Maple Syrup Canada: Tory Senator Nancy Greene Pushes New Labelling Rules

Maple Syrup Canada

First Posted: 02/ 1/2012 11:57 am Updated: 02/20/2012 11:07 am

OTTAWA - Falsely labelled maple syrup could be banned from the shelves of Canada's grocery stores if a Conservative senator gets her way.

B.C.'s Nancy Greene Raine admits she's not a natural ally for the Canadian maple syrup industry, but she's an enthusiastic champion. "I'm not from a maple producing area and so my maple syrup credentials are very much of the eating side," she joked in an interview with The Huffington Post Tuesday.

Raine pours maple syrup over cereals in the morning, on top of ice cream for a "nice simple desert," and sometimes uses it to sweeten muffins.

"I'm also interested in the fact that it is such a healthy sweetener," she said.

Thursday, she'll take the floor of the Senate to explain her motion to standardize maple product regulations to bring syrup grading and labelling in line with recommendations from the International Maple Syrup Institute.

"What they are going after (is) they want to make it much more difficult to pass off non-maple syrup as maple syrup," she said.

All pure maple syrup would be labelled "Grade A Maple Syrup" with four different classes established to give mostly Canadian and American consumers, who have vastly different labelling for similar grades, a clearer sense of what they're buying. Grade B maple syrup wouldn't be eliminated but simply reclassified as a Grade A dark syrup, she said.

"Products found to be below 'Grade A Maple Syrup' would be removed from retail shelves, strengthening consumer confidence in the purity of the maple syrup they purchase," Raine said in press release announcing her motion.

That doesn't mean that fake maple syrup would be off the shelves, Raine and the Maple Syrup Institute's David Chapeskie acknowledged.

"No, no you can't stop that, but obviously you can stop it from being called pure maple syrup. If it's not 100 per cent pure maple syrup, it can't be called pure maple syrup," Raine said.

Chapeskie said new regulations would simply target those who seek to take "advantage of this unique and natural product" by selling an "adulterated" version.

Raine doesn't go as far as some of her colleagues south of the border. Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy and Maine Senator Susan Collins have suggested stiff criminal penalties for those caught selling fake maple syrup.

In October, the senators introduced the MAPLE Act which makes fraudulently selling a product purported to be maple syrup a felony offense carrying a five-year maximum penalty.

"I have been alarmed by the growing number of individuals and businesses claiming to sell genuine Vermont maple syrup when they are in fact selling an inferior product that is not maple syrup at all. This is fraud, plain and simple, and it undermines a key part of Vermont's economy and reputation for quality that has been hard earned through Vermonters' hard work. I know that diligent syrup producers in Maine, New York and other states have been similarly hurt by this crime," Leahy said when introducing the bill.

In Canada, the value of maple products, including maple syrup, sugar and butter, was up 20 per cent in 2011 to $349.5 million, Statistics Canada reported last year.

Quebec producers account for 90 per cent of maple syrup production in Canada and two-thirds of world supply.

Raine said her motion, which she discussed with Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz, is about comparing "apples and apples" so consumers know what they are getting.

"I've just bought a certain brand and it's always been Canada Number 1 Medium but now I'm going to look for Grade A Golden with delicate taste, as it will be called," she said.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story contained a photo of Aunt Jemima's syrup and a reference to that brand as an inauthentic maple syrup. Aunt Jemima's has not, and does not, claim to be maple syrup.

You can see the Maple Syrup Institute's suggested labelling guidelines below.

Maple Cards

Like Huffington Post Canada's Ottawa Bureau Chief Althia Raj's reporter page on Facebook and follow her onTwitter for all the latest news from Parliament Hill.

althia.raj@huffingtonpost.com

The 7 Storylines To Watch As MPs Get Back To Work
1  of  9
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Here's a look at some of the storylines and hot-button issues expected to set the tone for Parliament over the coming months. (CP)

With files from CBC
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - Falsely labelled maple syrup could be banned from the shelves of Canada's grocery stores if a Conservative senator gets her way. B.C.'s Nancy Greene Raine admits she's not a natural ally f...
OTTAWA - Falsely labelled maple syrup could be banned from the shelves of Canada's grocery stores if a Conservative senator gets her way. B.C.'s Nancy Greene Raine admits she's not a natural ally f...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:17 PM on 02/19/2012
It is so obvious that the persons involved in this story and posting know very little about maple or don't care to research and promote the truth. Any one that did would never put a picture of Aunt Jemima's in a story about maple.
Are all your stories/blogs so missleading?
01:41 PM on 02/02/2012
nancy greene raine -----made a name for herself by going downhill fast -----she has a lot of company now in the senate
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
12:38 PM on 02/02/2012
I wont touch the fake stuff, but the real stuff is pricey. I don't think it is a viable alternative sweetener.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigLittle
02:41 AM on 02/02/2012
Thanks Nancy, somebody had to do this.
Next, please take on the artificial vanilla extract cabal.
12:06 PM on 02/02/2012
Yeah -Thanks Nancy!

