Canada Income Inequality And The Decline Of Unions: Have We Passed A Point Of No Return?

First Posted: 12/12/2011 5:28 am Updated: 02/ 3/2012 12:35 pm

ST. THOMAS, Ont. — If there is any doubt that the erosion of unions could be contributing to the decline of the middle class — and, by extension, Canada's growing rich-poor divide — consider Shane MacPherson's career prospects.

When MacPherson stepped onto the line at the Ford Motor Co. assembly plant in St. Thomas, Ont., in the mid-'90s, he counted himself among the lucky ones. After decades of deterioration, good factory jobs had grown scarce, and, as the son of a Ford worker, MacPherson took comfort in knowing he would be able to provide his family with the same financial security his parents had given him.

"It was like, 'You're here. You're not switching jobs. This is it,' says MacPherson, whose sense of security grew even more when his wife got a job at Ford. "We weren't going to worry about the things that some people worry about."

Of course, all that changed in 2009, when the beleaguered Detroit firm announced it was closing the plant in St. Thomas, vaporizing 1,000 jobs and pulling the rug out from under MacPherson's vision for the future.

"I've been looking for a job for over a year and a half — and it's not happening," says the 35-year-old father of three, who will be removed from Ford's callback list at the end of the month. "Me and my wife realize that life's going to be completely different than what we imagined it was going to be."

More on income inequality at Mind The Gap: Which Provinces Have The Widest Income Gap?.. 11 Products And Services For The Super-Rich.. Calgary's Energy Boom Masks A Growing Gap.. FULL COVERAGE..

MacPherson's struggle is a reminder of the gaping hole in the labour market that unionized jobs once occupied.

"Unions are a major force for greater income equality at the national and local level," says Stephanie Ross, a labour expert at York University. "Through collective bargaining, they basically turn bad jobs into better jobs; into jobs that have a decent wage that can sustain a certain standard of living."

So it should come as no surprise that the diminishing capacity of organized labour appears to be having the opposite effect.

According to a recent Harvard University study, the disintegration of unions has been a significant factor in the growth in income inequality in the United States. Using data from the Current Population Survey, researchers decomposed the growth in hourly wages inequality for private sector workers from 1973 to 2007, when union membership plummeted from 34 per cent to 8 per cent. They concluded that the decline of organized labour explains a fifth to a third [of] the growth in inequality — an effect comparable to the stratification of wages by education.

Though the trend has not been as pronounced in Canada, experts say the fallout has been similar.

According to Craig Riddell, a labour economist at the University of British Columbia, in recent decades, fully 20 per cent of the growth in income inequality among Canadian men can be attributed to the decline in union density. The link, he says, is particularly apparent in the private sector, where the drop-off has been most pronounced.

For better or worse, observers tend to chalk up the decline of unions — and many of the industries where labour was once strongest — to some combination of a changing world economy, competition from cheap imports and the unsustainable nature of big unions themselves.

But for those born and raised to work on the line, the implications of this particular aspect of the growing income gap are more than an abstraction. As a gulf opens up between their expectations and reality, their sense of community and personal identity hangs in the balance.

"We don't go and get a big education and move to Toronto for the big jobs," says Ron Drouillard, a fourth-generation Ford worker who was laid off in 2007 when the company announced it was closing a Windsor, Ont., plant.

"[People] go into the factory when they're 18 or 19, and that's their sacrifice, that's their education. It's going to take a toll on their bodies and they're going to die a little bit younger, but that's going to provide a better life for their kids. This is what we do," he says, pausing briefly before correcting himself. "Well, it's what we did."

According to Jim Stanford, chief economist for the Canadian Auto Workers' union, the role labour organizations played in smoothing out income disparity in the 20th century cannot be overstated.

"There's no inherent reason in any profession or in any industry why middle class jobs would normally be produced by the market economy," he says. "Middle class jobs are a creation of deliberate efforts to lift standards, and unions are the most important of those efforts."

Peter Temin, an expert in economic history at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, sees it somewhat less starkly. Noting that the rise of unions during the 1930s occurred alongside a host of other redistributive public policies, he says they have been more significant in maintaining equality than creating it.

"Income inequality was reduced a lot in the Second World War, and the unions preserved it for a generation," he says.

But either way, it's clear that there's something about unions that is conducive to flattening the income distribution — and not just for those who pay membership dues.

For all of Big Labour's shortcomings, the evidence is ample that the collective agreements negotiated by union bosses tend to bid up wages throughout the entire sector, as management strives to retain employees and discourage unionization.

