11/24/2017 17:41 EST | Updated 11/24/2017 17:45 EST

We Can't Allow 2 Million Litres Of Pesticide To Be Dumped In B.C. Waters

The mechanism by which it affects sea lice is not clearly understood — how then can anyone guarantee it won't harm other organisms living in the environment?

Douglas Williams/The Canadian Press Images
Waves crash on the rocks on Flores Island, Clayoquot Sound, B.C.

A small ad appeared in Tofino's newspaper recently. It stated that Norwegian-based salmon farming giant Cermaq was applying to the B.C. Ministry of Environment for a permit to use Interox Paramove 50 to combat sea lice. A bit of searching on Cermaq's website revealed they're applying to deposit 2.3 million litres of pesticide — enough to fill an Olympic-sized swimming pool — into the pristine waters of the Clayoquot Sound UNESCO Biosphere Reserve over a three-year period.

The active ingredient of Paramove 50 is hydrogen peroxide, touted as being harmless — the stuff your mom used on cuts, right? Turns out that no — moms don't do that anymore because hydrogen peroxide is now thought to cause tissue damage because it can kill healthy cells.

Sea lice resistance plagues industry globally

Cermaq claims they need to use this chemical as an option to control sea lice. Sea lice outbreaks plague the salmon farming industry worldwide, and are known to impact wild salmon, with out-migrating wild smolts being particularly vulnerable to sea lice infestation. Sea lice are also a vector for transmitting disease from farmed fish to wild fish.

As with all other chemical treatments, resistance towards hydrogen peroxide is becoming a problem for salmon lice control. Friede Andersen, a section chief at the Norwegian Food Safety Authority stated that "widespread use of drugs is no future plan."

According to Fisheries and Oceans Canada, "hydrogen peroxide may affect the ultrastructure of the skin... (and) the composition of the mucous layer, making it easier for sea lice reattachment. Damage to the dermis from this treatment may also release... chemo-attractants causing sea lice to be overly 'attracted' to these fish."

Clearly chemical treatments of sea lice are not sustainable, and harm conservation values.

The chemical is known to harm farmed fish and may have caused a mass die-off, raising concerns over animal welfare.

Cermaq's pesticide use application indicates they would seine their farmed fish and place them in a tarped-off area or in a well boat. The fish would be immersed in the chemical bath for 30 minutes and returned to their net pen. The pesticide would then be diluted and released into the environment.

A ticking viral bomb?

This treatment is stressful to the farmed salmon, and weakens their immune system. It can take up to two weeks for the fish to recover, during which period they are susceptible to disease outbreaks.

Many B.C. farmed salmon carry the Norwegian Piscine reovirus (PRV). But when a fish is stressed, PRV can cause heart and skeletal muscle inflammation. A diseased farm can shed viral particles, which are spread far and wide by ocean currents. Because fish breath water directly through their gills, disease transfer from farmed to wild fish is dangerously easy.

Using Paramove 50 to combat sea lice could lead to an increased spread of disease from farmed to wild salmon.

Peroxide persists and harms organisms

Proponents claim that hydrogen peroxide quickly breaks down into water and air, causing no harm to the marine environment. However, pesticides are designed to optimize delivery, and according to a report from Fisheries and Oceans Canada, "may include solvents, surfactants, and stabilizers. The ingredients in the formulation will affect how the active compound behaves in the environment... Rapid degradation will occur... however... hydrogen peroxide can be an extremely persistent substance in the environment."

Colin McPherson/Corbis via Getty Images
A scientist removing a specimen of sea lice from a wild salmon captured at Strathy salmon netting station in Sutherland, Scotland.

Hydrogen peroxide is known to harm other marine organisms. For example, a University of Bergen study showed that hydrogen peroxide in small doses causes shrimp to die. In the same article, Bjorn Olav Kvamme, head of fish health group at the (Norwegian) Institute of Marine Research stated that while hydrogen peroxide does break down, "we thought that it happens faster than it actually does...the substance can spread faster by currents than we thought previously... (and) will probably primarily (affect) surface organisms and those living along the shoreline." Wild salmon, herring, and prawn and crab larvae all rear in shallow inshore waters.

Paramove 50 doesn't actually kill sea lice, it stuns them. They then get knocked off as farmed salmon bump into each other in crowded net pens. The mechanism by which this pesticide affects sea lice is not clearly understood — how then can anyone guarantee it won't harm other organisms living in the environment?

Permit must be denied

Cermaq states on their website they have "no immediate plans to use this treatment... but has applied to have the option of using it..." The Clayoquot Sound UNESCO Biosphere Reserve is meant to demonstrate a working balance between conservation and sustainable development. Clearly chemical treatments of sea lice are not sustainable, and harm conservation values. The only long-term solution to the industry's sea lice crisis is to remove open-net pen salmon farms from the ocean.

In the meantime, B.C. Environment Minister George Heyman must to do the right thing by denying Cermaq's permit to dump pesticides into the pristine waters of Clayoquot Sound UNESCO Biosphere Reserve.

Clayoquot Action has teamed up with SumOfUs to fight Cermaq's application. More than 25,000 people have signed a petition.

Dan Lewis is Executive Director of Clayoquot Action.

Also on HuffPost: