Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Annette Poizner

GET UPDATES FROM Annette Poizner
 

What Rob Ford's Signature Tells us About The Toronto Mayor

Posted: 08/23/2012 5:55 pm

In the wake of reports that Toronto's mayor has been distracted at the wheel, only one question remains: why won't Rob Ford use a driver? One look at his signature provides the only answer that hasn't been put forward, an answer not but forth by his aides who are rebuffed when they offer to take the wheel, and not by puzzled journalists who conjecture about the issue.

2012-08-23-robford11.JPG
Rob Ford's Signature


Ford's signature is unique because, well, it doesn't actually pen his name. So driven is he by the urge to move, to race to the completion of the task, that he lets many details fall by the wayside, such as the need to legibly shape letters so people can read his name.

In his signature, the most fully articulated letter is the last, a "D" emphasized by its prominent uppercase. Graphologists conjecture that the person who creates elaborate capitals at the beginning of words is the person who cares about first impressions. The first letter introduces the word and to embellish it means that this writer puts extra importance on the first moment of contact. As they say, "you never get a second chance to make a good first impression." This is the writer who plays to the camera or otherwise selects the right power suit, adorns with cologne and overall manages how he or she appears to others. Notice the elaborate first letter in the signature of Mel Lastman, a former Toronto Mayor known for his dramatic flair.

2012-08-23-mlstman1.JPG
Signature of Former Toronto Mayor Mel Lastman


When, in contrast, the writer articulates and emphasizes the last letter, in this case, the last letter of his name, the graphologist asserts a writer who emphasizes closure and getting things done. When completion is the all-important goal, progress can be ramrodded forward with a little less attention to details.

Through his dynamic, action-oriented signature, Ford reveals himself to be a personality-style termed in business circles as "the Driver". Merrill and Reid, in their book, Personality Styles and Effective Performance, describe that type as matter-of-fact and to-the-point, decisive and independent, also impatient. Of relevance here, though, is the idea that the strong-willed "Driver" likes, first and foremost, to drive.

The story on Ford's peculiar driving habits ran with the headline, "What Keeps Ford behind the Wheel?".

May I suggest an answer?

Ford's hands-on style has him happier behind the wheel then beside it. Yet, Alexandre Dumas, in The Count of Monte Christo, pointed out a fundamental truth that I will paraphrase here: any virtue in excess becomes a crime.

Let's hope that Ford reclaims the mantle of leadership and responsibility and becomes a role model, teaching us all how to properly drive projects forward. He is in a unique position to demonstrate a lesson that relates to every citizen: the line between virtue and vice is a fine one and crucial choices will determine on which side one falls.

 

Follow Annette Poizner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/apoizner

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
In the wake of reports that Toronto's mayor has been distracted at the wheel, only one question remains: why won't Rob Ford use a driver? One look at his signature provides the only answer that hasn't...
In the wake of reports that Toronto's mayor has been distracted at the wheel, only one question remains: why won't Rob Ford use a driver? One look at his signature provides the only answer that hasn't...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:26 AM on 09/16/2012
Great article! Graphology has always been a topic that interested me. The way people sign their name does say a lot about them as does body language and both are good tools to use when understanding a person's psychology. Think the skeptics are a lot of people who have never had their handwriting analyzed! I bet they would be shocked to see what their handwriting says about them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Douglas Sinclair
sufferin' succotash!
01:34 PM on 08/27/2012
Do Bay/Wall St. fund managers use graphology?
07:36 AM on 08/24/2012
Graphology is nonsense, with no empirical basis whatever, just somebody's impressions of what this or that might indicate about the signator. So I'll give my graphological analysis--this poor excuse for a signature indicates a person who is sloppy and careless, with negligible interest in language. I think you can see my connections between the qualities of the signature and the qualities of the person who would sign that way.
07:22 AM on 08/24/2012
All Rob Ford's signature says about him is that, as he rushes thoughtlessly through life, he can't even make time to ensure his signature is legible. Kind of goes along with everything else he does, thoughtless rushing through everything. Which explains an awful lot about his 1 term tenure as mayor.
01:14 AM on 08/24/2012
Rob Ford's signature makes me think of - well it makes me think of Rob Ford - unintelligible.
10:14 PM on 08/23/2012
I wonder what signature the writer is looking at. I see a stylized F as the last character.
08:10 PM on 08/23/2012
ford cant use a driver because with his hard line stance he has painted himself into a corner and there is no escape for him except to harden his position or lose face ----------most conservatives suffer from the same affliction
07:25 PM on 08/23/2012
You know that graphology is a quack science, right?

Your signature says absolutely nothing about you, except for how to spell your name.
08:30 PM on 08/23/2012
Actually, its not. And graphologists have been used in court.
10:21 PM on 08/23/2012
Psychic mediums have been called to the stands too, it doesn't mean ghosts exist either. The fact that any judge would permit that is terrifying - can you actually imagine your freedom resting on so-called "evidence" that's no better than examining chicken bones or tea leaves?

Graphology is totally unscientific, has no hard evidence to back up a single one of its claims, and has ruined lives by giving people "evidence" based on nothing but one quack's imagination.

It deserves to be shunned and denounced, not promoted as if it has anything backing it up.
11:23 PM on 08/25/2012
If that were true, then everyone's signature would look alike, the way they learned to write in school. The fact that people individualize their signature proves that it says something about them.
09:36 PM on 10/09/2012
Yes, that must be true. The question is how to interpret meaning from a signature.

I see that a number of people criticize Annette Poizner over the fact that this is not an exact science. However it's my understanding that Annette uses graphology and a number of other tools to make assessments. If she were a doctor, this would be her 'physical exam'. She is able to assemble her assessments and then use them to help her clients gain some insight.

Likewise any intuitive assessments we make in our everyday lives are not validated by science but we are able to gain a working knowledge and judgement from this. Annette is using a honed skill to add dimension to her assessments. She can and I'm sure does discount evidence she collects that is not consistent with her overall impression.

In a world where psychological assessments and treatments have become homogenized, I applaud Annette for daring to reach beyond.