'Ethical Oil' TV Ads Re-Brand Canada Oil Sands On Oprah Winfrey Network

First Posted: 08/29/11 12:12 AM ET Updated: 10/28/11 06:12 AM ET

A campaign designed to re-brand Canada’s oil sands as an ethical alternative to fuel from states with questionable human rights records was scheduled to take to the airwaves Sunday, with the first of a handful of television spots appearing on the Oprah Winfrey Network.

The 30-second advertisement suggests North Americans, through the purchase of more than 400 million barrels of oil from Saudi Arabia last year, helped bankroll a state that doesn’t allow women to drive, doesn’t allow women to leave their home without a male guardian, and believes a woman’s testimony in court is only worth half as much as a man’s.

“Why are we paying their bills and funding their oppression?” a woman’s voice asks viewers.

EthicalOil.org’s Alykhan Velshi, a former communications director with the Conservative government, told The Huffington Post Canada that the “public information ad” will run exclusively on the Oprah Winfrey Network in Canada for a week.

“The Oprah network's programming - which includes lifestyle issues affecting women, women's health, and entertainment - in my view fits nicely with a campaign promoting Canada's oil sands as an ethical alternative to misogynist conflict oil from regimes like Saudi Arabia,” Velshi said.

Greenpeace’s Tar Sands campaigner Mike Hudema said Velshi is mounting a “very appealing argument” and "dangerous" defence of the environmentally destructive oil sands by framing energy purchases as a choice between supporting a liberal democracy such as Canada or conflict oil from oppressive regimes.

“It really presents us with a false question … when the reality is, we have a lot of different choices about how we produce energy,” Hudema said.

Velshi wouldn't say whether EthicalOil.org collects money from big oil companies. He described his campaign as "grassroots," saying all Canadians who care about ethical oil are invited to donate and that the median donation is in the $20-$25 range.

"We are 100 per cent independent of government and industry," he wrote in an email.

EthicalOil.org's campaign could expand in Canada and into United States if public donations on its website keep flowing, Velshi said.

But Hudema cautioned that the campaign's goals could have massive consequences.

"This campaign is designed to keep us locked in an outdated fossil-based economy that potentially could decimate the entire planet if we do not get our greenhouse gas emissions in check, and I think that is the most dangerous part of this campaign,” he said. "(It's) going to give people more excuses and give our politicians more reasons to delay action."

"To me, it is very immoral,” Hudema added.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

A campaign designed to re-brand Canada’s oil sands as an ethical alternative to fuel from states with questionable human rights records was scheduled to take to the airwaves Sunday, with the first o...
A campaign designed to re-brand Canada’s oil sands as an ethical alternative to fuel from states with questionable human rights records was scheduled to take to the airwaves Sunday, with the first o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 347
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
03:42 PM on 08/31/2011
At the rate Alberta is going with their environment their tourism slogan should be updated to something like: On your way from saskatchewan to British Columbia stop and see the man made moon. P.S. bring your own bottled h2o and a chemical suit with a built in oxygen mask.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
11:46 PM on 08/30/2011
Does this sound ethical Stan? Land that provided for natives decades is now destroyed. It now kills wildlife, destroys land and pollutes water beyond what can be conceived, all for the purpose of serving your addiction to oil and the oil companies addiction to money. "The economic crisis has put many expansion projects on hold, but it has not diminished the long-term prospects for the oil sands. In mid-November, the International Energy Agency released a report forecasting $120-a-barrel oil in 2030—a price that would more than justify the effort it takes to get oil from oil sands.

Nowhere on Earth is more earth being moved these days than in the Athabasca Valley. To extract each barrel of oil from a surface mine, the industry must first cut down the forest, then remove an average of two tons of peat and dirt that lie above the oil sands layer, then two tons of the sand itself. It must heat several barrels of water to strip the bitumen from the sand and upgrade it, and afterward it discharges contaminated water into tailings ponds like the one near Mildred Lake. They now cover around 50 square miles. Last April some 500 migrating ducks mistook one of those ponds, at a newer Syncrude mine north of Fort McKay, for a hospitable stopover, landed on its oily surface, and died."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
11:50 PM on 08/30/2011
: This destruction is beyond belief. If gawd looks on, s(he) must be horrified. For picture, go to link: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2009/03/canadian-oil-sands/kunzig-text/2
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
11:19 PM on 08/30/2011
So what's ethical about raping the environment? (rhetorical)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
10:20 PM on 08/30/2011
By using the media to put out propaganda with high dollar pr campaigns.. Never heard of propaganda skippy? You have been brane washt by it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
10:06 PM on 08/30/2011
ethical oil !! Gee, what will (Madison Avenue)/ the propaganda mill think up next? We've already had nuclear weapons for peace, "safe" fracking advertisements, nuclear plants claimed to be safe, BP posing as the eco-conscience oil company (prior to the gulf debacle), tax cuts and corporate welfare (supposedly) growing jobs, and even permanent pressed shirts. Maybe deep-fried oil on a stick at state fairs? Bring on the new pipeline! (Yes, that's a related AOLpo article.) The US is hosed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
09:38 PM on 08/30/2011
"Preserving Environment

