Canada Identity Screening Regulations: Transgendered Community Effectively Banned From Flying

First Posted: 01/31/2012 7:43 pm Updated: 02/ 1/2012 9:28 am

OTTAWA — A number of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights advocates are raising concerns about Canadian air travel regulations that appears to exclude transgender passengers from flying.

“It looks like a very serious violation of people’s rights,” the NDP’s Randall Garrison, the party’s critic for LGBTT issues, told The Huffington Post Tuesday.

According to Transport Canada’s Identity Screening Regulations, an airline is not allowed to transport a passenger who appears to be a different gender than what is listed on their official travel document.

For transgendered persons who haven’t completed a sex change operation or who live their life as another gender than the one specified on their passport, the regulation effectively bans them from flying, advocates say.

Blogger Christin Scarlett Milloy called it a “discriminatory smear” and urged Canadians to complain to their member of Parliament.

“In order to change the ‘sex’ designation on a Canadian Passport, the federal government requires proof that surgery has taken place, or will take place within one year. So for non-operative transgender persons, for gender nonconforming (genderqueer) persons, and for the vast majority of pre-operative transsexual persons, it is literally impossible to obtain proper travel documentation marked with the sex designation which “matches” the gender identity in which they live,” Milloy wrote.

“In the eyes of the honourable Minister of Transportation, that makes trans people unfit to fly in Canada,” she added.

Transport Minister Denis Lebel’s spokesman Pierre Floréa insisted the rules were needed to verify an individual’s identify and ensure that they didn’t pose a threat to aviation security.

They were also “not discriminatory,” he said.

“They apply to all passengers, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, and they do not impose barriers to any particular group,” Floréa wrote in an email to HuffPost.

“Any passenger whose physical appearance does not correspond to their identification can continue to board an airplane by supplying a letter from a health care professional explaining the discrepancy,” he added.

Garrison, the NDP MP, said he’d written to the Minister about the practice and he didn’t think a letter from a doctor would solve the problem.

“First of all the regulations don’t say that so I don’t know how anyone would know that. A lot of transgendered people are non-operative, which means that there wouldn’t be any medical letter that would be possible… I’m not sure that a doctor would issue such a letter,” he said.

The Conservative government is trying to “chip away at LBGT rights,” Garrison said but noted, that in this case "I’m not sure that this is anything more than insensitivity and a lack of understanding of the issue.”

“I don’t understand what problem they are fixing here, some type of misplaced fears of men in burqas? Something like that that must have motivated them to fix the regulation,” he said.

The regulations were introduced in August of 2010 as an interim measure and formalized in last July.

Transport Canada spokeswoman Maryse Durette told HuffPost the department had received no complaints from any transgendered persons who had been refused boarding.

“Transport Canada is not aware of any case of a transgendered or transsexual individual in possession of a medical document who has not been permitted to board an airplane since the publication of the Regulations in 2010,” she said.

Garrison, however, suggested that no one may have come forward with a complaint because of the public stigma attached to transgendered and transsexual persons.

“That doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened because it would be very difficult, I think for a transgendered person to come forward on this case as it is in many cases because of the general hostility in the public," he said.

Also on HuffPost:

The 7 Storylines To Watch As MPs Get Back To Work
1  of  9
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Here's a look at some of the storylines and hot-button issues expected to set the tone for Parliament over the coming months. (CP)

