Canada Manufacturing Jobs: Sales Are Back, But 200,000 Jobs Are Missing

Canada Manufacturing Sales Jobs

First Posted: 02/17/2012 5:02 am Updated: 02/17/2012 2:30 pm

Canadian manufacturing sales may have rebounded to near pre-recession levels, but the same cannot be said of manufacturing employment.

New figures released by Statistics Canada on Thursday show that December marked the fifth increase in manufacturing sales in six months, with sales rising to $49.9 billion -- not far off the $50.2 billion logged in October 2008.

Manufacturing employment, however, shows little sign of bouncing back: over the same period, says Statscan analyst Vincent Ferrao, the sector posted a net loss of more than 200,000 jobs; in January, total manufacturing employment was 11 per cent lower than it was in the fall of 2008.

The relatively weak employment numbers highlight the legacy of a downturn that evaporated hundreds of thousands of jobs, and quickened the pace of a fundamental labour market shift.

Angelo DiCaro, a national communications representative for the Canadian Auto Workers’ union, characterizes the gap between the rebound in manufacturing sales and employment as “tremendous.”

“Any uptick in manufacturing sales is really not being seen or felt by the legion of laid off manufacturing workers across the country, that’s for sure,” he said.

In the aftermath of an economic shock, it’s common for employment levels to lag production as companies test the waters before expanding their ranks. But RBC economist Nathan Janzen concedes that the gap in this instance remains wider than expected.

“We were a little surprised. Given that the manufacturing recovery in Canada started really a couple of years ago, we should have already been seeing the manufacturing employment keeping up with production,” he told The Huffington Post.

It’s tough to know what, precisely, is behind the discrepancy, but the challenges that have long plagued Canadian manufacturing are no doubt partly to blame.

Even before the recession, the combination of a strong Canadian dollar, increasing automation and competition from cheap imports was taking a significant bite out of output and employment. Since 2002, DiCaro says the sector has shed nearly 600,000 jobs, over half of which were lost in Ontario, where manufacturing sales “are still below levels seen in the late ’90s and early 2000s.”

“We’ve seen such a collapse in manufacturing production that any uptick that we’re starting to see, we’re just nowhere near where we were,” he said. “When you start looking at the jobs, I don’t know if we’ll ever be where we were less than a decade ago.”

The downturn sped up the decline, with the bulk of the employment loss in the past decade occurring in 2008 and 2009 in Ontario’s once-robust auto industry hubs.

“A lot of that employment has been difficult to recover,” he said. “It’s difficult to say if those jobs will come back or not.”

As employment growth moves to other sectors, such as service and construction, DiCaro says the shift does not bode well for workers, who are often faced with lower wages, greater job insecurity and fewer employer benefits than traditional manufacturing jobs offered.

“We’re not trading off those job losses for equivalent jobs,” he said.

The recent uptick in manufacturing sales in December was concentrated in the transportation equipment industry, where sales rose by 3.7 per cent in December to $8.5 billion. Plastics and rubber products producers and primary metal manufacturers also posted sales gains, while a decline in prices pushed down the dollar value of sales for petroleum and coal product manufacturers.

But Ferrao suspects that a still-shaky global economic climate continues to make employers, who have become accustomed to doing more with less, hesitant to take on a significant number of new hires.

“In order to increase productivity, manufacturers would probably use less labour, or get the labour they have to work more hours,” Ferrao said, adding, “there’s not necessarily a correlation between sales and employment.”

THE 10 FASTEST-SHRINKING MANUFACTURING SECTORS IN CANADA

Manufacturing jobs in Canada went into a steep decline even before the recent economic troubles began. According to StatsCan, employment has been in decline since 2004. Here are the 10 fastest-shrinking sectors from 2004 to 2008, when the recession began.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Printing: 11,900 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Paper: 13,200 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Food: 14,000 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Metals: 15,000 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Furniture: 23,100 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Machinery: 26,200 Jobs Lost Before Recession's Start

  • Plastics & Rubber: 35,300 Jobs Lost Before Recession

  • Clothing: 37,800 Jobs Lost Before Recession

  • Vehicles & Parts: 56,500 Jobs Lost Before Recession

  • Wood Products: 57,300 Jobs Lost Before Recession


Loading Slideshow...
  • 5 Signs Canada's Workers Are In For A Rough 2012

    Photo: CP/Andrew Vaughan

  • Good Jobs Few And Far Between

    When it comes to evaluating Canadian job growth, the employment numbers are just part of what worries Benjamin Tal, deputy chief economist at CIBC World Markets. "It's not only the quantity, but also the quality of employment that's falling in Canada," says Tal. "A lot of the jobs that are being created are low-quality, especially part-time jobs and low-paying jobs." Though -- unlike the U.S. -- Canada has regained all the jobs lost in the recession, he says that an absence of good-paying jobs is the "main reason" why wages have stagnated. Adjusted for inflation, personal after-tax income is now rising at the slowest rate since 1995. Meanwhile, the skills mismatch in many jurisdictions has left employers short on skilled labour despite still-high unemployment levels in other regions. "If you lose a job, you don't have the skill set to go an find a job elsewhere that companies want and need," says Tal. (Alamy photo)

