CEO Compensation In Canada Jumped 27 Per Cent In 2010, CCPA Says

Ceo Pay Compensation Canada Jumps 27 Percent

First Posted: 01/ 2/2012 10:01 pm Updated: 01/ 3/2012 7:42 am

As debate about Canada’s rich-poor divide intensifies, a new report highlights the growing income gap between top-paid CEOs and average Canadians.

According to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, the 100 highest-earning CEOs on the TSX Index pocketed an average of $8.38 million in 2010 -- a 27 per cent increase over the previous year.

It’s a stark contrast to the annual incomes of average Canadians, whose wages, when adjusted for inflation, have actually been falling. By noon on January 3, the top paid CEOs will have already raked in an average $44,366 -- the amount that it took average workers an entire year to earn.

“There is obviously something very different at play here for CEO compensation compared with the compensation of other Canadians,” says CCPA economist and report author Hugh Mackenzie, noting that the substantial rise in CEO pay came during a period when average wages grew by just two per cent. “That’s a pretty big gulf in just one year.”

Deriding corporate compensation for executives as “a major driver of income inequality
in Canada,” the report notes that top-paid CEOs banked 189 times the earnings of average Canadians in 2010, up from 105 in 1998.

More on income inequality at Mind The Gap: The Decline Of Unions: Have We Passed A Point Of No Return? Which Provinces Have The Widest Income Gap?.. 11 Products And Services For The Super-Rich.. FULL COVERAGE..

Magna International Inc. founder Frank Stronach was by far the highest flying CEO in the group. In the year before he retired, Stronach pocketed more than $61.8 million -- thanks, in large part, to a $41 million bonus.

Fellow Magna execs Donald Walker and Siegfried Wolf snagged second and third spots, with earnings of $16.6 million and $16.5 million respectively.

At No. 85, Nancy Southern, president and CEO of Calgary-based Atco Group, was the only woman in the top 100, which includes bankers, resource producers and telecommunications giants.

The bump in CEO earnings in 2010 follows two years of relative flat-lining, as bonuses and the value of stock options -- important components of CEO compensation -- dipped during the economic downturn.

But according to Christopher Chen, a Toronto-based compensation consultant for the Hay Group, during the recession many corporate boards opted to make retention payments to CEOs, which “allowed them to keep sitting in the seats and doing what they were doing.”

“That really long fall from the top floor that we all expected to happen, it didn’t happen so much in 2008 and 2009,” he says. “For that reason, I can understand why people looking from the outside are fussed.”

The recovery has also been particularly been kind to CEOs, whose earnings came roaring back in 2010 as the market regained its footing.

“In 2009, in particular, stock options weren’t worth very much because the market was in such poor shape,” says Mackenzie. “But stock options became a very popular form of compensation again, partly because the stock market hit such low levels. When the stock market goes down, the potential upside from a stock option goes way up.”

Among the top 100 CEOs, the report found that 70 received part of their pay in grants of stock and 73 in stock options. The average grant was valued at $2.6 million; the average awarded options, meanwhile, were $3.2 million.

NOT-SO-FRINGE BENEFITS

CEOs also benefit from more generous retirement plans than Canadians typically enjoy.

Whereas 30 per cent of Canadians have defined-benefit pension plans, in 2010, nearly half of the top 100 CEO had this type of gold-plated plan, which had accrued to pay an average annual pension of $1.19 million upon retirement.

At the same time, a growing number of Canadians are finding themselves on defined-contribution plans, which do not guarantee any level of income for retirees.

Though CEO pay in Canada is much lower than in the United States, Mackenzie says the rate at which it is ballooning “puts a face on” deepening income inequality, which has ratcheted up substantially in recent decades.

“When you look around the rest of the industrialized world, Canada still stands out as generating excessive inequality,” says Mackenzie, noting the findings of a recent report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

As the CCPA report notes, with earnings ranging from $3.9 million to $61 million, the top 100 CEOs are among the top 0.01 per cent of the income distribution -- which, in 2007, was a group of 2,460 tax filers with incomes of at least $1.85 million.

“Although its a pretty small percentage [of the total population], they are grabbing a non-trivial percentage of the national growth in income,” says Mackenzie. “Living in a world where the top of the top is detaching itself is not good for the way the economy works or the way society works.”

All of which, as far as Mackenzie is concerned, should be adequate motivation to rein in CEO pay.

The CCPA report argues CEO pay has gotten out of hand at least in part because boards often find themselves in a “prisoner’s dilemma” -- caught between the desire to cut costs and the need to remain competitive. In that context, government is “the only actor left to inject sanity into an irrational compensation sytem,” either through regulation or changes to the tax system, the report states.

