Althia Raj
GET UPDATES FROM Althia:

Canada Budget 2012: Cuts For Public Service, Investment For Business In Conservative Spending Plan

Posted: 03/29/2012 4:07 pm Updated: 03/30/2012 12:29 pm

Canada Budget 2012 Cuts
The Canada Budget 2012 will be delivered by federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty will deliver Canada's 2012 budge

OTTAWA — The Conservative government’s first majority budget focuses on business-friendly incentives aimed at creating jobs while reducing the size of the public sector and eliminating or cutting many programs that don’t jibe with the party’s ideology.

“It signals a very profound change in direction,” said Ian Lee, an assistant professor at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business.

“This is going to be a transformational budget and ironically, not because of the budgetary stuff in the budget, it’s going to be transformational because of so many policy initiatives, changes and direction,” he added.

Budget 2012, titled Jobs, Growth and Long-Term Prosperity, has the Tories slashing $5.2 billion from public services — a figure they’ll reach by 2014-2015.

Some of the departments hardest hit include National Defence, which is wrapping up operations in Afghanistan, Public Safety, Health Canada and the International Assistance Envelope. The federal government will spend $900 million to eliminate approximately 19,200 federal jobs (including attrition), mostly in the national capital region.

A measure to eliminate the penny will garner plenty of attention and headlines, perhaps a distraction from other Conservative cuts in areas they have long shown disdain for.

GALLERY: FEDERAL BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS

They plan to scrap the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy, a group that provides advice on the environment, saying they don’t need their advice any more. They will make it more difficult for charities, such as environmental groups that oppose pipeline developments, to engage in so-called political activities. The CBC will be chopped by $115 million. The youth program Katimavik will be killed.

Diplomats will have to live in less ritzy accommodations and public sector workers will be forced to work until age 65. Public employees will see some of their severance packages eliminated and, eventually, they will contribute more to their pensions. MPs will be asked to do their part too, the government said, but any pension changes for them won't take effect until the next Parliament.

The federal government will streamline environmental reviews to ensure the speedy approval of natural resource development projects, such as the Northern Gateway pipeline. It will spend $306 million next year for research and development, business investments, and help for entrepreneurs to bring their products to market.

The Tories aim to refocus the National Research Council toward “business-led, industry-relevant research” while slashing the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada’s budget by $14 million – all while chasing free-trade agreements with renewed vigor.

On the labour front, the Tories will revamp the immigration system, killing a backlog of 300,000 skilled foreign worker applicants by sending them their money back. New applicants will be judged on whether they fit with current labour demands and applications have been capped at 10,000 annually.

The government will also invest heavily in Aboriginal education, as well as infrastructure to provide clean water on reserves. The budget also aims to help young people get “tangible skills.”

The budget will bring significant changes to Employment Insurance (EI), encouraging people to work while receiving benefits and standardizing qualification standards.

As expected, the age to qualify for Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement benefits will be raised from 65 to 67, but the change won’t take effect until 2023 and will be gradually implemented over six years. Starting in 2013, however, the federal government will allow seniors to defer receipt of their OAS benefits for up to five years, a move which will result in a slightly higher benefit. The government predicts the cost of the program will explode as the Baby Boom generation retires.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said he has used the budget to lay out a clear policy direction for the country.

“The plan’s measures focus on the drivers of growth. Innovation, business investments, people’s education and skills that will fuel the new wave of job creation,” he told reporters Thursday.

“This is the largest budget we have done, it is looking at the longer term … up to 2020 and beyond,” he said, waving the 500-page book in the air.

GALLERY: FEDERAL BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS


(Story Continues Under Gallery)


Flaherty called his cuts “moderate” and dismissed the notion they were ideological.

“I’m not a very ideological guy, I guess because I get people mad at me for not being a strong enough fiscal conservative,” he said. “We are a moderate, pragmatic government that responds to the facts as they are,” Flaherty added.

The focus is more on prosperity than austerity, said Lee. “What they are saying is this isn’t just about doom and gloom and downsizing and layoffs, I think what they are trying to say is we are not just doing this for the sake of doing this, we are doing this because … this is going to free up resources to allow us to go down a different path.”

Allan Maslove, a former editor of the series “How Ottawa Spends,” believes there is no argument to be made for severe budgets cuts.

“The deficit is already coming down quite rapidly … (and) the economy is still pretty weak. Over the last several months there's been no real growth in employment,” he said. Cutting expenditures to balance the budget is not a way to strengthen the economy. If it does anything, it weakens the economy,” he told HuffPost.

“They didn’t need to cut, they could have invested in infrastructure …They could have done more for young people who are waiting to get into the labour market,” said Armine Yalnizyan, a senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. “There is no response to the middle class getting hollowed out.”

Despite the opposition, Flaherty’s fiscal plan will receive guaranteed smooth sailing in Parliament. As the first budget in a majority mandate, it’s also the time when big and painful changes — if a government wants to make them — are usually made, before spending ramps up again just in time for another federal election.

