Gordon Pinsent And The Oil Sands: Elder Statesman Of Canadian Theatre Throws His Weight Behind Protests

Gordon Pinsent Oil Sands

First Posted: 09/22/11 05:00 PM ET Updated: 09/22/11 05:00 PM ET

Gordon Pinsent is the latest Canadian celebrity to endorse the protest against the oil sands planned for Parliament Hill on Monday.

Canada’s elder statesman of theatre spoke out on Thursday in opposition to the oil sands, which have come under increasing scrutiny in recent weeks following well-publicized protests in Washington over the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline.

“I can't think of anything -- here, now, or in our future -- that would rank above the tar sands for sheer, blind, stupidity,” Pinsent said in a press release by Greenpeace Canada, one of several organizations behind the protest. “The dangerous minds who are heralding the tar sands as an answer of any kind to our betterment need to be shut down with such positive action as to cancel any possible recurrence.”

Musician Dave Bidini and member of the Order of Canada Tantoo Cardinal -- the first Canadian indigenous celebrity to pledge to be in attendance at the Ottawa event -- are other recent additions to the small but apparently growing list of Canadian celebrities that have lent their support to the action.

Dave Thomas of SCTV fame, as well as Graham Greene, Mia Kirshner and Kate Vernon have also given their stamp of approval to the protest.

It is not yet known whether Pinsent will join the hundreds of demonstrators that organizers are expecting to attend the sit-in on Monday. But the characteristically eloquent actor was clear about his position, articulating his concerns about “our children’s future and the world they would be left to clean up or live with” in almost Shakespearean terms.

“It would break the hearts of this world to see their world beyond their control, having to fictionalize and paint over a nature that seemed to have ignored and eluded them. A beauty we have known for so long, to suit our lifespan and not theirs,” he said. “What kind of heroics would that take? This world has already lost too much of its beauty. To denaturalize and tear away what remains by greed and desperation is an unforgivable future.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Gordon Pinsent is the latest Canadian celebrity to endorse the protest against the oil sands planned for Parliament Hill on Monday. Canada’s elder statesman of theatre spoke out on Thursday in o...
Gordon Pinsent is the latest Canadian celebrity to endorse the protest against the oil sands planned for Parliament Hill on Monday. Canada’s elder statesman of theatre spoke out on Thursday in o...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
11:50 AM on 09/24/2011
hopefully they will cave to the protests, and maybe we will refine it here and get those 100,000 jobs plus what another 20 thousand reverberating down the economic line as cashiers, restaurant workers and owners ect supply goods and services for communities built around the refinery.. if im not mistaken would that not bring unemployement down another percent? im no economist or anything though..
photo
BentleysPal
We'd be better off if Springers ruled the world
02:58 PM on 09/23/2011
While the current state of Oilsands development is not where it needs to be from an environmental perspective, it's getting better every year. Ongoing research into how best to recover the oil will no doubt produce results that are much less harmful to the environment and like it or not, we need this energy. I'd much rather put my energy dollar into Oilsands R&D than seeing North American money being sent to the Middle East, Africa or South America. The hyperbole has to stop on both sides of the argument. The Oilsands are neither the worst thing to ever happen to the environment nor do they have no impact whatsoever. We'd serve ourselves well to have calm, reasoned discussions. Sadly, this seems unlikely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
11:58 AM on 09/24/2011
and how will we benefit from this in canada shipping 100 thousand jobs away boosting the american economy yet again like we would do with these jets. middle east and african oil has been good enough since, and is the us really cutting down imports on mid east and saudi oil down to 0%? no way so are you feeling so much better now on your ethical high horse now that your buying 20% less. phew you can sleep at night now. we get all the environmental damage, most other canadians aren't reaping any benefits from it, no subsidies gas for us or the like that might actually boost the economy and give our lower and middle class a chance. cause i wanna know what we spend most our money on? car, rent, food, insurance and gas and at least 2 of those things would be alleviated. these sorts of things are not "necessities" for the rich, they don't struggle getting these things. it's kind of like that selling the law stops poor and rich men alike from sleeping under bridges
photo
BentleysPal
We'd be better off if Springers ruled the world
04:08 PM on 09/24/2011
I'm pretty sure you're making my point, Kristopher. Part of the discussion should involve increased benefit for Canadians. R&D that finds ways to decrease the environmental impact will create direct employment for people instituting these improvements as well as many ancillary jobs. Refining the oil in Canada and shipping the finished product? Absolutely! Why not? But merely screeching about the problems and not getting engaged in a positive dialogue about where we can go from here is not helpful. The discussion is no longer about whether to shut down the Oilsands or not; the genie is out of the bottle. It's about what do we do when Middle East oil runs out. You know we'll be back in Alberta and we won't have the luxury of time to ensure we get it right. So let's do it now while we can and make the Oilsands an even more attractive alternative to Middle East oil.
02:20 PM on 09/23/2011
With the Oilsands contribution to Canada's GHG global output Canada produces 2% of the worlds output. Put into perspective the Oilsands produces about 5% of US Coals daily output .

