Alberta Oil Sands: Protest Planned In Ottawa, Pipeline Advocates Hit Back

Keystone

First Posted: 09/23/11 07:42 PM ET Updated: 11/23/11 05:12 AM ET

As hundreds of demonstrators prepare to descend on Parliament Hill on Monday to protest the development of the Alberta oil sands, the patience of some of their most prominent adversaries appears to be wearing thin for what they claim is a campaign of rhetoric not based on fact.

In a speech to the Canadian Club of Toronto Friday, Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver turned his attention to the question of how to address the increasingly vocal opposition to the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline, acknowledging that “There is a significant communications challenge.â€

Noting the “celebrity protesters†that have made headlines in recent weeks for opposing the transport of bitumen from Alberta to Texas, Oliver outlined the safety and environmental standards the pipeline has met, pointing out that greenhouse gas emissions in the oil sands are lower than in coal plants in Wisconsin.

“We just have to keep repeating those points and making people understand that this exaggerated rhetoric about the end of the planet just doesn’t pass muster,†he said. “With regard to the oil sands and the Keystone XL Pipeline in particular, it’s time to separate fact from fiction.â€

More than 1,200 demonstrators were arrested in Washington earlier this month as they protested Keystone XL, which is currently awaiting approval from U.S. President Barack Obama. The protesters, many of whom represent environmental and First Nations groups, say the pipeline will pollute waterways and fisheries.

Following his speech, Oliver told media his statements were not born out of frustration.

“People are entirely free to express their views, as long as its done in a civilized way,†he said. “They’re free just as I’m free to counter with the facts if I believe the facts are not being stated as clearly as they should be.â€

But in a recent conversation with the spokesman for TransCanada Corp., the Calgary-based company behind Keystone XL, the emotion was considerably more palpable.

Shawn Howard told The Huffington Post Canada that the information being propagated by some of those opposed to the project has made it “very difficult to have any kind of an informed discussion.â€

“As a company, we’re held to a certain standard. We’re expected to be precise, we’re expected to provide a lot of facts,†he said. “It becomes frustrating when people will willfully make things up, or lie right through their teeth, even though reality and the real world and facts tell them something completely different. It’s kind of perplexing.â€

Howard points to an assertion that the pipeline could someday be used for bulk water removal of the Ogallala aquifer, which runs below the U.S. Great Plains, as a recent example.

The accusation, leveled by the Council of Canadians in August, stems from testimony delivered at the Nebraska state assembly earlier this year. When asked about how the company would eventually take the pipeline out of service, a TransCanada official prefaced his response by listing the various products that it could be used to transport before that time, including oil, gasoline and water.

“He was talking about how thorough our monitoring programs are that they would stand the test of time,†says Howard. “He wasn’t talking about some secret deal [to transport water].â€

Howard’s comments come as tension between those on both sides of the issue mounts. In advance of Monday’s protest, organizers report that hundreds have expressed a willingness to risk arrest.

“You see people beginning to step forward and say there is a role for non-violent civil disobedience,†said Andrea Harden-Donahue, energy campaigner for the Council of Canadians. “That’s to underscore the seriousness of an issue to our government, and to stand side-by-side with other people who share that opinion and share the opinion that enough is enough.â€

Labour officials, who believe that the Keystone XL Pipeline will costs the Canadian economy tens of thousands of jobs, have also spoken out about the issue. On Thursday, the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada (CEP), petitioned MPs in Ottawa to reverse their approval of the pipeline, calling it a “jobs killer.â€

All of which, says Clayton Thomas-Muller of the Indigenous Environmental Network, is proof that the movement is gaining momentum.

“This is one of those sea-change moments, not just for First Nations but for everybody who is concerned about the psychotic energy policy of Canada, and their attempts to market dirty tar sands to the world."

Related Video:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

As hundreds of demonstrators prepare to descend on Parliament Hill on Monday to protest the development of the Alberta oil sands, the patience of some of their most prominent adversaries appears to be...
As hundreds of demonstrators prepare to descend on Parliament Hill on Monday to protest the development of the Alberta oil sands, the patience of some of their most prominent adversaries appears to be...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:01 PM on 09/26/2011
Having no specific beef with the pipeline in question, I'll just add this: the mistaken belief our politicians have that oil company safety is of high quality is a deadly mistake.

Oil companies have tonnes of documentary processes and such, but the core of their systems are not correctly focused on risk assessment or mitigation, they are focused on compliance -- and regulation lags reality by decades, in many cases, as well as being simply wrong in many more. Quantity (reams of paper) do not and never have imparted quality.

