Canada Wireless Prices: Choice Of Carriers, Connection Speeds Could Suffer Under New Rules, Critics Say

Posted: 03/15/2012 1:31 pm Updated: 03/15/2012 5:05 pm

Ottawa’s new rules for wireless carriers could mean Canadians will miss out on faster cellphone connections, a telecom consultant says, and some industry insiders say the changes will ultimately mean fewer companies offering cellphone service in Canada.

Industry Minister Christian Paradis announced rules for the auction of the 700 MHz spectrum on Wednesday, setting aside 10-MHz blocks to allow smaller wireless carriers to capture a share of the new spectrum that otherwise would likely have been bought out by the big three carriers -- Bell, Rogers and Telus.

Analysts and wireless industry executives are in disagreement about what these rules will mean. While companies such as Mobilicity welcomed the move as a step towards greater competition and lower cellphone prices, Wind Mobile’s CEO argued the new rules could actually decrease competition.

And telecom consultant Mark Goldberg argued that the 10-MHz blocks are not big enough to properly build the next generation of wireless network.

“While LTE can operate on 10MHz of spectrum, it can operate that much better on 20MHz. In other words, Solomon went ahead and cut the baby,” Goldberg wrote on his blog.

Wireless carrier Wind Mobile suggested that the result of this could be that small players end up with slower networks, while the large established players are able to offer faster speeds on their wireless networks.

The government’s decision “will prevent any carriers, other than the incumbents, from building faster networks and keeping up with the increased consumer demand for the best available smartphone technology,” the company said in a statement.

Wind CEO Anthony Lacavera told the press the new rules could “cripple wireless competition in Canada.”

Lacavera told The Huffington Post Canada that the spectrum blocks amount to "only a tiny sliver of beachfront real estate, but not enough for me to build a hotel."

He said large cellphone companies would be able to use their existing spectrum to augment what they buy in the new spectrum, meaning they could provide faster mobile service than smaller companies that only have access to the new 700 MHz band.

Lacavera said the likely result of these new rules would be consolidation among the small wireless players, resulting in fewer overall choices for consumers.

But another small wireless carrier, Mobilicity, disagreed.

It’s a victory for all Canadians,” Mobilicity CEO Stewart Lyons said in a statement. “This ensures that wireless competition will stay alive and stay healthy and that means consumers will get lower wireless prices, better services, and more technology faster. We will be in the auction 100 per cent and we will bid aggressively.”

Lacavera told Reuters on Thursday that Wind Mobile will likely boycott the spectrum auction that is expected to take place in early 2013.

In announcing new wireless rules on Wednesday, the federal government made clear what it’s looking for -- one more major wireless carrier, to compete with the big players, Bell, Rogers and Telus, in order to bring down cellphone costs for consumers.

"It's almost as if it was known this would limit competition" and force small wireless carriers to merge, Lacavera said.

The federal government's new rules consist of two main parts: One loosens foreign ownership restrictions by allowing companies outside Canada to own 100 per cent of wireless carriers in Canada that have less than 10 per cent market share. That should allow foreign investors to pour money into new wireless companies.

The second major policy change involves the government’s auction of the 700 MHz spectrum, which became available after TV stations went digital last year. The government put in place caps on how much spectrum any company can buy in each of Canada’s 14 licence areas. The way it’s set up should allow room for at least one additional carrier -- on top of the big three carriers -- in each region.

This story has been altered from its original version. It was edited to add comments by Anthony Lacavera.

-- With files from The Canadian Press

THE 10 MOST EXPENSIVE COUNTRIES FOR BROADBAND INTERNET

Loading Slideshow...
  • 10: Iceland

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $54.71.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • 9: Hungary

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $55.31.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • 8: Norway

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $55.90.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • 7: Spain

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $55.97.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • 6: United States

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $57.36.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • 5: Canada

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $62.91.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • 4: Israel

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $65.42.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • 3: Luxembourg

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $74.76.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • 2: Chile

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $79.89.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • 1: Turkey

    <strong>Average price per month, Sept. 2010: $84.14.</strong> (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

  • All OECD Countries

    (<em>All numbers are in U.S. dollars, based on connections between 15 Mbps and 30 Mbps. Source: <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_hplink">OECD Directorate For Science, Technology and Industry</a>.</em>)

