For this year's World Press Freedom Day, I spoke in the chamber to assure the Canadian public that the fundamental principles of journalism are being respected.
Allow me to refer to the code of conduct of the Fédération professionnelle des journalistes du Québec to outline the fundamental values of journalism in Canada.
We know that journalists' work must be based on the critical thinking that pushes them to question everything, the impartiality that pushes them to do their research, and report on the various aspects of a situation, the independence that keeps them at arm's length from power and lobby groups, the honesty that makes them stick to the facts, and a number of other principles.
In the collective agreement between CBC/Radio-Canada and the Syndicat des communications de Radio-Canada, which expires on September 30, 2012, it is agreed that in order to fulfill the mandate given to the corporation by Parliament through the Broadcasting Act, CBC/Radio-Canada staff members will report factually, and without intent to deceive the public. The parties recognize that the primary professional obligations of the corporation, and of its employees are toward the public, which is entitled to news, and information that is impartial, complete, factual, and balanced -- that is from section 47.2 of the agreement.
On December 21, 2011, the Conservative government imposed a type of "pledge of allegiance" on all federal institutions through a so-called values and ethics code. The code describes the values and behaviours expected of public officials in all activities related to the performance of their professional duties. This so-called code was established by the Treasury Board, in accordance with section 5 of the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act.
In this regard, it must be stated that under the Broadcasting Act, CBC/Radio-Canada staff are not subject to the so-called values and ethics code. Although the corporation is a federal institution, section 44(3) of the Broadcasting Act states that staff members are not officers, or servants of Her Majesty.
In fact, under section 46(5), the corporation shall, in pursuit of its objects, enjoy freedom of expression, and journalistic, creative, and programming independence. Therefore, CBC staff enjoy an exception and are not subject to the values and ethics code.
Finally, CBC/Radio-Canada adopted a new code of ethics on April 2, 2012, to introduce guidelines for standards of integrity, and professional conduct for its staff. This new code is a serious threat to the independence of the public broadcaster and its workers. Section 1.2 of the code states that CBC/Radio-Canada staff must loyally carry out the decisions of their leaders, and support ministers in their accountability to Parliament and Canadians. And there is obviously no exception for the opposition.
The Conservative government, and the new CBC/Radio-Canada code of ethics violate the principles of independence, and impartiality that are so closely associated with the profession of journalism, and are a serious threat to the preservation of Canadian democracy, where freedom of the press is a fundamental value enshrined in our Constitution.
Matt Price: Dear Tar Sands: It's Not Me, It's You
James Denselow: A Knight's Tale
Josh D. Scheinert: Conservatives' "It Gets Better" Video: Hypocrisy or Opportunity?
Facts/Science & Conservatism don't mesh well, so the ideal of journalistic integrity will be chipped away at by these bunch of Cons
Media Ownership and the Radical Right in Canada
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8D67YiLcOM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiurWhmOIgk&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRnZ43wxGvY&NR=1
Part 1, 2 & 3. Note: each video about 10 minutes long
No time for video? Read review instead:
http://pushedleft.blogspot.com/2009/11/under-stephen-harper-we-are-no-longer.html
Mr. Hurtig begins by discussing the Canadian media and how we now have the greatest concentration of media in the western world. In fact, he states that this would simply not be allowed in any other western democracy.
And since these same media outlets control newspaper, television and radio news; we are essentially only being given one voice. There are few or no alternative views. As stated in the video, a healthy democracy should foster a healthy and independent news media.
http://pushedleft.blogspot.com/2009/11/under-stephen-harper-we-are-no-longer.html
Suddenly competition for readers was no longer necessary; these publicly traded corporations now focused on advertiser-pleasing copy as the technique for pulling more ads.
At least Postmedia has an understandable reason for changing standards: they're legally obligated to maximize profits. But the fact that the commercial-free public broadcaster also ignores the public good suggests that there is a new definition of journalism.
http://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2010/12/28/NewNewJournalism/
The board, including president Hubert Lacroix, were all appointed by the Conservative government. Among the directors are figures with ties to the party or conservative politics — notably Montreal lawyer Brian Mitchell, who once ran for the party presidency and sat on its national council.
Pierre Gingras, appointed earlier this year, is a former member of Quebec's ADQ party. Director George Cooper is a former Progressive Conservative MP for Halifax.
Montreal lawyer Remi Racine, appointed to the board in 2007, was once national secretary of the Progressive Conservative party. He told a Montreal newspaper in 2008 that he was still a card-carrying party member and was close with John Baird, now foreign affairs minister, and former minister Jim Prentice.
http://www.friends.ca/news-item/10398
Which is why I like the HuffPost.
Senator, who is truly "Orwellian"?
Go private or shut up, it's your choice.
1. The CBC costs each Canadian roughly 33 dollars a year to fund.Thats less than a case of beer, and you never get a hangover from the CBC!
2. CBC broadcasts to almost every area of Canada
3. The CBC has broadcasts in both official languages as well as 8 aboriginal languages
4. It only costs each of us 33 dollars a year! Thats less than it would cost for 3 people to go see Fred Litwin's new film, and the information CBC presents is factually substantiated!
5.The CBC has a page on their website which provides wide access to information about its activities and the way it manages public resources
http://www.cbc.radio-canada.ca/docs/disclosure/
6. Did I mention that it only costs 33 bucks a year? Thats way cheaper 65 F-35 fighter jets( roughly 469$ per person)!
7. The CBC is among the lowest funded public broadcasters in the world..only the US funds less..
http://www.friends.ca/ILoveCBC/
1. CBC-SRC costs us (family of five) $15 per month that I am forced to pay under threat of imprisonment. Given the choice, I would use this money to upgrade my cable TV package, but I have no such choice.
2. CTV, Shaw (Global) and Quebecor also broadcast to almost every area of Canada, their information is also factually substantiated and they also publish annual financial reports and the vast majority of Canadians find them more interesting than the CBC. They cost me (and you) nothing. $0.00.
3. Your comparison with the F35 fighter jets is grossly misleading. From the article below (from the CBC), the total cost of 65 jets over 30 years is $29.3 billions. At the current rate of CBC state funding of $1.1 billions per year, that's $33 billlions for the CBC, more than the jets! Is that what you mean by "factually substantiated"?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/04/12/f-f35-cost-estimates.html
Nadine, as many comments alluded in this thread, the CBC used to be biased towards Liberals, now they seem to serve their Conservative masters. This is a recipe for bad television. Without public money, the CBC will not perish, it will improve!
The human condition is a product of many temperaments fraught with occasional displays of altruism, selfishness, prejudice, irrationality, cruelty, creativity, compassion, brilliance, stupidity, individualism, community, ad nauseam - yet we need to be impartial, factual and balanced, perhaps god-like.
And would that be the same impartial and balance way the feds are attempting to criminalize environmental groups?
I just feel a little Orwellian perspective is required here.
And, of course, there is less and less news analysis, and more of the he-said-she-said brand of non-journalism infecting the CBC of late. Recently if was shown in black and white that the Conservatives had planned to cut back the medical staff involved at the Department of Defense programs for suicide prevention and monitoring of post-traumatic stress disorders, and reduce front line medical staff in a other programs for the military. MacKay said in the House of Commons, which was broadcast without comment by the CBC, "The Canadian Forces have increased the number of mental health services". Huh? Perhaps he meant that the Conservatives had created more names for categories of health services? Or some such semantic lie? But a lie it most certainly was, and presented in the news cast without comment.