THE BLOG

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Brent Preston Headshot

Systemic Pesticides Aren't On Your Food -- They're In It

Posted: Updated:
AVACADO
Shutterstock / Bashutskyy
Print

You grab an apple out of the fridge and carefully wash it before cutting it up for your kids. Or you decide not to buy the more expensive organic bananas and avocados in the supermarket because you think, "Hey, I'm not going to eat the skin." If this sounds familiar, you may need to re-think your pesticide avoidance strategy, because the fastest growing class of agricultural chemicals aren't on your food, they're in your food.

When my wife and I started farming ten years ago, we subscribed to agricultural magazines that were filled with ads for pesticides. We tended to ignore them -- as organic producers, we weren't in the market for chemicals -- but I started to notice that many of the ads had the word "systemic" in the headline. I had never heard of a systemic pesticide, so I did some research, and what I discovered shocked me. What the big chemical companies were selling were pesticides that made the whole plant toxic to pests, including the part we eat. That seemed like a very bad idea to me, but our current agricultural system seems to double down on bad ideas, and the use of systemic pesticides has exploded.

Pesticide use really got going after World War II -- some of the first insecticides were nerve gas agents invented by the Nazis, and 2,4-D, a common herbicide still used widely today, was invented by the US military during the war, and was later one of the main components of Agent Orange. These chemicals were highly effective, but they were also highly toxic to humans, and they usually had to be sprayed directly onto the plant or insect the farmer wanted to kill, which meant farmers often had to spray repeatedly to kill subsequent outbreaks of bugs and weeds. Chemical companies spent a lot of time and money trying to increase what they call "persistence," looking for compounds that would stay deadly for days or even weeks after spraying. Their success saved farmers money, but it also made it more likely that pesticides would persist on fruits and vegetables all the way to your kitchen table. And farmers often still had to spray multiple times in a season.

In the 1990s, a whole new class of pesticides, called systemics, was introduced. The first on the market were neonicotinoids -- they made the news after research suggested they were at least partially responsible for the dramatic die-off of bees and other pollinators in Europe and North America in recent years. Neonics, as they're commonly called, illustrate the frightening power and persistence of systemic pesticides. Applied only once, as a powder to seeds before planting, they make every part of the plant toxic to insects for the entire life of the plant.

But neonics were just the beginning. Over the past 15 years, hundreds of different systemic pesticides have been developed. There are systemic fungicides for berries and fruits, systemic insecticides for literally every kind of vegetable, even systemics that are applied to farm animals to control tics and fleas. Systemics are now the biggest selling class of pesticides in the world, earning chemical companies billions of dollars a year. Remember those cheap avocados you thought were safe after you peeled them? Systemics are routinely injected into the trunks of avocado trees to control fungus.

What's the result of all these chemicals entering our environment? Systemics remain active for months or even years, so they can persist in the spoil and make anything that grows there toxic to insects -- milkweed that feed monarchs, wild flowers that feed bees. Systemics are also largely water soluble, so they can move around, poisoning wetlands and flowing far from where they were applied. The net result is the destabilization of whole ecosystems, where the plant-eating insects and invertebrates at the bottom of the food chain are decimated, and the fish, amphibians and birds that feed on them are sent into steep decline.

And what about us? If you're not buying organic, virtually everything you eat contains systemic pesticides -- fruit, vegetables, grains, even meat. There is no conclusive evidence that systemics are harmful to humans, but we've been consuming a cocktail of different systemic chemicals for decades now, and there's been virtually no study of what that might mean for our long-term health, or the potential impacts on developing children. You'll pardon me if I choose not to be part of that experiment.

I've been trying to tell my friends and family about systemic pesticides for years. The reaction I get is always the same: they look shocked and disgusted. "Are you serious?" they often ask. Making virtually all the plants and animals we eat toxic in order to fight pests strikes just about everyone as a fundamentally bad idea. But the vast majority of the people I talk to don't even know it's happening.

The very first seeds are starting to grow on our farm right now, and I know that this year, like every other, we will face challenges from pests. Flea beetles will eat our mustard greens, mildew will attack our lettuce, weeds will flourish in our organic soil.

I also know that by encouraging a diversity of life in our fields we can grow healthy, resilient plants that are resistant to pests and disease. The flourishing organic farm movement in North America proves that we can grow food economically and sustainably without resorting to an accelerating chemical arms race. Systemic pesticides are causing harm to our environment on a massive scale. We don't need them.

MORE ON HUFFPOST:
Close
EWG's 2015 List Of The 'Dirty Dozen' Types Of Produce With The Most Pesticides
of
Share
Tweet
Advertisement
Share this
close
Current Slide