Quick Poll

Should the government intervene to regulate CEO pay?

VOTE

Chen, however, sees the issue somewhat less starkly. In his view, there’s nothing wrong with “the level of pay provided to a CEO as long as the CEO produces results.”

Yet, when it comes to the link between pay and performance in major companies that the Hay Group has examined, he says, “The correlation is not as close as we’d like. We’d like it to be perfect. Well, it’s nowhere near perfect. We think it can drastically improve.”

Though Chen says he is doubtful that the kind of government intervention in executive compensation that has occurred in the U.K. and the Eurozone in recent years will gain traction in Canada, he says there is still opportunity for reform.

“The hope is that fuller disclosure of compensation will shine light on compensation practices, good or bad, and that in and of itself will raise attention, and change the way things are being done,” he says.

THE 10 HIGHEST-PAID CEOs IN CANADA

Loading Slideshow...
  • 10: Jonathan Henry, Gabriel Resources $11.7M

    Gabriel Resources is a Toronto-based company focused primarily on a gold excavation project in Romania. <i>Note: An earlier version of this gallery reported that Gabriel Resources' 2010 revenue was $448 million. <a href="http://globeinvestor.sympatico.ca/invest/investSQL/sym.company_prof?company_id=160018" target="_hplink">It was, in fact, $448,000, according to publicly listed data</a>. A company spokesperson says the resource firm was in a period of pre-production in 2010, and did not generate revenue. Thus, Henry's compensation of $11.7 million exceeded the company's revenues for the year.</i>

  • 9: Gordon Nixon, RBC $11.9M

    Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) is the largest financial institution in the country. Henry's total pay of $11.9 million was the equivalent of 0.1 per cent of the company's $10.3 billion in 2010 revenues.

  • 8: Stephen DeFalco, Nordion $13.1M

    Nordion is an Ottawa-based health sciences company that specializes in medical isotopes. DeFalco's total pay of $13.1 million was the equivalent of 5.1 per cent of the company's $256 million in 2010 revenues. DeFalco left the CEO position in 2010.

  • 7: Steve Laut, Canadian Natural Resources $13.1M

    Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. is a Calgary-based oil and gas exploration company. Laut's total pay of $13.1 million was the equivalent of 0.08 per cent of the company's $14.6 billion in 2010 revenues.

  • 6: Richard Waugh, Scotiabank $13.8M

    The Bank of Nova Scotia is the third largest bank in Canada. Waugh's total pay of $13.8 million was the equivalent of 0.06 per cent of the company's $23.8 billion in 2010 revenues.

  • 5: Martyn Konig, European Goldfields $14.8M

    Despite its name, European Goldfields in a Canadian-based company, operating out of the Northwest Territories. Konig's total pay of $14.8 million was the equivalent of 29.1 per cent of the company's $50.7 million in 2010 revenues.

  • 4: Edward Sampson, Niko Resources $16.5M

    Niko Resources is a Calgary-based oil and gas exploration company operating fields mostly outside Canada. Sampson's total pay of $16.5 million was the equivalent of 3.6 per cent of the company's $455 million in 2010 revenues.

  • 3: Siegfried Wolf, Co-CEO, Magna $16.5M

    Southern Ontario-based Magna International is North America's largest car parts manufacturer. Wolf's total pay of $16.5 million was the equivalent of 0.07 per cent of the company's $24.2 billion in 2010 revenues. Wolf stepped down as co-CEO in 2010.

  • 2: Donald Walker, Co-CEO, Magna $16.7M

    Southern Ontario-based Magna International is North America's largest car parts manufacturer. Walker's total pay of $16.7 million was the equivalent of 0.07 per cent of the company's $24.2 billion in 2010 revenues.

  • Frank Stronach, Magna $61.8M

    Southern Ontario-based Magna International is North America's largest car parts manufacturer. Stronach's total pay of $61.8 million was the equivalent of 0.26 per cent of the company's $24.2 billion in 2010 revenues.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