FOLLOW CANADA BUSINESS

Ottawa’s new rules for wireless carriers could mean Canadians will miss out on faster cellphone connections, a telecom consultant says, and some industry insiders say the changes will ultimately mea...
Ottawa’s new rules for wireless carriers could mean Canadians will miss out on faster cellphone connections, a telecom consultant says, and some industry insiders say the changes will ultimately mea...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:32 PM on 07/30/2012
The legal advice being given to carriers is quite different from the information provided to municipalities. Industry Canada has informed some of the carriers that they have public consultation and LUA exemptions that they can exercise, however LUAs are often informed otherwise, all at the hands of IC. As a lawyer one of the areas that I had to learn which put me to sleep at school was constitutional law so I have a bit of a head start in understanding the issues that are relevant here and while it is grey I’m certain that when the Supreme Court decides the issue and I will be proven right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
07:23 AM on 03/16/2012
One industry expert says its good.
Another says its bad.
Who do I believe?
I dont expect to see any new cell providers out my way.
This is a story for the city folks.
I might get a break on my fees but not for a few years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mirabay
stand for something or you will fall for
04:34 AM on 03/16/2012
of course they will...........just like everything else they miss..............
photo
Bytown
One way or the other!!
08:21 PM on 03/15/2012
I see the ROBELUS fear ccampaign has begun.
06:38 PM on 03/15/2012
Yeah it pissed me off , this connection is worthless the call dropped affecting my sale of a crucial stock it cost me millions...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:12 PM on 03/15/2012
use a landline m8
10:18 PM on 03/15/2012
Sweet I tried but M1 dropped me again and My G1 bailed I am left holding the bag as usual. It would be so much easier if I worked their.
06:27 PM on 03/15/2012
So, what's it going to be, Lefters?

Bell, Telus, and Rogers ripping us off, or allowing the huge multi-nationals in to put them out of business, costing tens of thousands of jobs?

It seems, other than the resource sector, Canadian business cannot survive without government subsidies and/or protection from foreign competition.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
04:55 PM on 03/15/2012
Harper can't even sell us out to other countries properly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JeanFrancois Lord
04:41 PM on 03/15/2012
they should be told to stop ripping clients, or else, you say you like free market, then be it. But once that door is open, ouch,
04:34 PM on 03/15/2012
Get the government out of it and let the free market take it's course.
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
04:19 PM on 03/15/2012
the only cel phone Harper should be worried about is the ones used to launch fraudulent robocalls.

When is this PM going to be accountible?
This comment has been removed.
03:59 PM on 03/15/2012
Every day another story of how they sold us out to the corporations, way to go Canada.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
02:54 PM on 03/15/2012
We're talking Canada and Telecommunications companies.

If there's a way to screw over customers, they'll find a way.
02:24 PM on 03/15/2012
Look just as landline Bell did for so long the big 3 wireless companies are doing the same. We will charge you whatever we want and will not allow competion to help the consumer with what is thier kryptonite COMPETITION.....

I got a call from Bell the other day asking me to come back as a customer. I told the nice person on the other side I've had 3 great days in my life 1. the birth of my child 2. The day I married my wife 3. The day I told Bell to piss off I getting VOIP....I am saving days 3 and 4 for when I can tell Natural Gas and Hydro to piss off
06:15 PM on 03/15/2012
Getting rid of Bell and Rogers were pretty satisfying. I'm with Teksavvy for the internet/home phone and got rid of cable and got an antenna. Now if I could just ditch Telus for a small cell phone carrier, I'd be set.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PiperSniper
09:58 AM on 03/16/2012
I live about an hour east of Toronto, less than 10 km north of the 401 ... got rid of dial up six months ago when wireless came to our area (really wanted teksavvy but only available 15 kilometres south) ... two companies with apples/oranges plans ... rather expensive (we pay $85 for 40g while my son in peterborough pays $55 for 120g) ... no fibre optics ... bell & rogers only cell in "area" with bell not working very well at all ... and 5 minutes east is long distance (three area codes ... so some neighbours are long distance calls!) ... very frustrating