Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Andreas Souvaliotis

GET UPDATES FROM Andreas Souvaliotis
 

Vision vs. Populism in Ontario Election: Using Dirty Energy Incentives to Get Ahead

Posted: 06/28/11 09:09 AM ET

It's election season in the largest province of our country and the parties are busy rolling out their usual promises. In stark contrast with some of the higher-engagement democracies in the world, where the dialogue between voters and candidates involves plenty of long-term strategy and vision, our campaigns tend to be dominated by tactical promises that can be packaged into easily digestible sound-bites, focused on immediate gratification.

Look the latest campaign pledges by the two opposition parties in Ontario: They're both promising to ease their voters' "pain" at the pump and at the hydro meter by reducing provincial taxes on gasoline and electricity, as well as eliminating our time-of-day electricity usage incentives.

Now think about this: We're in the second decade of the 21st century; humanity is starting to respond and adapt to climate change; carbon is being rapidly vilified across the globe; and forward-thinking nations are racing to capture a leadership spot in this emerging low-carbon global economy.

Arguably the most critical competitive differentiator for any of us -- individuals, corporations or nations -- will be our ability to out-innovate others and quickly adapt to these completely changed rules of the game. And while the world marches forward and other nations are designing smart incentives to reduce their citizens' addiction to dirty energy, our politicians are offering to take us a few more steps backwards and prolong our addiction to cheap gas. Instead of recognizing our serious long term competitive vulnerability, as one of the world's most carbon-intensive, automobile-dependent economies, they're simply encouraging Ontarians to keep up the old habits and risk turning this province into tomorrow's rust belt.

Is this any different than offering more affordable cocaine to a population of unemployed and hungry addicts in order to "ease their pain"?

Leadership is about a lot more than cheap, regressive promises designed to buy today's votes at the expense of tomorrow's prosperity. We should stop setting the bar so low on our politicians and start expecting them to show us the future instead of showing us how to stick our head in the sand.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:07 PM on 06/29/2011
You can't expect much from voters who voted for Harper. He has reduced Canada to a country which is shameless. And it only took a few million for negative ads which used words out of context and people who actually thought he cared for anything but his own religious beliefs. No contraceptives and no abortions even when mothers and children can and will die without them. Hoo Dat is a clone of ford in Toronto. But Ford won and so did Harper and so will Hudak despite the integrity and concern of the other parties who oppose him. Canadians will no longer be people the will be peons.
06:33 PM on 06/29/2011
who-dat is a mike harris clone --with fewer watts --and harris was no 100 watter

but ontarians can be bought with a few pennies -----they seem to think the american model works --in spite of what see south of the border and in spite of what they know to be true ---they want to learn the hard way
08:43 PM on 06/28/2011
As I've said so many times before... we are terminal adolescents in North America... and we get the unimaginative and idea-constipated politicians we deserve.

We want cheap and easy and to hell with the bigger responsibility.
05:03 PM on 06/28/2011
The argument about whether global warming is real or not is irrelevant and politicians should not bother embarking on a debate about global warming's veracity as either fact or fiction. The argument is over the draconian legislation and oppressive taxation the Left wants to implement to 'change the climate back'. A preposterous notion in the first place - and an outright deception.

They want to implement global wealth redistribution and all encompassing government control over our lives by lowering our standard of living.

The whole scheme has NOTHING to do with climate change. It has EVERYTHING to do with our burgeoning governmental bureaucracies slipping in more and more "rules" and "regulations" designed to FORCE us to live the way THEY think we should.

This is a Trojan Horse that is filled with officious bureacrats looking to control EVERY facet of your life.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesse Wright
09:05 AM on 06/29/2011
So they won you over eh!? The argument about whether global warming is real or not is definitely relevant and politicians shouldn't make you think it isn't. And what kind of 'draconian legislation' are you talking about that they have proposed to legislate?? All the writer was talking about is enacting legislation that cleans up our environment and removes us from this cycle of bad habits that we've been on for over a century with dirty energy. Regardless of global warming, this affects our environment and will help us remove ourselves from a system that puts billions of dollars into the pockets of terrorists every year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
12:17 AM on 06/30/2011
You're right! It's all a big conspiracy! The communists didn't lose the cold war, they just got trickier. Quick, Candan, to your bomb shelter!!
04:55 PM on 06/28/2011
Not allowed to post counter argument here?

Pretty "Lame" Site.

Kind of like those global warming peer review journals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LawTalkingGuy
Rational human male.
12:16 AM on 06/30/2011
Except you can post your counter argument, even if it's preposterous and incorrect drivel like the 'argument' you just posted.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
09:42 AM on 06/28/2011
It is very disheartening to see Hudak soar in the polls and people supporting his brain dead energy plan. The stupidest aspect is abandoning Smart Meters. Yesterday he killed ECO fees, let the taxpayer pay instead of the Liberal plan where industry pays to incentivize then to make products that are more sustainable.
http://thinkingaboot.blogspot.com/2011/05/idiot-wind.html
photo
EllaMai
Non-violent complainer. From North of the border.
08:59 AM on 06/28/2011
Most Ontarians don't care about innovation or forward thinking. They don't understand you can have a strong economy, and efficient green energy programs. This is because they want to swallow the Conservative talking points that they remain the "kings of the economy" and we should just put all our trust in them.

It has almost become a religion to vote Conservative in Ontario.