  • Globalization

    When Caterpillar decided to stop assembling locomotives in its Electro-Motive facility in London, Ont., it was a poignant reminder of how globalization is giving deep-pocketed, transnational corporations the ultimate trump card in bargaining with workers: a cheaper alternative. According to Mike Moffatt, a labour expert at the University of Western Ontario's Ivey School of Business, because of automation and an increase in imports from lower wage jurisdictions like China and Mexico, Canadian workers are competing for fewer manufacturing jobs. "That's given firms real power to negotiate down wages," says Moffatt, who points to the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/06/riotintoalcan-alma-idUSL2E8D699U20120206" target="_hplink">Rio Tinto lockout in Quebec</a> as another illustration of the might afforded to companies with global reach. Since locking out workers at its aluminum smelter in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean on December 31, the Anglo-Australian mining giant has used non-union workers to operate the facility at one-third capacity. With no plans to return to the bargaining table, the company recently announced it is restarting two suspended lines, and is expecting to return to full capacity in May. As Tal maintains, "In this environment, the bargaining power of labour is diminishing."

  • Austerity Agenda

    Just as the power has shifted toward private-sector employers, Michael Lynk, a labour law expert at the University of Western Ontario, says there is a sense that governments are becoming emboldened amid the post-recession climate of austerity that has swept from Toronto's City Hall to Parliament Hill. "There's increasingly an attitude of take-it-or-or leave-it by [private sector] employers, but we may begin to see that with public sector bargaining as well, where they basically say, 'You have to meet our bargaining objectives this round, and we're going to be prepared to endure a short or lengthy lockout to prove our point," he says. Though global economic instability recently prompted federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty to pull back on his earlier commitment to deep cost-cutting in the upcoming budget, government departments are expecting spending to be slashed by between five and 10 per cent, a goal that will be met at least in part at the expense of public service jobs and benefits. The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives recently estimated that the <a href="http://www.behindthenumbers.ca/2012/02/02/federal-cuts-could-push-unemployment-to-8/" target="_hplink">federal government's budget cuts could push unemployment up half a percentage point, to 8 per cent</a>. (CP photo)

  • Pension Problems

    From <a href="http://dalgazette.com/featured/faculty-strike-rumours-explained/" target="_hplink">Dalhousie University</a> to <a href="http://www.thestar.com/article/1120516--labour-strife-ahead-in-air-canada-pilot-talks" target="_hplink">Air Canada</a>, employers no longer able -- or willing -- to fund costly pension plans are mounting attempts to roll back retirement benefits, stoking labour unrest and a growing sense of financial insecurity among workers. As Dalhouse University labour economist Lars Osberg explains, the financial crisis took a huge bite out of the value of corporate pension portfolios and the interest rate required to generate the stream of returns to make these programs sustainable. All of which explains why experts anticipate a deepening of the trend away from inflation-protected, gold-plated defined-benefit pension plans, shifting responsibility for retirement savings from employers to workers.

  • Decline Of Unions

    The power in numbers that enabled Big Labour to negotiate better wages and benefits in the aftermath of the Second World War is a distant memory today, as the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/12/12/canada-income-inequality-decline-unions-middle-class-jobs_n_1139136.html" target="_hplink">erosion of unions continues to whittle away the strength of collective bargaining</a>. This is particularly true in the private sector, where unionization sits at 16 per cent of employees, less than a quarter of public sector unionization. "I think you will see more disputes with unions having to compromise more than in the past," says Tal. "I really don't see that they have the upper hand at this point." Given the yawning gap between private and public sector unionization, Lynk warns that pressure on public sector unions could mount as it has in the U.S. in recent months. "The argument they've been floating is, 'Why should public sector workers have jobs for life, good pensions, and decent wages? They're eating up your taxes,'" he says. "I wouldn't be surprised if we're not [starting] to see the beginnings of that kind of argument here in Canada."