With files from CBC
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 131
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
12:18 AM on 02/02/2012
Everyone is a suspect in George W Bush's war on terror.
07:38 PM on 02/01/2012
“In order to change the ‘sex’ designation on a Canadian Passport, the federal government requires proof that surgery has taken place, or will take place within one year." I do not find the rules harsh.
I am all for freedom of choice but until the above take place, the person in question is legally and medically their original birth sex that can be proven in examination if necessary and is on the passpart. it is a no brainer, otherwise there is false identity. That is not discrimination, that is fact. Debra Reece Simons, Asheville, NC
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:37 AM on 02/02/2012
Of course YOU don't find the rules harsh, they don't affect you :)
Try to imagine yourself as a transgendered individual. Not you as you are now just transgendered, but who you would have been had you grown up transgendered in this world. then tell me you feel the same way.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
02:16 PM on 02/01/2012
How can a person's ambiguous gender pose a threat to aviation safety?
04:00 PM on 02/01/2012
I hope they don’t, but look at this from different prospect.
Imagine you are an airport security screener… you have a passenger standing in front of you… passenger looks like female and her / his passports says “male”…
What would you do? - It may be the case when somebody is using stolen passport (threat), or trying to enter or exit country using false identity (threat), or just a harmless transgender… You don’t know the answer, but you see that it is not the same person as on passport, which means potential threat to aviation safety. Period!
So, you must stop this person, the rest is none of your business. You have to identify problem with passenger’s identity. Nothing else. This is part of your job.
Now, all these debates are for nothing. Just another reason to blame Mr. Harper (?) or Canada for… not even sure for what. This can be resolved very easely – ask transgenders to be dressed up and to behave according to their passports while using civil aviation! Is this some violation or their rights? – I am sure it is not. End of story!
04:49 PM on 02/02/2012
Of course that is a violation of their rights! It would be compromising their identity. You cannot simply ask a transgender person to "dress up" as the gender corresponding to their passport. Chances are they still wouldn't resemble their birth gender. Consider transgender men who take hormones that allow them to develop facial hair, wearing a dress isn't going to make them look like they match their passport gender.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
02:01 PM on 02/01/2012
Can 'o' Worms....

"Any passenger whose physical appearance does not correspond to their identification can continue to board an airplane by supplying a letter from a heath care professional explaining the discrepancy."

Thanks gwinegarden !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mary Newland
01:35 PM on 02/01/2012
Talk about looking for trouble where there isn't any. This blogger makes a judgement based on what she thinks a piece of legislation says and then posts it as discrimination. I have never heard of an incident denying any such person from boarding an aircraft. This blogger and subsequently this reporter are irresponsible.
11:38 AM on 02/01/2012
You could always offer to "show your junk" if they argue, that would settle any gender concerns, but I doubt that they would persue the matter any further after such an offer. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bec DeCorbeau
Le langage de l'invisible est le silence
11:49 AM on 02/01/2012
But, you will need a picture of your "gender" to prove that it's the same on your canadian passport and the real thing!

You go to the airport, down the zipper, put your "gender" on the scanner...

I'm sure there will be a lot of conservative officers around.
12:17 PM on 02/01/2012
Good idea! I think I will tatoo my passport number there as well!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bec DeCorbeau
Le langage de l'invisible est le silence
11:37 AM on 02/01/2012
«The Conservative government is trying to “chip away at LBGT rights,” Garrison said but noted, that in this case "I’m not sure that this is anything more than insensitivity and a lack of understanding of the issue.”»

No, it’s not insensitivity or a lack of understanding. It's a simple pure laine conservative thought. Did you know that the conservative wants to put a rope in murder jail so that they could hang themselves, we could save money they say!

http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/Politique/2012/02/01/002-boisvenu-peine-mort.shtml

Please God, make our next referendum a victory before it's too late!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
02:04 PM on 02/01/2012
No, it's just a situation that hasn't been addressed yet is all....
See gwinegarden's comment where the minister responded

"Any passenger whose physical appearance does not correspond to their identification can continue to board an airplane by supplying a letter from a heath care professional explaining the discrepancy. To this point, we have no records of any individual ever being denied boarding in Canada because they are transgender or transsexual."

Arrêtte de nous faire passer pour des idiots tanant !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bec DeCorbeau
Le langage de l'invisible est le silence
03:42 PM on 02/01/2012
«A lot of transgendered people are non-operative, which means that there wouldn’t be any medical letter that would be possible… I’m not sure that a doctor would issue such a letter,” he said.»

The conservative have a visceral hate about any type of gays or transgender. To the conservative it's a sickness, that's why they want those people to get a medical certificate of their illness!

