Toronto Digital Media Summit 2012: Future Of Radio Still Golden, While Rest Of Media Changes Tracks

Posted: 03/21/2012 8:10 pm Updated: 03/21/2012 10:18 pm

Radio
Panelists at the Digital Media Summit in Toronto were asked to speculate on how the household of the future will consume digital content.

In 20 years, there will be virtual buskers and major cable providers will have been replaced by video gaming systems like Microsoft’s Xbox, but radio -- a medium that has defied countless prognostications of its imminent demise -- will still be going strong.

These were among the predictions of the future of media forwarded during a panel discussion on the subject at the Digital Media Summit in Toronto on Wednesday.

Held as part of Canadian Music Week, the panel included a range of digital media industry experts from UK-based self-proclaimed radio futurist James Cridland and Australian innovationist Justin Baird to Jennifer Dettman, head of factual entertainment for CBC and Jeff Leiper, director of strategic policy for the CRTC.

As media advertising continues to migrate online from print and digital media audiences become increasingly fragmented, panelists were asked to speculate on how the household of the future will consume digital content.

The model they envision represents a significant departure from what we know today.

According to Baird, who was Google’s innovationist before joining Aegis Media and Jump Tank, an innovation consulting firm, the current content subscription model is on its way out.

Despite the proliferation of user-generated content, such as amateur music videos on sites like YouTube, Baird notes that users continue to give away their rights for free.

But he predicts that will soon change, as users begin to charge other users for their content.

“How come there is no such thing as virtual busking?” he said. “As we move into the future … I don’t think there will be any subscriptions. I think it will be ‘How much for this piece of content?’ Maybe it will be a donation, maybe this is a piece of content that someone is giving away for charity.”

“There’s a whole different ecosystem out there in terms of how these diff types of content will change the face of the way that people interact with and change content,” he added.

It’s a prospect that no doubt sent a chill down the backs of the industry executives in the audience -- and prompted moderator Raja Khanna, CEO of Toronto-based GlassBox Television, to tell Baird, “I think you just told everybody in the room that they’re out of a job.”

David U.K., founder of Toronto-based Cue Digital, has a slightly different take.

He says that when it comes to digital content curation and delivery, telecom giants will be replaced by video-gaming systems, which are already in 70 per cent of homes.

“In 20 years, Rogers [Communications] becomes a utility, and XBox and Playstation takes over,” he said, noting that it won’t be a completely open platform because “people still want some sort of content curation.”

“Maybe they’re a content curator and there’s a one cent fee for a million channel universe,” he offered.

But Cridland, who is managing director of the independent media directory Media UK, questions the viability of these piecemeal models for consuming paid digital content.

“I’m not going to give my credit card details to 150 different people just for a little bit of content,” he said, adding that “people are more and more used to getting content for free and not seeing any value in terms of the content they’re consuming.”

When it comes to the consequences of illegal downloading, the panelists agreed that the trend would continue to shape their decisions.

CBC’s Dettman, for instance, said the network recently put episodes of the popular show Dragon’s Den online -- supported by paid advertising -- before the program even aired on TV.

“If we fight it then there will be legal battles. If we figure out a way to give it out for free but still make money, that’s [ideal],” she said.

But despite the ever-shifting landscape of the digital media industry, there is one medium that is expected to remain seemingly unchanged: radio.

“People have been talking about the death of radio for like 30 years. It’s the only medium that’s left,” U.K. observed. “Radio is here to stay. It’s just a question of how it’s consumed and what device it’s used on.”

As the CRTC’s Leiper sees it, radio will be somewhat protected until it becomes more affordable to extend wireless connections to vehicles, where consumers often tune in.

“The tipping point in radio if it comes will come as a result of getting the inexpensive wireless connectivity into the car at price points that people are willing to actually consume it, and I’m not sure that we’re there in canada yet,” he said.

The summit continues on Thursday with presentations on Facebook, the future of the agency business and a closing keynote address by Arianna Huffington, editor in chief of AOL Huffington Post Media Group.