At the same time, studies have shown that in industrialized nations, high union density often accompanies a variety of other equalizing measures, including progressive taxation and robust labour laws.

Within unionized shops, says Riddell, unions have tended to lift the earnings of those at the bottom and compress incomes at the top — an equalizing effect that is most pronounced in the kind of private sector unions where the decline has been concentrated.

"You had a lot of unskilled, and semi-skilled workers whose wages moved up into earnings that put them into the middle class, so you had a much more homogeneous society, income-wise, than you would have otherwise had," Riddell says of auto towns like St. Thomas and Windsor.

For many in those cities, generations of relatively solid pay, benefits and job security engendered an almost institutionalized belief in the promise of landing a union gig.

As Drouillard points out, when he was in his final year of high school, his vice-principal reminded him that the Big Three were hiring.

"He was questioning me, 'Why are you still here?' " recalls the 37-year-old, who started at Ford in the mid-'90s. "They pressured you to go [because] that's the best job you'll ever get. If you're going to live in this community, quit school and go to the factory. That was normal."

Which could explain why these plants became communities all their own.

"One of the neatest things was that we had our own hockey league, not just a hockey team," says MacPherson. "We had our own league with just our plant."

Quick Poll

Do you think Canada would be better off if unions made a comeback?

Michelle Gleeson, who was a second-generation Ford worker in St. Thomas, also describes a culture of togetherness.

"It wasn't the drone syndrome, where you just go to work and you're like a robot," she says. "It was more like a family, and I loved that."

The auto workers in Windsor and St. Thomas say they always suspected on some level that their jobs wouldn't last forever — and this fear was not unwarranted. Even before the recession, Canada's auto industry was falling of the cliff, shedding a staggering 56,000 jobs from 2004 to 2008.

As the rumours became harder to ignore, the threat of shutdown gnawed away at the ties forged on the factory floor and in the union hall.

"It's almost like [we] couldn't take out their anger or their power on the employer anymore so it just kind of turned on ourselves," says Drouillard.

But animosity soon gave way to grief.

"There was obviously a big sense of loss," says Dennis McGee, president of CAW Local 1520, which represents Ford workers in St. Thomas. "[It's like] you've lost a family member."

THE 10 FASTEST SHRINKING MANUFACTURING SECTORS IN CANADA

Manufacturing jobs in Canada went into a steep decline even before the recent economic troubles began. According to StatsCan, employment has been in decline since 2004. Here are the 10 fastest-shrinking sectors from 2004 to 2008, when the recession began.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Printing: 11,900 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Paper: 13,200 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Food: 14,000 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Metals: 15,000 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Furniture: 23,100 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Machinery: 26,200 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Plastics & Rubber: 35,300 Jobs Lost Before Recession

  • Clothing: 37,800 Jobs Lost Before Recession

  • Vehicles & Parts: 56,500 Jobs Lost Before Recession

  • Wood Products: 57,300 Jobs Lost Before Recession

WEARING DOWN THE UNION LABEL

In a recent report on deepening income disparity, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) noted that, in Canada, more than 40 per cent of the increase in inequality since the 1980s can be attributed to the "rising gap in men's earnings."

"Employment is the most promising way of tackling inequality," the OECD maintained. "The biggest challenge is creating more and better jobs that offer good career prospects and a real chance for people to escape poverty."

But as labour share's of GDP falls and corporate profits increase, it's difficult to see where those jobs will come from, or what role unions might play in this effort.

Whereas the Great Depression ushered in a progressive political atmosphere that was conducive to the rise of unions and the redistribution of income, the recent recession has left a very different legacy in its wake.

In the private sector, experts say that the passage of restrictive laws around union organizing and shifting employer attitudes are making it tough for unions to lay down roots, particularly in the growing service sector.

Unlike big plants, which contained hundreds of full-time employees under the same roof, restaurants and retail outlets tend to be staffed by temporary and part-time workers scattered over many locations.

"It's been very difficult for unions to organize the Walmarts, and not just because Walmart goes out of its way to prevent unionization," says Riddell. "Even when unions have made some in-roads, they've either not been able to get a first collective agreement or survive."

Despite repeated organizing drives, a Walmart in Weyburn, Sask., is the only unionized location in North America.

Got a story to share about unions? We want to hear it! Leave a comment on our Facebook page, Tweet @HuffPostCanada using the #incomegap tag, or leave a comment below.

At the same time, as governments trumpet the virtues of austerity and push privatization as a means to trim the fat, public sector unions — the last stronghold of organized labour in Canada — are increasingly coming under attack, as the threat of cutbacks loom everywhere from city hall to Parliament Hill.