The amount and repetitive nature of the BS constantly regurgited about the Oilsands has to make one wonder who's paying the green tinfoil hats to keep this up ? - the Saudis ? the coal companies?
I know that Mark Twain once said " you'd never lose a bet underestimating the intelligence of the average man " but in this case there has to be an underlying propaganda campaign funded by those who would benefit from the shutdown of the Oilsands -the people can't be that stupid - can they ?
11:54 AM on 09/23/2011
I fear that the language that is generated by the development of the oil sands is the most toxic form of pollution thus far. Regardless of where you stand, acknowledge the valid and compelling arguments that exist on both sides. I think that would be a good start in cleaning this thing up. Short and sweet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffery Cuneo
11:05 AM on 09/23/2011
For those slagging Gordon Pinset. I IMPLORE YOU to do a minute of research on Energy Returned on Energy Invested (Google EROEI). It will show you just how inefficient the oil sands actually are. The truth of the matter is that it is and never will be a solution to the looming energy crisis. It won't - or rather it simply can't - provide cheap energy the way coal or traditional oil production does. The public is being mislead. There is a mountain of money to make with the oil sands, which is why their is such a push to develop them, unfortunately it will NOT mean a secure energy future for anyone - and it will come at significant cost to our environment.

The standard rebuttal to this is "oh, but we'll develop more efficient and better means of extraction once we get rolling." This line is believable and quite understandable given how industry does produce efficiencies as time goes by. However, in this case, I don't buy it. The physical requirements of extraction will never change, and the energy required to get it will always be high. Costs may be saved here or there as their operation expands, but it simply can not change the EROEI ratio - which means the oil sands are and will always be very expensive to develop - and thus the energy produced will be very costly.
10:20 AM on 09/23/2011
We can now add Mr. Pinsent's name to a long list of highly qualified economic advisors (read :actors) condemning resource development. Who needs jobs, incomes and economic progress, with todays rosy world outlook ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
10:49 AM on 09/23/2011
1 red herring plus 1 red herring = fishy argument.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffery Cuneo
10:54 AM on 09/23/2011
Who needs clean air, water, and a sustainable future? Um... everyone.
04:03 PM on 09/23/2011
With Fort McMurray having cleaner air than Toronto, whoops, there goes that argument. !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tooldude
09:59 AM on 09/23/2011
Maybe before all these Canadian 'celebrities' jump on this Greenpeace bandwagon, they should travel to Ft Mac and tour the exhausted and reclaimed mine sites and see with their own eyes and make up their own minds instead of joining the flavour of the month protest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miller Time
11:15 PM on 09/22/2011
Mr. Pinsent. You are a great actor. Why don't you stick to acting and stay out of politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
11:29 PM on 09/22/2011
This is not a reason to tell him to stay out of this discussion. Perhaps when you come up with one, you could post it.
01:04 AM on 09/23/2011
Miller Time - why don't you stick to drinking beer and let the intelligent people talk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miller Time
12:29 PM on 09/23/2011
This beer reference is getting so old and tired. You must be the 50th person who has gone there.

I use Miller, because it is my middle name. Do you have a problem with that Mr. Pinkbus?

And, I drink very little beer.
10:34 PM on 09/22/2011
“I can't think of anything -- here, now, or in our future -- that would rank above the tar sands for sheer, blind, stupidity,”

Pinsent has a point but having Harper in power with a majority government comes close if not ahead of the stupidity, the true evil of the tar sands
photo
jsehgal
Micro-bio? There is too much to say!
09:28 PM on 09/22/2011
To think that the leftist's point of view is all that is ethical about Keystone XL, i.e. desire to shut it down, is a mistake. There is another perspective to consider. Most of the OPEC countries are dictatorships and have abysmal human rights record. The chief among these tyrants is the Islamic Saudi Arabia. USA is under their yoke and does its bidding so many times and pays a hefty price. Even Saudi's sins of 9/11 are forgiven. Consider a more ethical perspective that puts Canadian oil in a different light:

