
And now the government is on track to miss its legally binding target by a massive margin of 2 million. This was made legally binding by the Child Poverty Act passed by Labour in March 2010 which set a series of targets to be met by 2020 including the reduction of absolute poverty reduced to less than 5% and a reduction of relative poverty.
How did Labour do?
Labour came to power in 1997 with just over a quarter of the UK's children - 3.4 million - living in poverty, according to the DWP. The figures went down to 2.7 million in the first two terms of Labour, jumping to 2.9 million in 2007/2008 as the banking crash hit, before slipping to 2.8 million the next year. They still had to admit to not hitting their 2010 targets on reducing child poverty.
Child poverty is worse here than in Slovenia
In a Unicef study of children's material well-being, measuring how little money and essentials they have, the UK came below other advanced economies like France and Austria.