In the U.S., observers often cite the infamous Reagan-era firing of 11,000 striking air traffic controllers as the moment the tide turned against unions.

On this side of the border, Dalhousie University economist Lars Osberg says the Harper government's swift intervention in the recent Canadian Union of Postal Workers and Air Canada labour disputes may one day be seen as a similar turning point.

"If you want a direct indicator of the political power of unions," he says, "that's an indicator."

But however the labour market adjusts to the New World Order, it seems unlikely that the kind of work that once powered southern Ontario will ever return to the same extent, forcing legions of laid-off factory employees to ponder a tough choice: settle for less, or move somewhere else.

Meanwhile, in St. Thomas, the death rattle of CAW Local 1520 is taking place in a rented space at a nondescript strip mall a few minutes from the plant, where the union and government have funded an "action centre" for workers to spruce up their resumes, peruse job boards and find support in one another.

Since selling the old union hall a few months ago, the action centre has also become a kind of makeshift memorial. Framed portraits of the CAW's top brass and a photo of a Crown Victoria, the car that used to be built here, hang on the grey walls. Behind the door in his office, McGee has stacked several plaques marking significant milestones in the local's 44-year history.

As McGee explains, the plaques used to be mounted in concrete at the union hall, but are too heavy to hang.

The assembly plant is still impossible to miss from Highway 4, but the massive employee parking lot that extends to the road's edge now sits empty.

"I hate driving by there," says MacPherson, who passes the plant on a daily basis. "I just try not to look."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

ST. THOMAS, Ont. — If there is any doubt that the erosion of unions could be contributing to the decline of the middle class — and, by extension, Canada's growing rich-poor divide — consider Sha...
ST. THOMAS, Ont. — If there is any doubt that the erosion of unions could be contributing to the decline of the middle class — and, by extension, Canada's growing rich-poor divide — consider Sha...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 236
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamster88
12:39 AM on 04/29/2012
Unions were very effective at giving workers collective bargaining rights, increasing wages and working conditions.

However - times have changed.

Government regulations do a very good job at ensuring worker safety, and the minimum wage sets a floor for compensation.

Where unions exist, workers are radically overpaid with respect to the national average. Bus drivers earn over 60K a year while working a little overtime. Once you are mid-level in the white collar world 'a little overtime' is the norm, and average salaries in Canada are just over 30K.

It is quite stupid to pay the least hard working, least talented, least educated - and the people who put in the least amount of effort and took the least risks - well above the average.

People who put in less effort, have less talent, who take on less risk, who couldn't be bothered to pursue higher education - deserve to get compensated less than the average, not more.

Unions right now have far too much power - they guarantee the least talented people higher wages than they deserve, absolute job security (a benefit), and life-long retirement packages worth a fortune.

The total benefit packages for union workers is far, far too high.

The rational recourse for our most talented people is to drop out of school and to drive a bus - great pay, plenty of time off. Who will do the rest of the work?

Unions have outlived their usefulness and are now a drag on everyone,.
02:03 PM on 02/05/2012
Unions, like governments, do not generate income or "wealth." Look at the GDP for the two top unionized nations, Finland and Sweden. Both rank 36 and 22 respectively while France ranks 5th. Social safety nets aren't a contributing factor either. Finland, Sweden, and France have enormous safety nets yet France produces a far higher GDP. No as a lot of my Dad's high school friends learned in the 70s, it depends on the value of your skill set. If your skills are difficult to acquire, need a certain level of mastery and are normally in demand, keeping a job isn't difficult. If my Dad didn't go to college, ending up as a college administrator, he would have been an unemployed steel worker with a mortgage he couldn't pay on a house he couldn't sell. Steel never came back to Pittsburgh. Those who remained had to re-train and enter new industries. It's difficult but what else can you do? The union? They couldn't bring back the factories or lure new steel makers to Pittsburgh. They sat on their cushioned butts and held to their demands for "more this" and "more that."
07:45 PM on 04/12/2012
I think you forgot to mention that France's population is nearly 7 times greater than Sweden.
09:38 AM on 01/26/2012
I see the anti union campaign set out by certain people in power seems to be working with one poster in particular
reminds me of the joke there are 3 people in a room a ceo a union employee and a non union employee
There are 12 cookies on a plate the corporate ceo takes 11 cookies
he than looks at the non union employee and says watch out that union guy over there wants your cookie
Continue to deominize unions, the working conditions in China present day remind me of the sweat shop days in North America.
08:40 AM on 01/26/2012
For anything to grow, fertile conditions must exist. Now that workers are seeing the results of fewer unions and how the 1% are taking it all, I suspect it will be a lot easier to organize labor. Everything goes in cycles. Big business had its chance and we all have seen the results. It will change as change is a fact of life.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:12 PM on 01/12/2012
Something every union goon should know, but doesn't:

http://www.torontosun.com/comment/columnists/2010/08/23/15117326.html


"The paper uses a multiplier and ignores the de-multiplier.

