Canadian Navy, Air Force 'Royal' Again With Official Name Change

Royal Canadian Navy Name Change Air Force

The Huffington Post Canada   First Posted: 08/15/2011 1:45 pm Updated: 02/ 6/2012 12:46 pm

Canada’s navy and air force will get a royal name change Tuesday, The Huffington Post Canada has learned.

The Conservative government plans to announce that Maritime Command and Air Command, the official names of the two Canadian Forces' units, will be returned to Royal Canadian Navy and Royal Canadian Air Force, monikers last used in 1968. Simultaneous announcements on the name change are planned for Tuesday in Halifax, Kingston, Valcartier, Que., Cold Lake, Alta., and Esquimalt, B.C.

The Canadian army, which is officially called Land Force Command, will also be renamed simply Canadian Army.

The change is mostly symbolic and won’t affect how the Canadian Forces are run.

“The reason is to restore the historic identities of the Canadian armed forces that were lost in (19)68,” an official said.

In 1968, the Royal Canadian Navy, the Royal Canadian Air Force and the Canadian Army ceased to exist when they were unified through the Canadian Forces Reorganization Act — a move designed to improve the military’s effectiveness.

Tuesday’s name change won’t affect the unification of the forces and is expected to be “low-cost.”

The “plan is not to go out and repaint stuff,” one source said, although badges on uniforms may be changed.

The Canadian navy and the air force are currently using logos on their websites that are officially “unauthorized” but meant to brand themselves in recognizable terms to most Canadians.

This announcement will force the use of the word “royal” — to which some in the Canadian Forces have been adamantly opposed.

However, more 6,000 people, including many members of the military, veterans, and several high-profile Conservatives, have signed an online petition titled “restore the honour,” an initiative to give the royal designation to the navy and the air force in time for the Queen's diamond jubilee next year.

Robert Finch, the chairman of the Monarchist League of Canada told Huffington Post Canada he was “absolutely thrilled” about the news.

"From a monarchist perspective it is always good to see the visibility of the crown restored … for me, it underlines the fact that the military is non-partisan and that the Queen is the commander-in-chief of the military."

Last December, the Senate passed a motion calling on the government to rename Maritime Command something with the word “navy” after former Liberal Sen. Bill Rompkey brought forward a petition to change the name officially to "Canadian Navy."

Websites bearing the new logos are expected to launch Tuesday.

Finch said he believes that this federal government’s decision has more to do with restoring the military’s history than reinforcing links to the monarchy.

“It is certainly a part of it (but) I don’t see this as being on the same level as royal family visits or the diamond jubilee.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 279
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
05:36 PM on 08/21/2011
Good, it sounds cooler. "Canadian Forces" always sounded lame in comparison to Royal Canadian Air Force. I don't know why so many people are so bitterly opposed to anything British - that's a very American attitude.....
08:33 PM on 08/19/2011
And people actually think that we are a country free of ties to the crown. Ha! Right, that's why we have busts of the queen in every government building in Canada. Why don't we just change the name of Canada to 'Her Majesty's Royal Commonwealth of Canada'. Makes no difference, it might as well be.
yukoner1
Living way up the left coast.
07:22 PM on 08/19/2011
Can someone tell me the name of the idiot who thought this was a good idea? Probably the same moron who thought borrowing 16 billion for fighter jets we will never need, nor use in combat was a great idea.
08:15 AM on 08/19/2011
The idiocy of the Cons never fails to amaze.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cananna
I like trees and bunnies.
12:27 AM on 08/18/2011
Well after speaking to my mom tonight, we decided that my late dad (eternal father) had one good thing to say about tri-services.
My dad was on ships during the transition, and the ugly green pants were far better for being on deck.
Apparently, the wind and salt water would whip up the bell b
08:16 AM on 08/16/2011
This is an Absolutely fantastic Idea, the forces should of never been amalgamated in 1968 and Canada should never have elected any of the liberal governments from the 1960's to the present.

To the people who say the french do noit like this they are mistaken I am a Canadain first and a frenchmen second so I have no qualms with pandering to the British Monarchy as Canada was once a British enclave as well a french. Royal Canadian Navy and the Royal Canadian Air Force are two names that are very good to hear once again. also another reason why I like this move, it annoys the liberal and NDP supporters.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jon Jony
03:47 AM on 08/16/2011
Bad idea. It is better for national unity to allow Canada to have its own identity rather than associate it with the British monarchy.