Share
0digg
Email

Carbon is not only the most common element and the basis for all matter that we know, it’s also the root of harmful pollution and environmental woes. In the spirit of ‘fighting fire with fire’, an aspiring research team from Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory has mapped out a method by which to turn CO2 from a would-be pollutant into an electricity generating catalyst.

Geothermal electricity production typically uses water as the vehicle, whereby the Earth’s heat converts the water to steam which then spins the turbines to create power. In the case of the Berkley Lab project, carbon dioxide is fed into the ground instead, where the geothermal heat puts it into a super-critical state (it has properties of both liquid and gas). After that, the CO2 is drawn back up to the surface, where turbines convert it to electricity.

The project is set to begin testing in Cranfield, Mississippi soon, at which point researchers hope to finally convert decade-old theories into proof. Whether the new technology is viable as a mainstream method of electricity generation is still up for grabs, but if successful, the breakthrough process could have more benefits than just power production."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
09:40 PM on 08/30/2011
"Firstly, this type of process could bring geothermal energy to drier locales, where water is scarce. It could become a far more flexible and viable green energy standard in places previously thought incompatible for such methods. Using super-critical CO2 has long been proposed as a possible alternative to water in geothermal electricity generation, but never tested.

Also, much of our pollution (stemming mostly from commercial and industrial waste and byproducts) is abated using techniques that serve to bury CO2 deep underground and away from our atmosphere, but it’s very costly and requires a great amount of effort and hardware. However, using the new geothermal generation process, all that excess CO2 would instead be put to good use in electricity production.

“We actually want some of the CO2 to become trapped,” says BarryFreifeld, the project leader for Berkley Lab. “Our approach relies on this gradual loss as a way to store a power plant’s CO2 underground rather than emitting it into the atmosphere. Our planned demonstration is the first attempt at proving that we can simultaneously mitigate greenhouse gas induced climate change and generate clean baseload power using geothermal energy.”

Furthermore, the ‘fuel’ is recycled through the system and reused, and the power it generates could help offset the cost of burying and storing CO2."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
10:36 PM on 08/30/2011
Umm, vested interests , rightly say carbon is relatively common, but fail to mention in what form and where. (Hydrogen is the most common and energy from that element is continuing to progress.) Excessive amounts of CO2 in gaseous form and in the atmosphere do lead to the greenhouse effect, as has been proven and verified many times over. Carbon in living organisms doesn't have the same effect. Carbon buried underground doesn't have the same effect, as you already mentioned. Carbon released into the atmosphere, particularly in gaseous form does add an insulative effect. No, it doesn't matter if commentors disagree with this. Doesn't change the fact.
Greenland and Iceland have shown national willingness to invest in geothermal energy, but there are (right now) at least five working geothermal plants in the US. What isn't suffienciently explored/perfected ( as yet) is the function of geothermal energy production, as an accrued benefit in the prevention of volcanic eruptions causing damage to populated areas. Believe it or not, scientists in Iceland are exploring this. Any vulconologist will tell you, unless he works for Koch Industries or is a member of ALEC, that volcanos erupt when there is sufficient underground pressure to cause them to. Yes, plate techtonics are also involved, of course. Still, that area of additional energy is promising.
Geothermal also is continuous energy - independant of whether the sun shines or the wind blows. Even so, there are newer PVs that opperate at night. see also, cleanTechnica.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
09:28 PM on 08/30/2011
Our business model
Our markets
Our projects
Supergrid
Value of renewables
Why renewables?
Media resources
Events
Careers
Contact us

Friends of the Supergrid

Follow us on:
LinkedIn youtube
in youtube
Translate:
简体中文
English
Português
Deutsch
Français
Español
Afrikaans
New study reveals South Africa has enough economically viable wind energy sites to meet over 70% of its current electricity demand

01 Dec 2009 | Category: News Releases

And reduce carbon emissions by 68 million tonnes every year.

