Ethical Oil: Campaign Seeks To Rebrand Canada's Oil Sands

First Posted: 08/04/11 10:09 AM ET   Updated: 10/04/11 06:12 AM ET

Ezra Levant can pinpoint the precise moment he decided that the Alberta oil sands needed an image makeover.

While attending a writer’s conference in Ottawa in 2009 to promote his book Shakedown, the conservative pundit agreed at the last minute to participate in a panel on the oil sands -- and says it became immediately apparent that he was the designated “punching bag” in the discussion.

“If anything, I made the people in that room angrier, and that confused me at first, because I think I’m a persuasive person,” Levant, who now hosts Sun News Network’s The Source, told HuffPost Canada. “I reflected on that failure, and I realized that I was using a vocabulary that defeated me. I was not speaking in a way that respected the values of my audience.”

So Levant, who describes himself as a “right-wing guy from Alberta,” started trying to think like those on the opposite end of the political spectrum. The result was the birth of “ethical oil” -- and a rebranding campaign that is increasingly gaining traction.

Since Levant’s book by the same title was published last September, the term “ethical oil” has become the centrepiece of a new application for a classic marketing strategy. After being added to the Conservative political lexicon, the slogan is slowly beginning to creep into the public discourse. And like other attempts by industry and advocacy groups to use value judgments to alter public opinion, it has the potential to change the way we think about Canadian oil.

SIX MEMORABLE MARKETING REBRANDING CAMPAIGNS


Story continues below

Loading Slideshow...
  • 'Ethical oil'

    The term "ethical oil" has become the centrepiece of a new application for a classic marketing strategy. After being added to the Conservative political lexicon, the slogan is slowly beginning to creep into the public discourse. And like other attempts by industry and advocacy groups to use value judgements to alter public opinion, it has the potential to change the way we think about Canadian oil.

  • Ethical Oil vs Conflict Oil

    Share this video with your friends and family.

  • Ethical Oil

    An ad from <a href="http://www.ethicaloil.org/" target="_hplink">ethicaloil.org</a>, a new site trying to rebrand Alberta's oil sands.

  • Ethical Oil

    An ad from <a href="http://www.ethicaloil.org/" target="_hplink">ethicaloil.org</a>, a new site trying to rebrand Alberta's oil sands.

  • 'Pork. The other white meat'

    In 1987, pork producers in the United States were steadily losing ground to chicken and turkey, which prompted the National Pork Producers Council to take a different tack. To counter the still-widespread belief that pork was a red meat, The New York Times reports that the council set out to appeal to health-conscious consumers by reminding them that pork was in fact <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1987/01/15/business/advertising-dressing-pork-for-success.html" target="_hplink">considered a white meat</a>. The series of print and TV ads that followed featured pork prepared in ways that had been traditionally been reserved for poultry, such as cordon bleu and cacciatore a l'orange, as well as a new slogan: "Pork. The other white meat." (After nearly 25 years, the council recently changed its well-known catch phrase to "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/04/pork-be-inspired-slogan-other-white-meat_n_831331.html" target="_hplink">Pork: Be inspired</a>.") (AP File Photo)

  • Pork Commercial

    Pork, the other white meat.

  • 'Fair trade coffee'

    Though tracing the precise history of the fair trade movement is difficult, most observers agree that the concept was popularized by its application to the coffee industry. The <a href="http://www.maxhavelaar.nl/faq/how-did-it-start?destination=english&backtitle=FAQ's" target="_hplink">first official fair trade label</a> was launched by a Dutch NGO, which imported the pioneering fair trade product -- coffee from Mexico -- to the Netherlands in 1988. Billed as an effort to secure better prices for producers, and guarantee certain environmental and labour standards, the demand for fair trade coffee quickly spread. But it's still a niche item that carries a premium: as The Toronto Star pointed out in 2007, only a small percentage of the java bought by coffee-giant Starbucks is <a href="http://www.thestar.com/living/article/250730" target="_hplink">fairly traded</a>. (Photo: Getty Images)