The Keystone line's greatest fault is that it has a false economic promise, probably. Its greatest threat is that it is ignorant of the real risks, and built to comply rather than rise above risk.
04:44 AM on 09/26/2011
These people just never have a clue. As always, they still labour under the delusion that all that's really needed is just another ill-conceived spin campaign, which will then adequately dupe the public, so that these pesky damn demonstrators will just go away.
It's been their solution to the tar sands problem for 20 years. Endless spin and PR campaigns to try and convince the citizens that what they're seeing occur right in front of their eyes, isn't really happening at all.
On one level, these ad campaigns for dirty oil are ultimately insulting to the everyone's intelligence. Do they really think we're all that stupid?
This hasn't worked in the past, and it's not going to succeed this time either. Those days are gone forever - people now recognize that these are lies..
01:27 PM on 09/25/2011
These people are a bunch of ideological clowns to whom reason means nothing. They use junk science, twisted truths and lies to push their ideology and nothing else matters. They have lost all credibility a long time ago. Everyone wants a green sustainable planet but no one wants their stupidity!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:31 PM on 09/24/2011
How this Keystone XL oil pipeline will mutually benefit the Canadians and Americans consumers and the public?

Putting environmental impact arguments aside, what are the rationales for shipping tar sand oil to Texas? Why can't the oil be refined in Canada and sell its processed by-products to American and international markets?

Business don't invest because they want to help bringing down enery cost for the consumers, they are in it for the profits. So, question is which company would profit the most out of this project? It is the bigger question.

If all the oil companies intention is to processed the tar sand oil and sell it on international market, then we Canadian and American consumers are screwed because the raw materials being used by other countries like China as an example and they will then make finished goods and ship it back to NA market. Unless 100% of tar sand oil are dedicated to NA market, Canadian and American consumers lost big corporations and their speculative investors/bankers gained.

Say NO to the pipeline project!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Runey
anti-religionists, converge and amass
05:02 PM on 09/24/2011
Yeah, because, you know...... Big Oil would never LIE.
07:01 AM on 09/24/2011
“We just have to keep repeating those points and making people understand

Goebels did that to the Germans who just didn't get the ideas Hitler was proposing. So I don't find it odd that the Harper government is using the same tactic to relabel the tar sands as
ethical" oil. Gotta hand it to them. And I gotta hand it to Canadians who just fdon't believe it. Clayoquot Sound comes to mind. Also - remeber when Canada was viewed as a country with integrity? I expect some Canadians are swimming in the fake lake but more and more are saying the emperor has no clothes and going to a real lake. There are several hundred thousand lakes in Canada so why swim in a fake lake built with tax dollars?
02:34 AM on 09/24/2011
. All these over paid actors that are on the band wagon living in their little cacoons getting there info I don't know where. Shut up! i started working overseas a couple years ago. I'm actually in Iraq writing this, and let me tell something you big mouth 12 cylinder useing actors and planet do gooders. If you want to see damage to the planet come on down here (Iraq) It even makes me sick. they don't have the plants to deal with the gas so they just burn it off. Let me tell you it is gross! When I drive by these oilfields the Horizon is black with polution. What I'm talking about is Flaring and there is thousands of these. I was told a number I don't know if it is correct but some how I believe it. Here in Iraq alone it is said that they burn off 52 000 000 bucks of gas a week or day depending on who you ask. . Next to all these flairs the ground is black with oil not to mention the sky. I,m out of space for more so if the celebs want to use their voice get off your back side and look past your front door because the real problem is over seas. Remember this is just one small country with a small oil reserve. You guys have no idea how little polution or foot print we have in Canada\Tar sands.
04:41 AM on 09/24/2011
Al Gore and his little band of hollywood sheep
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Runey
anti-religionists, converge and amass
07:50 AM on 09/24/2011
Absolutely nothing noteworthy in an anti-gore comment.. surprise,. surprise.. call out claims of bleating while offering nothing of a contrast.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Runey
anti-religionists, converge and amass
07:52 AM on 09/24/2011
you should try to keep in mind that just because other countries do heinous things that the people here shouldn't just say 'well we could be worse, we could be like them' .. that's a bad mentality.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
11:20 PM on 09/23/2011
"People are entirely free to express their views, as long as its done in a civilized way"

He meant to say ...in a civilized way which does not offend THE CORPORATE STATE".

John D. Rockefeller,110 years ago, achieved massive monopolistic wealth from his 95% monopoly on OIL REFINING which launched The Carbon Economy in North America.

Today, that Carbon Economy is shepherded by David Rockefeller and his powerful 4000+ membership base of Wealthy and Corporate elites (including the Corporate Media) at The Pratt House in NY.