“If they are going to do anything controversial or unpopular, now’s the time to do it,” said Liberal MP John McCallum. “It’s the first time that (Harper) is in an unfettered position and can do what he wants.”

Weakening environmental reviews for pipelines plus major cuts of services to Canadians at a time when unemployment is so high, “those are not really Progressive Conservative actions,” McCallum added, “those are hard core Conservative action ... It’s ideological.”

Budgets are ideological tools, argued Donald Savoie, the Canada research chair in public administration and governance at l’Université de Moncton. “It is the most important instrument to give life to your policies.”

He believes that just like Liberal Finance Minister Paul Martin’s budget in 1995, which slashed services and health and social transfers to provinces, Flaherty’s budget 2012 will be a “game changer.”

But, he cautions, if people are sitting at home thinking this budget will redefine the role of the federal government, it is not going to happen.

“No government will redefine the role of the public sector in one budget, it’s done over a series of budgets,” he said.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story stated that the budget will kill a backlog of 460,000 skilled foreign worker applicants by sending them their money back. The actual number is 300,000. The story also stated applications will be capped at 10,000 annually, the number has already be capped.

OUR FULL BUDGET COVERAGE:

CBC Faces 10% Cuts

Tory Cuts Settle Old Scores

Highlights Of The Federal Budget

Public Service Hit With Cuts

Pennies To Go Away

OAS Eligibility Age Raised

Full Text Of Jim Flaherty's Budget

Related on HuffPost:

Armine Yalnizyan, Senior Economist With The Canadian Centre For Policy Alternatives, Gives Her View Of The Federal Budget 2012


FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA — The Conservative government’s first majority budget focuses on business-friendly incentives aimed at creating jobs while reducing the size of the public sector and eliminating or cutting ...
OTTAWA — The Conservative government’s first majority budget focuses on business-friendly incentives aimed at creating jobs while reducing the size of the public sector and eliminating or cutting ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 271
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
SamEasy
You really don`t want to know.
02:32 PM on 04/01/2012
Brought to you by.......The REPUBLICAN PARTY OF CANADA. Harper and his goon act like they were given carte blanche to do whatever they want tlo reshape our country to suit their BS dreams.

They are a discusting.
11:49 AM on 03/31/2012
Flaherty gives a speech in front of a lectern that says Jobs Growth Prosperity. The lectern hides the fact that his pants are on fire.
10:53 AM on 03/31/2012
If the Tories wanted to make some serious cuts, how about slashing all MPs pension plans in half, or if you're employed elsewhere at the same time, forcing you to pick which pension you intend to keep, and forfeiting the other one back to taxpayers.
This government has wasted more opportunities and cost more money than the previous Liberal government ever did.
When will the average Canadian say ENOUGH, and demand some accountability other than the typical stage show in Parliament?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
02:25 AM on 03/31/2012
"“They didn’t need to cut, they could have invested in infrastructure …They could have done more for young people who are waiting to get into the labour market,” said Armine Yalnizyan, a senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. “There is no response to the middle class getting hollowed out.”"

Tory weak points and areas the average Reformer couldn't give a flip about. This budget is no surprise.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shandra Brown Valyear
Political Addict
12:40 AM on 03/31/2012
Explain to me how you can work while collecting EI. Seems to me if you are on EI it is because you either don't have a job, you are pregnant, or sick. They say this is a jobs stimulus bill yet they are cutting jobs by the thousands and then expecting people on EI to work.......WHERE?
11:08 PM on 03/30/2012
Great budget!! I'm very pleased!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
11:26 PM on 03/30/2012
Funny 'cause lots of conservatives aren't.
10:57 AM on 03/31/2012
Because they didn't think it went far enough. This was a good balance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ascoli
09:48 PM on 03/30/2012
Jim Jim's face is becoming as angry and mean looking as his master Herr Harper
UGLY
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
02:26 AM on 03/31/2012
Probably stress from hiding deficits. Next gov will no doubt inherit another of Jimmy's surprises.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thalin Lea
07:04 PM on 03/30/2012
Ey dude whre is my polling station ?
06:01 PM on 03/30/2012
"government’s first majority budget focuses on business-friendly incentives aimed at creating jobs while reducing the size of the public sector and eliminating or cutting many programs that don’t jibe with the party’s ideology".

Can we get some clarity on what those "business-friendly incentives" are?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
emphatico
....is politically radioactive.
12:15 AM on 03/31/2012
Huge tax cuts, of course!
12:32 PM on 03/31/2012
Of course. I wanted to know the extent of the damage though.
12:38 PM on 03/31/2012
"Inconveniences" such as rules that try to keep food safe, that "responsible" businesses hate so much. They had to get rid of a lot of inspectors because a few of them wanted to do their job and blew the whistle on cover-ups. I assume that those who will complain when we have another Walkerton or listeria or salmonella outbreak are with the foreign-financed terrorist groups that are stifling the Cons' buddies "rights" to profits.
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
05:30 PM on 03/30/2012
The US spends the most on healthcare. They also have 50 million Americans with no healthcare coverage whatsoever.