The multiplier explains a dollar spent on the arts might hire an actor, who then buys lunch. The waiter benefits and buys shoes for her child, and so on. Of course taxes are also collected. It multiplies.

What they don't do is study what would have happened if the dollar had stayed in the pocket of the taxpayer in the first place. That's the de-multiplier.

After all, the same economic benefit-chain could be done stemming from the taxpayer spending that dollar as he or she chooses, perhaps to greater community benefit.

Private economic activity responds to market demand, while politicians can reward friends in return for political support."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sunnyokanagan
Increase compassion. Decrease suffering
01:55 PM on 01/12/2012
Some time in the 1980s, business changed; it is no longer about the intrinsic value of the product built, but the share value and ROI of the shareholders. Worse still, the meta-business of converting long-term businesses into short-term cash windfalls - the "raid-and-rape" scenario.

It is no longer sufficient for a business to produce a quality product at a profitable price. Because of the "trader" mentality of maximizing return in the shortest possible time, businesses now have to cut the legs out from under their suppliers and their labour force in order to wring every last penny of operating capital out of the business itself, and redistribute it "upward" to a diminishing number of "one-percenters" at the top.

If the business itself suffers or even fails because of this strategy is of no consequence to the recipients of the wealth thus vacuumed from the middle class or indeed, from the country's economy. The new Privateers are not loyal or beholden to any country except the one with the greatest potential for plunder and the one that gives them the most "welfare" and tax concessions.

THIS is the new reality. Unless working people get together to put a political stop to this dissolute and cynical piracy, expect it to get worse. If we don't join together to fight it now, prepare for the revolution later.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
04:26 PM on 01/12/2012
Good post. It will be a grand challenge. For the most part, business and political leadership has been compromised. We must retake our society one elected representative at a time. Passive = Failure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:13 PM on 01/12/2012
If unions are so great, why did Saskatchewan sit in the economic doldrums when the unions controlled the province?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:08 PM on 01/12/2012
Looks like the people understand unions have become a net loss for society and are rejecting them.
07:07 PM on 01/05/2012
I'm sick of hearing people blame unions for the financial woes of a broken economic system.The unions got no more than the companies were willing to give them.At the same time the companies obviously continued to make money reagardless of the settlements they made with the unions.
.I highly suspect that the definition of acceptable profit margin differs greatly from the 1950's to now.We went from making a living to making a good living to barely making a living.
This is the very situation that powered the movement to organized labor in the first place.The rule of thumb , according to Michael Moore's documentary 'Capitalism,a Love Affair,...if the company does well everyone will benefit(not just the shareholders and CEO's).Now companies are deciding to expatriate themselves to make an extra billion or two on top of the billions they already make.This is accomplished by eliminating jobs here and taking them to a country where the workers expect less..For example I would like to see a study on the frequency of recalls in the last 7 years vs. the increase in the use of temp agency workers.I personally worked at such a plant doing 2nd party quality auditing in final inspection.When the temps took over from the full time people I saw a 50% increase of defects at the final audit( the last step prior to shipment to the customer).
photo
tjdwill02
There is no free lunch
10:53 AM on 01/03/2012
The private unions severely hurt a company with strikes, work slow downs and noncompetitive wages and benefits, leaving the customer little choice, but to only go to another company where the same union was negotiating the same loose work rules. Toyota's system was developed in the absence of a strong union, without the adversarial model that the UAW had developed, no matter however historically necessary, it made the Toyota example completely unworkable in a Detroit union plant. Consequently Detroit died on the vine while Toyota and companies following its model flourished, bring better quality, better designed products to market faster and more efficiently.
10:51 AM on 01/03/2012
True or False . If we are all making minimum wage, the country will collapse ? There will be no one to pay the taxes, there will be no one to purchase the goods ? Corporations would prefer to see everyone making minimum wage to increase their profits ? Unions help to keep wages fair ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
renegade28
05:59 PM on 01/05/2012
If all are making minimum wage, then nobody is buying new cars, houses and all the big ticket items.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:10 PM on 01/12/2012
If taxpayers dollars are going to subsidize those union wages they are a net loss for the economy.

