Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Charles Lupien

GET UPDATES FROM Charles Lupien
 

Canada's Anti-Spam Act a Serious Threat to Businesses

Posted: 10/14/11 11:06 AM ET

On Dec. 22, 2010, the House of Commons passed Bill C-28 which aims to regulate unsolicited electronic commercial messages, commonly called "spam." Normally, this act will come into force by proclamation in at the end of fall 2011.

When in force, this act will require Canadian individuals and companies, as well as foreign individuals and companies sending commercial electronic messages to Canada, to obtain the prior consent from recipients before sending them commercial electronic messages. The law shall also require certain formalities such as the requirement to include an exclusion mechanism in all messages. The requirement of prior consent shall be substantially more restrictive than the one contained in the equivalent U.S. law (CAN SPAM Act) which only requires companies to stop sending electronic messages if the recipient manifests its refusal to receive them ("opt-out"). Please also note that the law does not distinguish between legitimate messages and malicious messages nor between individual and bulk messages; they all require the prior consent of the recipient, consent which cannot itself be sought by a commercial electronic message.

Despite the presence of several exceptions in this law that can soften its scope, such as existing business, private or family relationships with the recipient, the fact remains that this legislation will have a significant impact on the business of all persons using electronic messages to promote their activities or to enter in contact with past or prospective clients. For example, existing mass mailing lists will need to be purged of all contacts for which the company is unable to prove consent or an exception.

The consequences of not respecting the new Bill C-28 shall be very important. Indeed, the CRTC, the agency responsible for enforcing this law, may investigate and institute penal proceedings and impose fines of up to $10,000,000 dollars. The law also provides a private right of action, unusual in Canada, for recipients of unsolicited commercial electronic messages. I believe that this private right of action, which can be exercised as a class action, will pose a serious threat to large corporations who, if not compliant with Bill C-28, could be targeted by opportunistic plaintiffs seeking to collect the $200 per infraction per plaintiff statutory penalty provided for by the law.

Since the adoption of the law in December 2010, the CRTC and Industry Canada published in July 2011 two regulations clarifying some of the obligations and exceptions contained in the law.

Faced with this significant risk, I believe that proactive measures need to be implemented by Canadian and foreign companies doing business in Canada to prepare for the entry into force of the law. U.S.-based companies sending commercial electronic messages in Canada will need to be especially careful since complying the U.S. CAN-SPAM Act is not sufficient to comply with the upcoming Canadian law. This risk increases for U.S.-based companies who have assets in Canada as enforcement of fines and penalties will be facilitated.

 
On Dec. 22, 2010, the House of Commons passed Bill C-28 which aims to regulate unsolicited electronic commercial messages, commonly called "spam." Normally, this act will come into force by proclamati...
On Dec. 22, 2010, the House of Commons passed Bill C-28 which aims to regulate unsolicited electronic commercial messages, commonly called "spam." Normally, this act will come into force by proclamati...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
11:31 PM on 10/14/2011
If companies had been courteous enough to request permission when they originally compiled their mailing lists, they would not now have to filter them. That they were not LEGALLY obliged to obtain an individual's consent to be included does not give them any excuse. My right to privacy exceeds any corporation's right to send me unwanted junkmail, email, or voicemails.
photo
johngary66
Accused of heresy and decided to go with that.
01:39 AM on 10/17/2011
I would love to see as good a law passed in the United States. Canadians have the right Idea. Stick it to the man. We don't need their stinking spam.
03:32 PM on 10/14/2011
Gee, you mean corporations can now actually get in trouble over harassing us with endless trash emails?
How unfortunate.
03:07 PM on 10/14/2011
I'm curious if this law includes business to business relationships. For instance sending out a new product announcement to an existing customer base.
04:52 PM on 10/15/2011
I have had to go through this law pretty thoroughly at my work. Existing business relationships are one of the exclusions.
01:42 PM on 10/14/2011
Awesome law! Way to go Canada
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
12:50 PM on 10/14/2011
My mom gave me a good tip for making marketers waste even more money. Many marketers include a pre-paid envelope should you choose to do business with them. Problem is, they only pay for the postage if the envelope is used, so every time I get a pre-paid envelope, I put the original piece of junkmail in the pre-paid envelope and mail it back to them, that way they pay to send me junk mail, and pay again when I send it back to them, and then one of their employees gets to waste 30 seconds of his time going through the envelope, and they also usually pay per pound of waste of recycling they get picked up. That's a win-win-win-win-win in my books.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Green
07:41 PM on 10/14/2011
When I get a pre-paid envelope I over-stuff it with old newspaper and stick them with the over size and over weight charge.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
12:50 PM on 10/14/2011
"For example, existing mass mailing lists will need to be purged of all contacts for which the company is unable to prove consent or an exception."

GOOD !! I don't know about others, but I NEVER - EVER do business with people who actively seek my business. No I don't want a new alarm system, but if I ever did, I'd look around myself, so stop knocking on my door, stop sending me promotional bs by mail, stop calling me, I'm NOT interested.

I'm going to be so extremely happy when I know for a fact that the millions of mailing lists out there get purged. Finally, companies won't be making money selling Canadians email addresses to marketing firms.

I don't even want the 200$, but I'll let the CRTC keep it if it means they'll do all the dirty work themselves and run these marketers down.

"oh but poor ol big business is going to get chased around for their junkmail" - GOOD ! It's about time they deal with the consequences of their actions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Karmazenuk
Author, Freelance Journalist, Curmudgeon
10:50 AM on 10/14/2011
Who the hell uses email as a promotional tool, in this day and age? Anyone with the least microcosm of internet savy knows that social networking and social media sites and apps are the only effective way to market directly to the consumer online.