  • Starbucks is the largest purchaser of Fair Trade Coffee

    Full of rich bodied flavor and great respect for the farmers who grew it. Caf

  • 'Clean coal'

    The notion of coal as a clean source of energy was thrust into the spotlight in the United States in 2008, when a $40-million industry-sponsored campaign helped make it a talking point during the presidential race. An attempt to counter the public perception of coal as an acid rain-causing, environmental scourge, Businessweek observed that the <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_26/b4090055452749.htm" target="_hplink">"clean coal" campaign</a> tugged at the heartstrings with emotional TV ads featuring teachers and farmers -- and won the endorsement of both presidential candidates. (AP Photo)

  • Clean Coal Ad

    Political

  • 'Blood diamond'

    The recognition in the late 1990s that diamonds were being used to fuel bloody conflicts in African countries like Angola and Sierra Leone prompted the United Nations Security Council to find some way to track the movement of the precious stones. The resulting identification scheme, dubbed the <a href="http://www.globalwitness.org/campaigns/conflict/conflict-diamonds/kimberley-process" target="_hplink">Kimberley Process</a>, was put in place in 2003 to separate so-called blood or conflict diamonds from those used to fund legitimate governments. Though the process remains imperfect, the terminology was cemented in the minds of the general public, and soon found its way into popular culture: Edward Zwick's 2006 film Blood Diamond grossed more than US$171 million. (AP Photo)

  • Blood Diamond - Trailer

    Trailer for the movie 'Blood Diamond'

  • 'Dolphin-safe tuna'

    Dolphins tend to stick close to the surface, making them easy to spot, and easy prey for fisherman angling to catch tuna, which often swim alongside the large mammals. Despite several attempts by the United States government to limit the killing of dolphins by U.S. fishing boats, by 1990 the practice of purposefully ensnaring <a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer793/aer793f.pdf" target="_hplink">dolphins in tuna nets</a> became so widespread -- and so highly publicized -- that it had prompted a public boycott of canned tuna. In response, Congress instituted a consumer labelling program, and canneries that bought from fisherman that steered clear of dolphins started identifying their product as "Dolphin safe." Though the designation initially carried a premium, the program soon spread throughout the industry, making the additional cost worthwhile. (AP Photo)

According to Darren Barefoot of the Vancouver-based Internet market research firm Capulet Communications, the effort to popularize ethical oil is an attempt to win the all-important war of words.

“In any debate, various parties attempt to establish the lead position in [a consumer’s] mind,” he says. “To own that kind of vibe by setting the language of the conversation, you have a huge advantage.”

As such, Levant’s attempt to popularize “ethical oil” seeks to change the very nature of the conversation.

As Levant explains, rather than countering traditional anti-oil sands arguments, which he says typically compare Alberta oil to some kind of “fantasy fuel that hasn’t been invented yet,” he has endeavoured to position Canadian oil as the ethical alternative to the so-called “conflict oil” he says is produced in countries like Venezuela and Saudi Arabia.

“It’s a reminder that Canada, we’re the boy scouts of the world. We’re the gentlest country of the world, but the world is full of bastards,” he says.

And according to Mike Mulvey, an associate marketing professor at the University of Ottawa’s Telfer School of Management, it’s also a tried-and-true marketing tactic.

“Strategically, the use of ethical distinctions attempt[s] to [persuade] customers to do business with you rather than competitors,” Mulvey told The Huffington Post Canada in an e-mail.

Mulvey puts ethical oil in the same category as campaigns like “clean coal” and “fair-trade coffee,” in which producers “attempt to create distinctions to establish differences in previously uniform, undifferentiated product categories.”

This ethical distinction has been made clearer still in recent days with a series of hard-hitting ads published on EthicalOil.org, the blog Levant established to promote his oil sands book.

Designed by Alykhan Velshi, the former Conservative communications staffer who has been running the blog since early June, the ads use stark imagery to position ethical oil as the alternative to “forced labour,” “persecution” and “women stoned to death.”

As Velshi sees it, the blog, which features posts that take aim at anti-oil sands arguments, and includes a Paypal button for donations, is very much a “grassroots effort.”

