Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Cameron Fenton

GET UPDATES FROM Cameron Fenton
 

Why the Rio Agreement Is Good as Toilet Paper

Posted: 06/25/2012 12:00 am

Rio+20 failed, plain and simple. Few are surprised, and many are grasping at straws within the weak, toothless text, searching for something to grab onto to claim victory, but -- as one friend said in a final email on Rio -- we need to call a cat a cat.

Now I don't really know where that phrase comes from, but its pretty on-point. While the failure of Rio is certain, the question that organizers, youth and change makers fighting for a more just and sustainable planet need ask ourselves is "Why?" Why were negotiators unable to find common ground above the weakest possible positions? Why were world leaders little more than props for a glorified photo op? Why did this supposed historical conference produce an agreement better used as toilet paper or kindle in the post-climate apocalyptic wasteland we're headed towards?

I could keep going, but I think you get the point. Something is wrong, there is a proverbial floater in the punch of international climate politics. At its core, the problem is simple: There are a small group of corporations making obscene profits for whom protecting our planet and taking the steps towards addressing climate change is bad for business. If fossil fuels cause climate change, and you make your billions on oil, gas and coal, you aren't going to want there to be a solar boom or a wind power windfall because you can't put a tap, a pipeline, or a gas tank on the sun.

Climate activist Tim DeChristopher said it best once: "We've tried to make our ideas palatable to those in power but it's never really worked, because shifting away from fossil fuels is actually a threat to our current economic system and to our current political system."

Rio failed because the if it had succeeded, it would have fundamentally undermined some of the most powerful forces on the planet: big polluters.

A just transition to a clean energy society would create meaningful, long-term jobs by the thousands, it would clean up our air and water, it would stop us from driving out planet towards climate catastrophe, but what's more is that it would democratize the production and consumption of energy.

The simple fact is that there is no way that someone could install a tiny coal-fired power generator on the side of their house, mine some coal in the centre of town and make energy. Yet coal is the primary source of electricity for most of the world. On the other hand, I can think of ways that, were it made affordable and accessible to people around the globe, I could power my home, my block or even my city and community with a combination of small-scale, renewable energy and energy conservation systems.

Think about that. What if all the electricity in your city was made by the people, and not by a power company? Energy democracy would revolutionize our planet, they way we live, and it would fundamentally alter our economic system. Real, sustainable energy for all would put dirty energy out of business, and Petrobras, Shell, Chevron, BP, Exxon and the rest are not going to work with governments to put themselves out of business.

There is no fortune to be made by the corporate elite solving climate change. Instead there are jobs to be had, cleaner air to be breathed, safe water to be drank and a better future. What makes more sense to you?

So now we have the why, the next step is to figure out the how.

We know that in principle the solutions that the people and the planet need exist. We know that there is a strong, wealthy and powerful lobby standing in the way of this, and we know that we will never be able to match them in wealth, access to world leaders, or any conventional resource.

But we have one thing they don't: We have numbers. Together we represent a force more powerful than any dollar amount, the currency we have to trade in is our bodies, our minds and our creativity.

This fall in Canada we are taking the first step to building that movement that our planet needs, holding the second Power Shift Canada gathering. Bringing together hundreds of youths from across Canada, Power Shift will be a decisive moment in the fight to end dirty energy and build a just and sustainable future.

Power Shift is organizing to push forward a bill in the House of Commons to stop polluter handouts, and to empower youth from across Canada to build the solutions we need. The Earth Summit may have been a #RioFail, but this can be our chance build a movement that makes it impossible for world leaders to continue putting polluters ahead of people.

 

Follow Cameron Fenton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CamFenton

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
Rio+20 failed, plain and simple. Few are surprised, and many are grasping at straws within the weak, toothless text, searching for something to grab onto to claim victory, but -- as one friend said in...
Rio+20 failed, plain and simple. Few are surprised, and many are grasping at straws within the weak, toothless text, searching for something to grab onto to claim victory, but -- as one friend said in...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Gnomish
ego doctus ignarus
07:00 PM on 06/25/2012
Is it written on biodegradable stock and what is it's scratch quotient?
02:52 PM on 06/25/2012
Actually, the agreement won't make good toilet paper, because Canada blocked and reworded the resolution calling for the agreement to be printed on recycled paper. They claimed it was damaging to natural resource exports and would cost the jobs of hundreds of lumberjacks. .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
02:08 PM on 06/25/2012
To make a sustainable transition to take advantage of the technology that is available right now that could power our planet for thousands of years, we would have to do more than what is suggested in this article. We would have to abandon and mine our current cities, and design new cities from the ground up. We would have to alter values and behaviors that are currently hammered into us from day one. We would have to end the use of monetary systems and create a system of access abundance. Slapping up solar panels on peoples houses isn't gonna do it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:10 AM on 06/25/2012
Fenton claims those in "power". I agree if you define those in power as the common citizen, who knows that a radical shift to green energy would be horrendously expensive and ultimately impoverishing.
11:55 AM on 06/25/2012
In which country do you live, where the common citizen has such power?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:00 PM on 06/26/2012
It's called a "democracy".

