Ontario Election: Divide Between Rural And Urban Voters Key To Tory Loss And Liberal Minority

Toronto

The Huffington Post Canada   Eric Grenier First Posted: 10/07/11 12:27 PM ET Updated: 10/07/11 01:19 PM ET

Two things did not happen last night.

Dalton McGuinty did not win a majority government and Tim Hudak did not defeat the Ontario Liberals.

But both could have happened. Why didn’t they?

Several ridings were decided by only a few hundred votes. Had there been the smallest of swings or had turnout been higher, the Liberals could have managed a slim majority. In the end, they were only one seat short.

McGuinty’s majority was lost in southwestern Ontario. Last night, the Liberals held on to urban Ontario while the Tories took the rural parts of the province. Southwestern Ontario was one of the few regions in which the Liberals won a swathe of seats in the 2007 election. They lost those last night.

Province-wide trends pointed to the Liberals being able to hold those seats, but the Tories outperformed expectations in southwestern Ontario, while failing to gain much ground in the urban and suburban parts of the province,

The Liberals also suffered from the gains made by the New Democrats. Losses to the NDP in Toronto and northern Ontario, and to a lesser extent in London and Hamilton, also contributed to McGuinty's failure to secure a comfortable majority government.

Rural Ontario is where the Liberals lost their majority, while urban Ontario is where the Tories lost the election.

The key to the federal Conservative victory on May 2 was the party's breakthrough in Toronto and the outlying regions of the metropolis. But generally speaking, the federal Conservatives had more success than their provincial counterparts in every part of the province. While the Conservatives won 69 seats in southern Ontario, the Progressive Conservatives won only 35.

The majority of those seats the provincial Tories failed to win were in and around Toronto, eight in the city itself and 14 in the suburbs. Hudak's failure to break into Toronto cost him the election, as the PCs only needed to take nine of the 22 seats from the Liberals in order to win a plurality in the Ontario legislature. Winning 17 would have given the Tories a majority government.

But the Progressive Conservatives also had trouble getting elected in other parts of Ontario that opted for the federal Tories in May. Ottawa West-Nepean and Ottawa-Orléans, for example, were won by the Liberals last night. Both of those seats are occupied by Conservatives in the House of Commons. Parts of Kitchener and London also voted in Liberals in ridings won by the federal Conservatives, while smaller cities such as Peterborough, Niagara Falls and St. Catharines also opted for Dalton McGuinty after voting for Stephen Harper five months ago.

This election was Hudak's to lose, and in the final week of the campaign a majority government was McGuinty’s to lose. Both managed the feat, but the greatest loser last night might have been Ontario’s democracy. Less than half of eligible voters bothered to cast a ballot.

Éric Grenier taps The Pulse of federal and regional politics for Huffington Post Canada readers on most Tuesdays and Fridays. Grenier is the author of ThreeHundredEight.com, covering Canadian politics, polls, and electoral projections.

ONTARIO ELECTION FRONT PAGES:



FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Two things did not happen last night. Dalton McGuinty did not win a majority government and Tim Hudak did not defeat the Ontario Liberals. But both could have happened. Why didn’t they? Sev...
Two things did not happen last night. Dalton McGuinty did not win a majority government and Tim Hudak did not defeat the Ontario Liberals. But both could have happened. Why didn’t they? Sev...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 138
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
cinemaven
Follow me on Twitter :)
09:17 PM on 10/10/2011
The Tories has some bizarre ideas about participating in this election. Our local candidate didn't attend two televised debates or any of the social issue debates, I asked him why and he said it was a provincial strategy. I called a few friends and found out their candidate also didn't attend some of the debates. I think it really hurt them (although the Tory narrowly won, it should have been a much easier victory as the retiring incumbent was Tory and well liked).