Instead of debating that old age pensions will no longer be adjusted to inflation.

Let's talk Maple syrup...MMMM yummy!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:00 PM on 02/02/2012
Of course! Because government should be doing one thing and one thing only.
False advertising is a problem in our heavily-consumerist world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
09:28 PM on 02/01/2012
Oh I see, so this is where my tax dollars are going. Right-wing nutters at play again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geminivoyager
07:40 PM on 02/01/2012
You Go Nancy! ... and while you're at it .... go after all the food producers and eateries that spell Krab with a C. We should know up front if we are paying for crab or krab.
07:31 PM on 02/01/2012
my bottle says ----aunt jemima --syrup ------original ------------

no mention of maple not even in the ingredients list
05:40 PM on 02/01/2012
Seems to me the headline for this article is deliberately inflammatory and misleading. What is being proposed is conforming to international grade labeling guidelines so consumers are informed on what exactly they are purchasing. This is not a "BAN" on fake maple syrup ... it is regulation to make sure that fake maple syrups are appropriately labeled to prevent confusion and deliberate misleading by unscrupulous manufacturers. I am no fan of the Conservatives but this just seems like a good idea to me ... there is nothing wrong with imitation syrup and if that's what you want to buy then good for you, it's pretty good and a lot cheaper and there is a time and place when it's use is appropriate and indeed delicious .. don't get me wrong I LOVE REAL maple syrup, it is my "go to" syrup and I use it often, sparing no expense to get the good stuff but there is ALSO a place for imitation syrup on my shelf. Nothing wrong with good labeling.
07:03 PM on 02/01/2012
So Huffpo has slightly changed the headline on the main page for this article but it is STILL inaccurate... the headline on the actual article above is accurate so why not use that one on the main page instead of the inaccurate one you have up there now? They are NOT trying to remove fake maple syrup from the shelves they are merely trying to get tougher labeling restrictions so folks know exactly what they are buying ... you know ... if a story can't stand on it's own without a flashy eye catching inflammatory incorrect headline ... maybe it isn't really a story worth covering ... just sayin ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
09:27 PM on 02/01/2012
The headlines are for SEO purposes. They change constantly to garner the most hits. Get over it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
05:36 PM on 02/01/2012
Most of us have the intelligence to discern real from artificial maple syrup when shopping. Did the Conservatives run out of flags in which to wrap themselves? Now they have to bath in maple syrup to prove how Canadian they are?
08:49 PM on 02/01/2012
Yes I get confused all the time $2.99 compared to $9.99, I need to read the label?
12:04 PM on 02/02/2012
This story is an obvious distraction about changing our retirement income and age without debate.
The Tories want to debate maple syrup but not adjusting old age pensions to infaltion.
05:28 PM on 02/01/2012
considering maple syrup is Canadian icon down to sap from our maple trees, for sure it should be labelled as such. yes, real maple syrup in grocery will cost you 10.00 bucks in most grocery stores but much better tasting.
05:16 PM on 02/01/2012
This is the right move. The EU already does things like this in terms of labeling Parma Ham, Cheddar Cheese, Champaign, etc...
The customer should know what he's getting especially if its a regional product as maple syrup is in regards to Eastern Canada and the Eastern United States.
photo
49tales
lucem sequimur
05:13 PM on 02/01/2012
I think this is a good thing, it is just pointing out the real deal, real maple syrup is more expensive but it is healthier, much tastier and by buying it you're supporting Canadian farmers and not corporations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
05:37 PM on 02/01/2012
So you can tell the difference. Then why do we need yet another law?
photo
49tales
lucem sequimur
07:51 PM on 02/01/2012
Because corporations should not be allowed to imply that their products are something they're not

And there are many small Canadian farms/businesses that work hard to produce real maple syrup and their interests should be protected
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:02 PM on 02/02/2012
Because you might not know what it will taste like when you pick it off the shelf.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:57 PM on 02/01/2012
What else should be banned?
Fake snow on ski hills .... fake meat....fake politicians...fake boobs...fake teeth....fake laughs....I could go on forever...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
05:43 PM on 02/01/2012
Actually, she is just saying you can't label a fake product as an authentic one. Though it would be amusing to see a sign on some chests claiming them as authentic or not :)
04:45 PM on 02/01/2012
I don't care.
04:30 PM on 02/01/2012
do you think you can do something about the antibiotics in chicken and beef