01 December 2009

Mainstream Renewable Power South Africa has released the results of a technical study undertaken to estimate the scale of the country’s wind resource. The analysis, which uses Geographic Information System (GIS) technology and a state of the art Mesoscale wind flow model, concludes that South Africa has enough economically viable wind energy sites to generate 184 Terawatt hours (TWh) of indigenous, sustainable energy. Electricity demand in South Africa currently stands at around 250 TWh, coming from 44GW of installed capacity and is expected to grow to 80GW by 2025. The country is currently the 12th biggest producer of CO2 emission per capita in the world and emissions are set to quadruple by 2050 if drastic measures are not taken.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AuldLochinvar
12:11 AM on 09/19/2011
"South Africa has enough economical­ly viable wind energy sites to meet over 70% of its current electricit­y demand"

This might be true if you could store the wind energy, although I doubt it. But when demand peaks, or even if it's there at all, the wind does NOT come up to meet it. But a turbine with the meagre capacity of 5 MW is a monstrous 600 feet high at the top of the blade circle, and it takes half a gale to get that power. In the best locations, you can hope for an average power of a quarter of the maximum rating. In a full gale, you have to stop it before the blades fly off from centrifugal force. And the power of the wind varies as the cube of the wind speed, which is OK for a sailing ship, but not good at all for an electric grid.

Or take a look at your electric bill and your fuse-box or relay-box. Your average rate of consumption may well be under two kilowatts, but every circuit that's protected by a 20 Amp breaker expects to be loaded from time to time with 2.2 kilowatts. Usually a household will have about a dozen of these.

You really cannot expect to shut down coal burning with wind turbines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
09:19 AM on 08/30/2011
Necessity is the mother of invention and if we continue to rely on oil, nothing else will get done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
10:41 PM on 08/30/2011
So maybe when some country cuts off oil supply to this country, then we might get off our duffs and consider a more active strategy to wean us off our vulnerabilities. Maybe someone could get the Saudis pissed at us and do us (the US) a favor.
faved again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
09:00 AM on 08/30/2011
"Solar Breakthrough Will Help Spur Viability Of Alternative Energy - While traditional solar panels are made of silicon, which is expensive, brittle and shatters like glass, organic solar cells being developed by a University of New Mexico team are made of plastic that is relatively inexpensive, flexible, can be wrapped around structures or even applied like paint, said physicist Seamus Curran, head of the nanotechnology laboratory at NMSU. Read more from this Science Daily Oct 2005 article
NanoHorizons Patents Cost and Efficiency Breakthrough for Solar Cells and Organic LEDs - NanoHorizons, Inc., an emerging leader in applied nanoscale materials and solutions, announced today that it has received a notice of allowance from the US Patent Office for its innovative nanoscale photovoltaic cell design. NanoHorizons' design enables dramatic improvements in solar cell efficiency and breakthrough reductions in fabrication costs. Brighter, more efficient Organic LEDs (OLEDs) are also made possible. Read more from this Nano Tech Wire June 2005 article"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:21 AM on 08/30/2011
Hey, it seemed to work for the Bible (rebranding the Torah) :3

(fascinating to read the different Belief Systems in play in the article...Greenpeace's anti-capitalist one and the risk management one from the advertisers and then we'll have us, the people, blaming our feelings of joy or disgust on these people instead of taking hard looks at ourselves and figuring out why)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
08:59 AM on 08/30/2011
Your comment is confusing. Can you clear it up at all?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
11:02 PM on 08/29/2011
Alternative Energy

Alternative Renewable Energy
Geothermal
Hydro-power
Ocean Energy
Hydrogen Energy
Solar Energy
Wind Energy
Radiant Energy
Waste to Energy
Bio-based Energy
Biodiesel
Alcohol Fuels
Ethanol Fuel
Biomass
Fuel from Animals

Mix and match. Oil? Forget about it. It is old news.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
10:59 PM on 08/29/2011
Choke on this Stan instead of the noxious gases from fossil fuels: "In a scientific breakthrough that has stunned the world, a team of South African scientists has developed a revolutionary new, highly efficient solar power technology that will enable homes to obtain all their electricity from the sun. The unique South African-developed solar panels will make it possible for houses to become completely self-sufficient for energy supplies. The panels are able to generate enough energy to run stoves, geysers, lights, TVs, fridges, computers - in short all the mod-cons of the modern house, says this Feb 2006 article from ZP Energy"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:39 PM on 08/29/2011
Got a link?
Sounds fantastic.
Seriously.