This despised OIL V/P meets his boss at Pratt: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbnpN07J_zg&feature=related .

Oh, and The Pratt House controls Canadian Politics through Rockefeller agents Maurice Strong, Mitchel Sharpe, Frank McKenna and The Desmarais family.

In the 80's, Intel launched a 4K microprocessor which launched the personal computer revolution. Not one person said back then that in just two short decades, these computers would consume all business and households.

In 2011, Mercedes-Benz drove 3 POLLUTION FREE Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Cars, on their World Drive Tour, through the U.S., Australia, Asia, China, Russia and Europe. And after 33,000 trouble-free kilometers later, they proved this transportation technology is a go.

The Oil Cartel will not step aside gracefully and allow the emergence of The Hydrogen Economy by installing HYDROGEN GAS PUMPS on their service station lots.

It is for this reason that XL needs to be aborted using civil protest.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
10:41 PM on 09/23/2011
2/3rds of Canada doesn't use the stuff. We import from the Middle East and sell whatever we have. I think it's 2 million out and 2 million barrels of oil back in. You'd think we'd hold on to it, then sell whatever we have left over and not suffer for the world market price. Ah well, that's what we get for selling out.

None of the tar can be separated from the sands without additional energy like fossil gas and water, which are increasingly in shorter supply. ERoEI is quite low, thus it cannot expand exponentially. Not even linearly. Cancers in the region are routinely dismissed. There is air and the steam method, but it still requires energy to get the stuff out.

Even when the bitumen is out, it isn't oil. Think clumpy brown sludge. More hydrocarbons have to be added in order to get it to become oil. Then it gets mixed with regular oil in Texas etc. Kinda like extending orange juice with a clump of frozen orange juice. It works, they make money, but not without massive subsidies that they are used to getting and lots of write offs.

Alberta ethics doesn't travel well. (Sudan). But expecting ethics to exist where multi-national corporations are pulling the strings is obviously suspect.

To sell ethical oil means you have to have some atom of ethics to begin with. No one believes a word of this. Especially from Harper Gov't. Ha.

Please America, say no.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
11:50 PM on 09/23/2011
i have said no all i can, and still find ways to get louder every day. the united states is in freefall, the great american dream is a sham. i moved on top of a train station, and i like it a lot. people moan and groan about their house in the suburbs, but there is nothing more unsustainable. I live in Atlanta, pop of the city is about 500,000. Our suburbs are another 5 1/2 million -- most of them refuse access to public transit because they don't want black people in their neighborhood. You do the math. The United States will destroy itself before any oil will come of this stupidity anyway.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
12:15 AM on 09/24/2011
dude, jealous of the train station apt ;)
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
12:15 AM on 09/24/2011
F'd Fav'd
12:50 AM on 09/24/2011
It's actually written in a NAFTA agreement that Canada must allow the US access to a specific amount of oil no matter what.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
10:54 AM on 09/24/2011
I know. It's another facade. Are Eastern Canadians going to live in the dark while America gets our exports when the Middle East oil runs dry? I can see that provision largely being rescinded. Mexico balked at such a provision. Canada thought it had limitless energy. That will be proven ridiculous in some future scenario.
09:44 PM on 09/23/2011
Dirty or not. Ethical or not. Why are we as a country just flogging our raw resources to any other country? Why is this Keystone pipeline even an issue? Refine the stuff in Canada for Canadians first, go ahead and sell the excess (if any) elsewhere.
09:51 PM on 09/23/2011
Absolutely agree.... we should be refining, pipeline to Vancouver and shipping to Asia.... forget the US.
04:52 PM on 09/24/2011
NO PIPELINE. Canadian resources for Canadians.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
10:25 PM on 09/23/2011
Agree. But that isn't how business is done. We sell all our oil, then we buy it back on the world market and import it. same 2 million barrels goes back and forth for all I know. We call this trade, but it's really a facade.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
11:53 PM on 09/23/2011
its a game that makes a few people very rich, but everyone else has to pay for it.
09:25 PM on 09/23/2011
Separating fact from fiction? Ethical arguments?

"...“As a company, we’re held to a certain standard. We’re expected to be precise, we’re expected to provide a lot of facts..."

Like rebranding the 'tar' sands - as its been named for 150 years - and passing it off as 'oil' sands? Golden, liquid, stick-a-straw-in-the-ground-and-suck-it-up hmm, hmm oh-so-good....

Like the University of Calgary professors taking money from oil companies and covertly using it for huge 'ethical oil' propaganda campaigns?

Like the entire TAR sands debate that sucks all attention and initiative from alternative energy research and development?