FOLLOW CANADA BUSINESS

In 20 years, there will be virtual buskers and major cable providers will have been replaced by video gaming systems like Microsoft’s Xbox, but radio -- a medium that has defied countless prognostic...
In 20 years, there will be virtual buskers and major cable providers will have been replaced by video gaming systems like Microsoft’s Xbox, but radio -- a medium that has defied countless prognostic...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
edward60
moderate
09:50 PM on 03/22/2012
Radio is my favorite is listen every day, public radio, bbc, cbc local stations, short wave sometimes
08:51 PM on 03/22/2012
I think that ultimately, communication infrastructure, the pipelines the nuts and bolts of delivering content will have to be a structure that the purveyors of services on that pipeline support as a communal service to them. Paying for their traffic into a pool to fund it. In any case, there will have to be a central clearinghouse for billing. The consumer/user selects from a multitude of items and is billed by a central entity which in turn disseminates the payments to the various providers. the central service can then know the rate of use to charge the provider for pipeline space, with a charge for expansion and maintenance of the pipeline. What is left is returned to the provider as hopefully, profit. This sets a level playing field for providers. A set cost for usage. The usage is what your customers consume and system running maintenance and expansion costs. Every provider pays the same cost per bit of data sent. Pooled.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:04 PM on 03/22/2012
Satellite Radio is the only radio worth listening too. Terrestrial is a heavy bombardment of advertisement, with brief periods of mediocrity in between.
10:35 AM on 03/22/2012
Well, to be fair, the thing that has helped radio survive is its free for anyone to listen to, and the content is diverse enough that most people will find something they like to listen to. TV is not the same. The costs of a tv are higher than that of a radio (do people even still buy radios? Or just listen to radio online and in their cars?), and if you only pick up free local stations, you may find it doesn't play the shows you like. Cable is just a gouge-fest which is what drives so many people to things like Netflix or, yes downloading. But radio is always free.

Radio is also a vastly different business model than TV. I don't pay money to get radio stations only to listen to too many commercials. Radio makes money from commercials that it uses to profit, after paying song royalties. TV would NEVER do that. They charge you money for chanels, which they then play 10 minutes of commercials for every 20 minutes of actual show...and this ratio is always inreasing in commercials favor. Back when "cable" was first announced, they actually used to be commercial free, claiming that the extra money you were paying for the chanels meant they didn't need to rely so much on advertising. Of course, as soon as they wanted higher profits, commercials became king again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:49 AM on 03/22/2012
Agree, sick of all videos and visuals, radio is music and imagination.
photo
Billk29
Justified Ancient of Mu
04:30 AM on 03/22/2012
I listen to CBC and some sports radio stations in my car all the time.I bought a tivoli radio to listen to cbc at home. I think radio will be here for a long time as it is free and you can find stations very easily.
03:53 AM on 03/22/2012
I don't understand how a "14 year media veteran", (David U.K.) could make such a misinformed statement that clearly confuses a vessel for its content, radio for audio: "Radio is here to stay. It's just a question of how it is consumed, and what device it's used on." A radio is a device, you know, that translates radio frequencies. I think he means to say that "audio is here to stay", and I really don't need his expertise to help me understand that. If he really believes that A.M. and F.M. radio are poised to thrive, then I'm curious why he's making his career in broadband technologies.
Personally, I listen to more audio content than I did ten years ago, but listen to an actual radio far less often. The teenagers and college students I know almost never listen to radios, not even in their cars, you know, mp3 players, phones....Sure radio is thriving.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cameron d
Good Guys Win
01:04 AM on 03/22/2012
The only radio I've listened to in the last few years is CBC Radio 1 and 2. Even then I get most of the programs in the form of podcasts. Podcasts and Satellite radio is the way to go. User controlled content is King. Give me what I want and when I want it. It's that simple.
photo
Add In Canadia
Egotism is a weakness
11:08 PM on 03/21/2012
I think almost all new content will be paid for by donations in the future. It's really a question of who comes up with an integrated file-sharing and donation system first.

Take YouTube for example, if there was a secure donate button that people could press that donates say... a dollar into that person's account, people would press it if they like the content. If a video has a million views, even if just 0.01% of people donated a dollar; the owner if that video would earn $10,000 and that would be a sizable amount.

The main problem is that PayPal is the main way money gets around the internet, and they have a minimum transaction fee which would make such small donations incompatible with what would be ideally setup.

If YouTube somehow sets up a cash system internally in where accounts can be 'loaded up with money' via a credit card, and a donation button implemented, then YT could simply state that it will take something like 5% off every transaction as a fee and make money along that route along side ad-revenue sharing.

In any case, once a system like that is created; then advertisers or investors could start to partner up with content creators that attract a lot of traffic and donations.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Christian Cotroneo
11:22 PM on 03/21/2012
Great, thoughtful response. Thanks Add.
12:53 AM on 03/22/2012
Math correction. You mean 1%, not 0.01%, as a conversion rate from a million $1 opportunities for $10,000 in revenue.

No disagreement with the rest of your post.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramon Moreno
Read below.
09:41 PM on 03/21/2012
I can listen to anything in the world in my car now. Who writes this stuff?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Christian Cotroneo
11:28 PM on 03/21/2012
Humans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sillyfrog
Pastafarian and UU student
08:17 PM on 03/21/2012
So true. :)