Keystone XL Pipeline Will Hollow Out Alberta's Refining Industry, Opponents Argue

Keystone Xl Alberta Refineries

The Huffington Post Canada   First Posted: 09/21/11 01:35 PM ET Updated: 11/21/11 05:12 AM ET

"Americans will get the jobs, Canadians will get the pollution."

That's the talking point a union that represents workers in the Alberta oil sands is using to oppose the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline, the $7-billion project Transcanada Corp. is planning to build to transfer bitumen -- raw oil sands product -- from Alberta to refineries in Texas.

The Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada (CEP) has called a press conference for Thursday where they plan to lay out in detail why they oppose a massive expansion of their industry’s infrastructure.

"The pipeline will create environmental destruction, take potential upgrading and refining jobs away from Canadians, and put our country's energy security at risk," CEP President Dave Coles said in a statement.

"The Americans will get the jobs and Albertans, Canadians will get the pollution. It is wrongheaded for the economy of Canada," Coles told the Globe and Mail.

At stake, according to pipeline opponents, are thousands of potential jobs at refineries in Alberta that will not come into existence because raw oil is being shipped to refineries in Texas instead.

"We're sending jobs down that pipeline," Gil McGowan, head of the Alberta Federation of Labour, told the Toronto Star in August.

McGowan noted that former Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach had himself been concerned about the declining proportion of Alberta oil that was being refined in the province.

"Shipping raw bitumen is like scraping off the topsoil, selling it, and then passing the farm on to the next generation," Stelmach said in 2006.

Though Stelmach set a target of 75 per cent of oil to be refined in province, the Energy Resources and Conservation Board estimates that the percentage of bitumen refined in Canada will drop from 58 per cent in 2010 to 47 per cent in 2020.

The Council of Canadians, Greenpeace and others are organizing a protest against the oil sands in Ottawa starting Monday, with at least 150 people so far prepared to emulate the peaceful resistance protests outside the White House last month that saw more than 1,200 people arrested.

Most recently, a number of Canadian celebrities have come out against the pipeline and thrown their weight behind the protests, notably Dave Thomas of SCTV fame. That follows a similar theme seen in the U.S., where actresses Margot Kidder and Darryl Hannah were both arrested at the White House protests.

Though protesters' concerns revolve around the potential of environmental damage from building a 3,200-kilometre pipeline across North America, and the particularly high carbon emissions of oil sands bitumen, a U.S. State Department environmental assessment released last month found there would be "no significant impact" to the environment from the pipeline.

(The State Department hasn’t yet given its final OK on the project, but is widely expected to do so.)

And a Canadian government report, obtained by Postmedia, discounts an environmental group's recent assertion that the pipeline could pose a health hazard because bitumen would corrode the metal faster than conventional oil, increasing the likelihood of accidents.

The Canadian government report asserted that temperatures in the pipeline would be too low for faster corrosion to take place.

But Richard Kuprewicz, an engineer at pipeline consulting firm Accufacts, told Postmedia the Canadian government report was flawed.

"I don't want to embarrass anybody, but they have no idea what they're talking about," Kuprewicz said, arguing that the presence of water in the pipeline would make it corrode faster than government estimates suggest.

Another TransCanada pipeline, which delivers oil to the U.S. Midwest and is known simply as the Keystone, has experienced 14 spills since it began operation just over a year ago, including one 21,000 gallon spill in Ludden, North Dakota.

A final decision on the Keystone XL is expected from the Obama administration by the end of the year.

-- With earlier reports from The Huffington Post

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

"Americans will get the jobs, Canadians will get the pollution." That's the talking point a union that represents workers in the Alberta oil sands is using to oppose the construction of the Keyston...
"Americans will get the jobs, Canadians will get the pollution." That's the talking point a union that represents workers in the Alberta oil sands is using to oppose the construction of the Keyston...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 90
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:14 AM on 09/25/2011
Ever hear of the Brent WTI spread? Well basically it is a $20 to $25 discount that Canadian's have to sell their oil at Cushing because we can't get it to enough refineries.

That means Canadian producers are not getting as much revenue as they could and it means Canada's government and Western Canadian provinces are not getting as much tax revenue as they could.

