In the early-1950s, when it became widely known that smoking caused cancer, giant tobacco companies formed the Tobacco
Industry Research Council (TIRC). Its main goal was to deny the harmful effectsof tobacco and confuse the public.
The tobacco lobby wormed its way into the United Nations'World Health Organization (WHO), wreaking havoc and slowing the WHO's efforts to reduce the growing number of cancer deaths.
Realizing that the tobacco corporations were obstructing
progress, the WHO finally built a firewall between public health officials and industrylobbyists. Only then was it possible to better control tobacco.
Flash forward to Paris and the 21st annual UN Climate Conference, November 30 to December 11. The 190 participating countries are charged with trying to hold carbon
emissions to liveable limits between the years 2020 and 2030.
But -- just like when the tobacco lobby was powerful -- the fossilfuel lobby is strongly influencing decisions to be made in Paris.
Pointing to the struggling world economic situation, the
Fossil fuel corporations have spent billions of dollars over the years funding front organizations that mislead and confuse the public by claimingthat climate change is not serious threat.
But scientists say that the human race cannot continue to function in a near-normal way unless about 80 per cent of the remaining fossil
fuels are left in the ground.
The corporations oppose government regulations, and their
main goal is to have the marketplace determine the amount of carbon emissions.
However, public interest groups believe that industry will serve its own
interests for profits instead of prioritizing the reduction of carbon
The public interest group Corporate Europe Observatory,
located in Brussels, has compiled information on the agenda the corporations willbe pushing at COP21:
- Instead of governments taxing emitters -- a
simple and inexpensive system to operate -- corporations want to create a
world market where polluters and investors can buy and sell carbon
credits. They claim the system would help spur investments in low-carbon
energy. However, this system has worked poorly in Europe and is vulnerable
- The fossil fuel industry
wants governments and the public to acknowledge natural gas as a "clean
energy source." This would result in significant increases of fracking in
many parts of the world. It's true that gas, when burnt, has low
emissions, but the fracking process leaks methane into the atmosphere,
which is 80 times worse than carbon.
- The "net zero" proposal: Rather
than attempting to reduce emissions to zero, net zero means that some
emissions can keep rising. The industry says this would be offset in the
future via the removal of emissions from the atmosphere when yet-to-be developed
technologies make the removal possible.
- According to Shell, going to net
zero would allow them to keep burning fossil fuels for the rest of this
century. This would be balanced off by the -- so far -- theoretical removal of
carbon from the atmosphere at some point in the future.
While public interest groups will be kept mainly on the
sidelines, corporations are being allowed to hold at least 10 special events
for government officials. Names of some of the sessions: "The Future is Looking Up," "Energy
for Tomorrow" and "Business and Climate:
A positive revolution for companies?"
In addition, some of France's dirtiest corporations are official sponsors and donors for COP21. Included are nuclear and coal giants EDF, energy utility corporation Engie,coal-financing bank BNP Paribas and airline Air France.
Some of the very corporations
driving global warmingwill be represented in Paris.
Included will be Shell, BP, Volkswagen, Monsanto, Total, Dow Chemical,Monsanto, Syngenta, Nestles, McDonalds, Walmart and others.
Fossil fuel companies have not managed to get a much coveted
seat at the actual negotiating table during COP decision-making. But they are
lobbying so hard that they hope politicians will come up with pro-industrysolutions.
Meanwhile, a growing number of public interest groups wantthe fossil fuel lobby barred from the UN process.
NGOs have launched a campaign, Kick the Polluters Out, and
are planning demonstrations in Paris. Close to a half-million people signed theprotest document over a short period of time.
But, at the present time at least, it would be very difficultto get the fuel lobby organizations out of the climate change process.
they appear to be the proverbial tail wagging the dog. Christiana Figueres, head
of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), scolded those who
claim the fossil fuel industry is not part of the solution, telling them to"stop demonizing oil and gas companies."
In what critics consider a betrayal of the climate control
effort, after a few years inside the system, UN experts move over to the
private sector. According to the Corporate Europe Observatory, this revolvingdoor helps business to control the process in the COP process.
At the national level, because oil, coal and other fossil
fuel corporations are so wealthy and so important to national economies, corporations are able to intimidate governments from taking the best possible carbon
reduction pledges to Paris. Energy corporations are successful in compromisingthe policies of the U.S. government.
In October, the European Parliament expressed concern that
an early analysis of government pledges indicated the temperature would increasebetween 2.7 and 3.5 degrees Celsius. An increase within this range would be disastrous for humankind.
The European Parliament has now called on governments to
agree in Paris to revise the projections downward before 2020 to keep theincrease to two degrees Celsius, which is the target recommended by scientists.
Follow Nick's blog - A Different Point of View
MORE ON HUFFPOST: