Senate Appointments: Stephen Harper To Add Seven New Senators

Betty Unger

First Posted: 12/23/11 03:40 PM ET Updated: 12/24/11 10:41 AM ET

Prime Minister Stephen Harper will appoint seven new senators to the upper chamber in early January, The Huffington Post has learned.

Alberta's Betty Unger will likely get the nod to fill the one vacancy in her province.

She hasn't been contacted yet, she told HuffPost, but if the Prime Minister calls this holiday break she will gladly accept.

"Yes, if I have the opportunity," Unger said.

"I've been campaigning for Senate reform since 1998. It's an issue that I very, very strongly support. I think it's time, and I know Canadians, in countless polls, have consistently said they would like to elect all of their politicians," she added.

Unger, a Progressive-Conservative candidate, came in second to Bert Brown in Alberta's last Senate nominee election held in 2004. Former Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach extended Unger and the other shortlisted candidates' terms in 2010 and the current premier, Alison Redford, has said she plans to hold a new election process in 2012.

Brown is already a member of the upper chamber, having been appointed by Harper in 2007.

Picking a runner-up as the next Alberta Senator would be a first, Unger acknowledged, but the Conservatives have made it clear they will appoint nominees from provinces who have engaged in an electoral process.

Seven new Conservatives would bring Harper's majority in the Senate to 61 of the chamber's 105 seats.

The Tories already have a healthy majority in the red chamber due to 39 plum appointments Harper already handed to party faithful.

When the Prime Minister first began appointing his own people to fill the Senate's vacancies in 2009, his office said they were needed to push their Senate reform legislation forward.

Democratic Reform Minister Tim Uppal cited the same reason when the Tories re-appointed two failed Conservative candidates, Fabian Manning and Larry Smith, to the Senate after their unsuccessful election bids this spring.


Despite having a majority, Senate reform legislation has moved at a snail's pace.

A new version of the Government's Senate Reform Act is now in the House of Commons, after their own senators revolted and their support was less than guaranteed.

Many Conservative senators, sided with their Liberal colleagues, in thinking that the government had not thought through the long-term consequences of giving the Senate democratic legitimacy.

"The Senate wasn't set up to be elected," Tory senator Michael MacDonald said in June.

A staunch campaigner for Senate reform, Unger defended the Conservative government's decision to keep appointing senators despite having majorities in both chambers of Parliament.

Senate reform is not something you can "push," Unger said. "The Government believes that senators should be elected at the provincial level, as I was, as Senator Brown was. So what you need to have happened is for the premiers to call Senate elections in their own provinces."

"You need to have the premiers take this initiative and they are the ones who should be calling the elections, with a provincial election or municipal elections (since) stand-alone elections would probably too pricey," she said. "That's what we need to have happen."

"Vacancies keep occurring and the Prime Minister wants to fill those vacancies with elected people but if there are no elected people, he has to make the appointment," she added.

Few provinces have warmed to the idea of spending their own money to hold elections for people who sit in Ottawa.

Quebec has warned it might fight the federal government's legislation, which it views as anti-constitutional, in court. Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty and B.C. Premier Christie Clark have both suggested they would rather see the Senate abolished. But if it can be scrapped, Clark suggested, elections were the next best thing.

New Brunswick Premier David Alward announced in November his government would hold Senate elections.

However, some of the other provinces who initially seemed warm to the idea, such as Manitoba and Saskatchewan, did not hold parallel Senate elections when their provinces headed to the polls this fall.

The Democratic Reform Minister's spokeswoman Kate Davis told HuffPost Friday, the Government is still committed to Senate reform.

"Senate reform is a long-standing commitment of our government and of our party. I won't speculate on Senate appointments, but what I can say is that the Senate status-quo, where Senators have no democratic mandate from Canadians and can serve terms of up to forty-five years, is unacceptable," Davis said.

The seven vacancies were caused by five retirements and two resignations: one in Alberta to replace retiring Liberal Senator Tommy Banks, two in Quebec after Liberal Senator Francis Fox resigned and Liberal Senator Lucie Pépin retired, one in Manitoba to replace Liberal Sharon Carstairs who resigned in October, two in Ontario after Progress Conservative Senator Lowell Murray and Conservative Senator Vim Kocchar reached the mandatory retirement age of 75 and one in Newfoundland and Labrador to replace Liberal Bill Rompkey who also retired earlier this spring.

Senators early a base salary of $132,300.

2011: By The Numbers
76 Female MPs
1  of  11
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
76: The record-breaking number of female MPs who were elected in May.


The Conservatives won the majority they were seeking in May's federal election, but the attention was all on the stunning loss by the Liberals. They lost 77 seats and wound up with only 34 and 18.9 per cent of the vote. The NDP rode the orange wave and got 102 seats.


The federal election did bring more female faces to the House of Commons. 76 female MPs were elected in May, up from the 69 who were elected in the 2008 election.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Prime Minister Stephen Harper will appoint seven new senators to the upper chamber in early January, The Huffington Post has learned. Alberta's Betty Unger will likely get the nod to fill the one v...
Prime Minister Stephen Harper will appoint seven new senators to the upper chamber in early January, The Huffington Post has learned. Alberta's Betty Unger will likely get the nod to fill the one v...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 131
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:00 PM on 01/04/2012
Over 20 years ago I was in highschool discussing the Senate.I said then and I will say it now...get rid of it.
All the Senate is ...is a place for favours to be returned to people who did a solid for some other politician.It was called 'porkbarrelling' when I was in class in those days...I don't know what they call it now.
12:57 PM on 01/04/2012
Read it and weep, whiners - when Harper tried to reform the senate when in minority, the Opposition blocked reform - so, Harper has to play the cards he's dealt! Sweet revenge!
11:56 AM on 12/27/2011
I hear Don Cherry and Conrad Black are up for seats.
12:55 PM on 01/04/2012
Conrad Black is not a Canadian citizen - sheesh!
12:58 PM on 01/04/2012
I suppose you would prefer the Lib senator busted for fraud?
01:17 PM on 01/04/2012
Why is it that ONLYCONSERVATIVES have no sense of humor?
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
02:37 AM on 12/26/2011
Althia Raj
(12:04 PM)
The Prime Minister did run a platform of electing senators but he has not appointed more senators than any other prime minister. Jean Chrétien, for example, appointed 75 senators
**************************************************************

Harper appointed 29 at one time, did he not? Was that not more that any other PM at one go?
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
09:16 PM on 12/24/2011
Wasn't it Harper (Grand Poohbah) who ran on a platform of electing senators? And when it was politically expedient, he APPOINTED more senators (CONservatives, of course) than any other PM. Typical Harper behaviour-say one thing, and do the opposite. If I were standing outside, soaking wet, and Harper were to tell me it was raining, I wouldn't believe him.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Althia Raj
12:04 PM on 12/25/2011
Hi Newfoundlander,
The Prime Minister did run a platform of electing senators but he has not appointed more senators than any other prime minister. Jean Chrétien, for example, appointed 75 senators. You can see the list of senators appointed by PM here: http://www.parl.gc.ca/ParlInfo/lists/senators.aspx?Language=E&Parliament=&Name=&Party=&Province=&Gender=&Current=False&PrimeMinister=&TermEnd=&Ministry=987cfddd-765a-45b1-a3cc-615cda70797f&Picture=False
photo
turkeylurky
Just keepin it real........
10:27 AM on 12/24/2011
It'll take most of the rest of the Conservative mandate for Harper to have a sufficient number of Senators who will support his Senate reform bill - so filling empty seats with reform-minded senators is crucial to that end..
In any event, the Senate needs reformation as it is a useless and costly institution at the moment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
01:02 PM on 12/24/2011
It's modelled on the British House of Lords, where one could BUY a seat up to a few years ago.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Austin
Women = people. Corperations ≠ people.
02:20 PM on 12/24/2011
... except a majority of Cnaadians and MPs and Senators already support the bill and would vote for it tommorow. The rank and file of the NDP and Liberals want an elected senate as does the Bloc and Greens... the only peopel who are opposed to it right now are the Conservatives (that is, Harper, as many want to reform the Senate but not at the cost of their jobs)... because they (he) can appoint whom they (he) wish.

I have no doubt Harper will push for an elected Senate eventually, but it won't come into play for a generation and the bill will have 'tact ons' of ways to direct power back to the PMO and in the meantime those 50 odd senators Harper appoints will hold the balence of power even if the Conservatives are kicked from the Commons or made a minority again.

I just don't trust any of them. I want a law on the books before I beleive it to be real.
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
10:08 AM on 12/24/2011
Once Harper has all of his cronies in the Senate, he will start working on an elected Upper House, as he is always on about.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Devlin
11:03 AM on 12/24/2011
1) Why would he need to pack the Senate to do that?

2) The Conservatives already have a majority in the Senate.
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
11:31 AM on 12/24/2011
Since when is a "majority" good enough?
08:50 AM on 12/24/2011
This column is really gossip. There is no evidence that Harper is going to appoint 7 new senators. Yes there maybe seven vacancies but on what basis in fact is the column written. This is the problem with today's media and bloggers. There does not need to be evidence just a columnist who invents something in his/her own mind.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
09:57 AM on 12/24/2011
Your first fan...speculation is the foundation of a great deal of what is posted on this site...constant overuse of "could"
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
10:07 AM on 12/24/2011
Seven vacancies means seven appointments. Simple.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:10 AM on 12/24/2011
Really?
Harper left several seats empty while he tried to get the liberals on board to reform it, when they refused he had to go ahead and fill them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
07:06 AM on 12/24/2011
Any legislation that addresses senate reform needs senate approval. So any government that wishes to push senate reform obviously needs to stack the deck.
He said he was going to reform the senate.
This is how it is done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Allen
08:27 AM on 12/24/2011
It's also exactly what you do if you don't have any intentions of reforming the senate.
09:53 AM on 12/24/2011
Exactly. Sure, he may be wanting to reform the senate, BUT, will he fined his stacked senate to be very useful and, you know, slow down the reform process just a wee bit more.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:11 AM on 12/24/2011
HUH?
Please explain.
Or has hate competely obliterated your ability to reason?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johnny LaRue
political correctness is just incorrect
06:39 AM on 12/24/2011
Oink Oink Oink. Here comes another wave of washed up political hacks to the money trough. Just shows the only difference between the Conservatives and the Liberals is who they give jobs to.
photo
butchcliff
The future is unwritten
06:11 AM on 12/24/2011
Harper simply replacing retiring senators as his authority allows.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
01:08 AM on 12/24/2011
How about simply eliminating the Senate?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
04:15 AM on 12/24/2011
Considering they are just a rubber stamp, then yes, lets just eliminate it. Do away with the whole Governor General crap as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
04:26 PM on 12/24/2011
The Governor General, unlike the Senate, actually plays a very important constitutional role. I'd hesitate to eliminate that position.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EQ8Rhomes
08:30 PM on 12/24/2011
That will allow the Commons to act like the Alberta Conservatives have for 40+years--Ram+ bulldoze and all in secret with no hint of effective challenge (even by the opposition they have tolerated as a face saving device).
However, a fully elected Senate will toe the Commons majority line should the same party be majority in both plagued Houses.
Should Canadians try to be smart and elect majorities from diff parties, or coalitions thereof, causing the Senate and the Commons to face off, we could have a gridlock--a point the USA is closely flirting with--- along ideological (not pragmatic) battle lines.
In 1979, Peter Lougheed asked AB for 79 out of 79 seats(hence no opposition), and got 75! His gov did as it pleased him.
Honourable Harper is heading exactly that way--my guess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
12:12 PM on 12/25/2011
You seem to be arguing from both sides.
01:06 AM on 12/24/2011
Good time to do it when everyone is busy being distracted by the holidays. We wouldn't want Canadians to realize how slimy Harper really is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:11 AM on 12/24/2011
When are the seats being filled again....?
11:55 PM on 12/23/2011
So much for smaller Government.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:25 AM on 12/24/2011
There are a fixed number of senate seats....
Liberals and dippers/blocheads are against reforming it...
02:59 AM on 12/24/2011
As the article states, many Conservatives revolted against reform... Do try to be consistent if not coherent...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Austin
Women = people. Corperations ≠ people.
02:22 PM on 12/24/2011
Hey Stan, please don't reply to me anymore eh. Just because you're nuts dosen't mean I need to suffer for it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
10:56 PM on 12/23/2011
More idiots bloviating about the senate when they know nothing about it.
Pretty standard at the HP.
11:59 PM on 12/23/2011
And guess who's at the top of the list
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:24 AM on 12/24/2011
You?
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
09:59 AM on 12/24/2011
lol...I think I know!!
02:59 AM on 12/24/2011
Self-reference?