As debate about Canada’s rich-poor divide intensifies, a new report highlights the growing income gap between top-paid CEOs and average Canadians. According to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alt...
As debate about Canada’s rich-poor divide intensifies, a new report highlights the growing income gap between top-paid CEOs and average Canadians. According to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alt...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 302
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
12:44 PM on 01/05/2012
The problem with the CEO compensation being tied to "performance" is when you look into the average salaries of the regular workers of the companies they run you will find a) that the wages and salaries of those people never increased and in some cases in 2010 many of them were not given bonuses because the companies were tightening their belt. B) There were huge lay offs even in the Canadian Banking sector c) the growth of of Contract work for regular workers has meant that these companies are paying lower wages and no benefits. So yes Their companies did well but it was at the expense of ALL other workers. This is where the problem with this so called performance based compensation is. In the financial industry especially stock values may go up but when you look at the compensation for the non management workers you will be horriefied that salaries have not moved. Workers I contributing more and more to towards their benefits so that companies are forking out. Meanwhile they are reporting record profits every year. This for me is the biggest problem. Its no longer about innovation and progress its about cutting every corners at the expense of regular worker so that these CEOs get paid handsomely
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:08 PM on 01/03/2012
It's private matter what CEO's make.
10:35 AM on 01/04/2012
Except in public companies or govt funded institutions
photo
pleblian
One smart as meɪtər futūtor
06:04 PM on 01/04/2012
I agree, but is that what we're talking about here?

If we're talking about Bell Canada, or any other crown corporation I could understand peoples frustration.

Most of the mentioned companies here are private, why are we concerning our selves with these CEO's
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
07:32 PM on 01/03/2012
Oh dear, the writer needs to go the "extra" mile on a headline like this.

Who CARES on what they make!

But we all should CARE on how much Federal and Provincial Income Tax they are paying OR are avoiding paying!

The $44K guy cannot afford to hire the high priced professionals to help him AVOID income taxes whereas these Corporate guy's can hire the best-in-class professionals to help them AVOID taxation.

Additionally, the Corporate State employ the top Law Firms to lobby the government and political which gains massive amounts of Corporate Welfare from the Revenue Canada tax code as they do ruthlessly in the U.S..

Garnering massive amounts of Corporate Welfare from the Revenue Canada Tax code enables massive Corporate Profits which, in turn, enables MASSIVE Corporate Bonuses.

So, the Writer should go back to the drawing board and provide us with the analysis of the Revenue Canada Tax Code that has given rise to this all powerful CORPORATE STATE OF CANADA!
10:38 AM on 01/04/2012
The tax code is a legal requirement for filed taxes. Are you against CEOs/'the rich' following the law? In fact, 'the rich' pay a higher rate of income tax.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickwwalker
05:56 PM on 01/04/2012
Not really. For example, using flow through shares unduly favours those at the highest tax bracket.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ljkcan
I don't let geographical borders limit my thinking
05:41 PM on 01/03/2012
I have yet to receive my annual letter from my former employer telling me if they are giving annuitants a whopping 1% increase this year.
10:39 AM on 01/04/2012
And why do you merit an automatic increase? Are you more productive?
04:29 PM on 01/03/2012
If you have a problem with their salary then stop buying their products. Tell them you don't approve and say it with your money. Its not rocket science, whining does not change anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
typeterson
05:17 PM on 01/03/2012
great idea, and well thought out.

i'm gonna stop buying all those medical isotopes from nordion that i've been stockpiling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
05:54 PM on 01/03/2012
Easier done if the corporations hadn't monopolized their industries, run the independents out of business and taken away all of our choices.
10:39 AM on 01/04/2012
Really? Examples?
03:44 PM on 01/03/2012
LOL LOL - I see a poster GayBlade has informed us that the former USSR was a capitalist system! LOL LOL I guess there is no end to the amount of air a head can hold!
03:38 PM on 01/03/2012
Seems fair to me.
After all my income has gone up… wait a minute no it hasn’t.
In fact my income has gone down over the past few years.

Riddle me this Batman…
How can they (the 1%) make more money when we (the 99%) don’t have enough money to buy the stuff they (the 1%) are selling?
What kind of Bazarro world are we living in here?
03:46 PM on 01/03/2012
If you can't buy their products, then they go out of business - doesn't sound like business to me
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CreepyThinMan
More dapper than Don Draper.
03:19 PM on 01/03/2012
I don't begrudge people their salaries. What bothers me, and 99% of everyone else, is when these people pay politicians to game the system in their favor. This is exactly why the USA is in the toilet right now and why Canada will be swirling down the same bowl once Herr Harper is done with us.
04:12 PM on 01/03/2012
Harper has been PM for quite some time now and Canada is doing very well, even with our massive entitlement programs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
typeterson
05:21 PM on 01/03/2012
just wait.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
05:57 PM on 01/03/2012
Quite amazing what a minority government can come up with when they must compromise.

We'll see if it continues.
02:44 PM on 01/03/2012
There will be no change until people demand it. People will let this issue slide until they look around and see there is nothing on their dinner table, no future for their children and the roof over their head is open to the stars. Our unions are dwindling and many workers believe this is a good thing! The cream will rise to the top and if you can't cut the mustard you deserve hardship and pain. There is little compassion for your average man. I am not against CEO's being compensated well for a job well done, I just don't see how a job well done is based on moving jobs out of country, slashing benefits and pensions for the very people who built the company and taking these savings for their own.
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
01:31 PM on 01/03/2012
Now wonder that these corporations need more tax breaks.
02:52 PM on 01/03/2012
It's a free country.