I'm a huge fan of minority governments so I was very happy with the outcome. Hopefully, the Libs will come through with their University grants and some of their other promises.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Runey
religion is why we can't have nice things.
05:26 AM on 10/11/2011
We can hope so; on the flip side of that i starkly hope they don't hold true (or at least they don't go any further) with their public service cuts. I think we're both going to be disappointed though =\
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
02:53 PM on 10/10/2011
Nobody won the federal election either, but someone took power.
06:24 PM on 10/11/2011
How quickly they forget. There have been two federal elections in the last 50 years where the party that won received more than 50% of the votes. If you think that this election was tainted because the conservatives won ~38%, then I am sure you were alos howling all during Jean Chretiens regime.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
10:10 AM on 10/10/2011
The percentage of voters reflects the distancing from Hudak in the end and the lack of interest for McGuinty. Realistically I had moved towards Hudak and away from McGuinty. Hudak focued incorrectly near the end but I couldn't see myself voting for the liberals this time so I didn't vote.
08:47 AM on 10/10/2011
It is truly a sad society that is willing to allow legislation that is specifically to take your say away for the planning of your own communities.
Perhaps TO didn't understand the impact of voting Liberal.
People have given their lives so we can live in a free and democratic society.
The Liberals legislated away part of your democratic rights and freedoms.
And you folks told them that was okay.
I doubt it is okay for most people. Because most of us are immigrants that came here to escape tyranny and dictatorships.
The Green Energy Act , is a theft of our democratic freedom.
Don't be fooled by the name.............it is what it is. A step to a dictatrship.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elizlucinda
a mind is a terrible thing to waste
09:25 AM on 10/10/2011
Ernest...a lot of rhetoric...with no substance. It is NOT a theft of your democratic rights and to suggest that is ridiculous.
08:57 AM on 10/11/2011
elizlucinda,
It is surprising how little some know about the Green Energy Act.
I have lived in my community for 27 years, there are people that have lived here for 3 generations.
Under GEA no one has a say in the planning of IWTs in any community.
Land is just quietly leased or optioned and the people that have made these agreements sign a gag order.
When an IWTs developer has quietly done their testing , and has access to the grid , they have a few open houses telling people what they plan to do and where it is going and that's it.
Our quality of life interests , our health , including our children , or any right to plan an area to host this developments , are not the table.
If you live in a condo , you actually have more rights to complain about your quality of life because of a dog barking than I do regarding IWT developments.
In a democratic society , I would think that , people in a community would have the right to work together and map out areas to host these developments .
We do not.
Before commmenting please do it informed next time.
09:08 AM on 10/11/2011
In my world I would rather make friends than enemies...so I am going to apogize for my comment below...I just hope one day you and others do some more research on the issue.
Because it's not the direction..but how it is being done.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
01:44 PM on 10/09/2011
Article premise is seriously flawed. Torontonians are happy not to have Hudak. If you want a CPC province of Ontario, make Toronto a province and then Toronto will always be Liberal / NDP and Ontario PC. Then all of Toronto's money would no longer be controlled by PC's which would be a good thing too.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
07:58 AM on 10/09/2011
The people spoke no matter what way the pundits want to spin it, and in a democracy that is what counts.
06:28 PM on 10/08/2011
Bull! All Liberals won, because we don't mind minority governments! We actually think compromise and discussion helps the political process...
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
09:12 PM on 10/08/2011
In a land as diverse as Canada, compromise is what will keep us united.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
05:40 PM on 10/08/2011
Bull! We all win because little Timmy doesn't run Ontario.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CommonWealth-SinglePayer
Walk on the Right, VOTE on the LEFT
03:49 PM on 10/09/2011
What about Buck-A-Beer, how can we live in this hideous nanny state, we need Timmy and cheap brew! And non of that "Foreign" Beer either!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BUTCHER99
11:26 PM on 10/07/2011
What a disgusting headline on the sun! Probably according to them the only way it could have been worse was with a Liberal or NDP majority.
photo
turkeylurky
Just keepin it real........
10:09 AM on 10/08/2011
Yup, that would be worse..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
05:40 PM on 10/08/2011
Jerkylurky.
09:28 PM on 10/07/2011
Like PEI and Manitoba, people chose to be conservative in tough economic times. Expect this trend to continue in Newfoundland and Saskatchewan. Knowing your enemy is better than the unknown.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
01:51 AM on 10/08/2011
Manitoba 's election produced a NDP majority. I will say however that Conservative rural and NDP urban and north prevail. What is your word "conservative" no captial mean?
06:27 PM on 10/11/2011
He means voters don't want to change ship now. In Saskatchewan things are going well, there are jobs for everyone that wants to work (plus more) and real estate values & wages are going up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
10:13 AM on 10/10/2011
Further to this. We don't expect the Conservatives around for a long time. Like you say , hard economic times, but Manitoba is doing just fine.
05:21 PM on 10/10/2011
Why fit it if it aint broken.
07:07 PM on 10/07/2011
People are forgetting that the Libs proposed tax cuts exclusively for landed immigrants. That kind of minority pandering doesn't sit well with a lot of folks who feel as though their government isn't doing enough to put them first.
08:18 PM on 10/07/2011
No they didn't. They offered tax breaks for employers willing to hire certain professional immigrants, not all immigrants.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BUTCHER99
11:28 PM on 10/07/2011
How is that different than the pandering the federal conservatives did to minorities in the last election? Did that stop you from voting for the conservatives there?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
07:02 PM on 10/07/2011
A way back when, someone drew the boundaries of the provinces.

A way back when, when someone drew those boundaries, they had ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA how the humans would populate those provinces.

But the entire Canadian audience can't quite figure out how to RE-BOUNDARY Canada and balance the power of politic.

All that is required to to amalgamate Alta., Sask. and Man. into one province.

Then take a pen and etch out a boundary for Toronto and then draw a boundary for Northern and Southern Ontario.

Then take a pen and draw a boundary for Northern and Southern Quebec.

Then amalgamate the eastern provinces in a single province.

This would balance out the population in roughly 4-5 million jurisdictions.

Then we could get rid of this moronic political process that has inequitable behaviors both Federally and Provincially.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftyNeoCon
What happens when extreme left and right combine.
09:37 PM on 10/09/2011
Or we could just go to a straight 50% + 1 voting system as opposed to the current one...
photo
turkeylurky
Just keepin it real........
06:34 PM on 10/07/2011
Makers vs takers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
05:41 PM on 10/08/2011
A Holelurky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
06:27 PM on 10/07/2011
City Mouse vs Town Mouse. With a rat for a referee.
06:24 PM on 10/07/2011
This is nonsense! Firstly there's still some recounting to do and only one seat has to turn for McGuinty to have his majority - Secondly McGuinty wins a third term regardless and since there are more voters in the major cities than in rural areas their opinion trumps.

For the right wingers who don't believe in society pooling it's resources for the betterment of all, move south of the 49th and get yourself a three-cornered hat and enjoy a country where 1 out of every 4 children is hungry and 1 out of 6 Americans need food stamps just to survive.
09:17 AM on 10/11/2011
Intentionally driving the cost of living up for these people is going to make it better?
Did you know there was a plan put to Mcguinty to provide grants and subsidies to Ontarians to adopt some form of alternate energy..but , he wasn't interested.
I would like to hear more of your take on the betterment of all however.