Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Anielka Chakey

GET UPDATES FROM Anielka Chakey
 

The Kentucky Derby: The Ultimate Blood Sport?

Posted: 05/04/2012 6:36 pm

In 2007 the world was appropriately outraged when Michael Vick, an NFL superstar, was convicted of running an illegal dog-fighting ring. Dog fighting is widely considered the sport of thugs, and perpetrators are rightly rounded up and imprisoned. Americans have a somewhat different opinion of the "sport of kings," however: Last year some 14.54 million people tuned in to what they did not realize were two of the most brutal minutes in television.

Before you watch the 138th running of the Kentucky Derby today, consider the following wretched statistics. Each year approximately 37,000 thoroughbreds are born in the United States and registered with the Jockey Club. In 2010, more than 112,000 American horses were slaughtered in Mexico and Canada. An estimated 33,600 of those killed were young, healthy thoroughbred racehorses.

The ratio of slaughtered to survived? 10.9 to one.

Twenty-one animals will run the Derby this year. Lets apply these odds: If they properly represented America's thoroughbreds, then 19 of them would die in the slaughterhouse. Of course the participants in the Run for the Roses have a better chance at a nice retirement. It is by no means an iron-clad guarantee, however: not even for the greatest athletes.

In 1986 Ferdinand broke from a four-horse pack to win the Derby by 2 ¼ lengths. The chestnut stallion went on to win the Breeders Cup in 1987, and was later awarded Eclipse Horse of Year.

By 1994, Ferdinand was standing stud in Japan. His progeny, however, proved not to be racing prodigies. Hence the Derby winner -- whose career earnings were a record-breaking 1.47 million dollars -- became basashi.

"Basashi," should you not be familiar with this delicacy, is horse sushi.

Proponents of horse slaughter argue that horses are no different from other livestock commercially slaughtered for meat. This is a tragically inaccurate claim, easily refuted by experts in animal behavior.

Temple Grandin, famous for her work designing humane slaughter methods, writes: "The big difference between cattle and horses is that cattle aren't pure flight animals. When cattle are threatened by predators they bunch together and seek safety in numbers or turn and fight with their horns. " Horses, on the other hand, are like deer and antelope: They are pure flight animals. According to Grandin, they are "more skittish and startle more easily than prey animals that bunch, which makes them easy to traumatize."

Despite crucial differences in psychology and physiology, American horses are slaughtered in facilities with equipment, like captive bolt guns, designed strictly for cows. The purpose of a captive bolt gun is to destroy an animal's cerebrum, leaving it completely unconscious during exsanguination. Unfortunately, since its skull is much thicker than a cow's, a horse is frequently fully conscious as it is bled out.

Ironically, the racing industry's unfortunate discards represent a disaster not simply for horses, but also for the humans who supposedly benefit from this slaughter. More than 90% of American horses are slaughtered for human consumption. Since virtually no American horses are purpose-raised for meat, their bodies contain a potentially toxic cocktail of chemicals.

This is a particular problem in the case of thoroughbreds fresh from their racing careers. Despite the fact that "doping" is against Jockey Club policies, thoroughbreds frequently test positive for drugs like cocaine, Viagra, and Aminorex (a drug with effects similar to methamphetamine), along with more common stimulants and steroids.

Perhaps the most hazardous substance, Phenylbutazone, can be found in virtually all racehorses. This anti-inflammatory -- known as "bute" in the horse world -- is the equine equivalent of Aspirin, and is frequently given to thoroughbreds for swelling and injuries associated with racing. Dr. Gregory Ferraro, who heads up the Center for Equine Health at the University of California at Davis, points out:

"In general, treatments designed to repair a horse's injuries and to alleviate its suffering are now used to get horses onto the track to compete -- to force the animal, like some punchdrunk fighter, to make just one more round."

This approach requires huge quantities of painkillers, and high on the list is Phenylbutazone.

According to a study by Tufts University, "Phenylbutazone is banned for use in any animal intended for human consumption because it causes serious and lethal idiosyncratic adverse effects in humans." Americans dodge this toxin, because the sale of horsemeat is prohibited. Thousands of Canadians, French, Belgian and Japanese, however, unknowingly put themselves and their families at risk by consuming America's tainted castoffs.

The slaughter of thoroughbreds is not the only reason you should avoid tuning in to the spectacle at Churchill Downs. When Eight Belles collapsed and was euthanized on national television, moments after placing second in the 2008 Kentucky Derby, the media called it a "freak accident." Unfortunately, anyone who spends time at a racetrack is aware that these supposedly rare events are simply the norm. Casualties like Barbaro and Eight Belles are the tragic reality of horseracing.

The issue at the heart of this is surprisingly simple. For financial reasons, the racing industry pushes equine athletes to their physical limit before they reach skeletal maturity.

Racehorses begin training as yearlings, and typically start their careers as two-year-olds. The horses running the Kentucky Derby are three years old, which is only halfway to maturity. Equines, regardless of breed or condition, are never completely mature skeletally before the age of six.