Many French Canadians in Quebec would certainly embrace a more unique all Canadian identity (and it would be good overall for Canadian unity and the nations sense of self).
06:17 PM on 08/16/2011
The names are historical, but also are awards for loyal service and valour in the field. The vast majority of serving and former members of the armed forces have wanted this change for years. If what you said had any truth to it, we should have disbanded the RCMP years ago!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jon Jony
06:36 PM on 08/16/2011
Precedent is really not always a good argument and idea with regard to future policy. Bringing back the name after 4 decades (as if nothing has changed in Canada) is totally ignoring the direction of the country over this period of time; the sentiment of the population towards growing independece of its institutions and a general self awareness and metamorphisis into its own unique place with its own institutions - and without a need to rely on the British crown for such associations.

The question is and should be: Does it reflect the will of most Canadians. Poll after poll indicates a weaker association in the minds of most Canadians with the monarchy... Whether good or bad; this is the reality.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jon Jony
06:42 PM on 08/16/2011
The other important question on the direction of the country in this respect should focus on the need for national unity.

Does a change like this actually help make all Canadians comfortable and bring all within all provinces (ie Quebec) into a feeling of belonging to not only the countries past - but its future as well.

This is a crucial question as well.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
12:56 AM on 08/16/2011
If the Conservatives want to revive something of value from the past perhaps they should attempt to revive Avro Aircraft Limited, that way we would not have to go cap in hand to the US to pay inflated prices for Amurrican crap fighters. And since it was Dief the Dope who cancelled the Arrow program and destroyed Canada's high tech aerodynamics industry, sending Canadian Engineers off to labour camps at NASA, it would be poetic justice as well.
06:23 PM on 08/16/2011
I have to agree with the loss of the Avro Arrow and the aerospace industry in Canada, but since the liberals did close to the same with the EH-101 program... the serving and former members of the armed forces wanted to revive those honourable titles. Those whom serve and die for our country. Not for your political amusement.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
01:03 AM on 08/17/2011
Oh was there a poll taken of Forces Members? Have a link for that or are you just blowing smoke out your a...?
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
01:09 AM on 08/17/2011
And by the way, the EH-101 was an Anglo-Italian designed Helicopter being manufactured in Britain, the only connection to Canada was Canada's intent to purchase them. Your contention that there was some similarity with AA is hilariously bogus.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
freddychef
what the heck is this??????????
11:05 PM on 08/15/2011
RCA
Royal
CANADIAN
Artillery

UBIQUE
QUE FAS ET GLORIA DUCUNT
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bec DeCorbeau
Le langage de l'invisible est le silence
09:32 PM on 08/15/2011
If this can give the canadians teabaggers reassurances on their origin, why not and who cares what the army is called.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimonLeigh
08:50 PM on 08/15/2011
Royal sounds good, but why have the planes on an aircraft carrier working for a different force than the ship's crew, the navy? And any troops onboard working for a different service? Why not combine them, as any good organiser would, and call them, say, the Royal Armed Services?
08:52 PM on 08/15/2011
When did Canada get an aircraft carrier again?

And the Forces remain organized as a collective under the DND. This is a symbolic change, not a reversion of the CF unification.
photo
hculliton
Match bearings and shoot!
08:53 PM on 08/15/2011
We tried integration in the 60's & 70's. it was a complete failure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
06:41 AM on 08/16/2011
No, that was UNIFICATION. Integration had been going on for years, ie. having the same stock number for a particular item in the stores system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
11:04 AM on 08/16/2011
And you were an OFFICER?
07:58 PM on 08/15/2011
Tabarnac. C'est le temps qu'on décâlice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bec DeCorbeau
Le langage de l'invisible est le silence
10:23 PM on 08/15/2011
Harpeur s'occupe de nous le faire réaliser.
07:53 PM on 08/15/2011
i dont have a problem with traditionalists ------""monarcists"" dont turn my crank
07:39 PM on 08/15/2011
"The era of manned airplanes should be seen as over," says Michael O'Hanlon, a defense policy expert at the Brookings Institution. "The problem is nobody wants to give up the previously agreed on platform."

harper has 20 billion that says you are wrong
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
12:58 AM on 08/16/2011
And he is going to give it to Americans no matter how inflated the cost becomes.
07:10 PM on 08/15/2011
For those saying that the unification had absolutely anythig to do ith Trudeau, learn some Canadian history. Unification was bought abot through The Canadian Forces Reorganization Act, introduced to Parliament in 1966 by Paul Hellyer and PM Lester B Pearson. It passed, with cross aisle suport in April 1967, and came into effect on February 1, 1968.

Pierre Trudeau became Prime Minister almost three months AFTER unification came into effect (he took the office on April 20, 1968).