Start your own corporation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
typeterson
05:21 PM on 01/03/2012
genius!
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
10:13 AM on 01/04/2012
WOW! What an idea! Did it take you long to come up with that?
03:46 PM on 01/03/2012
If we can attract corporations here, we get more jobs and a better economy
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
typeterson
05:26 PM on 01/03/2012
ya except a lot of the companies mentioned in the article operate outside of canada. so no jobs for us, but tax breaks and subsidies for them.
01:18 PM on 01/03/2012
People are suffering around the world. The top 1% have no shame.

The greed is good gang wants it all.
01:53 PM on 01/03/2012
another 'wealth redistribution' fan? Rob the achievers to give to the couch potatoes?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
02:49 PM on 01/03/2012
yaa this is what its about. the CEO's just "work hard (it has nothing to di with them giving themselves bonuses) while eveyrone else is lazy.. your name is appropriate, because you seem to have no knowledge in any other field... depending on the tax system, a redistribution of wealth from those who earned it Middle and lower class to the rich who didn't earn it.. lookup the facts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carlyn Craig
Post Hypnotic Press Audiobooks
03:33 PM on 01/03/2012
So, wealth distribution is okay as long as it goes up, to the very rich? What sickens me about this attitude is your absolute lack of awareness. Most poor people work harder physically, with longer hours and less holidays. But you champion a bunch of fat cats who rig the system, buy politicians, and engage in all sort of illegalities. I take it you approve corporations sending jobs overseas and the return of the sweetshop to American soil,. From Joel Bakan's "The Corporation":

"Despite the Fair Labor Standards Act’s clear injunctions against them, sweatshops exist in North America, and every one of them is a fire disaster waiting to happen.33 “Sweatshops were wiped out of the United States in 1938,” says Charles Kernaghan, but “they are back now, with a vengeance. Sixty-five percent of all apparel operations in New York City are sweatshops. Fifty thousand workers. Forty-five hundred factories out of seven thousand. And we’re talking about workers getting a dollar or two an hour.”34 Los Angeles is no better. The southern end of the city houses America’s, and perhaps the world’s, largest concentration of garment sweatshops, staffed by some
one hundred and sixty thousand workers..."
12:15 PM on 01/03/2012
These CEOs are smart, talented, and ambitious.

You might as well get angry at our best athletes for making millions/yr. It's just not fair that they are more talented, either.

Protest the arenas and stadiums.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:50 PM on 01/03/2012
what warrants a 41 million dollar bonus though?
photo
luckincan
That rug really tied the room together
01:25 PM on 01/03/2012
~crickets~
02:45 PM on 01/03/2012
Performance at the highest levels.

Obviously the shareholders approved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
01:03 PM on 01/03/2012
Give your head a shake Harley. They aren't exponentially more talented than the average Joe. They are more ambitious, yes, and nobody is saying they shouldn't be compensated very well, but not on an obscene order of magnitude and certainly not when the economy, and many of their companies, are not doing well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
02:51 PM on 01/03/2012
yaa he doesnt understand basic comments stan explaining to him wont help.. people like him jsut assume everyone is lazy and rich earned it.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
11:45 AM on 01/03/2012
$8.38 million on average ? Quick ! Give these guy some tax breaks !!
12:10 PM on 01/03/2012
That means they're paying at least $4 million in taxes.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
12:24 PM on 01/03/2012
I have no doubt that many of them pay $4 million, but wouldn't be surprised if the more unscrupulous amongst them managed to pay very little.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adrian31
60% of the time, it works everytime...
02:40 PM on 01/03/2012
Dream on...
photo
darksideofthespoon
what we think we become
12:24 PM on 01/03/2012
They certainly deserve them... they must be working veeery hard. ;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert A Hayes
-commentclarity-
11:37 AM on 01/03/2012
step back and see it for what it is: stuff the pockets as long as you can... then run as far as you can... the wait out the depression as long as you can... return to do it all over again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter sfikas
Yia sou
11:08 AM on 01/03/2012
Some people, the 1%, with daily practice, become smarter crooks, and better thieves.
They're better known as, fat pigs. Very easy to spot on Wall Street, or at the banks, or at investment firms.
They also use their ill gotten riches, ( by employing thousands of lobbyists ), to influence the White House, the Congress, the Senate, the Judiciary, and the Regulatory Agencies. Scum o' the earth, I tell you. ... I protest !