“I would like EthicalOil.org to be a kind of pro-oil sands version of Greenpeace -- sort of the Greenpeace of the other side,” explains Velshi, who says he would like to forward the cause with “publicity stunts” and billboards.

But according to Barefoot, establishing real grassroots credentials -- the key to truly influencing public opinion -- is easier said than done.

“I don’t think they’ve got a message that’s resonating with millions of Canadians yet. Maybe it will, but they’re not there yet,” he says.

In the meantime, however, the campaign does appear to be making strides.

After receiving the tacit endorsement of Environment Minister Peter Kent and Prime Minister Stephen Harper (in January, both described Canadian oil as “ethical”), the online ads have vaulted “ethical oil” into the headlines of media outlets across the country.

“Its rhetoric is crude, and its visuals derivative...but EthicalOil.org’s campaign is an effective and overdue response to the grossly distorted slurs,” asserted The Globe and Mail in a recent editorial. “EthicalOil.org’s ads should be viewed for what they are: a welcome effort to level the field.”

All of which suggests that when it comes to winning over hearts and minds, a solid catch phrase never hurts.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article incorrectly identified the Telfer School of Management at the University of Ottawa as the "Tefler School of Management." The Huffington Post regrets the error.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Ezra Levant can pinpoint the precise moment he decided that the Alberta oil sands needed an image makeover. While attending a writer’s conference in Ottawa in 2009 to promote his book Shakedown, ...
Ezra Levant can pinpoint the precise moment he decided that the Alberta oil sands needed an image makeover. While attending a writer’s conference in Ottawa in 2009 to promote his book Shakedown, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 193
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
08:56 PM on 08/07/2011
Seriously? Does the Huff Post not know who Erza Levant is?! He's a very far-right reactionary puppet of big oil, corporatism, the Con Harper gov't, & all things essentially Tea Party. No one - absolutely no one takes him seriously in Canada. He's like never-ending high-pitched background noise. Whoever this reporter is, she completely missed the boat on this one. We call it "Deathical Oil" when referring to the Tar Sands here. Just really bad piece overall. And obviously paid for the the Oil Sands (Tar Sands) rich lobby group.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
swlewis57
Working class, and proud of it.
09:45 AM on 08/07/2011
Hello, Canada folks! Greetings from Oklahoma City, USA.

So, you guy up there like that sand oil stuff, or not? I've been trying to understand the issue from both sides to get a good overview of the subject. It's already looking like it's not a very eco friendly process, but I could be wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenCanadian
is mixing the new record
01:14 PM on 08/07/2011
Canada does not include the emissions from the tar sands in our carbon report to the UN. It's like Bush not including the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in his budget reports, but the Teapublicans get angry at Obama when he does and the deficit he reports is larger.........

It's conservative dishonesty on display at it's most naked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stupert
07:27 PM on 08/07/2011
http://www.oilsands.alberta.ca/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenCanadian
is mixing the new record
10:51 AM on 08/06/2011
Levant is a SUN host. Of course he thinks that rebranding is all that is needed, that's all his owners tell him is needed.

It's not news, it's SUN media
08:08 PM on 08/05/2011
Rachel I think it would be fair to outline Levant's connections as well as his opinions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stupert
04:13 PM on 08/05/2011
Really, I think it is to understand the argument Levant is making before denying it.

- the premise is we are stuck with oil until a viable replacement is found
-So the question is, does it matter if our supplier shares a common attitude to human rights, rule of law etc.
- Looking at major oil producers: Saudi - sponsors of terrorism, misogynist country where women are forbidden to drive, a dictatorship whose leaders loot the Treasury and let the rest rot; Iran - a nuclear-ambitioned theocracy with no respect for human rights, supporter of terrorism; Nigeria - a corrupt and civil-war ridden kleptocracy with a horrendous environmental record (spills etc. - Gulf of Mexico every couple of years); Sudan - genocidal dictatorship; Yemen - see Saudi; Venezuela - a leftist dictatorship that squandered years of oil wealth poking the US rather than improving the well-being of its citizens; or Canada - a liberal democracy with rule of law, equal rights, environmental standards that are actually enforced, no state ownership of oil so when something goes awry the offender is actually liable and accountable. A country full of people who don't sponsor terrorism or harbour any ambition to otherwise threaten the US/world and whose only real offense in the last decade has been Celine Dion. So, why give money to people that don't share your values and likely want to hurt you? It's not about whether oil is ethical - it's a commodity. It's whether your supplier is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenCanadian
is mixing the new record
10:48 AM on 08/06/2011
The points you make have very big flaws.

