Several Republicans, including some of former President Donald Trump’s most ardent defenders, said they were confused and concerned by his lawyers’ rambling, unfocused opening salvos in Trump’s impeachment trial.
The Senate began hearing arguments on Tuesday over whether a president can be impeached after leaving office. While Democrats spent hours detailing, with explicit video and social media footage, Trump’s effort to support the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, Trump lawyer Bruce Castor offered a strange defense of his client that touched on free speech and the partisan nature of impeachments but rarely the constitutionality of doing so post-administration.
The tactic perplexed some Republicans.
“President Trump’s team was disorganized,” Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who voted with Democrats to uphold the constitutionality of the trial, said after the vote. “If I’m an impartial juror, and one side is doing a great job, and the other side is doing a terrible job on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror, I’m going to vote for the side that did the good job.”
“I thought the president’s lawyer, the first lawyer, just rambled on and on and on and didn’t really address the constitutional argument,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said. “I’ve seen a lot of lawyers and a lot of arguments and that was not one of the finest I’ve seen.”
“I was perplexed by the first attorney, who did not seem to make any arguments at all, which was an unusual approach to take,” said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who voted with Democrats.
“I was really stunned at the first attorney who presented for former President Trump,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who also voted with Democrats. “I couldn’t figure out where he was going … spent 45 minutes going somewhere, but I don’t think he helped us better understand where he was coming from on the constitutionality.”
“I don’t think the lawyers did the most effective job,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said, calling Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the Democrats’ lead impeachment manager, “impressive.”
Even Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a stalwart defender of Trump throughout his administration, said he “didn’t really know” where Castor was going.
Six Republicans and every Democrat voted shortly after the arguments to affirm the constitutionality of Trump’s impeachment trial, although the 56-44 tally bodes poorly for any effort to convict Trump, which will require 67 senators.
Castor told reporters shortly after the vote that he “thought we had a good day” and that he had no plans to make any changes to his trial strategy following the criticism.
“No, I set up the outline a week ago and it will not change,” he said.
David Schoen, another lawyer defending Trump, said on Tuesday that the trial would “tear the country in half,” accusing Democrats of using the process to further divide the nation.
“As a matter of policy,” he said, “it is wrong, as wrong can be for all of us as a nation.”
Trump himself was reportedly confused and frustrated by the defense. The New York Times reported he was “shocked” that Castor praised Democrats’ case in his early remarks. CNN echoed that reporting:
The trial began Tuesday with a harrowing video compilation of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, emphasizing Trump’s role fanning the flames of the deadly insurrection and his work to spread lies about the results of the 2020 election. Raskin said the then-president’s words amounted to the definition of a high crime and misdemeanor.
“If that’s not an impeachable offense, then there is no such thing,” he said. Raskin recounted his own experience last month, telling how he became separated from his family during the riot and that his daughter and son-in-law feared they were going to die.
“Then there was the sound that I will never forget: the sound of pounding on the door like a battering ram,” Raskin added. “The most haunting sound I ever heard and I will never forget it.”
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.