Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Abubakar Kasim

GET UPDATES FROM Abubakar Kasim
 

Bring Back the Death Penalty for Brutal Murderers

Posted: 05/08/2012 9:30 am

Those who reject capital punishment tend to be noisemakers who are not inflicted with the pain and agony of losing someone in an act of homicide. I suspect these opponents would change their views instantly if their loved ones were brutally murdered,

But when it is about other victims -- whether it's 8-year-old Tori Stafford, or those of other previous horrific cases such as the serial killer and rapist, Paul Bernardo; the Shafia family who were convicted of murdering their own daughters and their step mother; or the convicted BC serial killer, Robert Pickton -- opponents of the death penalty unfailing start preaching about mercy and forgiveness because for them, the victim is someone else's family.

The majority of Canadians, however, favour the return of capital punishment.

According to a recent poll, the majority of Canadians support return of death penalty:

"The survey conducted by Angus Reid Public Opinion in partnership with the Toronto Star found that 63 per cent of the 1,002 Canadians surveyed across the country believe the death penalty is sometimes appropriate. Sixty-one per cent said capital punishment, which was abolished in Canada in 1976, is warranted for murder."

Meanwhile Prime Minister Stephen Harper has refused to hold a referendum on capital punishment, despite an online campaign to do so started by Canadians horrified by the Tori Stafford case. (On May 20, 2009, police charged Michael Thomas Rafferty, 28, with first degree murder and Terri-Lynne McClintic, 18, with being an accessory to murder of the little girl, who was abducted outside her school; McClintic has pleaded guilty. Rafferty is currently on trial.)

And the PM's refusal to re-open the debate flies in the face of a 2011 Abacus Data survey, in which 66% of Canadians indicated they want the death penalty to be used in cases like Tori's, just as they called for it when they learned about the details of the deaths of Tammy Homolka, Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French -- all victims of serial killers Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka. Some also think capital punishment is justified in the recent Shafia family murder case.

Harper's stance even flies in the face of his own views. In an interview with the CBC, aired January 19, 2011, Harper said, "I personally think there are times where capital punishment is appropriate," but added that he has "no plans to bring that issue forward."

Canada has hanged 710 people since capital punishment was enacted in 1859. A moratorium was placed on the death penalty in 1967; and in 1976, the death penalty was formally abolished (by a narrow majority in the House) from the Criminal Code.

Keeping brutal murderers behind bars, feeding and educating them with taxpayer's money is an insult to the victims and a mockery to the justice system.

The death penalty is the only punishment that suits the crime of murder; it creates a sense of balance in the scales of justice. As Ernest van den Haag states in his book (co-authored with John P. Conrad), The Death Penalty: A Debate: "Innocent life is best secured by telling those who would take it that they will forfeit their own lives."

Society must retain the death penalty in order to establish justice, especially for those innocent victims whose lives are so horrifically and unfairly taken.

