No one can really agree on what it means to "cancel" someone.
It was recently discovered displays about LGBTQ history had been censored for some groups.
The museum's leadership apologized after posts from employees revealed they were asked to avoid showing the displays to some school groups.
Although an imperfect solution, museums have means to re-narrate these statues in ways which speak to their original intentions and our current concerns.
Canada's largest telco wants tougher new copyright laws written into NAFTA.
"If this was a political censorship decision, it is terrifying."
It is becoming increasingly popular - and effective - to impose security fees on student groups that seek to host a controversial speaker, or to express an unpopular view. By extorting those who seek only to exercise their legal rights, universities are blaming the victims and encouraging the bullies.
When Rebel Media sent out emails claiming that "Canada is on the verge of passing a law that would prohibit criticizing Islam" and that "If this motion passes, Canadians can be persecuted for expressing any criticism of Islam, even when warranted," I pointed out that M-103 is a motion, not a law, and that it will not change a single comma of existing speech legislation. Apparently, Prime Minister Trudeau disagrees.
Censorship always stems from the same impulse: the authorities are firmly convinced they have the absolute truth, and are therefore entitled to suppress what they deem to be false. A recent display of this censorship impulse occurred at the University of Alberta Law Faculty.
"Hypocrisy is the homage vice pays to virtue," goes the old saying. At Canadian public universities, hypocrisy threatens to destroy one of higher education's most cherished and long-standing virtues: the free exchange of ideas.