ALSO ON HUFFPOST:
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Canadian manufacturing sales may have rebounded to near pre-recession levels, but the same cannot be said of manufacturing employment. New figures released by Statistics Canada on Thursday show tha...
Canadian manufacturing sales may have rebounded to near pre-recession levels, but the same cannot be said of manufacturing employment. New figures released by Statistics Canada on Thursday show tha...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:42 PM on 02/17/2012
I just had a dispute about an item on my Visa bill and ended up getting it resolved by talking to a guy in India.
The 6 major banks in Canada have made record profits in the past 10 years. Why am I talking to a guy in India?
I live on Vancouver Island and a few days ago I was up in Courtenay, a small city with a population of about 25, 000.
I saw an older gentleman lying on the sidewalk and across the street a number of people were milled about outside of a church waiting for a free meal.
There are no jobs to speak of in Courtenay.
Surely these banks could bring those jobs back from India and employ some people in Courtenay.
I am sure they could find some new employees there for as little as 12 bucks an hour.
The banks would still be making a very healthy profit.
There is something terribly wrong with this picture.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:48 PM on 02/17/2012
The fact that the NDP is mainly responsible for the current health care system that Canada enjoys speaks volumes.

What's his name? The late Saskatchewan premier who introduced it first?

You wouldn't be able to measure as to how much I hate Harper. But that doesn't mean I have to stop voting for the NDP and instead simply rely on the Liberals.
02:30 PM on 02/17/2012
Much of the problem lies with consumers of goods. We have a technology leader in Blackberry right in Waterloo, Ontario but people insist on buying Apples and Samsung smart phones instead of buying Blackberry which are made in Ontario. Sure the Apple may be a bit more fancy but a little responsibility in buying choices would go a long way to help local industry.
02:23 PM on 02/17/2012
The jobs are gone forever because improved machinery, automation and pushing more responsibilities on to suppliers means that the big guys like Caterpillar and Bombardier etc don't need the people any more. Also the skillls are dissapearing because the kids don't want to train for trades and jobs that are never coming back. It is a vicious cirle.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
12:17 PM on 02/17/2012
This regime has handed corporations tax money to move their operations elsewhere. ( Caterpillar )
The economic fundamentals are easy to understand so far as corporate profit is concerned but don't count on sales to continue to increase if no one is making any money.

This headline should say..."Sales are unsustainable if we keep losing jobs in Canada".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ochaye
11:22 AM on 02/17/2012
The one percent is on a tear. GM with a lifetime earnings record announcing the same day that they are gutting the pension benefits.
I'm voting NDP for every election from now on.
Just sayin' eh?
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
12:36 PM on 02/17/2012
If you live in Ontario and vote NDP, your vote has the effect of reelecting Harper.

And don't give me that crap about the NDP can win. Last time was a Layton aberration that only worked because the Liberals had a weak leader.

If you want to get rid of the Conservatives, you have to vote responsibly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
02:38 PM on 02/17/2012
Do you also forget Bob Rae? NDP Premier of Ontario. I guess history is best forgotten.

This statement assumes that people who want to vote for the NDP will be just as happy with the Liberals. Perhaps a vote for the Liberals will make Harper PM. Vote NDP and stop wasting your vote on Liberals, who are no longer the party that they were.
11:04 AM on 02/17/2012
Drummond says the rise of the Canadian dollar is a big factor. It may be the biggest. We need the PQ to threaten secession again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
02:39 PM on 02/17/2012
The Canadian dollar has not really risen. The American dollar has fallen. Don't believe me, check out the exchange rate of the Canadian dollar to currencies other than the US dollar. You will see that our dollar has lost value, just not as much as the US dollar.
10:40 AM on 02/17/2012
could this be a result of "Dutch Disease"?
gbtusa
Sweat is nothing compared to the tears
10:25 AM on 02/17/2012
all the jobs were found in China! thank god! we were all so worried.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adrian31
60% of the time, it works everytime...
10:05 AM on 02/17/2012
Why have jobs not bounced back but the sales figures have?

The article answers it's own question!!!

If these companies can make the same amount of money (pre-recession) with fewer people than they had before, why would they hire more?? It doesn't make sense for them to do so.

What a waste of a headline story.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
02:40 PM on 02/17/2012
Thus we have the crux of the problem with Capitalism. Technology and abusive employment practices will continue to reduce the number of jobs Canadians have access to, and salaries will continue to stagnate. Capitalism does not work.
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
09:47 AM on 02/17/2012
It's rapid fire change one after another. Machine gun paced transformation of the entire country into something resembling the mentality of the province of Alberta.