US taxes are lower. But they pay $400.+ per month for health insurance. If married, they pay extra for each member of the family.

If they have health issues, they paying a lot more for coverage. If the issues are chronic or longterm, they're uninsurable. The private healthcos won't pay more for treatment than what people pay in premiums.

That's what the HarperCons want for Canada. They try to con people into accepting it in small increments by telling them it's unsustainable. Don't forget, that's the way things used to be in Canada before the Liberals brought in public healthcare.

Why do the neocons want to go back to what didn't work before? Because they think taking the healthcare component out of the tax system would put more money in their own pockets.

OAS is the same. The percentage of the population that will need OAS won't change just because people live longer. Those who need OAS the most will become unemployed long before they reach 65. Even the government bureaucracy understands that people who lose their jobs after 55 will almost certainly never work again. It happens a lot more often than you might imagine.

The death by a thousand cuts to essential social services will destroy the quality of life of millions of people. Not because the programs are unsustainable. But because the neocons think it will cut their taxes.
11:05 PM on 03/30/2012
OAS is nothing but welfare for seniors. Everyone gets it, whether you work or not. For example, a person making $67,000 per year still gets the full OAS payment. OAS should be alloted according to income and should only go to the poor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
11:27 PM on 03/30/2012
Welfare that seniors have been paying taxes for decades for. You obviously aren't very old aren't very educated or both.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
09:44 PM on 04/01/2012
I am sick of greedy people who think those who never worked are not entitled to anything.There is no such thing as a person who never worked! People have to work to survive even if its not payed work some people have mental and physical disabilities other may suffer from all kinds of things that keep them from working. Women who stay home and work in the home work just a s hard maybe even harder unless they are wealthy. If someone collects OAS and has another income most of the OAS will be taxed back. Poor seniors also get a supplement so they can at least live with dignity! If people don't earn money outside the home they are not taking away jobs from others who may need it more! There will never be full employment and its less expensive to pay welfare then to let people live on the streets. I want a Canada that does not judge but has compassion for all human beings. Only truly inferior humans have the need to feel superior!
04:01 PM on 03/30/2012
Wow, the Libs or NDP are sure going to have a lot of work to do when we throw the con bums out in a few years.
03:32 PM on 03/30/2012
Nice way to wipe out a backlog, just refund and return the immigration applications! Now everyone goes to the back of the line. So instead of hiring skilled workers today, we get to hire them tomorrow?? Just procrastination.

19,000 jobs cut (many through attrition, true) but that leaves thousands looking for work. Just adds to the unemployment rolls and curtails spending by thousands of Canadians.

At least the CONS are honest about not needing environmental advice (or assessments) since decisions will be economic-based and not science-based. Sounds like China - booming economy with dirty air and water, respiratory and health issues, a high level of environmental degradation - yippee.

You are on your own kids. It is the new wild west where everyone fends for themselves and your government's decisions are now made solely in the boardrooms of Canada, China and the U.S.
11:07 PM on 03/30/2012
We shouldn't teach our kids to fend for themselves?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
10:00 PM on 04/01/2012
What we should teach our kids respect for all human beings! To be considerate of each other. The fend for yourself attitude leads to bulling not cooperation. It leads to greed and corruption, not caring and sharing. Nobody every does it on their own every one gets help at some time or another.Some times it's just pure luck! Everyone is not created equil.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shandra Brown Valyear
Political Addict
12:37 AM on 03/31/2012
Your post is spot on! f/f'ed!
03:23 PM on 03/30/2012
Do these tiny men (Flaherty, Harper, etc.) think they actually matter in the grand sweep of history? Courtiers, sycophants and servants to corporations, all. Two more budgets...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taylor Jay
I don't align myself with any political party.
02:18 PM on 03/30/2012
where am i in this budget?

oh ya gonna have to work 2 more years, have less government support for the entirity of my life. and i cant even smoke a joint to try and forget all this BS thanks conservies
11:07 PM on 03/30/2012
You count on government support? Sucks to be you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Filthy
12:40 PM on 03/30/2012
Of course it's ideological, they cut CBC's budget by 10% while funneling unprecedented wads of cash to Quebecor who owns Sun Media. $61 Million through the Canadian Media Fund, $14 Million through the Local Program Improvement Fund and $117 Million through the Federal and Provnicial Refundable Production tax credit. Quebecor got $13 million in aid through the Canada Periodical Fund between 2008 and 2010. And they're getting preferential treatment in the wireless market too. In 2008 Bell, Telus and Rogers were prohibited from bidding on available Wireless spectrum so Quebecor didn't have to compete.
photo
Spanky McFarlane
ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM.
01:20 PM on 03/30/2012
Do you happen to know if Brian Mulroney still sits on the Board of Quebecor?
02:19 PM on 03/30/2012
Why does that not surprise me.