I call bullsh*t.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
09:50 PM on 09/23/2011
I concur! Your comments are exceptional.
goleafsgo
A Lie stands on one leg, Truth on two.
08:21 PM on 09/25/2011
 Well said and very true!   Fanned and faved
09:22 PM on 09/23/2011
I find the last quote to really show what the problem here is. Of course, it's noted elsewhere in the article but it really drove the point forwards. What kind of person decides that the energy policy of Canada is psychotic? What kind of person decides that shipping oil bitumen that we've already sold to the US (most of Alberta's oil goes to the US and none of it is sold to Canada) is really part of Canada's energy policy?

Our policy is to use less fossil fuels, develop tide generators (U of BC is working on an excellent example), develop wind turbines (a canadian came out with a part that would reduce turbine and blade resonances), and develop solar projects.

Green Peace (it was three years ago mind you) told me that they wanted to cut down on nuclear power and replace it with fossil fuels. Why would we cut down on nuclear power which we can mine in our backyard and use in the world's safest reactors? And then replace it with fossil fuels when we can't even properly store the waste from the filters? It turns out it's much easier and safer to store radioactive waste then carbon emissions (the emissions keep slipping through the actual material used to store it).

Most importantly. Do we even refine the oil in Canada? Because if we don't do it now then we're not going to lose any jobs when the pipeline opens up.
photo
LuisD
It's a wonder what you'll find with an open mind
08:52 PM on 09/23/2011
The spin: "Oil from Canada is ethical oil! If we build this pipeline, we'll get oil from Canada instead of unstable middle-eastern countries! We will reduce our dependence on mid-east oil! Win-win!"

The truth: Canadian oil production 2010: 3 million barrels per day. Forecast for 2030 under the most optimistic conditions: 5-6 million barrels per day. Present global oil consumption: 89 million barrels per day. Forecast demand for 2030: 120 million barrels per day. Almost all of the world's oil producing countries are now experiencing permanent declines. A country like Mexico that is America's 3rd largest supplier of oil will be a net importer of oil in just a few short years.

CONCLUSION: Canada's tar sands are a drop in the energy bucket. It's not worth ravaging the environment for something that will barely affect gas prices (a few pennies if we're lucky).

REAL SOLUTION: Smart growth, investments in transit, building smarter and denser cities, driving less, reducing our automobile dependency, transit-oriented development, etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:05 PM on 09/23/2011
Canada can't supply the whole world so it's not worth it? Really, that's your argument?
photo
LuisD
It's a wonder what you'll find with an open mind
09:09 PM on 09/23/2011
If Canada had inexpensive clean resources to exploit, absolutely it should go for it.

Unfortunately:
1. the tar sands are incredibly harmful and damaging to the environment, not to mention the damage the pipeline itself would do.
2. the energy exported won't even be enough to fuel 10% of America's oil needs.
3. oil demand will continue to explode thanks to China and developing countries

Pumping more oil won't even slow the problem because it'll just accelerate the overall decline in energy resources. The only solution is to develop alternatives and change reduce our automobile dependency.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
10:44 AM on 09/24/2011
"A country like Mexico that is America's 3rd largest supplier of oil will be a net importer of oil in just a few short years"

Yes their fields are in rapid decline. Canada won't even be able to make up for the Mexican losses, which not a single person or government mentions. Thus USA will be in deep recession again at that point, probably before the pipeline is even finished.

America is wasting it's time for one final grasp for oil when instead it should be increasing efficiency and relocalizing its population with electrified transit and grid connected vehicles etc. So yes the pipeline is a waste of precious time.

Use what's left of the oil resources to put wind farms across the midwest has been pointed out to be a great resource of electricity. Solar but more solar thermal, which doesn't require fancy smancy special metals.

America seems utterly distracted right now with destroying itself. If it can get off that channel I have no doubt at all that America can become a greener powerhouse. It would take years, maybe wind and other techs wouldn't work out, maybe there would be mistakes, but in the end if that is the direction America wants to go, it would work out.

America's refusal for the pipeline would signal a new maturity about energy problems and the new direction it has to go. Doesn't look like anyone is ready for that conversation until Mexico oil exports stop.
photo
LuisD
It's a wonder what you'll find with an open mind
06:02 PM on 09/24/2011
I agree with you 100%. If we invested all our oil resources in alternatives we could get out of this mess in a decade or less.

I take it a step further though, as an urban planner I strongly believe that the way we build our sprawling suburbs is a serious problem. Car dependency is the source of our demand for oil.

We need walkable, sustainable cities not automobile slums.
08:14 PM on 09/23/2011
People are free to express their views as long as they agree with us.