Building the XL will be the first step in getting a fair price for our oil!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
01:01 PM on 09/22/2011
The problem with oil is you have to refine it close to where the markets are for the distillates. They want to send synthetic crude down to Texas because thats where refinerys exist that are built to handle heavy oil products. No big conspiracy there.
Just imagine trying to make gasoline or jet fuel and shipping that stuff by pipline across country. Crazy volitile!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Transitteer
and another thing . . .
12:14 AM on 09/22/2011
Big Oil always gets what it wants in Alberta. Anyone who thinks the Alberta Government is running things (or Ottawa) is dreaming . . . . . .
11:44 PM on 09/21/2011
The list of pros and cons presented here seems conclusive enough. With both economic and environmental trappings awaiting Canada (plus America in the latter) once the Keystone XL is given the go ahead, how could it get that far? Well... big business, to put it bluntly. Canadian jobs will be lost as Canadian resources are outsourced, the environment will bear the risk and suffer the inevitable consequences (based on the track record of the Keystone) as a handful of individuals in the private sector refuel their jets. One can never know the current jostling that is going on in the political and big business realm without being a part of it, but one could safely assume that if the pipeline goes forward, it will have been for the benefit of a small few amongst a great many. If it were just environmentalists or just economists lining up against this, then that would be one thing. But...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keezze
11:30 PM on 09/21/2011
Wonder if rich kids live down wind of that poison smoke?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Glass Cannon
Let every eye negotiate for itself.
09:16 AM on 09/22/2011
Yes, strangely they do. Really.
photo
Dahveed
step softly & speak easy
10:36 PM on 09/21/2011
Awakening!! C'mon Canadians!! Stop the degradation and pollution of your country. No Keystone pipeline and no more tar sands refining!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amorak
10:39 PM on 09/21/2011
Don't agree with that! As sure as the rains will come, the oil sands will be mined. And so they should be.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:30 PM on 09/21/2011
"Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value."

--Buckminster Fuller
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
v650
09:39 PM on 09/21/2011
So it would be better if they had the jobs and the pollution?
09:23 PM on 09/21/2011
And why is canada letting america doing this, i know it is our ally, but pollting our neighboor is kinda wrong, and why OIL excatly?
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
09:03 PM on 09/21/2011
I thought Harper was about jobs and bread in every house?

Oh right he's following the America first plan!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:31 PM on 09/21/2011
a chicken in every pot!
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
11:18 PM on 09/21/2011
yes that's the saying
08:36 PM on 09/21/2011
With the thousands of pipelines that criss cross this vast continent , the "nashing of teeth" on this particular pipeline shows that people need to get a grip, and put the matter in perspective.
All of the arguments against the pipeline, are really code for "we don't want the oilsands developed". Well, live with it, it's going to happen, whether you like it, or not.
08:29 PM on 09/21/2011
That's a beautiful photograph of the tar sands.
Where's the pollution?
09:23 PM on 09/21/2011
On the photo.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:41 PM on 09/21/2011
*chuckle* That's my line.

Yeah, some people really grok the industrial. I can't wait till we get even deeper into designing our own species & ecosystems.
08:22 PM on 09/21/2011
The "money quote" concerning the safety risks of the Pipeline,
"I don't want to embarrass anybody, but they have no idea about what they're talking about."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sdgreen
07:51 PM on 09/21/2011
Not withstanding the apparent pollution that mining for heavy sands create, It would seem to me more logical to build a new refining system in Alberta than to build a massive pipeline. In fact, all Alberta and BC oil should be refined in Canada, not Texas. Further, Canada could set its own price for fuels and get off the silly Petroleum market.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
09:10 PM on 09/21/2011
Very good point. I see Canadians gas prices going up because under this plan we ship raw oil at reduced prices to Texas and then they "sell" it back to us at a premium price.

Few jobs, most of the pollution, and higher prices at the pump because no refinery here. NICE! What a crock this will be!
09:33 PM on 09/21/2011
When the Texas refineries shut down because of hurricanes or the threat of one the price of gas goes up.Build the refineries in Canada and you create a more stable price for gas( no hurricanes) more employment for Canadians and more money for the Canadian economy. If we could increase the polution control of the tar sands and refineries it would be a win win.The American Oil companies don't believe in the EPA and we have to stop them from poluting our country
06:56 PM on 09/21/2011
The main benefits that will accrue will be to the Keystone people. They would like us to believe that they are nice guys who want to put everyone to work but it's their own jobs and pay that they are most concerned about. They are willing to endanger the environment to enrich themselves and they are trying to buy us with the promise of jobs. Unfortunately, we're probably dumb enough and desperate enough to go for it. The resulting pollution will be left to our children to clean up just as we have to clean up after past corporate foibles.

Fooled twice. Shame on us.
goleafsgo
A Lie stands on one leg, Truth on two.
07:03 PM on 09/21/2011
Well said, TT.   All true points.
Fanned and faved