http://www.ethicaloil.org/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
10:31 PM on 09/22/2011
The oil is destined for a refinery in Texas and will be shipped off to other countries like China. Meanwhile, Canada is left with the environmental mess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Hatch
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
03:07 AM on 09/23/2011
Yet of the industrial mining we do, oil is one of the cleanest resources we extract. It's so easy to tell other people to abandon their livelihood and so hard to accept that what we do to earn a living may have an "environmental impact." I certainly hope everyone on this anti-oilsands bandwagon doesn't drive a car, wear synthetic fibre, live in a painted dwelling, use plastic of any kind, eat any food grown with pesticides or shipped outside of personally picked distance, have a shingled roof, etc, ad infinitum...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giantsteps
07:31 PM on 09/22/2011
Ok enough is enough, let the oil companies shut down the oil sands and if there is any dire consequences, lets not whine about it. We must get on the band wagon and close down the oil sands.
Before I run, can we also shut down the coal burning plants that put more CO2 in our atmosphere than the oil sands. While I am at it, lets shut down the nuclear power plants that have proven to be questionable in their safety-Chernobyl.
Again while we achieve a green solution lets freeze in the cold and use a horse and buggy. They say natural gas is good only until something detrimental occurs.
Oh yes lets keep buying foreign oil from countries that want to see our demise. Finally, those of you that constantly bitch about the environment, I am certain you have a horse and buggy, no bad heating fuels and of course drive a hybrid.
We all want a green world, we all want a self efficient existence, we all want to save the earth and I am no different but I am no hypocrite.
11:48 PM on 09/22/2011
Actually I walk and use public transit. My fuel bill is extremely low. Ditto my hydro and water. I also compost and forget waste anything. I am still reusing and what I don't reuse I give to the Salvation Army for those who willing to reuse. And I assume you are talking about Iran and Iran and Saudi Arabia when you refer to countries which want to destroy us. So first you should read the Q'oran before you blab on about countries wanting to destroy us. They are like drug dealers. You are a buyer. They just need to keep selling and people like you buying and - whoops - we destroyed ourselves and the rest of the world too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Hatch
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
03:19 AM on 09/23/2011
Wow you use public transit. Do you also personally pick your own, non-fertilized, pesticide free food? Do you wear 100% organic clothing? Is your dwelling roofed in something other than tar shingles? Is there no paint on your house inside or outside? Do you not use plastic garbage bags, food containers, water bottles, or bags? You are obviously accessing a computer - is yours not made of petroleum based plastics? How about your cell phone, TV, DVD player, speakers, Wifi, all the cables in your house? Do you wear sunglasses, regular glasses, or contact lenses? Do you use detergents, hair dyes, ink in your printer or your pen?...
I'd say you reduce your impact but aside from taking the bus there isn't much difference between you and I.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giantsteps
06:44 PM on 09/23/2011
Perhaps you should read the Qur'an. We are infidels and find out what they think of non-believers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
06:32 PM on 09/22/2011
"The dangerous minds who are heralding the tar sands"

Those dangerous minds are concentrated in the CORPORATE STATE OF AMERICA which are controlled from The Pratt House in NY, David Rockefeller, Chairman Emeritus.

Rockefeller's Great Grand Daddy (John D) achieved a massive monopolistic wealth at the turn of the last century with his Standard Oil 95% monopoly in oil refining.

He, along with the JP Morgan, launched the CARBON ECONOMY using the Stock Market to manipulate pricing and profits from those refineries.

100 years later, no one becomes the CEO or gets on the Boards at Exxon and JPMorgan Chase without David Rockefeller's personal approval and the Carbon Economy continues.

If someone would just borrow one of those operational POLLUTION FREE Mercedes Benz HYDROGEN FUEL CELL cars and parked in front of those protests, then you can RELEASE THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY and end the CARBON ECONOMY right now!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulex
Made in Canada
06:07 PM on 09/22/2011
I always liked this man. Now here's one more reason why. :0)
05:56 PM on 09/22/2011
It's a good thing we have the Elder Statesman of Canadian Theatre's opinion on the matter. Scientific data just confuses me!
06:20 PM on 09/22/2011
You sound a little lost.

Here, let me help you out :

Mr Pinsent is correct in his assessment.
The tar sands project will not benefit your average Canadian.
The tar sands project will only enrich already entrenched oil companies.

The oil companies get the profits and the Canadian taxpayer will have to foot the bill when the INEVITABLE failures of toxic holding ponds despoils aquifers under the world's breadbasket : the Canadian prairies.

Profits are private. Losses are socialized.
Welcome to the Harper vision of Canada Inc.
07:57 PM on 09/22/2011
The tar sands is benefiting all Canadians, right now.

Yes the big players have a stake in the game, but if you think that the average Canadian isn't benefiting from the billions and billions of dollars being spent on it's development then you've got your head firmly planted in the sand.

The holding ponds are IMO less destructive than fracking for gas wells, and the soil already leaches all the toxins from the hydrocarbons that are in the soil naturally. The banks of the Athabasca river were already black with oil long before anybody tried to extract it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Hatch
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
03:23 AM on 09/23/2011
Seems many of my friends have gainful employment with which to enrich their families due to oil sands projects. I guess "oil companies" are not actually made up of people in your world view.
05:29 PM on 09/22/2011
The thing with the Tar Sands is... if we do not use it, it is not going anywhere. I, for one, am sceptical of the notion that there will ever be a time when we do not need oil for something. Therefore, assuming Alberta and Canada are still intact hundreds of years in the future, we (or rather the descendants of the current generation) still may able to reap benefits of oil production from it.