In Canada in 2008, Stephane Dion, leader of the Liberals, based his campaign on green policies (he called it the "Green Shift"). Voter support was tepid. The Liberals lost seats.

And the Green Party of Canada has, despite two decade of trying, managed to vote in exactly one member of parliament.

Vox populi.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chaotician1
05:26 AM on 06/25/2012
Simply put, we the people need to have "our" governments end the use of fossil fuels.. for everything except chemical food stocks; and to do that we need to end Capitalism as we know it...period! There must be a solar system on every home whether individual or community to provide power, hot water, and waste sanitation. That waste sanitation must be recycled for soil fertilizer and chemcial fertizer restricted such that no, zero, such chemical treatments reach the major waterways and the oceans. Commercial fishing fleets must be terminated and the fleets used to deacify the seas by spreading alkaline "dust" and then the boats used to "harvest" the billions of tons of plastic and other wastes from the seas...until the seas recover, the fish stocks recover, and the oceans become again sources of life and nourishment. Our parks and forests must become preserves where no commecial activity of any sort be allowed for a generation and then such areas should have very limited commecial activity where at least 25% of the time no such activity is permitted; absolutely no grazing or mining! Finally, there must be a serious viable decrease in humanities numbers with a goal of reducing the world population to less than 5 Billion using something like a birth permit for each woman of one birthing until the population reaches the goal when it should be increased to 2. Either we actually do something or we die!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
01:47 PM on 06/25/2012
If you're not aware of it, look into the Venus Project.
photo
OC Surfer
A second is 30 nanoyears.
04:32 AM on 06/25/2012
Rio failed because oil is the most efficient energy source we have right now. And it's ludicrous to say "the big polluters" (btw you're hypocrites for implying "they" are the polluters when You drive in cars, fly in planes, and make regular use of a thousand products that rely on oil) don't want wind or solar because they can't make money off it because it's somehow free. It still has to be captured and then transported from it's source to it's destination, and there's a lot of engineering that goes into that, engineering that "the big polluters" can make a profitable business out of.

Until oil becomes more expensive (authentically so, not leftist-morally) than wind and solar the good and smart people of the earth will continue to use oil. Now, in your favor, they WILL use it up. So hold your horses, your "moral" energy is coming. My educated guess (I have a Master's in Physics, a minor in Biophysics and a voracious reading appetite) is 50-80 years and wind and solar will be economical.

So please calm yourselves you silly twits. The Earth has been going around the Sun with lots and lots of life on it for billions of years, with hominids for millions of years, and in 50-80 years, a drop in a bucket in an ocean compared to those time scales, it will be much like it is now even with continued oil use.

Sapere aude! (to quote Immanuel Kant)
08:55 AM on 06/25/2012
except that it will be hell for millions, if not billions of people who will lose their source of livelihood so that other people can keep consuming as much energy as they do now. let's just send them to the gas chambers right now and spare them the 50-80 year wait.
11:08 AM on 06/25/2012
"You silly twits" does not help your argument at all and in fact could easily be self-referential. Could we, once and for all, dispense with the hypocrite argument for people who care about climate change but still use cars and fly in airplanes? What would you suggest that they do? Live in caves and never attend any meetings or conferences? Sail to Rio? We would all love to see renewables replace fossil fuels but to function in our current society requires the use of fossil fuels. People engaged in the political process fighting for change must use the very energy sources they are fighting against. It is unavoidable. I wish it were not so.

On a related note, the argument that life on Earth has survived for billions of years so it can only continue is also an irrelevant non-sequitur that those opposed to taking action on climate change often employ. No one is arguing that all life will cease due to climate change. Yes, the Earth and life on it will continue in some form regardless of what we do. But the point is that we can inflict and we are inflicting horrendous damage on ourselves and others species, and yes this can all happen within the next few decades. The 50 year timeline is indeed very relevant. Sure the world will go on but what kind of world will it be?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:23 AM on 06/25/2012
Another positive step forward towards reality!
11:44 PM on 06/24/2012
If these alternatives are Viable, then they are also viable on small scale individual projects. Going off grid with your own personal energy generation costs quite a bit. If the price comes down, people will buy it. I'd love to be 100% off grid. Make your own damn power and get off my Lawn!!

The Brainiacs in Japan would also figure out a way to run without fossil fuels as they don't have them and have to rely on Nukes that poison them. If wind/solar /thermal is the way, they would do it.

Also, why do media always list oil before coal? Shouldn't you Green worriers be talking Coal and Methane (cows pigs and chickens) all the time instead of the 15% of GHG that is caused by mostly Oil powered Transpo? Seems absurd to me. COAL, METHANE, CO2 from oil in that order. Don't forget the Mass flooding of water systems too.
06:57 AM on 06/25/2012
don't forget to mention the companies who got their victory in re-defining "climate-friendly" agriculture so they can get the green (pun not intended, but yes, there it is) light for absorbing even more people and even more land into an unsustainable and inequitable global food system.
08:49 AM on 06/25/2012
sorry, that wasn't meant as a reply to your post. i wanted it to be a stand-alone comment.