01/28/2020 12:19 EST | Updated 01/28/2020 12:22 EST

Failed Mark Norman Prosecution Cost Taxpayers $1.4M In Legal Costs

Justice Minister David Lametti revealed the figure in a response to Conservatives.

Sean Kilpatrick/CP
Retired Vice Admiral Mark Norman arrives to court with lawyer Marie Henein in Ottawa on May 8, 2019.

OTTAWA — The federal government rang up more than $1.4 million in legal costs during the failed prosecution of retired vice-admiral Mark Norman.

Revealed this week by Justice Minister David Lametti in a written response to a question from the official Opposition Conservatives, the figure is the first to put any kind of dollar amount to the high-profile and politically charged case.

Lametti did not provide any further details about the costs — including whether the figure included the cost of covering Norman’s legal fees, which the government has said it would pay.

Watch: Mark Norman affair needs public inquiry, Scheer says


“To the extent that the information that has been requested is protected by solicitor-client privilege, the federal Crown can only reveal the total legal costs related to the case,” Lametti wrote in response to the question from Conservative MP and leadership contender Erin O’Toole.

“Based on the hours recorded, the total amount of legal costs incurred amounts to approximately $1,425,389.68, as of Dec. 9, 2019.”

The minister also did not respond to the Conservatives’ question about how much the RCMP spent on the original investigation into allegations Norman leaked cabinet secrets about a $700-million federal shipbuilding contract.

That investigation prompted chief of the defence staff Gen. Jonathan Vance to suspend Norman as the military’s second-in-command in January 2017. The popular vice-admiral was charged with breach of trust in March 2018.

The Mounties and Crown prosecutors alleged Norman leaked information about the contract to pressure the newly minted Liberal government in 2015 to move ahead with the project to convert a civilian ship into a temporary support vessel for the navy, rather than cancel it.

Norman pleaded not guilty before his lawyers spent months in court fighting the Crown and government for access to thousands of documents they said were essential for ensuring their client received a fair trial.

Throughout the process, Norman’s lawyers alleged the case against their client was politically motivated and that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his government were interfering in it, a charge that was picked up by the Conservatives but which the Liberals denied.

Crown prosecutors eventually stayed the charge in May 2019, telling the judge that new evidence they’d received from Norman’s defence team had led them to conclude there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

Following the failed prosecution, Norman asserted that he wanted to return to duty. But he and the government instead reached a financial settlement, the details of which have not been made public, before the vice-admiral retired last year.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 28, 2020.

America Votes
The latest polls, breaking news and analysis on the U.S. election from HuffPost’s Washington, D.C. bureau