Des idiots vous dites? Je vous souhaite un Canada bien conservateur monsieur! Je vous le laisse.
11:34 AM on 02/01/2012
Get serious, fix the medical system and then you can start talking frequent flyers...
Don't they have something more serious to take care of, this is our tax money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
11:48 AM on 02/01/2012
Do both. Both are serious issues.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:39 AM on 02/02/2012
Haha, lets worry about healthcare purely and ignore the environment, the economy, labour rights, minority rights, and bureaucracy. After all, how do we expect our poor MPs to deal with more than one thing at a time???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wren Egan
11:29 AM on 02/01/2012
This is sick. Does Transport Canada really think that some terrorist is going to try to get on a plane by drawing extra attention to themselves? Is there a sect of radical trans people who are set on aviation based destruction? Do we need medical letters for everything else that doesn't match? Because I died my hair recently....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bec DeCorbeau
Le langage de l'invisible est le silence
11:15 AM on 02/01/2012
Can’t wait for the next référendum in Québec!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
02:07 PM on 02/01/2012
You'll wait a long time....
We voted NO, and the generations that have followed have seen the folly you prescribe.
All you are doing is tricking the english into thinking it's still an issue, it isn't, globalization is.

Vieux Dublin à neuf heure, don't be there.
photo
gwinegarden
She's an Arctic Wolf
10:14 AM on 02/01/2012
My daughter contacted her MP about this. Below is the reply:

"Thank you for your email expressing your concerns over rights in Canadian transportation systems. The recent media reports about transgender or transsexual individuals being barred from flights are false. Our Government has ensured that the identification requirements to board an airplane in Canada are not discriminatory; they apply to all passengers, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, and they do not impose barriers to any particular group.

Any passenger whose physical appearance does not correspond to their identification can continue to board an airplane by supplying a letter from a heath care professional explaining the discrepancy. To this point, we have no records of any individual ever being denied boarding in Canada because they are transgender or transsexual.

Nonetheless, the security of our aviation system and air passengers remains a top priority for our Government. Canadians expect their Government to ensure that individuals who pose a threat to aviation security are barred from flights to, from and within Canada. In order to achieve this, it is essential to verify a passenger’s identity. Our air security programs achieve this goal without discrimination and in a way that respects Canadian values.

Should I be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact our office."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
02:07 PM on 02/01/2012
Thanks for this !

That's the way to do it !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Azim S Khan
04:48 PM on 02/01/2012
I was starting to believe the hype that this was an actual issue, after I went and told all of my trans friends that it wasn't. Glad to know we are indeed safe and we don't have to fear our rights our beautiful country's reputation being compromised!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CmdrTomalak
I am... and proud of it.
05:05 PM on 02/01/2012
There are better ways to prove your identity but of course if everyone was suddenly required to be fingerprinted and/or have eye scans performed, see how fast people start yelling 'invasion of privacy'. My fingerprints and eye scans are on both on file with the RCMP and Transport Canada as part of my employment. Both of these will prove I am who I say I am but according to the regs, that's not good enough. They only care about what's between my legs.

All too often, the majority fail to see a discrimination issue when it doesn't apply to them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Azim S Khan
09:51 AM on 02/01/2012
I heard about this two days ago while it was spreading among my transfriends and small blogs. I did find that gender is mentioned in airport screening regulations since at least 2008. So even if this thing came in July 2011, there was already something there before. I also question this being a serious issue, though I haven't tried to fly since starting transition.
09:49 AM on 02/01/2012
I'm completely for LGBTQ rights and all that implies but I do understand where they're coming from with this. It would be easy for someone to disguise themselves for whatever reason and cause trouble. It is definitely horrible that it infringes on the rights of the transgender and gender queer community but I don't think they're doing this specifically as a slap in the face to transgenders. While I'm completely for human rights I think that they really just need to put some sort of provisions in place for transgendered people if there aren't already. I think that it's a good, if misguided, attempt at increasing airport security.

So basically, I'm completely for LGBTQ rights and equality but I think people are blowing this a little out of proportion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
11:11 AM on 02/01/2012
Me to
photo
Kodes100
Our Voices Are Strong and Have Power!
09:02 AM on 02/01/2012
Come on Canada - my true north strong & free - correct this - please!