The Harper government is creating a secret “consultation group,” likely comprised of lobbyists, who are getting inside information about Canada’s participation in Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, observers allege.

Advocacy group OpenMedia has obtained a non-disclosure agreement (see below) it says the federal government mistakenly sent to it, asking the recipient to keep secret the information it receives about negotiations on the controversial economic and trade agreement.

“I think it confirms that lobbyists are being permitted to have access to information about the TPP that is otherwise kept secret from public interest groups and citizens in general,” OpenMedia executive director Steve Anderson told The Huffington Post Canada in an email.

“It appears ... the Canadian government got confused about which contacts were industry lobbyists and which are from public interest groups.”

PHOTOS: WORLD'S MOST COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES

Digital law expert Michael Geist wrote on his blog Friday that the consultation group “raises a host of concerns including questions about who has privileged access, whether civil society groups will also have access and be invited to join, and the extent of behind-the-scenes consultations with industry groups.”

Geist added that “the lack of transparency with the TPP is now exacerbated by a two-tier approach to TPP information with a select, secret group gaining insider access to information.”

He called on the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade to immediately disclose who has been given access to the TPP consultation group.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a trade deal currently being negotiated between 11 Pacific rim countries, including Canada, the U.S., Australia, Malaysia and Singapore. Japan may also join the talks.

Critics have raised concerns about intellectual property rules that may find their way into the agreement, with OpenMedia and the Council of Canadians describing it as an “internet trap” that could “criminalize some everyday uses” of the web, including small-scale file-sharing of music.

The deal would “force service providers to collect and hand over your private data without privacy safeguards, and give media conglomerates more power to send you fines in the mail, remove online content — including entire websites — and even terminate your access to the internet,” OpenMedia said in a statement.

The final shape of the deal is not yet known. The next round of negotiations begins in Auckland, New Zealand, next month.

Copyright lobbyists in the U.S. are also reportedly using the TPP talks as an opportunity to pressure Canada into removing Canadian content regulations.

Ottawa was allowed into the TPP negotiations earlier this year, after a long and intensive round of lobbying for access. Critics derided the government for the deal it made to gain access, which commits Canada to abiding by any parts of the TPP that had already been agreed on when Canada joined.

"The fact is that a substantial amount of this agreement apparently has already been negotiated, and Canada is not going to have a choice but either to accept it or reject it," former Prime Minister Paul Martin said in June.

TPP Non-disclosure agreement
TPP NDA

WORLD'S MOST COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES

Loading Slideshow...
  • 20: Australia

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 19: South Korea

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 18: Saudi Arabia

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 17: Belgium

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 16: Austria

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 15: Norway

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 14: Canada

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 13: Taiwan

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 12: Denmark

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 11: Qatar

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 10: Japan

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 9: Hong Kong

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 8: United Kingdom

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 7: United States

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 6: Germany

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 5: Netherlands

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 4: Sweden

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 3: Finland

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 2: Singapore

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>

  • 1: Switzerland

    Source: <a href="http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012-13/GCR_Rankings_2012-13.pdf" target="_hplink">World Economic Forum</a>