Most critically, the spine of a three-year-old horse is not completely fused: hence they lack the balance and coordination necessary to compensate for missteps and irregularities in the track.

Nobody who witnessed Eight Belle's horrifying accident will ever forget this: the obvious contortion of her front legs as she tried to stand, and the look of sheer panic when she found it impossible. Far from a "freak accident," each year roughly 1,200 thoroughbreds die while training or during an actual race.

The dire statistics above become even worse. Remember: an average of 37,000 thoroughbreds are born yearly. An average of 33,600 go to the slaughterhouse. That's a difference of 3,400. Now let's subtract the 1,200 who die on the track. We're left with 2,200. This is by necessity a very rough calculation, but it gives you some idea of how many thoroughbreds -- out of 37,000 born -- will ever be retired, or adopted as riding horses. Only 5.9 per cent.

Publicly, the Jockey Club is anti-slaughter. They came out in favor of the (now reversed) 2006 bill that banned the slaughter of horses in the United States. So they should have: It was good publicity. If they truly cared about these miserable numbers, however, a few simple changes in policy could save thousands of racehorses.

As it currently stands, thoroughbreds are required to "break maiden" -- or win their first race -- by the age of four. This makes it absolutely impossible for thoroughbred trainers, even if they were so inclined, to wait until a horse has reached physical maturity.

By making it illegal to race any horse under the age of six, the Jockey Club could nearly eliminate overpopulation.

Raising horses is expensive. If you can throw them away after a couple of years, then you can raise many more of them. You can cover your odds. Thoroughbred owners typically spend around $4,000 a year on animals not in training. They spend anywhere from $25,000 to $50,000 on horses in training.

If forced to keep horses until a sane racing age, breeders would not only have to concentrate on fewer horses, but would have to breed them far more carefully. More selectively bred horses, who have been allowed to fully mature before they race, will be significantly less likely to suffer fatal injuries.

Racing aficionados bet on the horses. Breeders hedge their bets, by breeding far too many. The racing industry bets on horse lovers never properly educating themselves about the misery forced upon the athletes.

As we are clearly in the gambling mood, can I suggest a long shot? Your chances of accomplishing something are not stellar, but consider signing a petition to the Jockey Club, urging them to change their cynical rules.

 
FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:12 PM on 05/07/2012
An excellent article. I agree wholeheartedly! One question: Is there such a petition to sign (asking the Jockey Club to change their rules)?
09:12 AM on 05/07/2012
I am glad to see Ms. Chakey's article on thoroughbred racing, it points out the necessity for a huge effort to make improvements in the way thoroughbred racing is run and the way the horses are treated. I congratulate her on this excellent article.

I would like to point out that the American Quarter Horse Association is also just as guilty or even more so, of the things which were mentioned about the Thoroughbred owners and racing establishment.

There are more quarter horses on the slaughter trucks than thoroughbreds, and of course, there are hundreds of just plain good mixed breed horses that have served people well and then are discarded like kleenex.

The horse slaughter business is a cruel and heartless business. I despise anyone who engages in it in any form, whether they are a trucker, a feedlot owner, a breeder, a private owner, or any employee who actively works in the horse slaughter industry.

If you want to help do away with this cruel business, take a look at SavingAmericasHorses.org, you will find many ways to help.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seckhoff
Famous in the apple barns
02:21 AM on 05/07/2012
Good to see this. But it should be in Sports, Politics, and...Health.
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
02:40 PM on 05/06/2012
All forms of animal "racing" and "fighting" are disgusting. If it were up to me, race horse owners would be compelled to take the same drugs they give their horses and would be forced to run around the track carrying jockeys for the entertainment and betting purposes of all, and would be publicly euthanized using the same drugs at the first sign of non-cooperation injury or slowness. Further, Canada's continued complicity in the importation and slaughter of horses is horrific beyond description.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:39 PM on 05/05/2012
So much cruelty and abuse of these beautiful horses just to make the "owner" financially wealthier and the betters who bet on these races. Nature is going to retaliate very soon because of our abuse and destructive ways. I can't wait!
photo
Add In Canadia
Egotism is a weakness
08:13 PM on 05/05/2012
Unfortunately in the end this all falls under a 'first world problem.' and there's no real way to deconstruct the problem either, it's just something that 'is.' This isn't to mention that the 5% that survive isn't altogether much different than what nature does to an entire species at some point during it's entire existence. Like it or not, 'mankind' is the force of nature to which life must adapt itself around, and unlike other forces of nature we have this obsession or fascination with ensuring that no species suffers a 100% mortality rate.

We prevent the suffering of animals about as well as we prevent the suffering of our fellow human beings (not all too well), so for me even with the knowledge that the majority of race-horses never make it to the field or live full lives is somewhat meaningless to me in the end. This isn't to say that I value the well-being of human beings over horses; cause honestly I don't. I'm just saying that we as a species are completely inept at preventing suffering in any form or level.

