This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive.

We Need A Public Discussion About The Use Of Stingray Surveillance

For some time, Canadians have been calling for answers from the RCMP and other police forces across Canada about the use of these invasive cellphone surveillance devices. Stingrays enable wholesale monitoring of our most intimate moments, and undermine our privacy and security.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Hands holding smartphone in the dark.
Marco_Piunti via Getty Images
Hands holding smartphone in the dark.

It's no secret that OpenMedia is worried about the use of Stingrays.

Just weeks ago, we launched a new campaign to Stop Stingray Surveillance, and almost 30,000 people have already spoken up against invasive cellphone spying.

The campaign builds on our detailed policy intervention we filed last month with the B.C. Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, as a part of its investigation into the Vancouver Police Department's failure to respond to access to information requests on the potential use of Stingrays.

Well, now we're taking the fight national.

In December, OpenMedia raised concerns about the RCMP's potential use of Stingrays. In March, I filed an official complaint with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC), calling for an investigation. And now, it's happening -- OPC has launched a formal investigation into the potential use of Stingray surveillance devices.

Why did we file this complaint?

For some time, Canadians have been calling for answers from the RCMP and other police forces across Canada about the use of these invasive cellphone surveillance devices. Stingrays enable wholesale monitoring of our most intimate moments, and undermine our privacy and security.

We think it's time to bring these secretive surveillance tools into the spotlight.

We hope this investigation sheds light on the use of these devices, so that Canadians can have an open and transparent debate about whether their use can be justified in a democratic society. After all, police aren't allowed to bug your living room and listen in on your conversations without a warrant. Why should they be allowed to do the same on your phone?

Our cellphones contain some of our most personal moments and details. That's why Stingrays are such dangerous tools -- they can be used to invade the privacy of tens of thousands of Canadians at a time. I'm not saying there's never a time or place for them, but we can't even begin to have that conversation until we know that they're being used, or what those circumstances are.

We think it's time to bring these secretive surveillance tools into the spotlight. We need a public conversation.

Still not sure what a Stingray is, or why should you care?

Stingrays (aka IMSI-catchers) mimic cellphone towers and are designed to collect information from every cellphone in a given area, including geo-location and content data.

The devices are also capable of listening in on private phone conversations. People whose data is captured by a Stingray device receive no notification, and have no way of challenging the intrusion on their privacy. A number of police forces in the U.S., including the FBI and NYPD, have admitted to using Stingrays, but to date no Canadian police force has done so.

To learn more, check out our backgrounder: What the heck is a Stingray?

What can you do about it?

ACT NOW! Join the almost 30,000 concerned citizens who have already called for an end to Stingray surveillance at StopStingrays.org, a campaign launched by OpenMedia and over 30 other organizations around the world.

Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook

Close
This HuffPost Canada page is maintained as part of an online archive. If you have questions or concerns, please check our FAQ or contact support@huffpost.com.