Why should the single mom waitress have to pay higher taxes so these guys can continue to make 5 times her wage?
How is taking money out of her pocket and giving it to these greedy socialists fair?
02:30 PM on 01/12/2012
So when all the unionized workers from down the road no longer visits the establishment where she works because who can afford to eat out on minimum wage after all . She will become unemployed and will no longer need to pay taxes . We will be able to spend our tax dollars on her welfare . Good Plan . And since when ever has savings by the government ever resulted in tax reductions to the citizens , they will simply find somewhere else to spend it . Maybe build some more prisons , or buy a couple extra jets , maybe give themselves a better pension plan .
03:40 PM on 12/16/2011
As a child I moved from Cape Breton to Windsor in the 1950's - the coal mines closed and my (UMW member) coal miner father was told - Canada had enough oil to last for the next 300 years, so take your seven kids and move on. Now, as a retired person in Windsor - I lived through all the great years we had here. At one point Windsor celebrated the highest average wage in Canada. Good times! But for reasons stated in these comments with much greater emotion than I can - that Greedy Unions, Corporate Share Holders or some larger than God (socialist or capitalist) Government conspiracy - has a goal to destroy or enslave every working man (or woman) in Canada. Angry and accusatory fingers pointing in every direction. Hey folks nothing is forever!

My heart truly goes out to those laid off families (that's who gets laid off not the individual). But with the new global economy and the rapid rise and fall of new industries (RIM for example) the ability (and responsibility) to adapt to today's work place now rests with YOU.
photo
SkeeBee
Offending InFoxtrination Sufferers With Facts.
02:54 PM on 12/16/2011
Well if PC strong hold Oilberta is any harbinger, I'd say that combined with our corporatist, elitist, ruling party that yeah: Unions are going to follow the path they've been driven down, by Repugnicans, in the US:
Oblivion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:12 PM on 01/12/2012
Alberta has good wages, but it's a result of the good economy, not the unions.

Saskatchewan was ruled by the unions for decades and had low wages because they destroyed the economy.

Tommy Douglas and the unions created a socialist paradise in Saksatchewan but for some reason the workers packed up and left.
photo
SkeeBee
Offending InFoxtrination Sufferers With Facts.
06:55 PM on 01/12/2012
Lol.
You state the very reason Oilberta has ATROCIOUS union and SHITE working conditions and rights for workers: It's economy ie: the Bug Oil companies....

And you actually blame unions for destroying the Sask. economy?

I wish life was actually simple, black and white, and free of more than 4 or 5 details, as it obviously is in your world.
Must be nice.
01:43 PM on 12/16/2011
When the corporate executives of said company make Billions of dollars per year, it is unreasonable to blame the unions and the employees for a companies failure. The average working man should make a living wage, to say otherwise is irrational on the part of many of these commenters.

How can you blame the line workers who make enough to support their families, when the executives are not only making enough money to support their families in outrageous fashion, but enough above and beyond that to support a modest third-world nation?
07:53 PM on 12/13/2011
Many of the anti union comments here seen to miss the point of the article.

Income equality has declined in conjunction with union membership, this point is unarguable and is also supported by the fact that countries with higher standards of living have higher union participation levels.

While lots of anti union sentiment can be thrown around even by union members like my self it is indisputable that there will better wages when there are collective negotiations.

Contrary to what people think unions have been evolving in the last 20 years and have become less confrontational throughout the terms of collective agreements even going as far to help manage some of their members. The industry I work in is heavily unionised and I would suggest that the company would choose to maintain this relationship as it is beneficial to both sides. Even though at contract times the relationship can be strained after that the mutual respect returns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leader Newworldparty
09:56 PM on 12/13/2011
Which countries have higher standards of living and do not have fake economies and fake wealth?

Read:

Fake Wealth
http://www.newworldparty.org/2007/04/debt-fake-wealth.html

Fake Economy
http://www.newworldparty.org/2009/01/fake-economy.html

Read:

http://www.newworldparty.org/2008/11/unions.html

"Yes, unions elevate wages for workers. This may last for many years. However, it is debatable if this is sustainable. In the long run, their wages can go to zero. Unions are a good leading indicator for industries that will fail, as many industries with unions tend to lose money and go bankrupt, as in the case of the auto makers. Unions are predicting governments to fail, as the extra expense from unions are exacerbating the debt crises. The difference between the government and a business is that the government can continue to lose money, by stealing money from children and you through deficits and debts, for a much longer period of time."

Unions get to collude. However, for the majority of the population, collusion is illegal. Either ban unions, or legalize collusion for everybody else.