It's a bit pretentious to say that we as a species have some obligation to ensure that no animal under our care suffers, especially when no other animal on this planet cares about other species suffering. Nature picks winners and losers, and ironically so do humans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dawndebris
09:41 PM on 05/06/2012
I wonder if you would also say it's pretentious to state that humans are capable of a level of destruction that would ultimately result in the annihilation of most forms of life. I think there is enough evidence available to say that we do have that capacity. So, if we are actually able to cause that destruction, wouldnt you say that, from an ethical point of view, we have the obligation to restrain ourselves from doing it?
Still, there have been several moments in our history in which we simply ignore that ethical obligation of not succumbing to our darkest desires (luckily enough never to the point of absolute annihilation). Wouldn't you say then that we have the obligation to help those who have fallen victims of our bloodlust? And why not extend the same courtesy to animals? After all we do possess some knowledge to at least guarantee a basic level of well being for them as well. What if instead of waiting until those horrible moments actually happen, we just go straight to the part of guaranteeing basic welfare.
Maybe we just differ in the fact that I think we are undoubtedly obliged to ensure that all animal under our care should suffer as little as our knowledge allows us to prevent that suffering, as opposed to eliminating all suffering ever.
To Anielka, thank you for this article, it is truly outrageous that racehorses are exposed to this kind of negligence from the part of society.
09:21 AM on 05/07/2012
Well, Add in Canadia, label me pretentious. I believe that we as a species, since we seem to be the top dog here, DO owe it to other more helpless species and ALSO to the weak or sick ones of our species to help them and aleviate suffering.

You can live your life with the theory that it's all Nature and we need not take any responsibility for the suffering of this world. I choose to try to eliminate suffering where it can be eliminated, and to try to make this world a better place to live in.

You must not be a very close observer of any other animal or of man, because there are many instances of animals other than ourselves that care for and care about others.

Good luck with your attitude.
12:33 PM on 05/05/2012
I would take some of this with a grain of salt. Just because the writer writes these statistics doesn't make it so. I am no fan of horse racing by any means but, being a dog breeder/exhibitor, I know the misinformation, sensationalism and "statistics" my sport is subjected to. Also, this writer, from her picture appears to be about 12. Is this her own personal knowledge or do you think she might be influenced by the likes of that insane terror group otherwise known as PETA? Just saying.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Douglas Anthony Cooper
Novelist (Amnesia), www.bloggermortis.com
01:30 PM on 05/05/2012
Your concerns are understandable, but I know the author, and I assure you: she despises PETA.

(I have some credibility when it comes to the matter of despising PETA.)

Also, she's not 12. Although she occasionally looks like a teenager in real life too. Would that we all had this cross to bear.
09:20 PM on 05/06/2012
What she rights is the truth, the seedy back side of the track is the real world of racing. I know, I try to save those horses on a daily basis. The lower end tracks are even worse than track like Churchill Downs, if a Derby winner like Ferdinand is not safe, imagine how much of a throwaway low end track horses are. I have my own OTTB rescue, saved by paying 50.00 more than the killbuyer offered. My sound, young healthy TB. His only problem was he had quit winning. The racing lifetime of a TB is only about 3 years and then the racing world is done with them. There are good trainers and owners and there are bad, they have no regard for the horse, the abuse them, use them up, medicate them and use them some more until they can no longer race.

The FDA, CFIA and the EU all have 15 substances which are banned from use in animals intended for human consumption. Race horses are given a plethora of banned substances, bute, lasix, clenbuterol, etc. etc. Our own horses are given Bute, de-worners etc.

Last year approximately 150,000 US horses were sent to slaughter. Of those 92% were young sound healthy horses, of those 70% were American Quarter horses and Thoroughbreds.

Now I detest PETA and I'm 51.

you might want to visit this site.... and learn
www.equinewelfarealliance.org or
www.kaufmanzoning.net
12:54 PM on 05/08/2012
I just spent most of a day reading the articles from the links you gave me. Forgive me for not watching the videos, some things I just don't need to see in order to believe. So, pardon my naivete on the subject, I just didn't know.

A few years ago, north Americans found out that much of our dog food was made with melamine-tainted Chinese wheat gluten that sickened and killed thousands of dogs. Since then, the dog food industry has improved considerably (though it's quite likely our dog food is made with horse meat!). Many dog owners make their own at home as I do. Those that can't are buying it from small and expensive producers here in north America, with the assurance that the food is made with wholesome ingredients. So the lesson is that if you educate the "end user" of a product about the source and method of that product, you might make a dent in the supply. Perhaps the horse-rescue lobby should be putting their efforts into educating the European horse-eating public and their so-called delicacy? Or maybe find ways to tax the industry so that a pound of horseflesh is so ridiculously expensive that demand will be decreased?

I commend your efforts and wish you the best of luck.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:04 AM on 05/05/2012
With awareness comes insight.

Capitalism is the disconnect between the self, society and the nature world. Dog fighting, horse racing, ultimate fighting and rodeos etc. are the symptoms.