Will they power transport trucks?
Ships?
Heavy equipment?
Farm machinery?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
08:52 AM on 08/30/2011
You are kind of into that all or nothing type of thinking aren't you Stan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
08:55 AM on 08/30/2011
Read all the posts Stan. Others did not get allowed in, but I will try again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinnerator
08:19 AM on 08/30/2011
2006? That's ancient history and clear proof it was a non viable pie in the sky claim. Like most 'alternate' energy stories.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
08:53 AM on 08/30/2011
It is not the lack of viability. It is the lack of will, which you clearly demonstrate, that prevents progress. See how you resist change? Even when it can save your life. Amazing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
09:19 AM on 08/30/2011
These articles were reprinted to remind people of what is available. The trouble is that while we subsidize oil corporations, Bush also took money away from research for alternative energy. Obama has not helped in that area either. Necessity is the mother of invention and if we continue to rely on oil, nothing else will get done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chlai88
Change is the only constant
10:50 PM on 08/29/2011
Let's face it, we still need oil for this decade and maybe the next few. Addiction is the right word. But cold turkey is not the right treatment for the patient here. Yes we need to make progress on alternative fuels. But we can't just turn off the electricity and stop driving in the meantime, can we? In the meantime, we may just have to live with more such tradeoffs, as distasteful as they may seem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
10:54 PM on 08/29/2011
No we don't. Read below.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
10:48 PM on 08/29/2011
How about this Stan and JR: "UCLA Engineering Announces Breakthrough in Silicon Photonics Devices, July 01, 2006, B2B Energy - Building o­n a series of recent breakthroughs in silicon photonics, researchers at the UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science have developed a novel approach to silicon devices that combines light amplification with a photovoltaic – or solar panel – effect. In a study to be presented today at the 2006 International Optical Amplifiers and Applications Conference in Vancouver, Canada, UCLA Engineering researchers report that not o­nly can optical amplification in silicon be achieved with zero power consumption, but power can now be generated in the process.
Solar Breakthrough Will Help Spur Viability Of Alternative Energy - While traditional solar panels are made of silicon, which is expensive, brittle and shatters like glass, organic solar cells being developed by a University of New Mexico team are made of plastic that is relatively inexpensive, flexible, can be wrapped around structures or even applied like paint, said physicist Seamus Curran, head of the nanotechnology laboratory at NMSU. Read more from this Science Daily Oct 2005 article"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:26 AM on 08/30/2011
2005 huh?
So where is it?
Why are we still using oil?

How much longer do we have to wait and which oil should we use while we wait?
I reccomend the clean and ethical oil, but that's just me...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
06:26 PM on 08/30/2011
Did you invest in this? Do you know anyone who invested in it? Are they going to invest in it, when it requires the risk of the government investing in infrastructure or corporations to invest and corporations won't because they are already making gross levels of profit selling fossil fuels. Why change if it is all about money and we both know it is all about the easy money, isn't it, You ask questions you already know the answers to, but don't care to admit it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
07:39 PM on 08/30/2011
There is no clean or ethical oil, just ike there is no clean coal. It only seems clean when you aren't sitting in the middle of it, having your land destroyed, your water polluted, your mountains blown up and trees going away and wildlife devastated. When it gets into your backyard, instead of someone else's, it ceases to be clean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
10:46 PM on 08/29/2011
Hey Stan and JR, read: "New plastic can better convert solar energy - Jan. 9 2005 – CTV - Researchers at the University of Toronto have invented an infrared-sensitive material that's five times more efficient at turning the sun's power into electrical energy than current methods. The discovery could lead to shirts and sweaters capable of recharging our cellphones and other wireless devices, said Ted Sargent, professor of electrical and computer engineering at the university. Sargent said the new plastic composite is, in layman's terms, a layer of film that "catches'' solar energy. He said the film can be applied to any device, much like paint is coated on a wall.
Material Discovered For Full Spectrum Photovoltaic Cell - November 20, 2002 - A new discovery raises the prospect of a more efficient photovoltaic cell for lower cost solar energy. Two layers of indium gallium nitride in a solar cell design could convert sunlight to electricity at 50% efficiency. Researchers in the Materials Sciences Division (MSD) of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, working with crystal-growing teams at Cornell University and Japan's Ritsumeikan University, have learned that the band gap of the semiconductor indium nitride is not 2 electron volts (2 eV) as previously thought, but instead is a much lower 0.7 eV. The discovery means that a single system of alloys incorporating indium, gallium, and nitrogen can convert virtually the full spectrum of sunlight -- from the near infrared to the far ultraviolet -- to electrical current. More from this Future
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:40 PM on 08/29/2011
What do they cost?
Are they economically viable?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rshrink
09:02 AM on 08/30/2011
Of course. Save trillions on pollution clean up and deaths due to cancer. And imagine how much water it will save. Billions and Billions of gallons. Want destroy farmland that we need to grow food for the poor people you are so concerned about. Yes, it is viable and non destructive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
11:09 PM on 08/30/2011
Exceptionalists will always come up with exceptions. There were vested interests that railed against whale oil being replaced by coal generated oil. They just weren't as entrenched as the smokers are today. ( A "Waterworld" reference) The necessity for invention at that time was the over-harvesting of whales for oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
11:34 PM on 08/30/2011
correction: coal generated elcetricity. oops! A thousand pardons. Proved I'm human.