Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Bernie Farber
 

War Criminals -- At Any Age -- Should Be Punished

Posted: 05/ 2/2012 4:23 pm

The writer Joseph Conrad once observed that "the belief in a supernatural source of evil is unnecessary; men alone are quite capable of every wickedness." This certainly rings true with respect to perpetrators and enablers of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.

This week Canadian and international media reported on new evidence against an alleged Nazi war criminal living in Ormstown, Quebec, only a short one-hour drive from Montreal. German historian Pers Rudling charges in newly declassified Soviet documents that Volodymyr Katriuk was part of a Nazi-led battalion that machine-gunned innocent villagers in Belarus in 1943. Katriuk had already had his citizenship revoked but reinstated when the appeal court ruled there was no evidence that he had actually participated in the shootings.

Hopefully the judicial system will this time do the right thing before Katriuk, now in his 90s, succumbs to natural causes.

As important, some of the reaction to this story is deeply troubling. There remain those who believe that given the age of the perpetrators and that the murderous brutalities occurred more than 65 years ago, we best just move on.

Really? Should we forget that according to Professor Rudling's newly found evidence the villagers of Khatyn were forced into a barn that was subsequently set on fire? Should we ignore information in the new testimony that reads "One witness stated that Volodymyr Katriuk was a particularly active participant in the atrocity: he reportedly lay behind the stationary machine gun, firing rounds on anyone attempting to escape the flames"?

Should we move on from the fact that Schutzmann Knapp, another witness and participant in the slaughter claimed, "I saw... how Katriuk and Meleshko [another battalion murderer] were shooting the people lying on the road."

In modern times, no one singular act by a nation-state has captured the nightmares of civilization more than the Holocaust. The act, therefore, of bringing the enablers of this horrific genocide to justice as long as one walks this earth is vital.

The hunting down of war criminals sends a universal message that such unspeakable crimes will not be tolerated by a civil society. It tells potential perpetrators that there is no place to hide; that they will be hunted for the rest of their lives.

Indeed were we not to have continued in our efforts against Nazi murderers would there have been any ethical justification for bringing brutes like former Liberian leader Charles Taylor to justice? Without fidelity to justice no matter how much time has elapsed could we justify the current manhunt for Ugandan warlord Joseph Kony who ruined the lives of thousands of children by kidnapping them as child-soldiers?

The fact that the perpetrators and enablers of the Nazi genocide may today be elderly can be no reason to shirk our duty to the victims. We ought not see them as they are today, but should remember them for the thugs and murderers they were 60 years ago. To allow their crimes to go unpunished would give Nazism a posthumous victory and send a message of hope to the genocidaires of tomorrow.

At this time in human history we still face the specter of genocidal crime and mass murder. At a time when modern day war criminals look for sanctuary far from where they committed their crimes, we must not waver; doing so sends a message that if you can escape justice for 65 years, mass murder is of no relevance.

For the sake of the victims, we must demand continued justice with no get-out-of-jail-free card simply because you reached old age. It is no exaggeration to say that we must all be the protectors of our society and its values. We rely on our government to act on our behalf. As a society we must ensure commitment to law because we understand that evil is possible but justice is achievable and in the end, we are all responsible.

We have a solemn obligation to the victims and the survivors alike to hold the wicked accountable for their heinous crimes and to effect some measure of justice for what they have done.

There is nothing supernatural about that.

 
FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:55 PM on 05/12/2012
This "new evidence" was drawn up at a time (70's and 80's) when the Soviet Union would crank out phoney evidence at emigres of certain nationalities who were demanding human rights in the Soviet Union.
07:01 AM on 05/09/2012
How come the top orange title could not include the word "Accused"?
05:31 PM on 05/05/2012
The title itself suggests something very negative. That a person has to be found guilty no matter what.
01:21 PM on 05/04/2012
To bring someone to justice is one thing. But to frame someone, especially a very old man is totally despicable. You the readers may look at my nine other postings here.
03:27 PM on 05/05/2012
There is now new evidence which the RCMP is investigating. Seems there are two eye witnesses both of whom served with Katriuk.
05:43 PM on 05/05/2012
At Demjanjuk's Tremblinka trial there were 11 witnesses who swore they said he was Ivan the Terrible. Later Traficant proved they had the wrong man. At Sobibor trial, KGB had testimony of one man who (supposed) to have served with him. Yet in as early as1987, Sobibor survivors could not identify Demjanjuk.
In other words, past examples show any evidence coming from that part of the world is to be approached with extreme caution.
Soviets used show trials as propoganda. And had the cunning to hide millions of slow starvations from the world for years.
I did not see any postings mentioning eye witnesses for Katriuk. Note that for Demjanjuk reports varied wildly; omitting much; and getting key points wrong. Very biased they were.
08:08 AM on 05/08/2012
Wear did you hear about 2 witnesses? And are they alive? In good health?
I saw no mention anywhere.
09:51 AM on 05/04/2012
Farber is saying the man was cleared of charges in the 'shootings' because of lack of evidence.(???)
Were the'shootings' even mentioned the first time? The lawyer said he doubts whether his client even was at Khatyn. And being a commander of 180 men in his early 20's???