-Oil companies are taking $1 billion in subsidies from Canadians that could be invested in alternatives. We don't have a government willing to do away with those subsidies, or reallocate them in the right direction.
-Venezuela's elections are monitored and certified as free and fair. In the referendum on presidential terms Chavez lost his bid to extend his term and did not dispute it. Calling someone a dictator in spite of the facts is willful i-g-norance.
-Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, Sudan, and Yemen you are correct, so why do we allow the companies who do business with those countries to do business in Canada? And why do we allow individuals who have been in business with the Saudi Royal family for decades free passage to speak in Canada? The Saudi Royals are known sponsors of extrem-ists, and the Bush family have been in business with them for decades.
-Celine Dion, 100% correct.
-The bitumen being found in the Bow river in southern Alberta is from northern Alberta. This is evidence of the contamination of the water table. Yet no environmental standard has been violated seriously enough to result in a suspension or stop to an oil companies activities. Which is to say that Alberta's environmental standards are a joke. The conservatives in Alberta have charged royalty rates so low that there was in 2010 a $14.15 billion deficit in provincial coffers for the cleanup of tailing ponds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stupert
11:51 PM on 08/06/2011
- Oil companies receive favorable tax treatment on depreciating finding and development costs. Oil sands companies that are mining oriented receive accelerated CCA as do all mining companies. When netted with royalties and taxes, oil companies pay more than their fair share relatiove to any business in Canada
- Chavez controls media, money and energy sector - just because a vote is monitored, doesn't mean the winner hasn't gamed the result
- Saudi point - first is agreed, rest is screed
- Celine - duh
- Bow River flows from the Bow Glacier near Lake Lousie through Calgary to Lethbridge - Calgary is 500 miles from Fort Mac. I live in Calgar y and work in energy, I think I would have heard if some bitumen had mysteriously wound up in a shallow waterway tow days drive from the oil sands.
- Royalty rates in Alberta are the highest in Canada.
04:09 PM on 08/05/2011
I prefer to get my oil from a source that does not spill the blood of its populace as cleaning up that blood can be messy you know. however after rerading the comments I have come to the conclusion that it should be mentioned that Aboriginal Canadians have blood too!! I think it might have a higher % of cancer cells in it around the tar sands but ethically speaking there is no blood being spilt. I know lets us evangelical christians go into their communities and tell them they need a new God. See now all of oru conciences can be at rest as we tried. And those american corporations can just hop on their private jets and go to Aspen skiing or to their mansions back home and say to themselves there is no pollution here what the HELL is the fuss all about. I know its that damn liberal CBC. We gotta get rid of it when I get back to Canada.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PortlandZoo
Wait... what?
04:48 PM on 08/07/2011
wut?
02:40 PM on 08/05/2011
More moral governments don't need to obfuscate the truth from it's population. I am quite ashamed of this government. I yearn for the days of 'Hinterlands Who's Who's" Or "Heritage Moments" on ASN.