 
FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 74
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
02:23 PM on 05/21/2012
I recognise both sides, yet find the debate lacking in factual info. Supporters use economics and safety to argue for cap-pun, but don't support their arguments with facts. The strongest and only argument is that some people deserve to die and the state has the moral authority to decide. Why? Because execution isn't cheaper than life imprisonment (LI), it's about 10X the cost because of the lengthy appeals, which are necessary to decrease the chances of wrongful conviction. Second, there's no evidence that cap-pun deters murder more than LI. American execution states are actually less safe than non-executing ones. The people we'd like to see hang--child killers--are so lacking in impulse control that no penalty will deter them. Indeed, because cap-pun is so expensive, it redirects resources from preventative law enforcement to punishment that fails to deter more than cheaper alternatives. Cap pun may actually make us less safe for this reason. Finally, proponents assume victims are better placed to determine responses to crime than others. Nope. If we let victims dictate penal policy, we'd all be dead. Victims need to be honoured and cared for, and executing their perpetrators doesn't provides them with any more peace than LI. Research shows that an apology is more healing than execution. My point is that if you're going to argue for the return of capital punishment, then use the arguments that make sense, and not the arguments that can be shot down by your opponents.
12:37 PM on 05/14/2012
Reject noisemakers with views about Bernardo, Shafia, Picton. The unfailing preaching for punishment in the country is a campaign. Canadians survey Canadians, they called the issue. Feeding insult and mockery is justice. Debate the penalty, justice for victims.
10:06 PM on 05/14/2012
Jurors decide the case, Kasim loved emotion beyond the scales of punishment. Sharia Shafia honour is Kasim penalty. Practices of death and prison face the gates. More death would adopt the worst mind. Any deterrent is creative for society. Hell knows life. Criminal world is well-entertained and romanticized. Kasim death state is reducing the moral war for gratification. Death is not deterrent.
12:37 PM on 05/09/2012
I have not embraced the idea of the return of the dealth pentaly;until the four R.C.M. constables were murdered in Methop Alberta. (One of the murderd constables was related to me through marriage to a sibling.) I was able to see and then feel the angish his parents and aunt had to undergo. I think all emergency personal should carry the death sentance, if anyone murders them and serious time for even attempting to. We rely on all of these emergency personal to protect use in so many way there needs to be something much greater than a life sentance or two. The death penelty truly needs to be brought back to prevent serious offences like murder; what is more serious!
photo
duggyg
Situation normal.....
09:51 AM on 05/09/2012
It would feel good to execute some of these people......but feelings, or emotions should not rule you. State execution is a step in the direction toward state tyranny. Besides, endless incarceration is a far more terrible penalty.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:48 AM on 05/09/2012
Even the USA is realizing the ineffectiveness of the death penalty. What is with these people who want to embrace these already proven failed policies?
09:35 AM on 05/09/2012
Your assertions are flawed and unbalanced. Justice does not equate to an eye for an eye.
06:42 AM on 05/09/2012
Those killers cause very little damage to the country when compared with those Masters of the Universe, those Job Creators who poison people, who destroy, who crash the economy and get away with it every time. Why, in the US, they estimate 500,000 deaths caused by a drug company between 1999-2004. I suppose that this is just a trifling matter.
TheRenaissanceMan
A starry-eyed idealist with too much time
06:23 AM on 05/09/2012
I agree that the death penalty should be allowed for extreme cases. However, the fact that there are people who get killed by the government and later found to be innocent overshadows this for me. Unless we found a foolproof way of making sure that people are 100% guilty, then I would be against re-instatement.
12:44 AM on 05/09/2012
My son was murdered and I don't believe in the death penalty. Revenge doesn't resurrect the loved one or lessen the pain and longing.
The argument that the death penalty saves money is spurious. Appeals cost millions of dollars and can be ongoing for thirty years or more with taxpayers footing the bill.
There's plenty of evidence in the US that poor people and minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty while those that can afford high priced lawyers are moe likely to be aquitted.
Rather than encouraging revenge, as a society we have to implement prevention programs targetting young people with mental health issues and children born into poverty and chaos.
The young woman in the Tori Stafford case sounds as though she has been deeply disturbed from a young age while the male is probably a psychopath. In spite of his mother's protests, I bet he set fires and tortured cats as a child and should have been identified as a danger to society in his early years.
TheRenaissanceMan
A starry-eyed idealist with too much time
06:24 AM on 05/09/2012
I am so sorry for your loss.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:01 AM on 05/09/2012
Thank you for your enlightening comment. It's so encouraging to hear from someone who, although suffering a tragic loss, understands the difference between justice and revenge. My deepest sympathies.
photo
1846
Deir Yassin Survivor
12:28 AM on 05/09/2012
Rubbish!!
Canada abolished the death penalty for good reason and there is more evidence now than before that it was the right thing to do. Everyone abhors the brutality exhibited in the crimes listed, citing them as reason for reinstating capital punishment however is duplicitous and misguided.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Archie1955
12:25 AM on 05/09/2012
No, no,no! Two wrongs have never made a right. Canada is beyond barbarism and it will not succumb to such entreaties to bring back sociopathic policies. Our judicial heritage has grown up over many centuries as an offshoot of British common law and we do not wish to travel any other religious or cultural legal path than our own, thank you very much.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
10:45 PM on 05/08/2012
First of all, the marker of an enlightened society is that it understands that you can't turn back the clock if you execute the wrong person. Enough people have been wrongly convicted of brutal murders for us to not follow the leads of middle eastern countries (plus the American south and China) and have the state kill people. Secondly, it costs a lot more to run through the gamut of appeals than to house a prisoner for life, so so much for your economic argument. And finally, the Supreme Court is unlikely to find capital punishment defensible under our Charter of Rights, so again, so much for this dumb idea.

If you really like capital punishment, I'd suggest moving to China, Texas or Iran. Bon Voyage!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Avrum Rosensweig
10:02 PM on 05/08/2012
You haven't done your homework. My brother-in-law was murdered in cold blood, and I am thoroughly against the death penalty. The death penalty, contrary to what you wrote, is not a deterent to murder. Studies have shown that. And as per creating a blance, so would plucking out an eye of someone who took my eye; so would punching out a tooth, for someone who took my tooth. But then, wouldn't we have a society that looked like those of old where violence was everywhere -- in the courts and on the streets. Do your homework my friend. You wrote your article as if it simply is your opinion with little to know evidence to back up your point. As per 'x' amount of Canadians callling for the death penalty, that number changes regularly.
09:46 AM on 05/09/2012
Exactly!
11:03 AM on 05/09/2012
My Condolences to you & your family ...& I totally agree-the Death Penalty is revenge-pure & Simple
08:37 PM on 05/08/2012
There is no reason for capital punishment, not in any intelligent society. Violent/physically abusive crimes are the only reason why anyone SHOULD be imprisoned, because the offenders are a threat to society. Yet our judicial resources are so clogged with non-violent petty offenders, soon to be even more with Harper's warped crime bill. This means less money to treat and/or imprison the violent ones, which leads to people like the author proposing a return to the dark ages as a solution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
08:27 PM on 05/08/2012
Is this a response born of religion Mr. Kasim? Are you by chance a member of one of the Abrahamic religions? This seems like a religious response to me, short on logic and reason. And long on emotion and vengeance.
08:15 AM on 05/09/2012
No kidding...
09:47 AM on 05/09/2012
I believe Mr. Kasim is wrong with respect to his views on this issue, but really...picking on what you think are his religious beliefs based on his name is also wrong...it degrades the level of conversation further
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
12:39 PM on 05/09/2012
I would ask the same question of Mr. Coren, who I already know is religious. Why can't you discuss where the motivation comes from on a topic like this if its religion based? If it is, it should be dragged out and discussed openly.