Note: There is a place in Poland with almost the same name. Katyn Forest. For years it was believed the Nazis killed 22,000 Polish soldiers and intellectuals. Only recently did the truth come out. The Soviets did it.
09:09 AM on 05/04/2012
Do we know the TRUTH? So we are we judging. Remember Demjanjuk? All the contreversy spanning 35 years. The seemingly Soviet fabricated evidence; concelment of evidence by prosecutors; the biased media coverage (final verdict was innocent-they did not even get that right!); the kangaroo courts. And the sheer hypocrisy of Germany trying a man for a war they started; invading his land; taking him prisoner; while they pardoned thier own. He never said he was a guard. And the little evidence agaist him were called Soviet forgeries.
07:16 PM on 05/03/2012
I agree, anyone found to be a war criminal (any age or time) should be prosecuted
02:13 PM on 05/03/2012
I doubt if the author of this post is advocating prosecution for war crimes against former US Presdent George W. Bush, former Vice President Dick Cheney, former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeldt, current US President Barack Obama and a host of others formerly employed by the US administration under Bush and/or currently employed under President Obama. This is so despite lies about weapons of mass destruction, invasions that have cost over 100,000 lives by conservative estimates, torture, and drone attacks which kill civilians.

The Holocaust was a horrible historical event, but I am more concerned about the senseless killing within the last decade and which is currently going on now.
06:50 AM on 05/05/2012
Or about the Ukrainian Holodymor. In 1932-33, Soviets confiscated food from Ukrainians who resisted collectivization (having thier lands taken away). By some estimates more than 6 million starved to death. Journalists from USA and France were bribed to lie about it. One, Walter Duranty, won a Pulitzer Prize. Some want it posthumously retracted. The CBC for weeks advertised
the doc, "Harvest of Despair". In the last minute it was canceled. Today, many countries recognize this deliberate genocide.
An exhibit on this horrific event is shown at the Human Rights Museum in Winnipeg.
12:16 PM on 05/05/2012
.... and with this museum's opening there was a debate (which Farber participated in) as to how much space the various human tragedy exhibits should be allotted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr e MaN
Political Atheist
11:28 AM on 05/03/2012
Did the vile Nazis show any sympathy for their victims, no. He should be treated as such.
09:00 AM on 05/04/2012
Innocent until proven guilty. Soviets extreme liars.
09:10 AM on 05/04/2012
There is no crime in the world big enough to frame someone innocent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg YanickThompson
11:07 AM on 05/03/2012
really , how our thought,s of right and wrong are trained into us by media and government ,,pfff , you want to go after this old man who,s already been through a trial supposedly because what the Nazis,s did to the Jews was inhuman and disgusting!!! And yet Canada,s best friend now ,, the USA does and is torturing right now at this very moment !!! and is responsible for a million or so civilians deaths just in the last 10 years !!! OH, and assuming your Canadian , why are you not out they're speaking out to bring the Canadian government and catholic church to trial for the 150,000 plus native kids lying in unmarked and in some case mass graves around this oh so beautiful and free country of Canada , just like the Jews, these children were taken at gunpoint by the RCMP as young as 6 and taken to re-education camps where more than 50% were dead with -in 4 years ... how the hell is there any difference except well there is no bloody difference ... So please why not spend some time and find your own conscious !! you think if there were 150,000 white kids lying in unmarked graves around the country you would not be talking about it .. !!
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
12:01 PM on 05/03/2012
Sadly true. Canada's hands are drenched in blood as are many other nations.

The world needs to be reminded on a regular basis of such crimes committed wherever they may be and no matter who is responsible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arachne646
No more hurting people--Peace
10:04 AM on 05/03/2012
Is it surprising that so many people say "oh well, just forget it", when GW Bush and Dick Cheney do speaking engagements routinely in Canada and we just forget they still openly defend their torture and other gross abuse of POW's, and their mass slaughter and destruction of the nation of Iraq with no provocation or international sanction, certainly probable cause for trial of war crimes and crimes against humanity for leaders of any other nation. When the US has carte blanche to commit War Crimes, prosecution of sick old men seems less urgent.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
11:40 AM on 05/03/2012
I agree that the Law should apply equally to all. That it obviously does not is shameful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:14 AM on 05/03/2012
Waste of taxpayers' money. Prosecuting him at this age would serve no other purpose than to take revenge. It would not bring any of his victims back.
Let him be. He knows what he has done, he lived with it all his life, and had already been through a trial.
The article states that his alleged crime is that he participated in the shooting of villagers. That makes me wonder... many acts of that kind were committed in the Vietnam war, but I don't see the hunt for the offenders happening, or a similar outrage over the lack of prosecutions and punishments for those vets who committed the crimes. Do people like this old man evoke such passionate desire for punishment in people because they were Nazis? The crimes of those who murdered and raped villagers in Vietnam are no less severe, and yet I don't see the masses crying out for their blood. There seems to be a double standard here.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
11:37 AM on 05/03/2012
Re: "It would not bring any of his victims back."

Justice is not about reviving the dead, it is a principal of a civilized society that there should be severe consequences for such illegal acts.

As far as there being a double standard regarding atrocities by other nations....it is true, and it represents a profound moral stain that, to our shame, may never be addressed.
09:19 AM on 05/04/2012
Meaning also... it is doubtful if anything can be proven. And the sources of information not to be trusted. In 'civilized' countries people still get framed. A witch hunt is a witch hunt. And if you knew somethig about this topic you would see some good examples.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
07:22 AM on 05/03/2012
Even if he dies before sentencing, society still has to prosecute. Some things must be zero-tolerance and this is one of them. No ifs, ands or buts.
09:36 AM on 05/04/2012
Demjanjuk trials were a farce. They were huge travesties of justice. Want it repeated?

A fair hearing before any trial; fair trial if happens; and no tainted, biased journalism (fat chance there!).

No ifs, ands, or buts, in that respect also. Wait..."has to prosecute?" Innocent until proven guilty. (which already happened before for him). That's it that's all!
09:41 AM on 05/04/2012
"zero-tolerance" could also apply for 'accusations' against others from that era. But it doesn't look like it's going to happen. There are plenty of ifs ands or buts; if people were not so blind.
03:33 AM on 05/03/2012
To the Victor goes the spoils.
12:51 AM on 05/03/2012
This should go without being said.