At least we could be proud and not feeling like we're selling ourselves out.
photo
Peter Sharma III
See clean energy's future Google revolutionswind
01:26 PM on 08/05/2011
There is no such thing as Ethical Oil or Clean Coal. These are definitive oxymorons and their promoters and adherents are cons and scamsters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mheister
Raconteur. Blog michaelheister.com
10:22 AM on 08/05/2011
That ethical oil video should have used a still from a Dudley Do-Right cartoon for "Canadian Law Enforcement".
06:59 AM on 08/05/2011
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith
schatsie
Wall Street is Worse than Vegas
07:24 AM on 08/05/2011
Read The Big Con....that is exactly what the Cons do, put lipstick on a pig.......and that is exactly what has happened here for the last 30 years while the right has GUTTED the middle class....of pensions, job security, financial security etc....it is not just by chance that over 5 milllion families have gone bankrupt or lost their homes in the last 5 years.....It is due to loss of a spouse, loss of a job, or loss of health....and that is after the Cons have elimininated pensions for the middle class and union rights...while the Rich take home 1 million dollar a year pensions while they are gutting the pilots.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenCanadian
is mixing the new record
02:55 PM on 08/07/2011
I live in Harper's riding and that describes his supporters en masse. They contrive an analysis to fit their ideology and obfuscate everything that pokes holes in it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PortlandZoo
Wait... what?
04:50 PM on 08/07/2011
you have my deepest sympathies... I can loan you a paper bag and some doggy doo doo...
01:26 AM on 08/05/2011
Does "ethical oil" mean "white" or "protestant"? Let's see, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela are apparently in some kind of conflict, so they produce conflict oil. Apparently both our allies and our critics are unethical. Being dark-skinned seems to be a good indicator that a country is unethical, but south americans seem to be with the unethical crowd. This is confusing. Would oil from South Sudan be ethical? There IS some conflict there, but they're protestants. Also black. What we need is a complete list of ethical and unethical countries.

It shows a lack of confidence in the ability of the industry to reduce its impacts that they would spend their efforts on changing the image of the industry rather than its environmental performance.
schatsie
Wall Street is Worse than Vegas
07:27 AM on 08/05/2011
Don't be silly, they have the ability to do anything, watch Lewis Black's skit about the cell phone..... They KNOW it is CHEAPER (more profits) to blackwash and lie to people.....why do you think there is still that lousy mercury in the multidose immunization vials....it is because it is cheaper to lie than to modify the production operations....
01:22 AM on 08/05/2011
Ethical oil is an oxymoron. And the Athabasca Tar Sands are the least ethical of all the oil. The tar ssands have become the great shame of Canada. The Taliban seem saintly and the Nazis could have been worse. People should remember Goebels way of persuading the Germens to do what they did was to lie and lie some more and lie again til people accepted the madness of the Nazis. And given that the tar sands are being "rebranded" it would seem the oil companies and the Harper government have learne the lesson the Nazis taught the world. Some people have read 1984 and they know war is not peace and the tar sands are evil. How ironic that Harper thinks he is a Christian. He is a whited sepucjher. So white without. a rotted corpsee within.
03:11 AM on 08/05/2011
Beautifully put.
Very poetic.
Just!
schatsie
Wall Street is Worse than Vegas
07:29 AM on 08/05/2011
Wow, you really hit the nail on the head....Read The Big Con and it will make you spitting mad. F&F
photo
Semprini
Stamp out and abolish redundancy
12:43 AM on 08/05/2011
Ezra LeRant is just a wannabe Glenn Beck. Lots of theatrics, biased guests and playing fast and loose with facts are the foundations of his show, just like Beck's Fox nonsense.

I tune in to Sun quite regularly to see what they are up to, and I am constantly amazed at the endless manufactured outrage and blatant attempts at ginning up a culture war with the "left". That and the constant juvenile slagging of the CBC, calling it the "state broadcaster" as if it were Tass...and I see they are giving the perpetually offended Michael Coren a show so that he can whine about the decline religion and morality in Canada.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PortlandZoo
Wait... what?
04:52 PM on 08/07/2011
"ezra leRant" LOL - perfect
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:58 PM on 08/04/2011
Why don't you ask the Native People what they think about your destroying their land and poisoning their water you smug parasite?

"War is Peace" -- The spirit of "1984" lives on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
10:24 PM on 08/04/2011
“If anything, I made the people in that room angrier, and that confused me at first, because I think I’m a persuasive person,” so you admit that your good at convincing people, probably bending or distorting truths and facts, while using fallacies and straw man arguments to distract people. thats why these people got angry. they knew you were going to lie and felt offended.