The economic success the oil has brought the government of Alberta has inflated the Calgary based Harper Conservatives' ego into believing they're smarter managers than the rest of us. They've forgotten it won't work unless you have the massive oil revenues coupled with a much smaller population to deal with. So they're trying to force the remodelling of Canada into the image of Alberta, whether the rest of us want it or not.

This is not a knock on everyday Albertans. I've heard the complaints about the gouging and profiteering going on in their marketplace. I sympathize with the stories about getting ripped off and having no recourse. But their Conservative governments seem to care more about corporate success than what's happening on Main St.

And in today's world of instant information, there's global recognition of the growing turmoil in the previously stable Canadian economy. That's a major part of why companies are ignoring Canada when they look to the resurging US for investment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
02:42 PM on 02/17/2012
It's funny how the rest of Canada has helped Alberta (with a transfer of payments from the haves to the have nots), but when oil was found it became something that only Albertans got to benefit from. I think it is time Quebec charged a fee for using the St. Lawrence Seaway, where the vast majority of good travel along. Why shouldn't other provinces pay us for the use of our river?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henrypapillon
Put a Psychiatrist in every NRA meeting.
09:46 AM on 02/17/2012
Politicians do not think of this in a positive way. They think that you can't have more public works projects because there is no money, but is Canada or the U.S. so rich that we can have that many people sit around unemployed?  Look at it this way. If you had a work crew of 50 people and only jobs for 20 , would you not try to find jobs for the other 30. this is a waste of available manpower to NOT employ these people to do something constructive. Are the railroads, bridges and highways, all public buildings in such good shape that these people could not be employed to do something? There is a lot of idle money sitting around. tax teh idle money and use it to get people working.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
02:43 PM on 02/17/2012
So workers should all be temporary then?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henrypapillon
Put a Psychiatrist in every NRA meeting.
07:10 PM on 02/17/2012
You said that. I did not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
09:44 AM on 02/17/2012
As long as the Canadian government tries to emulate the failures of the American government, we can expect these sorts of things to continue happening. They have failed their people, but they did not see it coming. We have seen what has happened over there, yet we stupidly plot the same course. I have said it before, and I will say it again - Canadians deserve whatever we get because we elected this buffoon into office.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
unclelew
09:42 AM on 02/17/2012
Let's not use the word "efficiency" when discussing loss of jobs. Do computers and advances manufacturing techniques lead to job losses? Sure. But in other cases those job losses are directly tied to a deliberate march toward destroying quality, something that is rarely discussed in this context. Newspapers are a good example. Even before economics started to crush newspaper publishers eagerly embraced computers as a way to cut production costs. Copy editors' primary job was to read stories for comprehension, trim the stories if necessary, write proper headlines. With the advent of computers, newspapers did away with proofreaders and compositors — who actually put the stores on the page. Editors then took over those jobs, to the detriment of their man in mission. And gradually the number of copy editors dwindled — as did photographers and reporters, librarians and other support workers. And this happened before the web became a big item. Readers noticed that quality was wanting and began turning away. On some big-city newspapers there are three or fewer reporters and/or photographers to cover their metropolises over a weekend.
The only "efficiency" in this process was the way in which fewer and fewer people worked their hearts out to try to maintain quality in the face of owners who cared little for quality.
Newspapers will continue to decline with or without maintenance of quality. But this rush for "efficiency" ensures the decline will accelerate.
Yeah, I know. I really do need a copy editor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
09:12 AM on 02/17/2012
Does the government do enough to encourage manufacturing, research, and development? Is it fair to say that union demands and company concessions have put a strangle hold on the economy? As a nation are our expectations greater than what we can truly afford?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
02:46 PM on 02/17/2012
So workers should have no protections? Can you give us some specifics about how unions have put the nation in a stranglehold? Do you believe the government should limit executive compensation as well, or are those excessive salaries beneficial to the economy? Unions help workers make better wages, which allows them to purchase goods, which drives the economy. Pure capitalism seeks to constantly reduce wages and reduce the number of workers they employ, which results in people not being able to afford goods, which slows down the economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
04:49 PM on 02/17/2012
You are on the offensive based on some assumptions? I was asking questions to field the view of those attentive to the economy. As for unions I have a concern since my company is cutting hours in Ottawa, cutting staff in Toronto. our contract is up and more hours are being offered to us but those people at the bottom are being laid off. I suspect bargaining will be tough I wonder what will have to further give up to avoid London, On. I unions as important organizations protecting workers and at the same time negotiating a living wage at standard. When the going gets tough I see a lot of this lost. As for CEO benefits I think their benefits are not in balance. They seem excessive. I know they take the risk. But I expect them also recognize. People work for them and good workers produce good results and positive returns.